CCMtg03-21-88WSMintoocwooD clTr corm issioN
11ARLII 21, 19NN
IIDRK S[GSI DN
Present: flayor David Gu n[er
eevnty Mayor tvnette Dennis
Lonmi ssioner Richard Nulling ton
Lonmfisi ~~er Hank Hardy
Lamni ssi ~~er Ted Pa el ki nq
Donald L. Terry, Acting City Administrator
M i<haei Kramer, City Attorney
Geri Zambri, Deputy C1 Cy Clerk
i. The work session was called to order at 6:3o P. M. by Mayor Gunter.
2. Discussion of Florf da Resider fiat Lonnnu niti es property located North of
Longwood Nil is Road and West of Lake Elmra Road
Mr. Kramer introduced Mr. Pa ui 6ougel man, co- nsel on the FRC ca and
said Nr. 6ougel man would give a brief his torycon the FRL prpperty,sMr. Na91e
would make a presentation, followed by questions and discussion.
Hr. 6ougel man stated the work s called to request gu itlance from [he
C.i ty Lomnf scion regarding the FRG S property as to what type of land u e the
Commf scion views as being appropriate for the ar well as gnat type of
rand u e ehey womd c cider apnroPri ate on the oeh~~ nnaevel ones parcels ;
the , ue ,to ied he w s jr~se r oseinq dtrectmn rram cne Lnamli saion
not a vpte,ebut a ttr. Gougel nlian qav a brief history of the FRL
request and sta tedctha in FRC would like to get the Comni scion's guidance as tv
where tp qo and woof to ao wi to tots paracmar area and now to solve me
litigation.
Mr. Nagle presented the staff's v on the is Ne stated a esident ial/
professional land use designs t ion issappropriateua nd r onablz for both the
FRL parcels and the otn er v ant parcels in the a 11rs Naqte referenced
exhibits which he had prepared which he believed supported pis reconunenda ti on
Mr. Bi nes ,: fRC, stated nd would like to co e to s e type of settlement of the
litiga tion, Mr. Bi nes explained they wduld like the obi ti ty to develop
tally but would vol vn[arily restrict the type pf cominerc ial a well a
howmmuch land could be developed co dally, would restrict the buildings s
story, would restrict hours pfeopera tion, etc. He stated he believed
th i~ntype of restricted development would then set the precedent for the
other vacant parcels in [he ar rlr. Nines asked the Lonmli scion for a -
us thus guiding them as toewh e ther they mould upp1Y and 9o throw Dh the,
process again.
Mr. Kramer s med u asking the Lomnissivn f r their guidance as to whether
FRC's proposal fora es tr is tetl Lonnnerc ial i cep table, o whether a sidenti a l/
professional land u ceptabl e, and. al so to consider that the direction
9 iven on FRC's parcel s iwould influence the direction on the other vacant parcels
rn the same area.
It w [he co of the Lonlmissi on toot a resider [i al/professional land use
wovl dsbe m o Tia e.
3. rleetingst journed-at J:25 '
~.y/ad ~ / M. /
ATTEST: fi'~.f.eC.Ga.r<~i ~~fiYG~/ yor, ity o ngwood, pl or~de