CCMtg07-25-83142
1DCA'LSAD CITY OJtkH55I0N
.tULY 25. 1983
resent: Mayor lnrnmm
conmiaainner Gta,c
cam~ission¢ Mitchell
Cmmissioner Pappas
R vid chacey, city Adminisiramr
Marvin Rooks, City Attorney
D,mald Tem, City Clerk
Absent: DepMayor Uskert
1. Mayor toxmann called ehe maecing to order at ]:34 p.m. Imocaeion follwed by
Pledge of Allegiance m the L4ited Seaces Flag.
2. Approval of Minutes, ]/18/83 Regulaz Meeting mid ]/19/83 Woricsession. Nation
by Commissioner Pappas, s corded by Cmmissioner Grant that minutes of ]/18/83
Regulaz Meeting mid ]/19/83 wrksession be approved as sodnitted. Lbtion carried by
3. Continua m of Public Heazir~g, Ordinance Ho. 585. Request to ezone lots 3]7,
318, 3I9, 3801 381, plus W 35 feet of toe 382, logs 383 and 385, Ismgwood, Plae Hook
1, page 18. Mtim~ by Gxn~dssim¢ Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Pappas. !h.
Rooks road by tiele only. Mr. CRacey des¢ibed location of lots. Mayor rennam
said she lad received a petition signed by 32 residents of tl~e azea w1m were opposed
eo the rezontng. Mr. Willias T. Pratt was presort and spoke on behalf of itie rezwun;
.
He said the lots had hero clwiged eo Hist¢ical on the land Use Nap aid he said Ne
Fhme hwre was ehe bare of the founder of lang,.nod. r4. Pratt said he canted m
restore the property to the original state and he Bald the property was for sale.
4. Mr. F~,ey Mosler said he brought his property 20 yeazs ago when it zoned 1~
dupleu mid he said he was never informed abort the range fran duplex to single
family. Cmmissioner Pappas asked Mr. NUSlar wiry he had waieed 20 yeazs aid Mr.
Mosl¢ said it had only. been a fea yeazs stn it had changed mid he tad not been
e of Ne change when it occ~ared. Mr. Terry Itipp of 205 W. Magnolia spoke agains
r
t
rezoning and said the peciticn contained roman frcm residents of ehe fliseoric Dist
the
He said he was roc concerned abort rezming the Hutt prop¢ty or the telephone cm~miv n.ce.
horse but said the torn mgty lots could be built m aid he cras mncemed about Nat.
Camdssioner Grant said he didn't approve of the ranges. N¢'. Praee said he wanted
to restore the Hint }wane aid use ie as an antique strop or a doctor's office which
are penaieted in the Historical Mstact. C~ssioner Pappas asked if he vented to
make Ne property camer<ial aid Rk. Pratt said no -just historical. Mr. Rooks said
rn types of business were permitted in the hiseoricai disev-iee. Mr. ttipp said
caof the petitioners were concerned about the vacant Smtd and objected eo a
duplex nrndng hou on the s 'there no EisNer discussion. Moeion by
C vsswner Pappas, s corded byrCam~issioner~llitchell that public heazinc be closed.
Nntian caxri.ed by vice mote.
5. Mayor tomann said she Fad received a Leteex f om Dzd^ayor Usk¢c con coring
both rez<mings. She read the letter which stared ehae Depnayor Uskert was opposed
eo Urdirimwes No. 585 and 586. !fr. Pratt said the Hint twm ors of historical
sigluEicace to'che disxrice. Mr. Se£f Razier said he was roe opposed Co all of the
zoning hue was opposed eo pare o£ it. He suggested that the district be divided
before Wilne Street. Mr. Pcatt said all things in the historic district rust
be approved by ehe Hiseoric Cmmission. Mr. Rooks said Ne historic cortdssion had
say abort the outside appcsrance of the building but could not queseion ehe use
if the us teed in the Mdinan Cmmissioner Gran[ said he mould agree
'1.J
ezw~ing U.e tbst house and the telephone building but he didn'e wart eo
Co r
h any fisther. Mayor rnxmmm and Gnmissi.one Gran up3 d ifat Mi. Pratt
breakup the property and not rezone ~ry Lots. Mr.rPratttaskede[ha[ i t be
broken up. Mayor Wnrarm said she did rule objece co c}ange to historical but
she was opposed eo a dwlex in the area. cemndssioner Crane said chat since Che
mould not agree co split ~ ehe rezoning aid delete the Como ant loos, he ozwld
to dmy the rezoning. Notion by Gnmissioner Grant, .seeondedvby P4ryor Innmam (afeer
passing gavel to Commissioner Grant) chat request for rezo~ting be denied. Nk. Praa
asked to withdraw the iw lots aid Commissioner Gtanc said he had suggeseed this before
the `moon and said the `ration mist be weed upon. Notion to dmy the rezoning ras passed
by a roll <a11 v Commiss er Pappas aid he though[ injustice
o penm.t Mr. Pratt t arcmd his reque Mayorsiomatm said ehe a mey said the
property could not be broken up. Nk. Pratttasked Fora onsider Lhe ordinance
and said he did not wish to spend another $150.00 and saidehewished to michdraw the itm
ant lots. Nk. Rmks said the ordinance bad already been denied. He suggested that
Mrc Pratt could file a motim ro reconsider ordinance No, 585 and tlut Che persons raking
the ~mcim and second could withdraw than. Mc. Rinks said he thought the plat should be
looked ac c:,*efvlly eo see if the right two lots were being deleted.
6. Notion by Camdssioner Pappas, seconded by C .issioner Mitchell that Ordin~ce No.
505 be reconsid¢ed. Nh. Willimn T. Pratt identified himself as ehe vaner of the
property aid said he }tad xro plans to build a duplex m vacant lot. Nk. ftozier said he
had no objecCion to Doing Mr. Pratt's property except for the txo cm[ lots, t4.
Chacey ideitified the two vacant lots aid tots 377 and 379. Mr, Terry Kipp said the
of ehe petitioner e the v e lots and he would have no.objection e
zoningcthe reaeining lots. Cmmissimer Grme asked which two logs mould be dropped
and NK. Pratt said logs 377 and 3]9. 'the motion to mcsider was passed by a voce of
4 eo 0. Mayor tvxmazs Chen withdrew her second and Commiissioner GYait withdrew his
ro dmy Ordinance No. 585. ME. Rooks said Ordit~mce No. 585 ovs back on the table
and suggested thae the plat be reviewed. Mr. Pratt said he was officially requesting that
lots 37] and 379 be withdrawn frua Ordinance No. 585. N6tion by Gmnissiw~er Giant,
corded by G issimer Pappas that Ordinance No. 585 be amended by deleting logs 377
and 3]9. Nneim r=.-.ied by u~murous roll call wee. Nbeion by Commissioner Pavpas,
corded by Cam~issioner Mitchell, that Ordinance Imo. 585 as amended be approved.
tbtion carried by a unaiim~us roll call voce.
]. Continua eon of Public Rearing, OrdLw~ce No. 586 - rsryest to xezone lots 364, 366 S 368
Iangwood frw`R-1 to H. Nbtim by G issioner MitcM11, seconded by Commissioner Pates
trot Ordinance No. 506 be rmoved Lzon table . Motitm carried by wise vote. Mr. Rooks
read by title only. Mayor Iormam said that Nk. Tbsler tested the property reamed to
build.a duplex and Mr. Nbsler said thae cas correct. Nk. Terry Kipp said the pessons
sig~ung the petition did objece ro Nk. ebster's request, tie asked xbae the property
be regained as side family. Nk. Q,acey said the property had bem zmed R-2 san
1958 and was changed to R-1, single family in March 1981. There was no fin-lter discussion.
Cumdssioner (,tan[ said he believed trtaY Mr. Nosier had bem notified about rez«dng
and said he believed trtae the rezrnssng was done correctly. Mayor Iormam passed the gavel
and made a vntion that the Cmmi.ssi.on deny Ordnmce No. 586. G issioner Giant passed
the gavel and seconded the vtion, tbtiwi ses carried by ur~minrnis roll call vote.
8. PirsC Reading, Ordinance No. 592 -rezoning of 1oC10 and East 25 feet of lot
11, tiamars Addition, Plat Hook 3, Page 73 fran C-2 (CCmoercial, office) to C-3,
Cumiexcial, general). Nh. Chacey described location of the property. FbYion by
Comnd.ssi.oner Mitchell, secmded by G issisner Pappas that Ordirvsce Lb. 592 be passed
on firs reading and tlvat a public hearing be scheddled far n g <t 15, 1983. Fbeim~
eareiedeby urinous roll call woe.
9. Site Plan Review - 2immz Building (Retail Shopping Center). location - NW comer
of l.ongdale Avmve and Highway 17-92. Lots 1 and 2, Oak Orwe Park. Nk. (hacey described
location of oxoperty and said The building mould be 1],000 square feet. Toe principal
rs Glidden Paint. T4. GRacey said Mr. Im~d iad made s eral r maenda[ions
and said tha[ Nk. Bryan s leteer reported chat all of Cher ommnda['w~s had bem eakm
of. Camdssioner Ltant said he did not s anything wrong with Plan, NbCion by
Cumussionex Grant, seconded by Cmmi.ssioner Mitchell trtat stee plan for .lack Zimrer be
approved. Tb[im cartled by vnmimous roll call mote.
10. Resolution ISa. 498 -approving bond i e for r ve Year Capital Improvmwics
Yrogran. Mr. Chacey said i£ ad valorem coats were used to repay the indebtedness,
refermdan was required and he recmnmded that the Commission place the issue on ~
the ballot for Dece~Fer 6, 1983. Camdssinner Pappaz seated glut ae die wrksession
rn Su1y ], 1983 he had requested chat the bend issue be placed on a re£ermdun. Mr.
Qucey said a refermdan would not be required if the band was repaid wirh ocher sour
of in such as one half ants sales tax ceipes or electric franchise fees. He sail
dose sources world not provide Che necessary incare and he explained the effects o£
Proposition One on the budget if is is passed in 1984. Mr. Ckacey recanamded chat the
City n [hest s repay the bond issue. C 'ss es Pappas said he did not
believetthac Proposieimaa0ne would pass in 1984. the Comm_ssion agreed to hold awork-
sessron on Wednesday, August 10, 1983 to discuss lilt bond issue further.
11. Mr. Chacey recmmmded that the City Caaaission increase the roll bac'c millage
for the budget for klscal Year 1963/84 to 2.520] which would be a 15 percmt increase
and chat this in e be used to build a new Fire Station. hk. Cnacey said the
additional millageewuld bring in about $61,000. Mr. a,acey also r amended ChaC
the Camdssion approve the dates of the tom public hearinRS requuede£or the budget.
12. Motion by Conmissioner Pappas, seconded by C®miss'imer Geme dux the City
Cumdssion adopt a proposedvdllage rate of 2.520] which was a 15 percent increase aver
the roll back rate and that the additional fords to be generated would be used speci£i-
rally for a niw fire station which would be a nmikey cans and tha[ the two
public h=~rix~gs be held on Sepeed~er 12 and Septmher 26, iMOtion carried by a
nmanvrous roll call wee.
13. Mr. Clucey said he had given each Gnvissioner a copy of a proposed letter to
Mr. Geoeges St. tauxmt wtnrch specified Che terms the Cwvv.ssion requested m
]ule 19, 1963 concerning granting Ft. St. ian:se 150,000 P,allons per day capacity
e he Skylark Sewer Plane. Ccmmrssioner Gtme said the proposed Letter did not
everything discussed ar~d he objected to tthe. terms of die refwds o£ Mr. SC.
Lasmt's centribucion fee of $250,000. Cxrmdssiorer Mitchell said he was concenad
about Che funse sewage needs of longwmd and he said he wouidprefer Chat Mr. St.
iaurmt build his an plane. Mr. (Macey said the majonry of land in the area was
zoned R-1 and cwld be accarodated by septic Conks. Mc. (Macey said ie was the policy
of the City eo mcour~ge use of septic conks whenever possible. I4-. L4acey said the
days of the $11.00 s r bills mould soon pass. Gnmissimer Mitchell sa'd the City
should not lake a ncaa custarer at the expense of old ones and Mr. Chacey said the
aaer plat has, the pore economical it to operate. Cmmissioners
Grmtcand Mitchell said they wished eo ew [he proposedsleeter fisdier and !4. Qiacey
said the Ccavdssion shouldn't wait tom weeks. Crnmissimar Pappas said the letter
ered everything the Camdssion bad requested mid said it slwuld be sm Comdssimar
Grarne said Che City stuuld build its mom plaC and Camdssioner Mitchell asked abort di=
possibility of gectinR a grmt for drat purpose. Mr. Qacey said lie was wnrkinR on etae.
Mayor IonnBm said she thought the letter covered all tt~e i.tmw requested at the Suly
19, 1983 worksession and she thought the letter should be sm Canndssiwar Pappas
asked if. the proposal was a caitract and Mr. Rooks said is ace but a
proposal but he said the City sFrould back ~ any offers con ainedtin the proposal.
eh. Rooks said the letter could be written to qualify a~ey offers contained. 'the
Camdssion was split evenly with Commissimers Giant and Mitchell stating that Hie
let shoulU be r cored furCher and Camdss r Pappas and Mayor Iormam s R
ctatethe letter c ered all the eemu of the wrksession ad should be mailed~t
14. Ciry Adrtiniseraeor's Report
i+a. Chatty asked the G.nmission co advise wfiae ee re desired for the
paving asaes~a,ca on wegr lake street. Mr. rnacey aaia h~reca„~,aea that ab»cting
property s be equally assessed fifty percmt each and he aid the City could
ate~cmipl.ish drf Wese~lak~5tc~eetybe~rdafor 50%50 b~ abutne3nd by Camissi~me{5 Mv~e11
a~cvargried by a unanvrous roll prall voce. y g Property
15. Mayor and Cwmdssioners Reports:
Cwmussioner Pappas said that grass ar and Quail Pond was in need o£
Wowing and said the weeds azowd the sale were very hieh. Camdssioner Pappas
asked char police enfo'ece the Clty's ordixiv ce prohibiting display of goods o side
of shops aid cited a poster place on S.R. 434 as an exary~le. He also said a £urnitse
score was displaying couches on The outside.
Chief Naming pointed out co the Conmission thnt several harAaare stores, Ace
Hazdware and tangwood Hazdwaze SCO also placed goods ou side their
display aid had Ear yeazs. tte asked cif the Coimiission Granted full ca~liance by
all sC The City Attorney said the ordinance wmil.d have to apply equally to
everyanee5 TF~e Gxnnission agreed ettat Che police depaztr~c shwld enforce the
ordina:ce conplecely and require all stores co refrain £ran displaying goods outside.
b. 6.xm:issioner Mitchell suggeseed tha[ Chief Marnung make a report m the
trip to Wese Palm Beach Co Srnrestigate ehe effectiveness of the Canine Corns of trtat
Ciry. Chief Marming said CttaC Cmmissioner Crane, Comrtissioner Mitchell, he a:d
Lieutaiant Haker vi red West. Palm Reach and rode on patrol «tri tun of Hieir
Cause Patrol. Cmmissiorer Mitchell said ten was favorably inpressed with tt:e
performaice of the :nits and he supported p:schase of two dogs and finding two
additional officer Caanissioner GTa~t said he gained additional ix:formatinn buC
said he did erot accepC everything thaC he heard, fle said he saw good use of Che dogs.
Mayor ]nnram said she had received a letter fran Camdssioner Bob St:xm
of Smdnole Gnmty advising ttmt the Bcard o£ Cwm:ission rs had approved the
finding o£ a traffic signal £or $4],000 at the intersection of CR 42] and I~mgwood
Hi11s Road. t~yor Iornmm requested Ne Ciry Attorney to prepare an anendmait to
the City Zoning Ordinm:ce specifying the size, location and use of utility buildings
d she cited the hn large utility buildings on GranT SCreeC as an exa~mle o£ wfiae
had co bepreveneed. Comiussioner Mitchell said tMre was a lazge utility shed an
pmpetty of£ 434 which had large wooden skids ad dim,' Y appear m be fastaed or
m:rlrored.
16. 'the Canntission adjourned at 9:55 p.m
elay6r~ city o
1ESt: (/
iii Q