CCMtg04-13-98WSMinLong Does e ~ y c set ns chambers
Lo~ywowoa T eloriaa e
Present. Mayor Rusty Miles
aul L d
ssioner s
icrlx for
raiai~enD iey c
TayloL1J ityaA ney
try Baker, D euClic safety
John B ity s
Mon,oa n,coneii, oar.ootnxam~n~straci~a sar~area
Absent: Deputr Mayor R argant
.. Mayor Miles pa llaa a worx session to oraer
at '/,Oy OpRmsR
~` Mayor Miles noted m s from peputY MaYOr Sargent a
about t nabilitY t attend t night's
ingmion t1ahere w eea t e
absences as there is no drequirement to attendnwork sessrons.
ith referred t a from the Inspections 0
(dated April 9 98) a d from John B ock (dated Aprils n1998).
ith briefed9the c the development impact f
charged for s ingmvhat portion goes to the c unty ands
what portion isekept by the city. d the six-month period
n to lapse on the w the city's portion of the fee.
ued with respect to the $550 R ial C ect ion
andat ee$]50 C ial F Mr. s ith explained t
ost likely e tedcfor purposes ofmpayi ng foe the lateral
off t the individual r ce/bu or
For the tapeY Howev ,stheetap is no longer doneaby thescitys
ock said his understanding i that the $550 C ection F
s fox putting the lateral in whensthe line is first rnstalled or
to put one >n if needed.
aspect t reaaoea a lopment
actsfee offerededt sitlents who hook i ethe first srx
months. Commissioner Lovestrand was in favoriofiall ow ing
cc 4-13-98\la5
reeiaential nooxup incanti~es. -~
of ine w er/sewer f urplus ana wing inae surplus
to accomplish the Hwy. 17-92 andnSR 434 sewee projects.
and opened discussion with regards t
expandingntneLCityts t x base. thing the city could
that would greatly expand itsHt xabasenwould be to purchase
the 5 o plant. d he would prefer t ity
expandni and ando thanado any c action of ~c ityhbuild logs.
e ai scuss ed Sthe i of putting thetquest ion of purchase to the
voters and whetherGthe c embers w of this
ing t o pass t referendum. He said
Sanlandoinas approximatelyvlo, boo customers.
anlando ptilities w t listed on the agentla a
discussion i t wasathought that in order to discuss, rt
should be added. i
Mayor Miles thought a charter r and a enament w eedetl t
e if a referendum would pas ould allow t n to
float bond 1 specif ica lli ea rma kea forh5anlandosibut
to give the c sion back the au hoeityrto do what it needs to ~
pass bond issues.
and disagreed, e believed the i
itse if yv sM1OUldohave to go b aid t ity w
n good shape because of thefcharter restriction andhth ought the
people would vote for the bond for Sanlando if presented
properly. mayor miles was in agreement, if presentee properly,
it could pass.
Commissioner Miller w skeptical a selling i rs.
thought, that plant w ba tto capacotYhet„ete
pipesuw n the ground about l5ayears; rwould b major
expenditurevj ust t vn it; price has been reduced because
to ey know the. realostoryta
and said i will m self; they do i
isseason for price decrease is thaws anytpeopl e, like the
my a Dogwood, have said n o the purchase. urther, they
w have na emporary permit to putiwater in the Wekvva and it vs
a little bvt in limbo.
filler thought those problems would be inherited and
aolotsof study would have to be done.
commissioner Lovestrand discussed the surcharge to 1
CC 4-33-9a\lo6
/~ rs/us side t ity 1 nd/or t e potential for
ration. eTRenc 25%cs rcharge o rage u ou ld
generate approx imate Syn$90, OOOUa onth on theal
ing tM1is acquisition would n t the~00YycV
anythingt dtpossible
s forCpotentia tobjectiontt eepurchase 1fromscity
residents, non-city residents, and the county.
ued with r splitting the t plants, o
andnwekiva, nbluhtsaid he believed t
Plant w ery close t city, but believesMthePwek iva
Plant stilltha srcapacity. Taylor s impression,
when he had a endetl meetings with Ue Sanlandoapeopl e, tM1at they
were not in favor of splitting the plants.
and said he would speak w
andmwou ldnreport back as to eeactions rece>,vediwithmrespect to
this issue.
asked for a
IeavesUenimpact feesna oily chargedsuforoa
least a year, along with charging a ced fee of
51,800, to r silents who hook into a salable
Miles and Commrssroner Miller were
inwagreementr
~ Taylor s and M ambri c that the reduced r
tRe Citydc offereditomr silents, r cr ,
ney h n waeni~nsrx months of notification oetsewer
availability.[
3. OISCMAS POS&ZHILITY of ACCOMPLI ANING PAVING AND AE6 UAPACSNG
Yioj ects In-rouse.
Miller discussed doing paving projects in-house a a
waymt e paving c referring t
solutioascwnich charges thesfullta nthe landowner.o
asked about the i ity o ingti equipment ande
arging the r rnjust thewcost of sthenm ials.
then referretl t ock's m and c toted with respect to
needing A/10 new people full time, to makemthrs work.
estrand pointed o that private companies a
ablertordospuClic works projects much m efficiently a d less
stly than government a d he referred iota e had
obtained from a pii ompany on the cost tostloea sidewalk
project comparetl to the cost for the city to do tRe same project.
h discussed h ing worked i who did road
pavingrprojects in-house u ing a asphalt o lay w ushed
urface, butlw
~ rnexpensive comparedrtortneopa ing cost for roads done in
Cc 9-13-9A\3o~
Longwood. aid s e years back the s tup c s $156,OOo
h he v red to guess would b riplerthat a
further explained that employees would have to bemtrainedwandMto
Mr. Brock w s familiar with this process but w not a of any
oaas i ral Florida being done this way, but thought it
would be worth further investigation.
of rock w s discussed and M ith said unless rack
couldrbe obtained close by, it wou ldrbeB expen sive to haul.
and m ved to have the
admmni stratorLlooktinto this matter. onded by
Commissioner Miller and carried by voice vote.
a. blscUes ADOPTION of HuuGET BY ORnxNANCe vs. RESOLUTION.
Miller discussed his preference for adoption of
~aseeaey o solucion ana c tea nis m was
expendituresdof largess majoe project, forainstanee n
where a public Tearing w held giving crtrzens the
opportunity to speak on the rssue.
Commissioner L and also favored adoption by ordinance,
saying that adoption by resolution does not require a public
hearing.
Mayor Miles s d he d object t adoption by ordinance, but
would prefer to have thenbudget adopted wrth only three marn
r Lovestrand and C Miller favored adoption
bymordi na nce e though it mightstakeem e time and m ney to
effect. Both believing it provides for notice to the public and
allows for public input.
the adoption procedure. Mayor M.i.les continued t
of going to three major categories and allowing moneyatorbe moved
commrssron has the authority t approve.
ing all c mmission m the
s present to Drngethepquesticn ro udget
adopti onsbyfortlinance vs. resolution to the full commrssron at
cc 9-i3-98\las
ing on April 20, 1995, and eo lust vt
under Mr. Smmthss report.
5. SCUSS POTENTIAL C ENTS, v. e., Community
DI APITAL ZMPROVEM
Building, PuD tic safety complex.
ued with r expanding the Public Safety
ing o sChurch A modifications to Station 15 possibly
notbeing feasible d satisfactory soil conditions o the
property; u ing t ity-owned property, a ent to and
behind statvon 17, toalocate a community buvldingdja
Mi11 er thought the facility snoula be able to
accommodater"Night Moves.
mith discussed a potential location, approximately li acre
located near the corner of Grant and SR 4J9.
Miller s of approximately 4
sof buildable l.anddi espouse t
Miller, M ambri saiddthisehadebeen i tigated
previouslysand w ily a ible due t highnvegeta[ion
Commissioner Lovestrandefelt that because this location i
industrial a ou ].d not be conducive to hold.i ng e suc
weddings and believed the location needed to have goodts
sibility and a t perhaps t a good
location for "Night M and youth a ith
thought i might be a good location for vthe vPUblic rWOrks
facilities. espect to the asking
price of the property o aadw5 ted that
the a ing price f the o tpar cel (six4a as)tvsa5900,000 but
.it w t known what t ing price w sof or t atljacent
paecel to the east (approximately 5 acres owned by the
ity projects), w nanny
the city w e pu rchasee b ordinaet
representative, she has already allocated all the moneyhshe .s
going to give for the year.
There w ontinu ed d.i scussion a tilizing the property (near
Statiot il) o Wayman and Magnoli land whether it w s large
ough foe both b ing and the n any pa rk.i.ng,a.i is proximity
sidential hovsiag, and compatibility t the a ft w
alsoement ioned that there w t property a eet
from Station 1 d perhapttheas n house couldsbehmoved,
thereby, vncrea sing the svze of thetsite.
c have the
administratoinstudysthistlocationyfurthe e.
Mr. Brock asked the commvssvon if it was their intentvon to
Cc 4-33-98\109
Upon suggestion by C r Lovestrand, i
the c of the c that a ordinances
e draftedsto provide for3staggering terms of the
embers; members appointed from Disteiets 1
and 5, would be reappointed for a e-year t
and 4, for two-year t ambermof
for t o-year terms, thereafter,
al lmterms to be two years. 1
7. AoSOUnN. Me~.ting a 1 rued 9.1"1 p~J`
// a/r~'ni les C. Mile sue, I Mayor
Attq
fie. 1K <~<; c~~ ,~li~
_. aine c ambr., city clerx
cc a-as-9e~uo