CCMtg09-08-8027tl
Iongvrgd City Caimission
Septenber 8, 1980
ahe city ca,.nission of the city of lnngwma, Florida s a eoara of Fquali:ation
for the pavemant and iaq~rovarent of stxee and the insiall.aticn of water line
drainage and se,.orage lines in the area know az the [nn9wocd Adustrial Pazk.s
Present Mayor tlskert
Ca:missiceer Grant
Hepp
Cmmissicner Ign~aN,
Mitchell
CavidsQ~aceY, City AAninistrator
ronald Terry, City Cleric
Mayor Ilskert called tin freeting to order at "I:05 p. .
1. L. Mirn3o gcestim,ed the extent o£ i~rovzmnts. Mr. Cnacey stated
that iapmvements would include installing a 12 inch water line, 26 foot. streets
with 1 and 1/2 indi cap applied over soil cement plus ary sewerage lines and
drainage. The as t £ee does not include serer hcokups; w uvula be avail-
able at the front of each pr~exty and each individual tenant avst anstall a ,mtri'.
2. Payne N carry questioned whether a lift station would be available; whether
.ormlines would is usable withrnrt lift statiq,; whetlrec s t lights were included
and ra'pnsted additional infonration. Mr, cnaoay statea that the lift sta mould
not L installed imrediatzly and the dry serer lines mould not to usable; Nat the
i~mveaents had not been let for bid and that Final as mold not exceed
thirty one cents per square fmt. Street lights mould h=_sprovided by Florida Po.,er.
3. Bill Oahe questioned why as sirents were pade m basis of square footage
rather than Fmnt fwtage. ar. (Rarey stated that in vie+ of the range of ir~pmvearants_
being made, tM square taNage assess,mnt was tin fairest way to app rtion cysts.
liage, rePresentin9 his Nbther, Iz en Rage, objected to sling ii,n
m square foot basis, s ting Uat he had a small Piece of property ce road
but a lot a squae footage. Mr. Hage questioned whether he mould }e required to hroktgr
and water line Mr'. Cnac_ry advised that he mould not unless septic tanks
ware to cm,tann.nate xslaaa lake.
s. c woia saretree mn-soon a the ti.nn fra~a for mmwno-~,~nnt ana m~plation
of work. nu. Chacey stated u,at it resolution re passea ne n~,ea to time loan
on Septenber 9, 1980 with m in aPproxi.~tely one nenth and an
tinated oa,pletlon date o£n90 daysaftet thmmencennnt of constrvction. Me. 4rtetrse
q,nsticsed when Lift B would ~ in nlZraticn and Mc. (harry stated that he mold
not g1w an estvrate whenrstatim would to in operation.
6. Mr stated that he thought the thirty one cents per squaw fmt was
hign but that he grin fawr of the inpmvements.
lingo questimed whethec it would be ne sary m
and sewetlinesr Mr. Chacey strted that it as her option unless Uvirtceptic tank
tansnatieg area Mrs. Mingo questioned whether m was ad ~uate
aawv statea inat~a arai„age stagy nag peen aow~latsa ana why :am~nnaations
were i~slsaented, M believed it world alleviate the drainage problem. ~
8. C Fobart Oaves questioned what collateral weld 1>' used for financing. Mr
Chacey stated that F)>e property of the wners and the steets would be used for
collateral and no other revenue source uvula he mnsidexEw3.
279
9. Ntrtian by Commissioner Hepp, semnd by Gm`issioner Mitchell to close Board
o£ G]ualization. Motion passed on unaninous roll call vote and aeeting waz closed
at J:35 p.m.
Inngwuod City Crnmissiq:
SepteA '' fl, 1980
the City 6mnissiw~ of the City of Iong..md, plorida sa a Board of E:iualization
for the paving of wayman E t fran its u~TCrsectron with State Read 434 to its
rntexsectron with Orange Avenue.
Present: Mayor Uskert
Camvissioner Grant
Ccmtdssioner Bepp
Crnrtissioner It>menn
Cvmissiorer Mitchell
pavid ChaceY, City xAninistrator
Marvin Fod:s, City Attorney
Nnald 1prry, City Clerk
f4ayor Uskert called the neeting to order a[ >:35 p. m.
Mrs. elearar tapelle
the rteeting. 14', imoks stated that every regulation and pxoceduze waz m~Qlied. with
wing with the paving o£ Wayman St all persons had been wtifisl
by mail~and that adsertisemnts had toen placed in the Sanford Berald. Ma Oskert
rated that the late hour was not tumal and that Ne matter was bmught
by a Crnmrssroner during tus reio4t.~
2. Mr at ebjectad to the paving of Wayman straet and cited one letter
fmm (~CC$ that indicated that at one tvre the baN: was willing to assist the
City in paving portions of Nayman strset but Nat the plan was not Tied fo 'd.
citd reasons of financial hardships o silents, in ceased traffic fla+
and safety factors for opmsing the paving of Wayman st fie. Neat also questioned
the nece sity to charge residents 8 [zrant interest and why Wayman St ring
re than land Avenue. Ctacey explained that the assessrent price for paving
wayrtan was less than t1r. Nnat thought.
3. er L rmaem inquired hoa many re represent representing
waymen Stsiffit Hdmaners and a rhos of hands revealed six persons.
9. Mr. W mmended ttwt the City pay Eor paving all s Teets in irmgxgwi
and Nat Hie w~abe paid thi ugh in reared tares. Mr. Danat suggested that the
rssue be plaadson the ballot and letting the citizens decide.
5. on by Cmmissiornr Hepp, sewnd bi Cammissiornr lornann Nat Boned o£
m izatim for wayman Btreet Ce closed. IYrtaon carried bf unaeum~us vote and
`meting was closed at 8:10 p.m.
2~~) Lmgwad City Caanission
Septemler 8, 1980
1fie Iengmxl City C ission held its mlular meeting at 8:15 p.m.
Present: Mayor Uskert
Carvnissioner Grant
er Henp
Mitchell
wv~iasaa«Y, city A~kniniaeramr
Marvin Froks, City Attorney
Ibnald Tarry, City Clerk
Mayor Uskert called the neeting to orffir. Snuacation follaued bf pledge of allegianre
to the [mired states eLeg. The ta8c recorder was not wrkin9 pmpesly during rteeting.
1. Approval of minutes - 0/25/80 Pegulax Meeting. Potion by Coandssioner titchell,
nd M' Co n approve min of 8/25/80 as sutmitted.
Chacey stated that he Iwdum Rly given tIV= term D.E.A. as the authorizing agency
for Ciw,aiw.s in lake aa,~e anma me maert agency was e.P.A, tParagrapn lot. ro
by Caimx Mitchell, second by Cmmissioner Iornaev: that mmutes of 6/25/80 be
approvedsas naerended. Gbtion was carried on wanvrous vote.
Amroval o£ nunutes - 8/2]/50 i^brkshop on mamrtendations Uf Charter Advisory
Gnmittee. an by ~mussimex tnxmvm, s wnd by Commissioner Mitclnll to
aq:rove minutes of 8/2]/80 as sutmitted. lotion carried on imanvmus wte.
3. Approval of minutes - 9/4/80 Fbrlcstxn a~ Bulger. on by Cortnr
onand by C ~e er liepp to approve minutes of 9/4/50 as submittrd~a [btion~carried.~
4. Public Participat xiod~ Skylark subdivision spoke aWUt the
iaproveaen oted inrthePSkylazk rseaer Plar~t and thanked the Camivssron for their
efforts inthaving tl'e i~rovements maw.
5, f IUy F1utte stated FSwt a building permit has 1 n issu;a £or Iqt 5, Block 25
to !ti•. 1b Lwdsford. rated tlut it appeazed that C4. Lwdsford waz atte~ptinc
separate the lot in half and M wautrd to knov what the City could do to Prevent it,to
Mc. [oaks stated that here was no xaluirairent for accuracy for itgrs filed ~mder the
Fi:chanics Lien Law but that it did not give person any right to airy ro of act
Mr. Chacey stated that the City mold not keep tor. Lundsfexd from sellingehalf ofrthe
lot but that a penN.t mold be denied. Mr. Rroks stated that M would have to look
.veto the situation further.
6. Mr. &~tert Caws reg:csted a ropy of the approved budget for next yeaz, st
that the City (lwrter requires that the buageC be mr{:letd try Sept crier 1. M1b
Lacey stated tlut the provisions of the Chartr were srQ.ersed?d by the State Iaw
(Trim Hill) due to late receipt of prcgerty tax rolls.
]. Mazkwitz autmitted a written s and asked what the Ctmr¢ssion
tended to m in carrying Uut its mspaisibilitres under Section 3.0"1 0£ the City
CMrT¢ because of Mayor Uskert's alleged violation of the City Charter in preventing
Mr. Robert Raves frrm attending the Camnssion greeting on August 11, 1980 and fox
wing orders to GieF of Police Gregg Maeuiing. [ Rinks sUted that his associate
a. O.ms, had briefed him m the events and that^if Mr. Davos had such a T shirt on 1
would 6x mnsidemd deregatnry and xould he gxo~sds for exclusion and that the '
decision W exclude t7r. Wws Frad hen made before the neetin9 b'<Ian. t4 Markonitz
led that the tNyor had taken an oath to ~Iwld the Constitutim of the United States
d that his a violated this oath, 4r. tHrkoxitz stated that Mayor U5Y had no
autlwrity to 9~!'exoChief Manning orders.
~s
0. ~nmissioner [ pp stated that efayor Uskert's orders w dvief LNnning wu'e given
to Chief M ing in his capacity az Master at Arns. Cmmissionez }pxmvn; {uintcd out
tnat no fon;tal chatye had been rta~ against Mayor Oskert. Mr. Rvks stated tnat he
was not surn that any citizen mold ilutaate a chazge.
9. Mayor Uskut stat=e that he diM't Celiew that ne had aa,e anything wrong; that
1p had not mwternanaed any orders and had in fact gr en Chief Maru;ing instrvctions
in his capacity as - Marknowitz stated that the Mayor was m
in his a N [tn building but that he waz not autlmrizea to tell the Chiefro£
Police nowt tospemti.t soneona to nice in.
10. statsa t}at he had rereiuea an order in the aftemmn from the Chief
of Police notsto to the rtcetrng. restated tnat he had asked Quef Mxuilnq
if he ~mderstmd the legal irtq;limtions of this actr rated that he
withdrea his right to sue on the basis of Laing granted his right to attend ;let _ .
11. Mr. RnY statW that he vould revie.+ the Charter b;R ne L lieved tlwt a potion
slwuld Lc started by a Cmmissionee - tlut Mr. Mazkasitz nad made the C~nnission
are of his q>i~ti Mr. Amks £elt that sere type of Proredure should be established
tO handle situations such as this.
12. Mr. B. D. SinQSOn spake, state3 that he agrtea that Mr. Dews' rightr had been
~iolatea and s,~ggestea mat me maixer ewla be aettlea !coigne and that the i~arties
sl,oula atteape to ao ae.
13. on try Comu Mitchell, second try Coandssirner Inrnann that M1tr. PuDks
be i.ns~tNCrEa w rewi w,mt~ erecter m a~tez,~ine wnat pm dnx'es should ba £ouoeea.
I~btion was d=ried by a 3 to 1 wtc with Mayor Uskert abstaining due Tn wnflitt of
ssvw;er Hopp wring Aye, Commssronexs Grant, lomarin and Mitchell
wtin9sMay, ~v
14. nez Bepp stated that P believed that sone actron was nernssaxy to
cleaz the issue up.
15. Ordinnno=_ t1o. 499 -Public Haazinq. increasing ;ninthly fee for sewage txeatnent
Mr. Rvks read the ordinance by trtle only. TMxe was no discussion either
£or o~against the increase vn sewage treatrent service fron n~dv s of Tln audience.
16. on by IX.mnissi.a; Mitchell, second by Crnmissioner Gzant that Ordinance
No. 494 to adopted. Ibtron cazriea by a wannmus mll call wte.
17. Ordinance No. 498 -Operation of water Systan, inclwling razsing water ra
Mr. Pocks read the Ordinance by title only. 1 m by Cannissi¢~er tNtcnell, second
try Coumissioner Hepp that Ordinanrn No. 49H be passed on first reading. Motron was
carried by a wanvrous roll call wte.
1H. ai by Crnmissio r ~titrhell, second by Gcnmissia;er Ion~wvi that the Public
azing for Ordinar;ce tane998 to set for Malay, October 13, 1980 at 7:30 P.m. Irotvon
tarried by vnannmvs roll call wte,
19. t ra'luested that Mr. Q;acey explain o a;Hience s ce
they maY rrotle aw anof what in Mr. (Reedy advisedathattwatre' ra
rsed £xan 53.85 m $4.00 fox the first 5,000 gallons and from 45 cents to 50 cents
£oseeach additional 1000 gallons.
20. solution No. 400 - roviding for the pauznent and inpro~arent of str and
the installation of water lines, drainage and se:.erage lines i ongwmd N trial P k.
. mks read by title only stating that resolution reaffixmsnthe advisabil ty and
necessity £or inQeovemntr.
28`L
21. Ns. Gus Pattemon questronal whether the City had revived any bids for the
inpmvpsents. tfr. Chawy stated ro but that any inpmveimnts to the p Sv1ty wind
not excc~d 31 rents per squaze fwt. ,
,
22. [boon by Nmussioner Hepp, second by Camdssimer ttitGell that Pesolution ~
tb. 908 to adoE2ed.
23, Hage quustioned about the security for the loan and whether other
property o:mers would lu rnsi»nsible in r forfeits. Forks stated
t
Cut omperty lierywuld b=_ filed agains
earh individual wmer and tbat in the
t of forfeiture, property mould In sold. Cb other Omer would be m]uized to
make up Paymant.
24. C missiw~er Uss. gwstiorod whether representatives of lon9wa3 Adustrial
park were in fawr of the inQrove~rents. Cmmdssioner Grant staT¢d that he was
sueprised that ero t present. rage stated that they wer of
e n
~e
n
infoxrted of anytl~in9
fl~e past
until Cey were ze:luested to dcnats 25 feet of
property. Comrtissioner Grant stated that rtost property amem had xoques[ed that
the irtprovmrents to rude.
25. M1btion to approve Resolution No. 400 was a~mut 1 by a wanirtous roll call
vote.
26. Resolution No. 409 -Approving Prnnissory Note tic. 102 to L issued to Gtl"B~4 J
sa~inole aunty and aulJ~orizing the execution thereof. P7r. R'nks read by title only.
2J. on try worm er Grant, s mood by Camdssionec lemkvln that i~solutinn No.
409 L ad pted, Matron carried by wanvrous roll call wtc.
tor
28
tl
t
d
u
i
t
dd
th
(b
i
i
d
h
3i
1
.
.
wcey reques
e
perc
ss
on
o a
ress
e
nm
ss
m an
t
e a~e
ence.
i~ stated that it had tales four yeazs ro get the project in Ca ground. Eie said
that 'thd tbshes got the PmJwt stari:ed and Andy A~roroso succeeded him in pushing
Lor the irtQmvemants. Mr. ChaceY and ¢rmissim~sr Grant pmsented Mr. Pm~
Cartifirate o£ Apprec or the many hoots o£ hard wore dewt~ to the project.
M
I
d
l
th
l
r.
vromso state
f
at
e project was on
y a success tNay to tM1¢ wtxring effor[s
of Mz. Ciucey.
29. Resolution No. 4 - psovidin9 £oe tF¢ ivproverrent, repair, and se clog of Waym ari
tenet £mn its inteesection with Grange Avenre to tersectr¢~ with State Axd
rn
434. Mr. Pwks mad Pewlufion Ns. 41o by title only.
30. Mes. eleanor Iapelle, Mr. war ronat and Mr. Steve Chapran spoke against PavirN
Wayman Street. Mr. Gwp~an stated flat he thought tfe City should pay 50 ~rcent and
tl,ae indivia~al ovners par zs pera.°nt.
31. on by Comnissioner Hepp, sewnd by Nmissioner Inrnarin to adwt IZ?solutim
No. 430 on £ailed by a 3 to 2 mote, Nom Doer Hepp and Mayor Uskett wtino
Aye and Cpmdssioners Grant, Ioxrtaeu~ and MitcMllrvoting Nay.
32. Nntron by Comm sewnd by Camussioner Grant that City pay full
amxmt of itiayman Stmet paving~a
33. Cmmissiones tkpp sUted that ~proval o£ Comrussioner Inrnwn's notion mould - '
~£eat Ce long zange plans of the City for paving stxee ce the City cam
af'POrd to pave Out on each year. Camussion Hepp stated that if C'e t
e '~
,
City makes one exxption, then it weld he regcested
to make additional ex ptions.
gas
39. ¢zmus Mitchell stated that he lwd brought up flu reconsideration of
p wing wayman S[reat but that he Fawrad the City picking rY~ fifty percent o£ cost.
35. Cmmissioner Grant stated that Wayman Street is a thoroughfare and that he did not
vote to abandon tl'e paving of Waymsn street eazlier.
36. th yor Uskert made a rtotron to anend cmmissioner toniann's ~rotvon fiat all stxeEts
in Ixmgwcd be paved rn Uat tasis.
37. Cam~issimer tennaem stated that sM no longer c~essidered her notion a good idea
and requeeeea rnae it to wimarawn. ~m155io~r r, t venlir a m wiudraw nis eeaona
as defeated by a 4 to 1 wFe wtvtq Aye and
Caimissoners F>epp, Iarmann and [Atchell and !ffiyorrUSkeKrwting Nay.
38. M1btion by Cmmissiim Mitdrell, semnd by Ramussim;ex Grant that Waynan Street
bs paved and that paving assess~ent be fifty Fermat £or City and 25 and 25 for
harewners. Son was defeated bf a wte of 3 to 2, Cortmissiceers Grant and Mitchell
wring Aye, Gxrmissioners Hopp and Iornann and Mayor Uskert wring Nay.
39. on by Cmmissioner Ioenw~n, seamd by Comm Hep2 that a wrkshop Ce
scheduled for Nbnday, ~ptarbex 15, 1990 at 2;00 p.mssto consider paving of Snng~,m3
40. 1'd?wlutron No. 411 - autlwrizin9 installation and nau~teew~ce of traffic lights
UpF»site 1Wmsiup Plaza in order to obtain approval for Fennit from p.O.T. which is
reguired tefpm traffic Light can Ca installed. Mr. CAa2y stated these later on the
light will be maintained by Seminole County by agx'eenent Ueneen Seminole (bwty and
L n9wr1.
41. on by Gams tiechell, semrd trY Came Hepp that Fesolutiat
No. 411th ailed 's6s~ron~ ca led by a imarwous rollyrall wte.
42. Petitrm Eras Mr. N. A. Caiazca for arnexation of Staten natel, F(ighway 17-92.
4r. Fooks stated that this was a luntary ann and wnat was mprired was
direction £rmn the Cazmission to tle City Attnmey to prepare an Ordinance mvaring
43. on try Crnmt Mitchell, s and by Commissioner Grant that City At mey
prepare Orditunce annexing Staten Nbtele trotron carried on a unanvrous roll call wte.
99. Site Plan for Shannon s Wkuttle Shed Nklition, say}.ood Lsslustrial Park.
Mr. Chawy strted that site was pmpsrly zoned, that there were no drainage ox
pazking problere and that the City £Tgineer did not find any problems.
95. wn by Cmmissioner Mitchell, semrc3 by Crnmissioner Ionians to acrnpt
Site Plan for shatssgn-4Aittle. Protvon carried by unaeumsus mll call wte.
46. Site Plan fox IIJPERIEC Csq nests, Inc., Aaymd Industrial Pazk. Mr. Chacey
stated that site was prolerly zoned, not flood pane, that landscaping was adequate, that
pazking lot wuLd be mtlched to provide green area and that a light would Fe added w
plan. the holding pond is adguate Eox a one rnch rain then owrflw into Florida
Poor CmpanY drainage easelrent.
9). on by mmaissi®,e= crane, s road iry cSSai«ter ron1 to acarpt s.r
plan for INf£A'FG Caapanents, Inc. trotron carried on tmaeSrtous roll call wthte
48. Mr. Cnacey stated that he sad L en wrking to obtain additional grants in aid
for iongwod and one way could to for the, City to provide 1ou and noderate in
housing. He stated that Fe had teen xoxking with a Mr. Wilson, President of ~amic
Program Planning and he has azranged fox Mr. Wilswl to brie£ the Cwmussron. Chacey
~a~
aaggestea mat th~ cma~issionrs vrsit sanfora u,ia wz J: to look at no»si„y projects
and ewo next ~:. rt was aqr a oat ~,. ro Grant and rnraan„ and ibyor uskart
ww.a visit sar,£orU ene wax of SeptemUes e and caeaissiw,ers outa,ell and Hepp rrs
reek of Septenter 15. 11
49. Mr, GtarnY stated mat the Cyemission needed to ret a date for the Iand Use Clap.
Mr. Fboks suggested that ire ~nnission establish rules for participation and whether ~
moon discussions were going th be permitted. Camdssioner C an tatad that he was
an fawn of open discussion. w agrmd to have a xoxk session on 1Vesday,
~pt~ 23, 1900 at ]:30 p. ro=t
50. City A omey's IYport: R'~olcs stated that he needed a mttion that City
Attorney draft an Ordinanre inmrpomtiny the approved s o£ the
Cliar'F r Advisory Certrtuttee for inclusion on the ~carbee 2nd ball t~ Mr. ks
read approved remm`endations fran minutes o£ Augnt 2], 1980. Carztdssioner Inmann
suggest d that the City Attorney lurk into Atticle 3.OSb on subject of misconduct acss3
ewes and see if that ee on n as re iny. ~>r. IFS said u,at ne wma rev,.ew and
have answrers for nxt [rondaY's ne~ting.~
51. Mr. Pinks stated that it was time to determine wlwt direction to Pureed in the
Hendry Way sui Qymussioner Mitchell questionel whether he tad obtained any in£or-
mtim as to whether the property Iwd teen split. Mr. Rwks stated that he mold
See no ~fer,se ~m,aer the stilaivision oratnance.
52. Virginia Warner stated tYat she had talked with several a meys and
they L liewd that sinrn Handy Way was "spot zared", that it was mssible that
it mold be xe cored to prevent Handy Way fxm gainino site plan approval. She s ated
that she felt very strongly aL ut not granting apomval arsl tint she mould initials
a sort to pmvent tffi C'ty from negotiating a settlerrent. ~'
53. Cm~missioner Ioxnaan questioned wMther Cmmissionus wem individually liable
for their rn the Handy Way sur 9u stat_d that she had voted against the
[e plan L cause ttat was what the purple wanted but that theic petrtion appamntly
didn't nean that m~rh. C1r. Rwl:s stated that for tM present the suit was only a
t of Mandamus but that he uvula he k to sin if them was any fexamai liability.
(Tmnissicner Leant stated that Crnmissioners xere personally liable if t}ay £ailed to
obey ttn law.
59. ~mnissioner Yepp gnstioned whether The citizen muldn't get an inj~mctim
to stq~ the City fzpn settling suit. Cfr. [droks stated that ws uvula 1K away to sate
exinnse th tl>e City.
55. Mrs. Virginia Waxrier stated that ste tMught City mould have a gma case with
idea of rezoning pminzty. iboks stated that he was open to suggestions but that
to did erot mink re Doing was proper action attempt. tested it was past ti.~re
when City needed tozmalce decision an matter. thRYte Cmnedssionsagrced to have Cfr. Rooks
lurk loin rezoning idea. Mr. Rwks stated that a final decision im~st Fs made next weep.
56. Mr. [mks was req:vsted to delay retwrt on Coae Enforcarent Poard wtrl next week.
5). Nayor atd Camdssioner's [Y. rts: Cmrtassiw~er MitcMll sugyestsd mat City
matth 5405.00 the Fire L+epsrtamnt made thrwgh their dinner and contributions for
the purchase of furniture for fire statron.
285
58. Camissimer Mitc]iell also sated Ghat Mr er s lot on (fiuzch Street
wa again filled with debris and needed cleaningrya~
Mayor Dskcrt read a Proclanation pxoclamv:g Tuesday, ~cmber 2nd, 1980 as
Election Wy for the cnneral City Election. Com~n~rent of qualificatim: i
CtFi~ber 3, 1980 and qualification ends on O:.tnber 11, 1980. Districts up for
reelection h}us year am Dis[riR 3 with Commissioner Grant and Distric[ 5 enth
Camussrmer Mitchell.
Tne cmnussion adjourned at 10:9] p.m~.~ ,~
Lryo CiG ng:.oo3, Florida
~T: