CCMtg01-12-81J IimguxN City Cernission
.Tanuary 12, 1901
me xonm, a city co~aaission Held ies Itzgulaz Heating v:3n p.m.
eresent Mayor Uskert
er Grant
~iepp
Canwssioner Ibniann
Mitchell
w~ia ~1 ma«y, city Aamin.iassa<or
rn Mmis, City Attorney
Ibnald ferry, City Clerk
Mayor Uskext called tln ereeting to order. Invoeatron follv..ed by pledge of all
1. A12roval of Minutes - 12/ls/8U t~gulaz IHetinq. Nn on by (ri~missioner MitcF¢11,
seconded by Qmnissioner Ibrmann that minutes of 12/15/80 SYgulaz ehxtinq L approved
as suhntitt~. I~btron carried by wanvrous wte.
Aopwvai of Minutes - 12/16/BO Wrkstwp on ?peung Advisory Camuttae. Mo w by
Mm~issioner [bxmann, seconded by Rvmdssioner Mitcbell tha f PbrKShop on
Zoning #Nisory Camuthre of 12/16/80 L approved as subnitted. Pbtron carried by
3. Mayor Uskert prnsentEil Cmmx tcMll a rtifirate of AFpmciatiw in
xcmgeution of his sexvrrns to HierCity s Gammvssorex, Urstrret Naar 5.
Mayor Uskert statsl that Fa tad rerniv~ a letter o£ xesiryation £mn !Y. Tinerthy
o'LSary cosigning fms tM Iand Planrdng Agenry cocking him eligible io asswe hxs 1
seat on the City ~mnission. l
5. '14ie City Clerk axAtinist=xed oaths of o£fi~ to ee Grant and Commissioner
Elett O'Leary. Cmissioner O'Leary asswed his sea~x thenCOnmvssron.
6. Election of Mayor aed tkputy Mayor. Mayor Uskert Sassed gauol to LYputy Mayor
Iorna~a and nav.nated Camussioner Hepp for Payor. Camuss=mer Grant notinatcd
twn iN Gamu HeFp, seconded by Como O'L?axy tlw
NNyorbb=_ closed. of CmnnissiaarlY¢pp was Camu ~app,n¢
O'leary and MaYOr Uskert wtin9aAye~ Canis and ioxnumswtug Nay.
Commissioner Hepp ass d his seat as Mayorsof the Cmrtassron.
8. Fn by ponnr seconded ty Commissirner Uskert thaT election a
MayosbFkpp be made wanurous. Cnmissionen lbrmann, o Leary, Uskert and Mayor HeF
9. Mayor Hepp passed tM gavel to Ceputy Mayor and made a irouon ttat Lb <y Mayor
carried by wanvrous m11 call wte
10. Aplaintrrent of City A[toxney and City Clerk. f on by Comissioner Gran[, sewnded
b~+ 6nmissioner Ioxrtann that ronald Terxy be xeappoibnted City Clerk. lbtron cssried by
unanvmus roll call vote.
1
11. on by Cmmr sewnded by Comissioner Usk rt that Faridn mxks
bs reappUinted City Atmmey~ lbtxon carried by unanvrous roll call vote.
12. trio 4 apmin to Land P1ar»irq P.gnnry. on by Mayor fYOp, semndea
Uy Co~mdssiorer O'Ieary that M1IlS ikeseaaxy lircher tea voted to rellace Tfr. m nntiry
Leary on Sand Planning Agency. arried by wan roll ce 1 w
Ibsemary %ircFmr gave a ve bal resignation to the City Conmrssvou resigningwherMal;minUrent
on the eoara of Fdjusumnc
13. ct z ana D ee 3 al~ni»vm„ra eo ripe wu,- of ndjnscwnt.
wra.,~r,sswtea thac sty naa wlkea wi n s;ra. sale shrnate ana rus. snonara~naanagr~
rw for an aaaitional t w w mamissioner ~ ll,,,aea by memtasiooer
Uskert that M th be xeappointaa to the Hxxd of .*djusbrent. Camussioner
stated that hevwuld na~irute a representative to the Poaxd of tYljustnent fcan
Distrvct 3 at next aee[ing.
19. Public tiearirig Ordinance No. 51.0 - ing of 16 Fangeline mxd frmi
Bl Tv Mr. Forks read Ordinance tYV. 51 title onlyig nfayor Pepp opeew.rl the Public
F'caring.
15, 7r. Carmine azaw spoke for the rezoning c£ tl~e project, s vng flat the project
originally listed for "apartments" but had Cm come ed to reflect tM intent of the
omens to buiia Con3mini~ms.
16. Forks stated that at last mexting he w s requested to aeten~ire if the applicants
mold obtain the rn Doing with Tl¢ mnaiticn that buildings be Cadpainiw~ and stipulatr
to what density the project would have. ~ir. Forks stated that any agxeenents o
mnaitions of this nature with ua city wma ~ ^c Wing' ana merefore illegal.
. Forks also statrxl that any deed re ~ plarnd w the prolKny by tre
developer mold only be enforced by futurn purchasersmo`.. tM1 pxoparty and the City mold
not legally bled the developers to the deed restrictions. If the ororerty was .rezoned to
R1, tip aeveloPers mold use the property for any use permitted by RN zonir+e.
17. Mr Ferry, resident of Fangeluie Paced; smoke against the xezon.i.ng, statiey Uat
wile prq~rtyseas first Sostrx3, Yln ass of property was 1 s apazVrents. Ar. Forks
SrarEa that t1n iaporrant iss~re was uve tun tuning, nor w>ffiu,aa xne use wma bet apart,renrs
or mna~air~iwe.
18. Mr. Max3c Pabenwritz slake against the xezrninq, curing intential flora hazards.
Me. Cazudne Br stated that his clients would not in t 5300,000.00 in a flora prone ama.
stated that City Pdminis[rator tad Previously stated that the area wind Ce less
e££e ~ w'r¢r EM zoning that present B1 zoo
19. Arango spoke for Ure re ordng. Arango stated mac M was n
landlord but a developer and wantsd ro build wFatMwas best Eor Ixn9wri3. Ne wlwteered
to censer any spxific question or reservation alnut Project.
20. Mr. Jim ICeins rri spoke against the project c ring additional traffic amgestion.
Mr. Arango stated t}~at traffic mngesti.on uvula terless for mndanieuws than office buila: n;
21. Mr. Larry Colaterg and 1~1rs. Vicgiriia Warner spoke against xezoeung Property.
22. ves questioner] whether City's s Plan Ordinance was ccn
and enformab e ~Mr. Forks stated that he tlnught tF questions tun min9stheuCity's
lan orainanw inwlwa me aegree of aiscrecion Permittea the m~mission ana ra,ae
tFieorevnau~der of tta Ordinance was enforceable.
23. tY rated that if the p wenforceable, the City
uvula to better off wvm a rznm xestrictearzonvtg fornpxoperty.
Nr. t~coks stated ma after xe twin9 Ne J age's preliminary dr rn Ure Nandy
way Law Sv.t, the xulingidid apwazvfn strike dam and declare rte City's Site Plan
orathanm w venal ana unenforceable. rnr. mks remanded mat c y versa
sent o~~mtitn
25. zV.'s. P~rrane Perry spoke against the rezoning, erring lotential flood hazazds.
26. on try Cartm er Inxmum, seconacd by Came Ieary that Fublic
Fbazing Lc closed. tbtvon was carried by unaninous rollrcal.l mote.
2]. Ccmmissio O't¢ary discussed Me reasons why the LPA xeam~ded that request
!~ denied. G issioner O'SZaey stated that if aeveloi~rs mold guarantee that
mnda;aniws would create less annsity than office buildings, r might be desirable.
O'Ieary suggested that in of pcoblans Ireing exrerienaxl by Tem;em
that [ertaps nothing should be built onvproperty at ttus tyre.
xmazin questrored wtren Drama StWy would kn mnQleted. r. Charey
stated studyvhadrb?en ax;pletea. TTe study assorted that the pxnperty in questron mould
Lre covered try JS percent and the only requirerent was that developers had to make provisims
to retavn a 10o yeaz storm on property.
29, frnmissioner ngnranm grastioned what steps City was taking to stgz flarl hazazds.
Mc. Chacey statea tlwt City was planning to build a "pap off" to ter; the City
at[enpting to obtain to aivext water under Pangeline Pcad to PNd lake but
that approximately lfl e re required. Cartrtissioner ra total that perhaps
the City slwuld wait until the floes control wrk was m~Qletsa. Ccemdssiorer Fran stated
that study conducted by Sveroent and Purrel indicated the area was safe even leforetthe
"lvp off" work was ax;plet¢d.
30. Mr Iboks stated Mat tJV ¢mnission should hake their decision based on ffie higMSt
anv3 best use of the prol~rty. Mayor Hepp stated toot he mould like to know what is m]ung
in tacause people am mnmrned about fla~iing.
31. IACtion FY Cmmissiorier Ionnsem, semnoad by Commissioner Uskert that Ordinance No.
510 ba deni.ed until flood control projects are m;pleted. Mr, Fooks state] theee was 1
ra requirement for developees to subv.t site plans for rezoning requests.
3z. cremiesiw,era lormann ana Uskert wiMarcw Meir nora.on ana semna.
33. on by come semwea vi m~missioner uskert u,at orainan« No. slo
be Y.abled until we ci~a w troi worx in s ~mlet~a a;,a u,at a sauna ~anl.ic nearing
~ held and public ratified before final actvon ss taken by Crnmission. INtion cazxied g'
a unanvmus roll call vote.. '
34. Public Neazing, Orainance No. 511, re Ming of Florida I+asidential Comnmmity property
north o£ Ionq..a]d Bills Foaa frwn RI/Bl tnzR2. Mr. [+mks read Ordinance tbl 511 by title
only.
35, guard Icikwitz o£ FFC sp;JCe for the m Doing, s [v;g Mis Iv.s anpany was
xetNescing Doing dm to the configuration of Me property; that the majority of
hales would to SocatEd on RS size lots; that all hares mould racer Rl standards in size.
Izfko+itz stated Chat a sv;uliar revue Fad been approved for the original ^i1 roe
and Mat Me density of Me rnzcnsd property would be Secs Man other 1lberrn devclopients.
36. Mr Kircher spoke against the rezoning and gcestionrea wneMer FIS wwlla Fave
to oxplyflwiM present or proposed R2 zoning Dorn then ing ordinance is passed.
Aaiks stated that FFC would nave to osply with Ux~on ng Ordinance in effect when
sure plan approved.
1
37. Mr. Ibtert paves statal Uut proposed R2 zming Formitted duplexes. ,`
and suggested th t special exmpi:ions to requested
for those rug ftt~sUndards. nr y rated Mat special exceptions
..onla navel o go ~for~ me soara of luljusrrnm~ce
-J
40. Alrs. Ethyl Goldberg <luestiomd if rzbdel properties mould rema Tiberon,
ing they created confusion f residents. Lefkoaitz s ated th mould
cost $150,000.00 to mwe them tvonew site and [he micany did not planato hove them.
41. Crnmissioner G tared that Mr. I¢fkowitz had been a res6vnsible builder and
thought the City should art ~L to work Things out with him.
42. S ve Kirohez stated that he cemed itat s ounding are ht be
damyradedtif the zoning was loner to R2s m 1¢MOwitz stated that surmvnrling
property was ~minole Cowry and zoned A1k.ttMr. Iefl:witz regcested that Gsmission
a aecisio„ eonighe.
43. Mr &wks stated that the Crnmission uvula delay a request for rezoning due to
a z ing change in ,mg ess but the delay must be a reasonable one.
44. Camus Ieaty questicmed why Mr. Iefkwaitz had not attmpted to obtain
panrission frran the Fvard of #ljustrmnt. I¢tkowitz statsi cleat he had ds cussed
his probjeK with individual Camussioners a'rcl they had lsl him to believe that the
rezoning of pzoimrty was the best approach.
45. Mr. George R. Uarze-.rood asked that the City Gmdssion novY ahead with the new
Ong and stated that he objected to rn passing the acct a Citizen's
Advisory Camittee. Crmmissioner Ibxmann stated that the Citizens Advisory Gmuttre
s a~inr d at rha reyvest of congwaa citizens. r~r. r~merxa awt~ a,at ne was
cemed grout the lack of direction of rte Cvmission and lack o£ progress in pushing
projects To ompletion.
46. 16e Cmmission recessed fmm 9:50 p. m. w it 10:00 p. m. at which tine the Public
Heazing was reswed. There were m further mmpnts after the ~reetina was resu 3.
47. tbtion by Camiissiorer Uskert, seanr~ by Camussronex' Inxmann That Public Heazinq
L closed. Nntaon was Passed by a wanvrous mote.
48. Mr stated Nat Cannissioner Grant had rslrestcd that he think of vxrcway to
solve the problem of contract zoning. Mr. Rwks staT~ thece were two ways, o would
to to follow the suggestion of C<mnussioner O'r~y that special e%rnptio.~is bengranTS3
for arose lotr not neeting RS standazds aed the other mould L for £R+C to withdraw their
xsluest for rezoning and to sukmit a request for a Plawed Unit 6::veloEne t.
49. rmsnn guestimed whetMC property was large enough for a PW and Mr.
R»ks stated that is was.
so. retkwitz awtea Nat if it as ayreeable m the c~nn on re wma ragceat that
Ne Camus m table the request for r miml to perndt him to review the requirenrarts for
PUD develrp ent. Hayor xepp stated Nat he thought this weld be a beneficial nerve £or all.
51. Naticn by Mmissiaier Oskert, s mnd3'1 try Camuissioner Grant that Orden .511
be tabled until .ianuary 19, 19N1. ~btron was caxrred by wawvus roll Call vote.
City ArMinistrator's rep_+rt: Chamry a gore appnintezs to
the Irong cn3 Code Ei~formnent -d'~ nnann suggestei that since all nacres
vere not available, Nat the naning of menM sobe delaye3 until January 19, 1981.
53. 931 can ruing .industrial waste was adopted in
19]] as ~meryency Ordviance which auota~aticallyexpires wiilvn 61 days, rated That
Ordinance was necessary and desirable and ague red autho y peepaze another orduanrn
w subject.
54. m by Crnmissioner Innwin, seconded by Camussioner O'[eary that City rerlra£[
ONinance tb. 431. Nbtrm rased by wanrrtous roll call win.
55. Camuss Iormann cequesd that the City #bninistzator 'rake a Sta of the
City Re{nrt.zOefr gacey then re[»rted on planned and current projects for ralendaz yeaxl.
1981. ~
56. City At rney's import: Pr. Pmks xsryested authorization to and make
remmendatims cramming changes W the Ordinan~z No. 388 on SvterPlan Nevvew.
5]. tbtim try Camu ner Ipria3nn, seconded by Co'mu er O'Ieaxy [o authorize
City Attorny to d zedraft as nesssaxy Ordinance No. 3P9. wntrm carried
by wanvrous roll call mote.
58. !m. Rinks stated that he had bee in contact wiN t9r. Mack Cleveland, Attorney
for Sanford-Orlando I(eiv~el Clvb m rning their IX:cupatimal Lv se for current yeaz.
stated that he thought pra3xess had been made and thought problan mold be
resolved smn.
59. Mr. Rvks relwrd that Ordinance Pb. 233, a vi.visim Ordinan an need of
and revision aril rembsted autMrity to snh. it a revised ordinance with necessary
changes.
60. Potion W C<mnissioner Loxrtann, seconded by Cmmissione [ISkert to auGrorize City
homey to re ew and draft as necessary Ordinance No. 233 m SWdivisious. tbtlnn
passed ~' a unanvrous roll call mote.
61. Mayor acd Cmmv I~poxts: ant questiored when City MNnnistrato
planned to mmence paving the north eM of waymineStr~t. 1r. Cnamy stated it xuld
deI^nd cyan the ._.. venues available To City and he stadr these had been delays vn
remrpt of tax revenues thi. yeaz due to the TRIPE Bill.
62. Uskert reported m the status of the Juvenile of the Yeaz (SOY)
award a~na ~e~.~a that 4 of s sa,mis has ay a to participate and ~ ocher slxol
weld probably pazticipate as xell. Nvmnataons are due February 9 and presentatims
will re made February 23, 1981.
63. Crnmissioner O'Irary questimed status of bike path m Range Lire Poad and t4.
Qracey stated that the grant requested for the bike path had tx~nn tamed dam. Pm.
Chacey stated that furthec aitmpts xuld ke made to have bike paths installed.
64. Camdssioews ioxnsm repored on tle std of the Hr cal Cmvm m for tim
Ia,m+mal B, and aa~isea rhattehe cannissim, naa m rno~ir reo~nenae<l
approval oP anroffimvbuilding requesrc><3 by Mr. Oovn o to m trotted on Fine
asked that the City Cxmussiorervgiw concept aprroval to the ptrolrx'ect.
his presenC and displayed a drawing o£ the pcoprsed building.
stated thatait mould Ce a small building consisting of approximately 1,400 sSVaze fset~
on by Ctnmv rand bf Camassipner O'ieary that Camussim
the concept ofvtheroffim bbuilding on Pvere Street subai[Na by Mr. tbranrca.
Pbtrm tarried by unanvrous roll call mote.
66. zported m the latest GS tl ~reetinq and she stated Nat na~Cer
o>ncerr d about an Ordinance end ed Iry ~iunole County mncoming precious
cities mmdesimer w:nann star a cnac trues wa concerned that w ordinance by
~minole Cowty rep send an authority of City to and she suggestctil
that C ty Attorney mvrew Nc Oxdwnce arv] prepare an ordnance fornimgwod mnce ing
Precvous PfeNls.
67. Nbtion by Comm secwdW by Cmmr rt ti!at City Attorrey
few ~iinole Cowtyrordinanm ww previous metals andspreper sere ordinance for the
City of Sony g veming precious ne[als. tbtron carried by wanv:nus roll call vote
require that liqudr establishments to at least 500 feet apart. C
also rn~rted tiwt she had been elected Chairman of the Iongwoa3 Hmu calrCOmnv
and Treasures o£ the Cowcil of Iocal Co s (CHINO). She questioned whethersany
of the other ~mussioners might desire these [rests and she was asked to serve in these
sty.
69. Nntion by Comm ewnded by Comu Uskert that City pay
approved bills. thrtron carried bf unanrnous roll callswte.
7D. Mayor Hepp rcxlixsted tFrat City Pdrtanistcator rlhecJC into the condition of a small
lake near his here in Skylazk.
71. TTe Cmmission adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
~ty~