CCMtg04-06-98Minuongwooa ciOty CC bexs
Longwood r Florada
AprilN6~ 1558
Present. nayor x sty n
Deputy nayor R argent
aulsL aaa
a (left a 10.01 P.n.)
m5heltones City A for
raldine D ZavSri, citymC erk a
Taylor, S ity Attorney
rry Baker, D of PuClie s ety
ock, D ityaS
Hitoneu, n nxaminisxraxi~e servroes
anonea Deafora, Puronaeing Nanasar
RDER. Mayor Miles tallea a regnlar meeting to oraer
~ 3. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEnenxs. There were no announcements.
4 A. Selected to perform i
Celeb~ationOOf Music i eat Brrtarn
under the drrectron of Alsce Ann Nilsen.
The choir and the D cogni2 ea and presented with a
framed c of icate. rr ember ssi ce were also presented
with copies of the framed certificatedan
B. 199 WARDS (JOY) - 1]Ch Y r
R ALtamonteOElementary A Kristen Goff ea
ood Lake Middle e Kelley
LakenMary High
Longwood £.l ementa ry rrReneeoAllen
Lyman High orlon H
Milwee Middle topher Ferreira
Rock Lake Middle mill
Sim H
Woodlands Elements ey 6hellie Oean
e presented individual c of icates b r
cognition of their a omplishments. Parents ^ay
teachers and principals in attendance were. also recoynized.
cc 4-6-96\s3
A. Entloeio CALNO re endation to appou`t Tom Hagood,
Se., Sem. olecCOUnty Expzessway A hor ity. .~
argent m ved t
ororoeypn o xag oaeno Seo~i eao~e
ci.lnPe ,tbatreappointed t rthe Ex r way
uthority. rs ed by C Millersa nd
carried by unanimous rollocal.l svote.
B. District. #2 - Nom lnation to Charter Advisory Board.
Commissioner Sargent n red J pa ly, onded
by Commissioner Miller andacarried by voice vote.
C. District $S - Nomination to CM1aiter Advisory Board.
Commissioner Miller deferred the nomination.
D. District #4 - Nomination to Charter Advisory Board.
Commissioner Vacca deferred the nomination.
E. District #1 - urination to Parks and Recreation
Advisory HoardNo
Mayor Miles n oared Gayle P Seconded by
Deputy Mayor Sargent and carried iby voice vote.
1
orge c Melbourne, F
representing W nagementV itha nkedCthe city and staff f
having been gigenethe opportunity t e the City o the
past five Years; distributed a information packet t then
and eefereed t n their s with
espectito the quantity andsquali tycsrequested thew
valuate and c s.ider theie pas history, andmtosconsider
the value and qua l.ity of their service.
Hob Hyezs, 1Sa tickoey Ridge C Lake Mary, representing
ings E tai S distributed a information
packet andnsa idntM1eir companyeguaranteed therenwould be n change
n disposal c t foe the life o gave a
mat ion of the history o thefcompany~tn ing n ity i
entral Florida had a disposal r e guarantee for t nhyears;
e Chat e ecycling w sagiven the option t offer th isas
ings E had b
givengthea optionnt bof fetus ents les s, niheynwouldlhave done
provided information a ctheir transfer station and
d p sal facility in sou thbFlorida.
represeatVnglFlorida Re~ycling~rlnc/Illinois iAecycli nga5ervice .`
Cc 4-b-9H\64
game a ref explanation o r business re oraf n tea they has
bra a ityee had m
~ oxhabstlvevc ompany e ith r their ability to
and h ompa nypastna~ing t e best
rvSce a
esponsive bid esaidethey wil lrsupp ly superior s have
rmd initial o eek s up meetings with staff a
believed they snouldvbe a arded t will bring ab aid all
d begin t ing foe a sit.i.on; have
ted t stationeryrlandf ill priceothwithnrespect t
question a experience i Florida, he explaineaaFior.ida
ecycling beganti October and have the Daytona E ach M cipal
and V my B itherespect it
beingaa ked by theiCityu if theinc~ompanycwou ld also guarantee n
n disposal r Vih l.en said [hey had been offered
that option b item w the City's
nstructions orabid aocumentna vedwt etgiven the option
was legal and ethical because it was not within the bid document.
ark A anford, FL, Florida
ecyrlingH Lnct/Illinois Aecyclingnusaid Mr. Vihlen had covered
everything.
Alderson, 33J Lazy Acres Lane, Longwood, spoke to Items
and 1 not against anyone developing the subject land but
believedea vel opment of less than o
ompatible with the e ing developmentainethe a wwnirhti
1/2 and up; i ted C s to v siT the a
~ aidathesr asha~e m ted their life savings,
not in just~a home,ibuthin a vay of life.
lips, 1 nch lands Trail, Longwood, spoke t
Items£1 andil d5tha subject a 6 properties, only
o£ which is~lese than o believedBthe request would be
patchwork z ing; when t nchange w rally addressea, the
n had a d forha ompromises thetl.and o u1a be
protected a wellka the s unding property o this i the
Ingle unspoiled a a betweenoLOngwood and LakewMary; be l.i eved
the comprom i.se offered by M osline o zoning
ceptable by the s Gng propertyno
disappointetl that the Land Planning Agency chosesto reject this
proposal.
lipse 1851 an{s Trai 1, spoke t 12
and 1 opposed o ItemA l2cas pertains theoaeveloper's
plan f whigh ity level opment; rw ity
preserved; w opposed t the developmentsb of
the on e ompromise proposed by M osl ineutL riginally
agreedeu til after M Brock spoke with them; s Mshe would be
happy tonbe a art of the City, i the City was commvtted to
preserving thePr quality of 1ife.f
05/2J azy A thanked M osline
for workingawith the resitlents; spokeLa ga inst item 12 because of
cc q-c-98\85
the irocess for c ing out thas pa rael o land; spoke in favor
of I 18, one e lots; s he r s sfhorsesi has 18 ac s .~
smfrom Ue city; said i vayaof life hey chose; rspoke
torpossibi l.i ty o exing somearlay and hoped that might be taken
into considerationann
theuproposednprojectazspokeef rablya of M s GosPenty b eks up
s~ggeation oe a aiaential a ing a ompromiae;
inaieataa his aisippointment Wien c ants maaeaby M oak eo
the L ith respect t appr ovingma sidential e
ingA which he then quoted; said they a e looking f
partnership for the futu[e, for a development that does not
plummet their property values i the Euture; believes the
unding properties e entually would c o the City but
asked how the City w s going to do this development and make
something work for e eryone.
aohn Blacks tockV representing cla rendon P roleum spoke to
m ll, and asked to have the a n tabled u til he had all
the necessary 1lcenses. After somexdiscussion, Commrssion agreed
item 16, extended compliments to Mr. Gosline wrth respect to
present to respond to any yuestions or legal issues that may
arr aline T Highland Hi11s, discussed Item 1
related to thelpotential wideni nq of Lake Emma Ro , oted if the
aid if Lake E e To b widened, i ould e wally force
ing oP Aangeline. e rther, questioned howtt ordinance
toer e to Residential Estate c ard, yet thehC
ing has been kept from coming forward due to a needlto amend
the comprehensive Plan.
Radun, 241 Lazy A s Lane, a take the
tNy.o nty, cw tofne ing a xed
ityf questioned i atheoa xation has b vetlnf rom
oagenda t a later date and if so wi 11 there will bempublic
aebate on the iaaue.
Upon completion of public participation, Commission recessed
from e.]5 PM to B.SO PM.
Das tract #3. Commissioner Miller discussed the rssue of
cc e-6-98\86
nole C my 9 1 dispatch going to quiet (voiceless)
dispatch. o oun that many count s have already been on
~ this systemFf orda Talkedr[ Public of ety
and foundwt ity i t prepared for this i any
OaYect Suggested t City Administrator be asked to look
o lap t omputers with a arils i order to get with
the future aq e. erhaps lookri o thisnfor t upcoming
budget year t if the City can upgrade w>th the County
of C o have Mr. Em ith look
into Squietc (voiceless) dispatching{.
t #4, of
the A ua SrE EggmH held o urdaytaad thankedut
Publio5af etysPepartmentnf or u of Stheir vehicle, t kedethe
ks/He Advisory B ardeand o r vo lunteershwho had
assrstedcin making the event a success.
t #5. estra ntl requested C
opi nion9 texplainingChemhad ti calls f oslives
Isleew aid a
expected t tbendevelopedba rtheir e
anti's i ial thought w thatrt eeLPACwou ldsnoteapprove
but Found thererw citizenar of this peoject. Also
thought the request would be subjectwt onditional u under
w Land D vel opment Code, it i notc aid theen
r opinione rs poor a ould like toes rap i ithLthe
ception o e bi llboardaand t
and discussedac ity boards5enoting there
only beenLO sejunior bi116oard~mi nthe city f r years a
the number of billboards allowad i the city h
of the n category established, t sapped esntonb
ralcapplication requests. and d.i scussetle
other s the code thatChembelieved neededrelarif ication,
lacklo of s e plans by anyone b distance
regulations betweenwalcohol esta 611shments anduchurches;
regu l.a{ions for L cep{ r of site plans which w
veil between first readingeandwadoption without commission s
areecion.
Mayor Miles asked M Taylor what the Segal ramrf rcatlons of such
an action would be.r
Mr. Taylor w of the opinion that s e things may have been
acted to put the City i ompliancemw ith the Comprehensive Plan
state law and did n ompound any i Further,
any changes would have to gonback t and Comm.i ssr.on would
have to give instructrons to that effect.
again i e
his c rn
lacklo wedue t angel m
commissioner Milled ~onevaeanwreh commissioner Lo~esirana. oia
r
cc a-s-seleo
t believe it w the f cne c n bnt e
reaument w so large it lust gob pa stmanoone beforehtheohe 1
lized. aThought ere M1ould e y f going b ek t square
ith the process w that t ery large; s
changes made w not brought C attention; thought
eapproved the LPA r inW the c ceptual plan,
butmi there. B li evee t repancies
and s understandings and m sebetween s aff
and theeC anbelieves t eed
o go backmandsr ception of a signs.
when thewbiliboard s s passedntsheathought
juniorrbillboards w e part ofcbillboa rds. ought a community
board was a board at rthe entrance of a subdivhsion.
Mayor M eed. End r salt w not what they had hoped to
achieveile ended t e for giving t endows
sight i onfusmon with
of the L embersea what they thoughtew the
document v what w actually in the document; suggested the
o get t eated quickly t
ordocument and the ordinance mnsplace poste haste
(w ithwexception of sectron on telecommunications and billboaeds)
Commrsszoner Miller said he would move to so direct Che
istrict g1. with respect t e year 2 ompliance,
anted t ind of the importance of e ing o e year 2 0
and w tedrt e the City does whatai eedei order t
omplynt rme date and asked for a briefing as to where we
are with othatt t
Mayor Miles spoke t them nth ly t e lakes, and
asked if the company c tly t ingeall thehlakes, given the
ondition of MuddeLake, should be the company we pay
$180e000sto do the treatment on Nudd Lake.
ock explained t ompany w s doing only lim eatment
n limited speciese cwhat they a e proposing totdo i
ally go i ith specialized equipment a ead plants
andndebeis. Mudd Lake i and drydlake and
all agree this exercase will Iastronlyee /i0eyears at best.
and reported that the City Bng ineee had also
disco~eredrs mething else. The r Mudd Lake, which i
now Island Lake North, thought ehespipessunder the goad which the ~,
Cc 9-6-98\ee
City put in some time ago, was draining the lake
vegetation m t be done w type equipment and that the
ompany selected i the only o approved for weed
val u ing thisstype of equipmenttandsdidenot believe another
company could be found.
District Ai. Comm is sroner Sarpent questioned whether a
n this respect, noting i s listed a Agenda 2 of
the t options listed. Anda a ing o report2from the
project engineer. Mr. Brock said staff hasnmet with the
Pay Approved Bills and e ted bills for April 1
B. Approve Minutes o rchs9 998 Work Session and March
Regular M ing.
C. Approvee lnforma tional Technology Structured Wiring
roject - Phase I
D. Approve purchase of B r from Safety E uipment
ompany, (as per CityuofeOrla ndo R A3).q
E. Approve t nsfer of funds from Confiscation account to
Property and Information account.
ved t approve the C ent
Agendasa submittedmo onded by C
Sargent and carried by8unanlmous eollmcallovote.
30. D (DRB1 F
- Appeal is limited t
theDE D25PaR 08yearAS elevatTOns a andated by the
ity E RequestedibymHUgh W arlingm P
Locklings Associates, Inc. (COntinuetl Erom (/16/98 meeting]
Taylor said the developer h requested a in
the absence Df the city Engineers the staff way requestingnd
r continuance.
CC 4-6-98\09
commissioner Miller m vea to table. onaea by
argent.o ian respece a ewnetner ~
Miller wish ed to table t specific,
he rep li edeno. Motion carried by unanimous roll call
AWARD OF HID #12-98, A£SI~ENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTSON -
Mr. Taylor Bead the agenda title.
Me. Smith referred to a o from M hell and explained
this contract price did n ncluae a1feeMfor billing and
collecting ana an aam>nrstrat ive eee wonla neea to ne aaaea to
this w not a franchise, but w the City's system by virtue of
going to contract and the bid price did n ncluae any
administrative fee for billing and collecting. Under franchise
the $1.25 w ncluaed as part of the total m nthly figure and
was kept byathe City for the administrative costs involved.
Taylor responded t a question w espect to the City's
liability if it i the city's system1thMr Taylor said the
ontract prow idessfor Sia bility coverage, the waste collection 1
system is not owned by the City.
Comml sssoner Lovesteana offered h1s opinion that he believed the
Mayor Miles said a ara of bid 1 ing c siaered and yet the
echanics of how, aftee b ing awa eded, itnw ill be administered,
have not been worked out.
Mr. Taylor said a decision needs to be made with respect to the
stating people's objections t anginq t ompany w ntly
and also r vetl phone calls oppos edet the processrb ing
gone through n Cehad problems with a former company and w
satisfied with the c ent company and she expounded the merits
of The current service.
looking a the bid t bulation, asked how
the differenceoaadea p o fave cents. Also noted waste .~
CC 4-6-9B\90
nagement wanted City to c Sider their offer t separating
r ecycling at the c b £or a s Jiff erence,ob tthis w t
given c While w e gentleman h uld
e themstheroption to discus she vFUrther, c retlrw
e past three yearshnas been
ccllen [~eb ion a little insufficient
and perhaps Ms. Ledfordbcould expoundat
a egent s s just distributed
tonight3a nd thought Itemd2inshould be moved forward.
argent m yea t r
n before mem ln. sea ~aea by mmmrssroner
argent saia ne c rea wi[n c r
andei Sthat he also wisheduto keep the r
present, n the m ntnly bill, w
difference goingetoward the administrative fee.whSeconded by
Comm issroner Miller.
Taylor recommended closing out item it rn order to consider
Item 24.
aid he just w ted the C think about the
Factsthat they will naveato deal withmtherc and after broken
will know by next week, and could then set the fee.
~. urtner, will need to estabiisn t by o
then do another o thecadministrat ive1feeCebuttlthe
administrative feedd tenave to be decided until we nave
information as to theecost involved.
and witntlrew his s and t
argent's motion, saying he was in favor
ofmcontinuingswi th Item 11.
Miller asked the administrator if he knew how many
back1do rnpi ckups there were.
Ms. Ledford wished to revrew ner information in order to respond.
order to give M Ledfoed t e informatron,
commras,on recessea from z.2z to 9.a~ a.M.
Ms. Ledford said there were approximately JS back door pickups.
. Smith responded t arlier question about why he had gone
. franchise e the
ing about taking a ity[t
franchisesta n fear oEwthishhappening andnalso b ved
ity hadnmore control over this type system than a franchise
system.
r
CC 9-b-98\91
argent yvestionea wnat xina of controls ana nos
tnere bnen the neea eor control.
mith said h mere has been any need b
under a nch ise,dthey payn~ eight to pick up and
eapaying them to pick i fup.foPelteconEident that, with
a oonuaoc, ine city nos morn control.
mmissioner iovestrana wonaered if ne coula yet a ana
i~pnt frnm t wnether i snoula nen~ ~ayear
r five yeanc~ actstr e preferred a neyear
act, ratesnwoula b nspretty well, r
and woula not have todgoo[hrough this processsagaintfor
ten1years.
mmissioner Lovesteand w ted the A ney's opinion with
espe<t t ing c snlast F aayo£ Duple o
wspapers andew asked to look ra therbottom of thefs and
page and asked His opinion about the J ings offer < intain
disposal price foe the life o actnand that the question of
ing the disposal price w talso posed t
ecycling, wno also respontled affirmatively. aidrhe a med
e Purchasing Agent w them a ifMthey would hold
the price. asked if nth eobid w ompromised by t s
e did n cept all bids a ved o sFlor iaa a
ecyclingtw s given a onaschance. clearlyli bid
formula forar ing tlumping fees. aid
ne thought it w ingenious for o ompany t sayvtheyawould
hold the price but to ey w not given a and c o go back
then and make an aajustmenYe Believed theebid hasabeent
Taylor s a prior to the decision being made
ask Florida Recycling ifuthey would Hold the aisposal price,
a~d his feel w and, it may have been ingenious of them, but i
t part o bid c if ultimately w artled t
inys basedfo hthat i ouldaprej udice F ecycling if o
they w not given the s opportunity toldorthat. Aftee
prow icing h Taylor said in Hindsight, rn his
opinion, what net thought the Commission should do, and it would
be t xclude from consideration anything about the holding of
the disposal fee.
Tnere w ontinuea aisonssion with respeot t the b ra
tha actual c t language. eaford said of ten ra
bidder, o ardeaa the bid, c of EerLa better servrce level or
Commrssroner Vacca left the meeting at 10.01 P.M.
Miller m ved to a cept Florida Recycling,
n year s tl #1x-
9BC bcingdtherlowest biaaer and haveeprovenato staff
Cc 4-6-9e\92
' ana as is he a not believe e e has
e.aiobeaLe ougn ana would lixe to give w nagement the
bight t explain their proposal for the 5 and
asked t attorney to respond. Believed bhitwas important
enough to look at.
Mayoe miles said now we wou is be looking at changing bid
Taylor said that is getting i e problem w
discussing about keeping the pricetc eitl document called
for separating at the curb, it is in theabid criterra.
and said i r bid, there w
iffereteebetween the firstsandns whensit as
that close, o e lookedna aFlobida
ecyclinq M1astbeenci ttheas a year w the other
close b n Floritlaofor s ra Shyears and their
performaaaeri and the c unty andvcity and has been
cellent. Alsoeesignif icance of what o administrator [old u
n better s ee lieved thtCity has the prerogative
inq n nlyct e lowest bid b experience
o gohw ompanyut Florida
fold short t rtM1er, lwhen he c siders the grea tin
improvement i e the city has had s e they've Tad W to
~. nagement, h believes city s experience andas
and all f Fl oridtRecyclingri ing experience
ofrIllinois recycli ngrbeing in business for l0 years, but have
t been i Florida. Thought all all criiterra could be used in
evaluatingniM1e bid.
Mr. Taylor read the criteria on how the bids were evaluated.
Mayor Miles s hile h ooa C anti's
he has heard n vaaence to believe FloridaaRecycling
ouldrprovide a any less than Sennings o rite
nagement and believes the staff has brought forwa ea a
which he believes C should a cept antl
further~ddid n t believe a ompany n Florida would n
perform a well. ThrougM1 the bid processoa valuation
staff provided, it minimltes any risk we mayatake.e
espouse t Taylor said the
this processlhasobeetgone thougheis based on statutory
requirements.
Mayor Miles s mely level playing field.
Ranking is ba sea uponrmanyethings%iw it p ce being one of them.
and spoke to having a hed r ord a
saithe1wouldlnotslike to take a chance with a company who has no
I
cc a-s-se\s3
Mayor M spoke t the r ord of Illinois Recycling, h ing
nlbusiness for 3o years. d the city o DaytonapB ach
hpsni tigated its validity t Sproviae s and h opted
to gnwitR them antl we now the ability to take advantagepof the
endation has b sed o erta i.n
exper iencem bcna.i ng, etc.en lot of staff time has
been takenct valuate these bids; the auditors r wed their
financials; references w checked; did n any negative
espouses and Ras a letterpf eom a City thaitspent 15100, 000
gating this firm, this e ort i aila ble for r ew.
ompetence level w there for both Jennings and FloridaV3
ecycling. TReref ore, the bid would b
ost responsible and responsive biadere alnformationha e
disposal cost was not conslaered in this evaluation processth
and asked Row long Florida Recycling Ras been
nmbusinessr w pit just formed. Ledford replied her
ing w when Illinois Recycling e wed the Daytona
hey i orporated F rich Recycling.ec ted the
ubjectib a joint v e between Illinois Recycling and
Florida Reaycli ng i pillinois Recycling will be backing
Fleriaa aecyming. neotR will joinav siyn the contract.
Miller r inaea t mere w n the
table551Mayor Miles offered t hpass the gavel and15 ond.
e Lovestrand said if C Millen w e to amend
hismmotlon to a five year contract helm ightrget a second.
Miller a ended his m and t
omFloridapRerycling for a e yeaenr sid ential solidd
waeee b>a. notion aied forfiack of a aacona.
argent s ing the competence w rry i
staf fsshowever, believesdthear esponsibility lies with the
ould like to s ealevel o ; has
wed n omplimentsmabout theft ent service and does
non alwaysuagreepthat cheapest is the bestrr
aryent m and the bid t to
nagemenn o a five yea racontract. Seconded byas
comm>aalonernLO~eatrana.
ana sa is M Nyers f ings
fishes t sayJa Mayor miles
suggesteneachM1Of theevendorn present be allowed to speak.
Hyers, s of a fixed disposal c
Questioned c ktheobidder s bid for disposal t
an FDEP approved facility other than Sem hole. Said Mr. Taylor's
CC 9-6-98\94
espouse w that it w the ity's i obtain best
ible prices for City of Longwood a nagement pl
does n require i em mole c ntytf acility.
check t ingna oalternate bitl and response was
could submitsan alternate bitl^
. Taylor said i speaking with S nole C nty, he had asked
ist.i ng interlocal agreement, r required solid was
eehauled to Seminole. And in his opin ionC based o
documents, rt rs not required to be hauled to the County,
Mr. Vihlen, Florida Recycling, read a portion of the staff's
Florida/11 ecycling. aid s a good job. IE
the City does oa and t r Salf Sarper m hey
ould b ook ing a maj orei ethe
ity a cepts FSOridaaRecYCl.ingce bid,fe withtthen$1.25fadded,
tRere would be a decrease to the c Believed they h
proven they a e the lowest, m esponsive, responsible bidder.
If the citYrwanted t abletto go t [Rese other items, why
didn't the City go to RFPe (Request for Proposal).
miller ted trtere w JS people who requi ack
rlpickuprand w nagement'srprice i higher
ahan anyone els e. as rthe[, they have alsosdeclinedrtosfreeze
their price and a sidera bly higher on this bid. In his
opinion, iY Florida Recycling generates too many complaints, the
City has e ery justification to go fo The second bidde[. That is
always an option.
r Lovestrand asked M Ledford t ity's
optmonsunder the c act i hey r d poorps
Ledford referred tonthe t specsvsaying theyvw e the same
they w ith W nagement. While M Ledf ordrw
looking forethe infoimatron Mr. Geletko was given the floor.
urge Geletko, representing Waste M nagement, s d he w s
encouraged to see that five years of hard work rs being a
co~ntv's lanafill ayaeem
t que
backdoor servrce now. M
cc a-6-98\95
replied 54 e Gelecko s onf irmea
aid b oor service cost will be negoaiated byfwnoever gets the '\
contractkd
Ledford read from a listing of penalties [ ompliance
which a ently within W nagement's ~ ing
tnese corms a~a Dona itions wo~la ee the soma unaerrch~e concract.
commiaaioner Lo~estrana w,tnarew nis seoona co comm,sa>nner
saryent's motion.
r Lovestrand spoke t o letter w by F rida
ecyclingnwith respect t of their facility e saying
cne letter turned him off,t~ ery distasteful.<c aitl he
Dula s and C r Millerssvm n to a and Florida
ecycling a emyearocontract rf Floriaa Recycling would better
explain thisf letter.
Mr. Sid V.i nle n, 523, said Che provisions i the code specifically
ity t nspect t e bidders facilities. Tna<
offersw made limp lyubecause it was an the City's bid invitation
and codes
Sia Vihlen, J aid he w e letter and if i taken
ong he apologiz ea and n tea inthishletter, he made tnewoffer
and sa if appropria te.o
tra nd said he would second Commissioner 1
Millers motion.
Miller r rated his m n to a and the solid
astescollection bid t tFlorida Recycling for five years, at
$10 1 per month, presuming there i ease in the
dumping fees. Seconded by Paul Lovestrands
Taylor r ended the language about no increase to dumping
fees not be partmof the motion.
Miller m rida Recycling be a
the r sideni ial solid w t for $10.71 per m nthed
r five years. SeconaedibycC e Lovestrand and
iea by a three t Mayor Miles, C
estra nd and C Miller v ing aye and1Deputy
Mayor s rgent votings naynewith Commissioner Vacca absent.
i2. 3 (Tablad o
- -9'1) A my t 9of ithe corporate
limits, a iag c nP la naalocatedaa rth ea st
PnLake EmmarA the city limits. noApplicant:
Aaron Gorov itz. $ANX-02d9'na
Commissioner Miller moved to table To May 4, 1998.
cc a-6-98\96
Tnere was aiscaseion as to wny the aeveloper enose to regeest a
delay.
ambri explained the Comp Plan a endment a
also2scheaulea for first reading T night, noweverYethe1C
nod directed when tnis i s previously before C and
requested t a prior m ing, theymw
e public h ingsasa long a theedeveloper paiduf
eadvert isi ng. Tne Comp Plan w eadve rt ised, however, r
e day short of meeting the legalrrequirements of the Statewfor
advertising. r this r ambri aitl she took the
liberty of r schetluling tosApr ils2 Mr. G vit z, being unable
to be Here on April 2 sked that all three atems be rescheduled
to May a, 1598.
Miller discussed what he thought was the developer's
rationaldfoe asking to reschedule.
Mr. Taylor read ordinance No. 97-1382 by title only.
Mr. S explained this w e parcel, r ended i
ceptedhon first reading and t schedule a publidh ing forbe
May 4 ith s saying t the developer c
o the City s acknaboutddevelopingaand a ing it into
ity, proposinget nstruct a ingld f mily
~ subdivision. change i o keep it
' at o ingZew ich woultlrbe s mila~ t what i
,nbutcthezdevel open saitl if he did not get the zoningttohbuild
so vn~ e wonla witnaraw.
Miller m ved t cept Ordinance N
1382ronrf first reading and to schedule a public h ing
for May 4, 1990. Seconded by Commrssioner Sargent
Commissioner Miller said there h all s of efforts to
reach a compromise but none so far on the developer's part.
Motion c d by a four t zero vote, with
Commissioner Vacca absent.o
13. - ending
the o undarteo of thepcorporate 1 ing
d land a of NogmT ack aROad and
unty Road 42].tApplicantasCla Tendon O.i.l Company. (8AN%-o2-
98)
Mr. Taylor read Ordinance No. 98-1398 by title only.
aid this is first zeatling and i wolves a
of property o the n oogtT
Brock explained that until the comp plan and zona 9 re assigned,
cC 4-6-98 \9'/
the property will r under t e jurisdictional authority of
nty. In response t inquiry, M ock said the property 1
ing a ith the 9 erlocal agreement
ith bt ntyea nee sold, and if before 3uly 1, will be
subject toot ity tax.o
Miller m ved t ceptea Ordinance rv -
n first reading and t a public hearing
forBMay 4 ontled by C argent and
ied by e four to zero vote,ow ithsCOmmrssroner Vacca
absent.
in. - ending
the corporate limits99a ing
nrland atuthern rthf end o Ssle Way between
Lake and Mud Lake. Appli ca nt~arWalter T mple, ($ANX-04-
98)k
Mr. Taylor read Ordinance No. 98-1399 by title only.
ock explained t the e at
r Isle subd iv ision.ao ,oleft the emeeting
with v sayThe is looking forward t inq
xedrb i{Yonsgpon completion of the subd ivisione there
wr 11 be i5 ilotse C
' argent m d to a cept the petition and 1
toma ceptnOrdinance N n first reading and t
dole a public hearingef May 4 onded by
ied by a four9to zero vo ,
withr COmmissroner Vacca absent.
i5. - ending the official
Andaries of the corporate lim itsoba ing c n land
located at 5 5. East Street. Applicant: SamesaFUlkerson.
(FANX-05-98)b'
Mr. Taylor read Ordinance No. 98-1400 by t.it le only.
ock explained the a s pursuant to the interlocal
annexatron agreement witnnsem~~oie county.
argent m ceps orainanee rv -
14oo3pn~erstEreaaing a~adt e~neaule a public he~r98q
for May 4 1998. onded by C r Govestrand
by a four to zero vote15withsCOmmissroner
vaccaaa bs ent.
16. - ing the official
boundarEe o orporate lim its~fa inq c
located a 5 5. East Street. Applicant: LacytYOwerand
(#AN% 6-ggi51
CC 4-6-98\98
Mr. Taylor read Ordinance No. 98-1¢U1 by title only.
r
<ept Ordinance N -
n firstMreaaing ana t a public hearing
fo01May 4, 1998. Seconded bysC ae9ent and
ied by a four to vero vo e, wmChsCOmmrssioner Vacca
absent.
1i. - Amending Chapter 2 of
theB CityAOO urldAiNngEPe~mitB Fees.
Mr. Taylor read ordinance No. 98-1402 by title only.
cept Ordinance No.
- nef irstereadiagmanddt schedule a public
heari~g for April 2 by C onee
Miller and c ied by e four to zero vote,ewmthst
Commissioner Vacca absent.
18. - ity
Coder C - ingma ew zoning
aisuicc~enti<iea2aesiae~ciai~estace ~xe~.n
Mr. Taylor read Ordinance No. 98-1x03 by title only.
Miller m ved t cept Ordinance N -
nlfirst reading and t schedule a public hearing
fo~JApril 2 Seconded by C argenT
and c d0by la four to zeeo vo e, ithrcommissioner
The Commission recessed Prom 11:15 p.m. to 11:2> p
is. - ing City C Rules 6
Procedure c, NSectfon3 A, Subsections 2,1 osmjssand 6. 1.
Mr. Taylor read Resolut ron No. 98-9I9 by title only.
Mayor Miles sa is the proposed resolution was the result of a
prior work session.
Miller m ved that Resolution No. 98-939 be
adoptealwith the e ception of t ange t
wh.i ch wou ltl have deleted t selection ofct
Mayor; the election of the Mayorhto r tM1es£irst
scheduled m ing i May, and t doptmt solution
as amended. eeSeconaetl by Commissioner Lovestrand.
d dis cussi.on, with Mayor Miles favoring n
ualwelectionnof Mayor, but if a election of Mayor were to be
held, he would prefer November vs. May.
r Motion ca rrr ed by a three to one vote, puty Mayor
cc a-6-98\99
argent, c ana c
Miller v ~nqi aye~nMayo~vM es voting nay ysw ith
Commissioner Vacca abs ent. it
20. - Accepting and approving the Pebsco
oeterrea cpmpenaac,nn elan.
Mr. Taylor read Resolution No. 9A-990 by title only.
mitR said tRis way a housekeeping item due to a change in
law.S
argent n adopt R solution No. 9A-
94U. Seconded by Commissioner Miller.
estzand questi onetl why the City had P
ongwood, t ity had Ha etford andr
and ihewrequeetedmP O be added as he w s plan
ved it to b supeeioe to the others,as
and said h in favor of companies~msucRias PEBSCO,
that nave captiveeagents~t
by a three t ith Mayor
Milesn OeputydMayor Sarge nt~ Commissioner Miller voting
aye, c voting nay, wicn
CommissloneriVaccababsenta nd
21. - - Accepting and Approving the ICMA
Retirement Corpoeation Plan.
Mr. Taylor read Resolution No. 96-9C1 by title only.
argent m ved, C ner Miller seconded,
adoption of SResolution No. 98-941.
and questioned if this w s deferred
ompensaticnOVe advised i estrand
aid he was not inwfavor as he does snotcapproveoofrcaptive
agents.
Motion c ied by a three t Mayor Miles,
Miller and C Miller v ing aye,
ves<rand votmngsnaye with commissioner
Vaccasabsent.~
22. ResOLUTION NO. 98-592 - Amending the 1998 Manning Document.
Mr. Taylor read Resolution No. 98-942 by title only.
ith explained the need < end t
due to hiring a operator andma Codes EnforcementuOffice
which ha pr viously been approved by commission.
Cc 4-6-98\100
ana Baia fine city Aaminietrator w o
ae~iaeewni~n position to nire ana ne aeoiaea t
officer ana sa is ne felt tney enou la ao their ow~rpiperwoaxs
M Lles said he hoped t n plane t address
theoa depaPtment b e he did not
aidsthat ~ tthey de n t naveeenowgh -
aaministrativetsupport to get this done
esponded t the Cotles O spent h
ing enforcement a enfoacement and theye
are supposed to be doing their own papeaework.
Mayor Miles said he noped all C ing copies
of the code letters which are beingssentewitninetneirldistricts.
and suggested M ith r w the cape of
tnemlast CodesoEnf orcement meeting,ra told by r silents
1n attendance that staff was poorly preparedsand time was wasted.
r Miller m d to adopt Resolution N -
r' four to zeroe oby C ith CommissSOnernVacca carried96y a
absent.
z3. - Amending the budget for the F cal
Otbeginni~g O tober 1 ending September 30,
1998, providing for budgetltransf eds.
Mr. Taylor read Resolution No. 98 -94J by title only.
Commissioner L esira nd noted the r solution provided f the
nsfee of funds for the Mudd LakeeProject and would, therefore,
file a conflict of interest
argent m Miller
ondea, nadaptian of R solution3N
by a three t vote, MayoreMles, Deputy
Mayor 9a rgent, end C Miller v inq aye,
r Lovestranalabstaininq due t a conflict of
rnteres t, with Commissioner Vac<a abse nt~
24 A TY computerRLabRUpdateORT.
ith reported tnat v office (behind t fission
er) v er Lab for employeemm
traibing on computorprogremompu
r
CC 4-6-98\l0l
With respect to C Miller's d s about voiceless 9
sedmthat a meetingchas been scheduled with a '~
companytio discuss same.
B. Water and sewer Rates.
ith presented h endation as perm o dated
MarchmJO, 1 with respect t ether o ity
should adjust0its utility r and
opened d ith re spectst themCity looki ngea
rear
t~hargi~sea miaeaaweto ett rncheha oageau
wicn~a nigher r e niynh~
people wno, livi~y aione~ omy u w thousandegallons,
wTile the a rage u otTers 1 thousand
gallons, andas waters their lawn often c 0
thousand gallonseOn ewbel ieved a adjusted rate wouldube 4
fair, especially t Mthe very lownusers.
by C and t ork
upta three rate scheduleOVeseconded byaCOmmissioner
Miller.
ith eespect to «e higher u cutting
ba ckutheie w sage; and the need, m in1y, tort and the
erg low u he reduction in rate possibly causing loss
of revenues.
n favor of just r and ing
those swhonuseMlessrthan threeior four thousand gallons a
Comm is stoner Lovestrand wathdrew h.is motion.
After discussion, the C asked M ith to do
a study to explore the fmna ncial impact if sewer rates
e drafted to establish a administrative fee of
$1. the monthlynpick-up f by
Flor idaoRecycling, tprov ided City could justifyhtheed
51.25 based on actual administrative costs.
?5 A. Telecommunications franchise ordinance for use of
public rights-of-ways.
Me. Taylor expects to bring forth a telecommunications
franchise ordl na nce for use of public righ<s of ways, ile
cC 9-6-98\102
wiil e ovestigate fate e„y „ew or pe~ai~q ieyielatio~
this veart
:s n~TY siaerAmoa~itioetio~ to city coae, ~~ e
na~isorv cooaeil lBAC~, to pro~iae cor sta9gezinges
. Zambri r d her m ith respect t the B
request t .,sion modify the Code to provide for s
s ggeretlhterms.
commissioe <o~se~e~s wa
e to smea~ie inie aise~ssio~ of
the BAC s terms on the Apeil 13, 1998 work session.
The meeting adjourned at 12.28 A.M. - -
ena~,iee c. jai xxl, nayor
c
la ne D.F ambr i~ city 1 re k
CC 9-6-9B\1o3