Loading...
Ordinance 09-1891 ORDINANCE. N~~. 09-1891 AN ORDINANCE OF THE ~CI'TY OF LUNGWOOD, FLORIDA RELATING TO ILLEGAL SITES, .STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPPOVEMENTS ;ADDING A NEW SECTION 9.2.4 'C0~ THE LONGWOOD DEVELOPMENT CODE, ARTICLE; ILL, OF THE CODE OF ORI)][NANCES OF THE C:[T•Y OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA; SETTING FORTH A PROCEDURE :BY WHICH OWNERS OF PROPERTY REM~~IIVING AFTER PARTIAL TRANSFER OF PROPERTY 7°O A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY MAY ATTEMPT TO BRING RESULTING ILLEGAL SITES, USES, ~ AavT? STRUCTURES ON REMAINING PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LONGWOOD DEVELOPMI~NT CODE, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION AND/RJR SITE PLANS AND PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ' D:E~'ELOPMENT AND/OR ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR A PROCEDURE FOR OBTAIr1IPdG WAIVERS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE LONGWOOD DEVELOPMENT CODE AND/OR ]PREVIOUSLY A,PI'ROVED SUBDIVISION AND/ OR SITE PLANS ANI) PRI~.VIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT AND/OR ANNI~;XATION AGREEMENTS, ~ FOR ILLEGAL SITES,STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM A TRANSFER TO A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY UNDER HARDSHIP CIRCUMSTANCES; PROVIDING F'OR FEES; PROVIDING FOR NONBINDING DETI~;RMINATIONS TO CONDEMNING AUTHORITIES; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING ]FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIF[CATIO7\', PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Longwood, Florida has the authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to Article VIII, 2(b) of the Constitl~tion of the State of Florida and Chapter 166, Florida Statutes; and. WHEREAS, the City Commission wishes to provide a fair and equitable process by which landowners affected by transfers of their l~roperl:y to an entity having the power of eminent domain may obtain relief in instances where strict application of the Longwood :Development Code would result in rendering the rerx~aining portion of their property unusable or otherwise place an unreasonable burden upon such landowner. BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY C~~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA: 1 SECTION I: The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Ordinance upon adoption hereof. - ~ - SECTION II: -New Section 9.2.4 of the City of Longwood, Florida, Longwood Development Code is hereby added to such Code and shall read as follows: 9.2.4. Hardship -Eminent Domain Takiri~s. A. Intent. This Section is intended to provide a fair and equitable process wherebX either landowners affected by the transfer of an~part of such property to an entity having the power of eminent domain, or such landowners iointly with the condemning authority,. can rehabilitate, or mitigate damage to, the Remaining Parcel, and the condemning .authority can independently obtain. nonbinding determinations, where such Remaining Parcel deviates from the LDC and/or any ~ applicable subdivision and/or site plan(s'), and/or developer or annexation agreements with the City that may result from such transfer. B. Definitions. 1. For the purposes of this Section and this Section only, the following terms shall have the following meanings. i. "Transfer in satisfaction of condemnation ("TSC", " shall mean and refer to a transfer of an interest in real property to an entity having the power of eminent domain, whether such transfer be effected by finallud~ment in a condemnation action, certificate of deposit pursuant to an 2 order of taking, deed under threat of condemnation, voluntary transfer, or otherwise. ii. "Director" shall mean and refer to the City of Longwood Director of Comrriunit~iervices or his/her designee. iii. "Remaining Parcel" shall mean and refer to the remaining portion of real proper including existing improvements, after a portion of such property is transferred to an entity having the power of eminent domain. iv. "Governing Documents'' shall mean and refer to those site and/or subdivision plans and/or agreements and/or City zoning/development ap~.•ovals, including but not limited to developer or annexation agreements, which are applicable to or otherwise enforceable against a particular property or development. Such documents when submitted to the City for approval, shall be fully engineered and :meet any requirements of the LDC applicable to such documents unless otherwise states( h~:rein. v. "Nonbinding" shall mf;an and refer to determinations by the City that do not require the owner of a Remaining Parcel to comply with the City's dfaenninations. C. Taking or Transfer Causing Nonco:nfc~rmance of Remaining Property 1. Notwithstanding any provision of the LDC to the contrary, whenever a transfer in satisfaction of condemnation ("TSC") 3 occurs, and such transfer causes the Remaining Parcel to deviate from the LDC and/or Governing Documents applicable to such property, then such Remaining Parcel shall thereafter be an illegal site and/or structure to the extent that the TSC causes the Remaining Parcel to deviate from the LDC and/or Governing Documents. 2. ~ (a) Within ninety (90ws after the date of the TSC, the owner of the Remaining Parcel must schedule and participate in apre-application conference with the Director to discuss the actions or improvements necessary to brim such Remaining Parcel into compliance with the LDC and Governing Documents. Such 90-day period shall constitute a "race period" during which Code Enforcement action `J against the Remaining Parcel, with respect only to those deviations caused by the TSC, shall be temporarily suspended to facilitate operation of this Section. An application made within such 90-damperiod shall extend such "grace period" pending the owner's Good faith participation in the rehabilitation process pursuant to this Section. A property owner may still apply for relief pursuant to this Section after the expiration of the 90-day period, at which time, pending Code Enforcement action against deviations caused by the TSC shall be abated 4 _ pending the owner's mood faith participation in the rehabilitation process pursuant to this Section. ~b~ Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prohibit or otherwise abate .Code Enforcement action against a Remaining Parcel for: ~1) deviations or violations not caused by a TSC or (:?deviations or violations, regardless of whether such are cau..ed by a TSC, that pose a threat of imminent harm or darner to the. health, safety, and welfare of the community, including, but not limited to, nuisances, environmental hazard~;~r other hazardous conditions. 3. Within one-hundred eighty (8(I) days after the date of the TSC, the owner of the Remaining F'arc;el must propose and submit to the Director an application; for relief pursuant to this section accompanied b~proposed amendments and revisions to the Governing Documents currently in effect, outlining a plan to correct the deviations from the LDC and Governing Documents that are caused by the TSC_ Such proposed amendments and revisions shall account for the effect of the TSC and propose a plan to bring those portions of the_F'emaining Parcel, which the TSC has caused to deviate from the LDC and Governing Documents into compliance with all requirements of the LDC, including, but not limited to, any applicable landscape buffers, stormwater requirements, setback requirements, landscaping requirements 5 signage requirements, and parking requirements. To be considered by the Director, the foregoing documentation. must be submitted together with appropriate application forms, as well as payment for any application fees, pursuant to the requirements of Section 10.0.5 B . 4. Following submittal of such application, the owner of the Remaining Parcel must continue in good faith with the processing of the application and the proposed revisions and amendments to the. Governing Documents and respond to city staff comments within thirt~(3^0) dais of receiving any such comments. 5. Following the City Commission's approval of the proposed amendments and revisions to the Governing Documents, the owner must proceed in good faith to bring the Remaining Parcel into ~ compliance with any such revised or amended Governing Documents. The City Commission or the Director shall approve a specific timeline for completion of site improvements required by any such revised Governing Documents, which shall be tailored to account for the complexity of the required improvements as well as any special conditions pertaining to the rehabilitation of the Remaining Parcel. Following timely completion of the site improvements required by any of the revised Governing Documents approved by the City Commission, the Remaining 6 Parcel shall thereafter be deemed to be conforming as it relates to the matters addressed in such doctunents. 6. The City Commission may, at its option, require the execution o:E a new development agreement ir,. connection with the approval of any revised Governing Documents or amendments thereto. Any new agreements or amendments to existing development or annexation agreements must be approved by the City Commission and be executed by the City officials having. authority over such matters. 7. Unless otherwise stated h.°rein, all review procedures and requirements contained in the L1~~C that pertain to particular types of Governing Documents shall be equally applicable to the revised versions of such Governing Do~~uments that are submitted by an owner pursuant to this section, except that no public hearings shall be required other than those required by State law. I). Waivers. 1. If, due to the TSC, bringing the :remaining Parcel into conformity with the LDC and/or the Governing Documents would place an unreasonable burden upon th~~~roperty owner, then the property owner may seek applicable wai~~ers or exceptions from the LDC and proposed revisions or ~.me:ndments to the Governing Documents as part of the, ov~mer's application. In determining whether bringing a particular ~lrcel of property into conformity 7 with the LDC and the newl~pproved Goyerning~Documents would place an unreasonable burden upon the owner of the Remaining Property the City Commission must .consider the following factors: i. Physical constraints imposed based upon' the size, shape, or usable area of the Remaining. Parcel and existing structures located. thereon; ii. Safety concerns that would be created by strict adherence to the LDC; iii. Factors and circumstances that preclude the continued use of the Remaining Parcel with the uses actually occurring on the property immediatelyprior to the TSC; iv. The effects of the proposed waiver or exception on traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and the danger of fire or other hazard to the public; v. Whether the effect of the proposed waiver or exception is in harmony with the general intent of the CitY's LDC and the specific intent of any and all relevant .subject areas of such Code. 2. In connection with the approval of any revised Governing Documents, the City Commission may~rant waivers or exceptions from the provisions of the LDC upon finding that an unreasonable burden would otherwise be placed on the property owner in 8 accordance with the criteria :yet forth in Section 9.2.4(D1(1) of this Code. 3. In granting a waiver or ex:ce~~tion the City Commission may impose such conditions and restrictions upon the Remainin Pg arcel benefited bX a waiver or excf~,~t,~'ion as may be necessaxy to allow a positive finding to be made: on any of the factors set forth in 9.2.4(Dl(I) of this Code, or t~ r.iinimize the ir~urious effect of the waiver or exception. 4. Regardless of whether brin~::ng the Remaining Parcel into conformity with the LDC ancVor the Governing Documents would Mace an unreasonable burden upon the property owner, if a TSC causes a Remaining Parcel i:o ~~3eviate from the LDC to such a degree that the granting of w~~ivers and exceptions would not permit the general intent of the ~~ity's LDC and the specific intent of any and all relevant subiect ~~reas of such Code to be met, the City Commission maw refu:~e to grant any such waivers and exceptions. E. Actions_Taken Prior to Transfer in Satisfaction of Condemnation 1. Prior to the occurrence of the TSC a property owner maw his/her option: i. Hold the preapplication ronference with the Director and submit such application and proposed revisions or amendments to the .Governing Documents to such Director ; 9 ii. Apply for waivers or exceptions as set forth in subsection j' "D" supra; and/or iii. Obtain approvals pursuant to such application to address the conditions that are expected to exist following the TSC. 2. At an ty me prior to a TSC, the condemning authorit~~pp1Y to the Director for a written, non-binding determination as to whether one or more .specifically detailed "cure plans," waivers,. or exceptions proposed by such condemning authority will likely sans . the requirements of this Section. Prior to submitting any such application the condemning authority shall hold apre- application conference with. the Director. 3. Following a condemning authority's pre-application conference with the Director, the condemning authority may submit an \`-J a~pl'ication for a written, non-binding determination as described above. Such application shall include the information requested by the Director at the pre-application conference. Any cure flan specified in the application must clearly depict and describe the existing condition of the affected property prior to the TSC and the predicted condition of the affected property following the TSC and the completion of the site improvements proposed by the cure plan. 4. The issuance of anon-binding determination by the Director or Cites Commission pursuant to this Section shall not preclude the Director or the City Commission from approving a competing 10 application from the owner of tl.ie Remaining Parcel, which differs ~ from the cure plan, waivers an~i exceptions addressed in the non- binding determination, it;bei~~reco~nized that there may be more than one (1) alternative approach to cure the effects of a TSC that would bring the Remaining_Parcel into conformity with the Governing Documents acid th.e City's code requirements. 5. In the event a condemniri~ authority obtains a non-binding determination concerniri~ ~i c;ure plan, waiver, or exception pursuant to this Section.. such shall only become binding upon the Remaining Parcel to the extent. such cw-e plan, waiver, or exception has been approved by the Cites Corrunssion and is incorporated into a written se~tlement of the TSC between the owner of the Remaiiun~. Parcel and the condemning authorit ~~If more than one determination concerning a cure plan, waiver or exception is approved by the Cites Commission .any of the determinations that are approved by the City_Commission may be used and relied upon by thf; c~,wner of the Remaining Parcel to rehabilitate such parcel. F. Fees. 1. Anyone submitting an application pursuant to this Section shall be responsible for all of the Ci~t~'s review costs associated with the submittal of such applicatiom., any revised Governing~Documents, and any proposed cure plans submitted in conjunction therewith. 11 2. The fees for the submission of a revised, fully engineered site plan are the same as those for an initial site plan as set forth in Appendix B of this LDC. G. Enforcement. The City may enforce violations of this Section by way of Code Enforcement Board action, revocation of any certificates of occupancy related to the subject pro~erty, and/or all other remedies available to the City in law or equity. Prior to enforcing a violation of this Section, the City shall provide written notice of such violation to the applicable property owner, requiring such owner to cure such violation. H. Notice. If a condemning authority or owner of a Remaining. Parcel seeks City approval of a cure plan, waiver, or exception, the party seeking such relief shall provide to the other party written notice of such application at the time of submittal of the application and at least ten (1 OLays notice of the hearin~sl before the City Commission related to the application. SECTION III: Severability - If any portion of this Ordinance is determined to void, unconstitutional, or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 12 SECTIOrd l[V: Controlling Provisions - :[n The event of a conflict or conflicts between ~ this ordinance and other previously adopted ordii~mc~s, this ordinance shall control only to the extent that such conflict exists. SECTI(DI•t V: E#fective Date -This ~Or+linance shall take effect upon its second reading and final. e~doption by City Commission. SECT$C7Nf VI: Codification. Section Ti of ttas Chdinance shall be codified and made a part of the Longwood Development Code of the City of Longwood, and the Sections and subsections of this Crrdinance may be renumbered o~r r+,lettered to accomplish such intention (e.g. the word "Ordinance "may be changed to "Section "Art7cle or other appropriate word). PASSED AND A])OPTED on first reading this (~-!~3ay of ri ~ 2009. PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this ~~~;day of ~d 2009. CI'T'Y +CCiMl~TISSION CITY +DF LONGWOOD, TLORIIDA Ha : .d Bundy, Jr., Mayo ATT)^ST• Sarah M. Mires, MMC, MBA Ciry Clerk Approved as to form and legality for the use ands re lianee of the City of Longwood, Florida, only. Teresa S. Roper, City Attorney 13