CCMtg03-23-81rgnga~nd city co~.,nission
4asch 23, 1981
The Inng~cvd City Crnnission held its regular reefing at "1:30 0
Present Mayor Ilepp
Cartnissianer G
Cemnissioner Io
Ieary
Uekert
Ca'nusChawy, City Administr r
Rinks, ¢ meY ato
9cnald Terry, City Cle~k
t9yor Ifepp called the acting to order. Inwratron follvaed by Pledge of Allegiance to
the LYti.ted States flag.
1. Approval Of Minutes - 3/16/81 Ae9ular Igeeting. Cmmissionu' Ioxmvin asked that paza-
t Gat the eceived $21.60 par hour for their wrk.
on bt Camu seconded by Crnmissioner O'2¢ary that minutes of 3/23/81
~ approved az agended. mtb ono passed by a unanvrous roll call vote.
2. Ordinance t3o. 495 -establishing Zoning Fcgulatr s for Citv of Inngxmd. tbtion by
Uskert, seconded by Gamussirner O'Ieaxy Gat Ordinanm [b. 495 be removed
fmn table.2 tbtron caaied try a unanvrous roll call mote.
3. C siorer Uskert questioned the wide of a right of way for 2-2 property and stated
that }e th ilit a 25 foot setback mould be sufficient in front of a promlYy abutting a mad.
!4. Gamy said that he agreed.
4r. tbLCrt Ca asked if Ge setbarlcs were str ctly for Parking or whether a loading
dockt mould to plamd in itn setbarJC area. tu-. Cnacey replied that a loading dock mold not
M Suitt in seGacA azea and That matters surh as t}LLS mould Fs taken care of during
site plan mvuw.
S. Mr Phvlip Tatitch, representing Mr. Cm ent spot and expressed his m
about rernnt lia ccuerage, rated that~rernnt editorials in Ge Sentinel Star ar~d the
vening news on Channel 9 Fuere biased and unfair. itch ~staTed that efr. St.
}aurent had previously agreed to a 200 fmt buffer and rhatTne Mad also withdma his regins[
fora 10,000 snuare trot nuniman lots e for i-2 lots. asked t}r Cawnvs.,ion to give
.redence to his re'p» t For changes to setback requirei2nts.
6. Mayor Hepp s[atsd Gat tre naaz also m mined ainut ze fated
Gat to city nag a grog mpmrt with Genpreea an as~nis opv,iomn~t~taaatewr
ahom.a remree nou>;n9 no ss Gan any ornerdcici~„ ana gaged that u,e ma ritY of t
rnv~mndations were denied. fNyor Yepp stated Gat Mr. St. Iuucent was
not given anY scer:» consideration.
7. Mr. C,regg Ilnsmrnd sta d that ne was not a msident of Inng oN but wined property
abutting the 2-2 oxopecty in questim. t rated that tw• reazlnized tt need
for industrial Oeveloprent but did no thiNC that thesi- category for Tints pr'cPerty was
the last use uggested that the City re cw the Seminole Cowry ae .i.al photographs
of the PropeitY~inm The ProPOSed maP was in egazding the higF wa er lin
Islmd ieke. Ne suggested Ga City seek a s~stanm fran the Seminole Cnur~ey P o-
fessrmal staff and Ge Regional Planning Cowcil.
Mayor
m f
3, ated Uat he obje ea m the remn an the press
Rv and OsaidNint wassthe IoxsT form of yello.~ journalism.c rated that Mr. J
S:iuires, editor of the ~ntinel S as a next dmr neighbcr ogf Mr. Bcwnrona and that 1
aile, the avUwr of the cr tcalwedimrial con rvin9 on
the Citizen's Advisory menu ee, liwa in the 51eeFy Fbllos~utdivision of IoncTwcd.
Sinpsm s area mat the City's orainanm exreeaea ttc requirnnents of Ses:inole
unty (antlntred b xwmond Eor buffer areas for 2-2. Sieipwn tatea that the
property adjacent Tn Dxwmond was omed M Mr am wniie an as his under-
tanaing tna PRUte intended to req~u= t a mangerin min9 to multi-familY~
Sirpson s atedr that M tMUght the semarxs for I-2 pmpertv were exmssrve and remmrmdei
changes, t
10. t1<. C 1 Selnh, stated that Fa was not a resident of Songxaod but arced pro[erty
adjacent m the 2 property in q:nstion. objected m the fact that pazking ould to
(ernutted in the 200 fmt buffer area because i would ¢ e heavy traffic and rnise.
suggeatea mac trees ana snrwd~ray woela nelo. c~.niasio~ner Uskerc atatea mat he aia
~t u,im: mere woma be too much noise from a zoo £mt wffer area. r for ~~a.~ statea
wonla m regnirea curing the srre plan mvrew. mm:u.ssro~r oaken smtea rnat
neanoreea with aajuaring the semaeks for 2-z.
11. Mr. [tusks stated that the mrtnission should have a n that inmxiarates all
d:anges ::ade to V ordinanre sinm the first public heazing. Mr. &nks suggested the
£ollauing notion: A f~b[wn to a:mnd Ordinanrn No. 495 Dy inmrloratino in said ordinance
other reasnrendations a[Prowa by the City Camdssion, wTich changes lave been inmxporatea
in the final test of the ordinanm and the folloring other dlanges. (Sange term "[Ise by
Right" where appeazin9 to "Femitta3 Use", Clange page 28 fxcm the ]aa1 Planning Agency
"teazing" to "mvi a:mndin9 ordiranm [o permit construction Of singm t~lY tines
any So Emt. lot in R-2 and n-3 regazaless f w}¢tFnr or no they am n igmus, 1I
Change section 509.3A -Area and Bulk rnquirefine:ts for S-2 Heavy Industrial ro - J
Iot Area (Minimian) 20,000 squaze fcet, IAt Width (tVi+:insnnl 100 feet, Int Cepth (Minim~nn)
150 Eeet, Frm Setback Rw:vmnn) 25 feet, Feaz Setback (tsinim:an) 15 feet, Side SemaCx
Rfinimwn) 15 fact, a ure, Amer 25 fee with Date:
side yard is required if whiculaz a~cress ho there o£ the building is provided, nBUilding
Fpight 6o feet with sa:m contained for C-3 zorun , duuloe nmcalures for
th plan re aew by adainge5 pmPxed deuelolnpnt m of SOg, 000 M"`° feet or Less
shall L reviewed b;~ Che City %Ndnistra[or acting jointly with the Ciiy Staff and/or
sultanm as t1:e [ity may require and rev exd by a m in the
t the re e+ing City Camr aoms object-s t0 anY aspec[~of the plan~the re will
m acm:plianea in the no er lafoxe the an City m n, aaa u,ewtouowi~w
ialiry statsmnt m the Zoning Ordinance - ?fie City of Innq..md will endeawr to be
receptive m ne.+:mthodolo9y and to Juliques in the rYSi9n, tun via deuzL~lnent
of land use Vfien an Architect/II:gineer/tevelorer prolnses tlanges that neet oc exceed the
wrap intent of establish mvniiman standazds the City Camission has the authority to
mrvsider and approve the changes, ctange to plan application reguixeimnts to requirn that
applications ba srgnea and sealea by a a~;l a,gineer/Ianasnape A< Cana swrveyor,
were that the buffer mPlir d for I-2 property abutting residentialthzo-:ing consider
mat ~mrx.mm~ building heights
Wunselom, lawn Care specialists, etc., be adtlea sor lure Oxirce Only 1i
12. ahe :met g mssed at 8:35 p. .and re~wned at 8:45 p.m.
13. on by Commissioner Uskert, seconded by Commissioner Grant that Ordinance No
995 to arten'~¢d by in ting in aid ordinanw. changes made sutr ue t to the first
public hearing as salt of ad spry oxmu and oUUr re sdations approved by
the City ~imission, which changes have Cee tinmrysratex3 in the final t of 1~e
ordrnance and Hie following other dianges read by Mr. Chacey. bbtron was passed on a
l9. on by Commdssioner Uskert, semnd~l by Co:snissiones C ant that ON.inanm No
495 az tarenoed, to passed and adopted. lbtron passed by a wtviv~ous roll call vote.
15. Ordinance Cb. 519 - anending Orrlinanw No. 956 eelating Tn the zeaii~mnent of the
gmgraphical limi s of the Commission Dr Auks read Ordinance No. 495 by trtle
only mr. thaceytstated that the proposed ordinance provided for the grwKb in the City
during past tw Patli D mould lave an eve g of 685 hmes and districts mould
be aLrost alual bf election dater
16. tray by Ccmmissiores O'SCary, sem~Led by Coma er 6cant that Ordinanm No
519 L passed on first reading. as passed by a wanamws roll call mote. A
Public Hearing as set for Pbnday~,bApri1w20, 1901.
17. f9r. Clwmy stated Heat due to the a~bptiw of Ordinance No. 495 i[ was necessary
that the rtembers of the Land Planning Agenry and the ward oC %]justmrot L reappointed.
18. on by (~rmissioner w mnded by Commissioner O'Leary that present ~vLw s
of the Lana Plannir~a Agenry and tte ward of esyajus4rent be xeappoin d. Obtron was
passed by wanurous roll cell mote.
19. City #A~inistratnr's Felnrt: Mr. Oiamy star d that he was still atteapting to obtain
fords for the ~PC1oEnent of a bike path en Fange Iine [road.
cey asked the Wnmission [o grant authority to pay certarn bills early when
mspanies grant a dismwt for early paynent. Chaay stated that many oa{wiles
grant a 2 percent dismwt far early paysent burl N. City F'-- rnt bec• able Tn take
advantage of the dismwts due to tM current procedure of approving bills at first
greeting of eacM1 ~ronCM1.
21. on by Co~mdssioner lnrnaem, semndea by oanmissiorer O'L_acy au arly
payrtent of ttwse bills that grant a discwst provided that sufficient fwdso are available
,n treasury. ~bnon carrica by u<,anr,~oua roll rau mote.
zz. ~t<. o,amy sratea that Hie mwty engineer naa wnancew a noise level rose of H,e
sewer plan at the skylark SEYF•S Plant and the ~roise level to residenrn was 55
Ycibels wnien was wall within use m~,ary for neise con ~Maynr app reggearea chat
Mr. Cliarny seed Mr. Smith of skylark a letter mnmming [th%1[est zzsults.
23. Chamy reported that there wzm no to present to the ies ETforcertent
[nard~ Of sere 80 warnings issued by the wlicesDeparrnent, all ce ons xecervang
25. Mr. Gamy stated That a City Map was
an the C®mmission (T,udvrt~ asked Uat
the next waeY, to check for aavrary.
26. City Attorney's wport: Mr woks sta
cerning required distanms between establ~rs.
dzstance rcytrired in venous cztres of Flonda
Rnks stated t}wt he would bring in vaxrous sm~ple ordinances Eor the Commission
to wnsider.
Rwks stated that the Cest waY to trol the ss of utility buildings w
ae ek ,~wiranems and aza no< aal.ie~~a uat the s zof at liey ahaaa wnla as
be limited if UeY ne setl+ack raluirements, mc'. Ctawy suggested that Uz ~nmission
mnsiaer ro-luiring utility sheds to Fe lowted'in the tear of Fumes.
r Uskert asked that the City osmenrn enforcenent of T}ax nevly enacted
ordin ~rsoan xitin9 sign regulatwn suggested that a permit s~miliaz to those
sed for auta~nbile safety ins~ction sticker tc used ansteaa of the metal t 9s.
29. Id~ber[ L+a asks idwn Ue ne,+ 20 g Oxdinanrn was effective and he was
advised that it waseeffective on Macch 23. 1981, the date Hie Ordinance was messed.
f ,Florida
ATTF5f:
Crty~