CCMtg04-11-83Present. Mayor L
MayornUSkext.
~" r Grant
ell
Pappas
vidsCnacey, City Administrator
ooks, City A ney
Gerr 2ambxi, Ae cora.i ngoSecxetaxy
Absent: Donald Terry, City Clerk (attending confer en cel
1. y Lormann called the meeting to order.
2. Snvoca tron followed by Pledge o£ Allegiance to the Un.i ted States Clag.
3. val o -21-83 R ing: by C
Grantp, ps onded bynC Pappasat Mapprove m of 35211H3rRegular
Me ing a ied Dy a
et~Approval rofiM tofn3c29 YH3 Work 5 n bytC
Pappas, s onded byuC tchellet rapprovetm of 3529-H3
Work Session as wrrtten. Motaon carried by a unanimous vorce vote.
4. Open Brds for Frre Trvck. Mayor Lormann slated there were nrne sealed
bids.
1. $ 93,250
aFrance J3,15>
2. FMC rCOrp.L 81,652
3. awling F'i re Equipment I 9],352
9, owl.i.ng F.i re Egv.i.pment Inc. 100,000
nclosed -
6. dca yneLF Equipment C .-ASkedNbi.drdate be postponed
Grohman Emergency P ]4,OOo
rohman E ergency Products 91,19]
5. Bulldog Frre Apparatus 101,328
suggested that the City Administrator and F Chief look o the
biasat i.E they m cif ications required eDy the City before
decidingseeCOmmissionertGranis as ked tF.at a information sheet be compiled
of each b so they can be compared to then s-peci£ications requested by
the city,ia
n by C Pappas, s onded Cy Dep. Mayor U table the
decision o ceptingrof a bid f uck u t.i1 tneen ity
Commissionnm ing of April 18, 1983 andele[ Lhe City Administrator and
Ch.i.ef present t that m all the c.i.ty specif i.c at.i.ons
ompan iea by a omparision sheetaoE all thetbias received. Motron
carrred y una nrmous roll call vote.
SJ2 - limit my hours oL yarbage a
ickupbi ctheaCity ofrL oodNO.
tl tle n
this w erne PublictH axingAa~dsasked DLO anyone would 1i.ke
speaksforeo against the o Catherine S and
aid x ro ld Meyers spoke f the rordinancerst a9there w o cont 1
the e mely early hovxsooE garbage pi ckup,arenbefore 5 A Charlesro
ingXOf e2 e ya rbage companies w willing t
W<hetearlyth ickups i e fe~ui red a omplaint
but asked thae the cityaCOmmrssron not evrtailsthe hourscof pickup in all
a by passing O 5]2. ted the earlier hour pickups
ompa meet begin g bage pickup before traffic i the m in3
and allowed them to ge[ t the dumping a s before 4:00 P
had n objection t the r n holiday p kup. Malsors [edg
Realth r s forothe earliercpi~kups. askedrCity C e
e houre6~A t ] A Pappas s ted he haas35 oroQOak
omplaints i eighborhooamalone regarding e ely early pickups.
stated t ula get together t adjustmtheir hours.
and L nrhis i eighborhood the refuse companies
ery g~iec a~ata aiaents. xyle Aaams, a
representative of C ral Servi ce,ta sidential c Doke against
the Ordinance. ted that I andeCentral hawethecbest s
possible a e price a ked t t Commission c si de rvt the
t factor mayebeoaffected by thi saOrdinance b g passed.n
t Central begins their pickups a de6n30 A Ha rweyl5 rilson -
spokeforathe O the health i eMb rought up Dy I S
aid there wouldds till benla[edaf ternoon pickups e if the companies W
t before ] A and he felt tRe c itled t a decent
nights sleep. velyn Shiff asked why thezcompanieseall s the s
and why they don't split the aceas so three dif fexentwcompanieeare
not servvcing the same street.
Motion Dy Dep. Mayor Uskert, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell to close the
Public Hearing.
Commissioner M tche 11 s ted that the City Ras c ted the refuse companies
and requested that theytvolunta rily s t later hoursabut n of the companies
espondea t this request but c ued to pickup a ar lynas 4:30 A and
also s ted i reply to Ms. Shiff tsnquestion that he believed the companies
had the rightnto free enterprise.
Dep. Mayor U that M rilson's s them t logical
and that thesC srondshould benefit the cvtazens not accommodate the
refuse compa na es.
n by C r Mitchell, s onded by C Pappas that
Ord i~ance No~S]2vbeepassed. Motvon carried by a unanvmous roll call vote.
6. ending, Ordinance N 5]3 - ending F and O Element oP
Comprehensive Plan for property o side of S wage C t from C ial
Industrial P - ooks readwbyttitle onlya Chacey explai nedo
that the b ildingkw sMbvilt a industrial buildingMUnaer the old ordinance.
and the future la naau tabrought the property t C-3. that.
vage i requestinget ing the property t -1 for purpo~s es tsted
utilizing the builai ng forothe purpose it was built.
by C Pappas, s ded by D Uskert that Ordinance
ti5J3 be passedvoe fi.xst reading with the PPb1MCyH ari ng set for May 9,
1983. Motron carrred by a unan>mous roll call vote.
], coding, Ordinance N 574 - ending Comprehensive 2 ing
orai~a~~e for property o siae e wage c t from x-z Ix~awacriaz,
rail t I-I (In dustrialePark). ooks read Dy title only.
Cha cey explained that t the companion ordinance t
e property prom i-2rt - n No Comm Doer tchellthse ondet
bywC a Orai 5]4ronvfir anocs .~
the earrneEOr y ,s1Ytl 3.n Motvon carrred by a unanrmous r llet
eading, Ordinance N SJS - Amending F and U Element
of C A-3 (Residential, multit Fami ly) t -
(IndusPrialnParklPfor Lo s 453, 95J, 959, 461, 462, 963, 512, 513, 519,
515, 516, 51], 518, 519 ,t520, 521,522, 523, 524, and 525, PB 1, PG 18-
21, T of Longwood. ooks read by title only. by Deputy
Mayor Uskert, s ded by C o pass oOrdinance N
SJS o eading and s Ps6licrHearing if or May 9, 1983. Motron
carriedFbysa unanzmou~ rolltcall vote.
9. eading, Ordi nu ncc N 5J6 - ending Comprehensive Z ing
Ordinance for lots listed in Item 6. above, changing z classifi-
n from R-3 (Residential, M - ily) t I-1 (Industgial Y rk).
by Commissioner Pappas, s onded by Bep. Mayor Uskert to pass
Oxdi~ance N SJ6 o eadieg and s Public Hearing for May 9,
1903. Motron carriedFbysa unanimous rolltcall vote.
30. eading, Ordinance N SJJ - ending Comprehensive 2
Ordinance For property located i 18, 24 and 25 f 1-1 )industrial
ark) t R-3 fNe siaentia l-Multi Fam11 y1 t onf orm with F and Use
Element by Commissioner M tchell, s onded by C
Pappas to passoOrdinance N 5» o eading and s Publicr
Hearing for May 9, 1963. Motron carried tby a unanrmous roll call vote.
11. onditional U Request - ongwood L s (BOWllnq C er)- M cey
explained that theoLOngwood L s propo s.i.ng to locate to there
side of 5 wage C approximate1yw400 feet s uih of SR 939nand needed
onditional u eufrom the City to locate i the C- s depicted
cthe Land UsesMap. also s ted that Mr. Heddon,dthero of the
property in question, h d purchased a other parcel U and for expansion
of the bowling alley fox added r and parkingf 1
Pappas q estioned M Heddon a owhether he would Lightmthese
way t the parking lot a requested by M Haynie of the Land Planning
Agency. Heddon replied he would d Pappas also
questionedrthe ingress/egress fort e Cole propertysandeMr. Heddon
ted the e ingress/egress will r A question w sed
the properrz ing for sale of alcohoLaand M Chacey s [edaa
ong a there w other 1
ithins1500 fectsof t Uwli ngralleyeSbybpedestrian 'o vehicle t vel,
there would be n roblem and to hi.s knowledge, the church n r Sobiks
than 1500pfeet from the bowling alley and there w
school o church closer. tsfelt the
ma joblc the traffic impact. HeddonoreplGednthat the
majoritynof rtheatzaffic f the bowling Malley would be after peak hours
of t d 6:95 P and 9:30 A eddon s
[hisrwould beahisyfou~th bowling M and he wouldremploy aboutt30
people. n by Commissioner M tchell, s onded by C
Pappas t Mappcove the ConditionalrU Request for the IIowlingrCenter.
Motron carried by a unanrmous rU11 call vote.
12. - s (Howling Center) - Chacey presented
e plan and s ted t and's objectionMw
Heddon had purcha sedea other
par~elsof la ndaofiapproximatelyb3ta n
additional parking. Cha ceycs othekplanrcould the passed io
object t approval o and. Heddon s ted they had n
problems d the C er /5 avageMproblem andthad r eup lama
few t already andaw s pressured to begin c
possib lesor put i oF£ fox another year. sbynCOmmissionernM tchell,
econded by Dep. Dfayox Uskert to reconMendMapproval of the Longwood
Plan subject t o letter of approval f m City E
rega rding0drainage. ied by a four t ith eDeputy
Mayor Uskert, C Pappas, and M tchell and Mayor zorma nn
voting aye, and Commrssroner Grant votingxnay.
13. solution N 488 - ending Site Plan approval for H orp-
f America.
ooksoadvised that a r[hAi sor so LUdt ionedid0w thers e plan
w process and that nothiny i this r solutioncgave a ity to go
ead with paving w Lake Street. xhi s0c so lut.ion s hthat H
esponsible [o pay f only 9 of the paving a n
o[hat a paving a will0havett e drawnwnpLe
fornthetabutting property o o pays454nof the a and if [he
solution i tnpass ed where H and theeprope rty o
on the east side of West Lake Street share in the cost, the City would
o pay 954 of the paving of West Lake S t from i ith
n Avenue t ith SR 434 andrthat sHCAaa lso
donateathe 25 foot e rigi~ally agreed t ied by
a four t ithmCOmmissioners M tchell, PappasMODepn M r Uskert
and mayor Lormann voting aye, and Commissioner Grant voting nayYo
14. City Administrator's Report:
Chacey reported that the Mid-Term Hudget R scheduled
for 3x00 P rsday, April 19, 1983, i e Commission1Chambers.
ted the n axy r endations wil lnbehin the Commrssroners boxes
on WednesdayecApril 130,01983.
by the City a impson had also reported a
which w close t atherv n placed o the property bynM i~nford.
Chacey s ted chat theuBinford e s lower than expected and
he s ted that the City had r vedsa coffer from FLOrida A sidential
o lease t e property for their t s plant dependent upon
themCOUn ty sallowing t tili ze the property f
ould be approximatelye$6 t000 per year for t e yearshwithsa o0year
option. ted that M inford's appraisal w s for $22,~OOw£or the
entire piecesof pcoperty.r ted he felt that he would prefer
o lease t e property than stellGi tnforts uch a low price. the
s of opinion of the Commission to negotiate to lease the property
15. City At to Report:
ooks reported o the s ted that the p
that the City i trying t regula tesaepermanent s n by t waybi
looks. ted that the ordinance c make a blanket s [hat
emporary0s t be m o permanent signs but thetordinance
aWhatnc empora ry sign and what
ahpermanentns t be0clearly defined. ted t
the sonlytsolutron rs to pxnndown the eq rements of a perms nent s g so
tight t t you r Sly a any objectionable si yns. The solution
m.i.ght bee to get. tighte rvo dthe c a for a permanent sign. The
e 15' setback for signsiw addressed and C
objected t a 15' setback because it p~tsi signsei
eofhparking a appas s
n discussedee ugh andsthart ney to Mayor
Uskerrshobu ld c up wi[hnproposals o else just drop theDe
leave the ordinance a Dep. Mayor Uskert s ted he felt perm-
- ouldih ra la requi rements
regardingstheirigi tallationave tchell s ted he t ought
e five foot setback for sign rhadib nag reed upon, tDep. Mayor
ted that would open [he door for a ond.i Lion than
tchell s ted i ondition t
ha veta s~gn i othesm of a pa rkinq 1ot.t ooksss ted tempura r;+
signs could be banneddbut i ended and i w being [ ted
Orlando. also s tedttha ra ordino ce c ~af ted s ing
that s ethingethat looks like a emporary sigrc t be a permanent
sign. o ooks r ended r ing design andns of a
permanent sign t acfor a permanent signcwhich would
tighten up the requi rementr ri ooks s ted he would txy t up
ith s valid c alsoAS tedt[hat m of the object i~onable
signs w the o ndfathered i and perhapsa ay shorter a
period could be i ted. nnby Commissioner M tchellmt tableon
and Seto-eptuMa yor Uskert and the a up w end-
ooks s ted n aryney Simpsono~
ted his objectiontt 15 Eoot setbacke£orsReal E signs. Mayor
stated [he 15 foot setback Eor Real E signseshould be looked
and s ted that after the Mid-Term Budgettr n Thursday, April
l9 tothe signs should be discussed. n by C onded
by Commissioner M tchell t udy t of setbacks fornpcrmanent
signs a Thursday, Apr~lsl4, 1983,dworkshop. Motion carried
unanim uslr ^
16. Mayor and commissioner s Reports:
Motion by Commissioner M tchell, s onded by Commissioner Pappas to
pay approved bills. Ted a usly.
Commissioner Pappasiq ned whynthe fire plugs'i o low.
Chacey w requested t report back to the Commission as toawhy some
of the hydrants a o low
appas s ted t t he had r ved a erbal r signation
from M AarD of the tCOdes EoE Orcement B and and iE thereew
objection from thencommissaon he would like to appoint Mr. Tony Taddeo
o present to Commission. n by c Pappas t
ceptwr signation of M Ray D andtappoint M onynTaddeo t the
Enforcement Board second ednby Dep. Mayor Uskert. Motion carried
una usly.
Dep. M Uskert s ted he h ing Depactmen[
arding hi rrequest t sidewalk in front eof nthe M Aidge
aif r
dtedi that hirer reques thw mthatf thewc
had t e focros properly s t fox the 9R' widthoa oeha ve i before
he p red the c ted t ingdD cthey
checked the sidewalks ewhe necompletedhbutnDep. MayopraUSkert feldt i[ better
to check before t s poured.
e naaen report.
mayo~e~, n proclamations; olaer Americans
Month, Bi11y Graham weekdandeChildtAbuse Wcek.
of Spanky`s W ecking S ked t eak and M
informed him h u1d h submit aeletter t e City Clerkr
byrThnrsday, n preceed ing iM1e next Commission Meeti~gtin order to be
placed on the agenda.
V itn9 /
Mayor
FLOr ida
y ood
,
,
ATT
E
S
T.
/
~/
4
City