CCMtg09-15-80WSImgxmd City Caimission
~pt~nber 15, 1960
9ie Irmgxmd City Cmmission Bret in a wrksh<q, sessron to discuss city {nlicy in
future pving of Stm9too3 streets.
Present fHyor Oskert
~mnissicner G
Camussioner Heppt
(bnmissioner In
C~mnissioner Mitchell
Wvid Cbarny, City NAUnistrator
Dcnald 1Erry, city clerk
Mayor Uskert called the special work sessrm to order at 2:10 p. m.
2~7
1. After considerable discussion m ming future paving of Ipngwcod City streets,
the ~nnissirn mashed the follvringmm~census:
Tbat an Ordinanrn M prep red setting forth City lolicy mgardin9 paving of
Ixmgxmd stmets and that tl'us Ordinance to adhered to in the future.
b. 'fiat the City o£ U grind cwuld from ruin vre specify certain streets
that require pving sinrn they wem City tJwmughfarestar~d for those streets, the
paving assessmst would Cs 50 percent far Jie city and 25 - 25 percent for abating
property omers.
'fiat th City of Iongxmd would consider petitions xequestvig paving of
Inngxmd provided they were sig`red by fifty percent of the horteamers.
trxN-s approved for pving by the Crnmission, the a t fee vould L 45/45
percent for abating property wmers and 10 percent to tesassu d by itre City.
d. That proputy amers with comer lots wM had previously been assessed pvino
fees of 95 percent mould M exenpt fran pavin<1 az second abating street
and the City would py Ue azsesarent fee for that particular exAn{rted lot.
2. 14~e maeting was adjovmed at 3:00 p. m. , ~ ~ ~
C2w '~97, i=LYk~i~l'~
Mayor, aty o ion~,r.~a, Florrda
2t3ti
Ian9wrod City CnmN.ssion
Septaii~ 15, 1980
'fie Iongwaxl City Cmmissim held its cegulaz neetin9 at "1:30 p. m.
Present Mayor Oskert
Cmmissioner Grant
Gmaissioner Hopp ~~
- ~
Commissioner It:niann
Cmnussioner ltchell
David Chacey, city Adnllnistratoz
Mazvin [a-oks, City Attorney
IXmald Rerxy, City Clerk
Mayor Uskest called tl~e mseting to order, Inraation follomd bi' pledge of
allegianm to the United Htates Plag.
1. Approval of minutes - 9;8 /80 Boaxd of £kP~alization, Seng~.m3 Industrial Park.
on by Commissioner Hopp, secmded W Commissioner titchell to approve minutes of
9/8/80 &urd of £qualizatian, Im9urznd IDdustrial Park. Fbtion carried on imanvmvs
3. Aoproval of minutes - 9/ 8 /BO Peazd of Fclualizatron, Waynan 5
b
by C<mmissione Mitchell, seamded by Cmmissioner Hepp to aopxove mv:utes
of 9/A /80
Poazd of equalization for Waymazi Street as sutmitted. tbtron css-Tied trv unani~mus wt
e.
3. Ftopmval of minutes - 9/ 8 /80 IrEgulaz ring. on q~ Cmmissimer Grant,
seceded M' Corte titdiell to appxow minutes of 9j 8 /60 as sulmitted. lbtion
carried lIi' wartvnous wte.
Public Participation Period: FHyor Uskert explained nroailures for Public
e 1~
ar-rioiparion Perioa.
s. omm, rutr~,ela srarea u,at he wishaa ro o~nt on to auegaa charges
n ~
against t9yo
USkart and wanted to open it ~ £or discussim anvng Camissien mertbers.
tbtron by Camussioner Mitchell, s cariazd 63' CamSssioner Hopp that an stigation
to opened for aiscussion letnaen Commussion mertbers cmcerning allege:] chazges against
Mayor Uskert.
6. ated that he tad not received any xules or guidelines £or the
e
s
Cmmis
Doer tL~ stated that he did not Celieve that Ma}mr U.skert did anY-
hearin9~
thin
wron
intenti¢all
and that he zeosmended llat
o a
tio
t
tak
C
i
i
y.
g
g
n
c
n
o
en.
om
ss
w~
tested [hat she believed that any alleged wrong was no intentronal and that es
rl,e matter Mesa gore far enoagn. on by mmm e< loraan~, eeoxa by c«m~isaia~e
~
i~
rQe o <
ev.tcl,eu eat xtayor Uskert be ~
a
md exonera
f anY wrm:g mi,:g. tmtirn passea
tE of 4 to 0 with Mayor Uskest abstainiru; dce th cmflict of interest. I>K.
on~~w~gested that IM1ayor Uskert file a conflict of into t form.
Ordinance No. 496 - Amnaing Ordinance No. 143. Public Heazin9 - Mr. Rinks mad
by title only.
0. s. Barhara Itlritte, Mrs. Vlrginia Warner and Mr. Zen Fboa spoke in £awr of the
ordinanre.
9. [ Robert Wws questioned wMm this left an individual. who had purGased
lots Mr. Fooks stated that it was rot appropriate Fo discuss the inaividual. ',:
10. Dbtion by Commissioner FRpp, seconded try Cannissioner Fitchell to close I
Publre Heazing on Ordinanw ha. 996. .btrwi passed by unaninous roll call veto.
289
11. ~ by mmdeeioner Mita,au, semnaea try Camdasioner l~rnann that ordinano
No. 496tb=_ apy ved. 4btion Eased by a mote of 4 to 1 with Camussimers Repo,
L xrteinn and MitcF 11 and Mayor tlskert Voting Aye and Camussioner GYant wring Nay.
12. Ordinance No. 991 - Mc. Rvks stated that Ordinance Nb. 491 Czcwes mot with
H>° passage of Ordinance No. 496 and stated that no further action was necessary.
13. Ordinance No. 499 - Annezatron of Staten tbtel Property. Mr. Rvks read by title
or:ly. Cation by-Camussioner Mitchell, seoanded by Cbmnissicner utant that ordinance
No. 499 ~ Fassed on first reading. Mctam was passed on a unanvrous roll call mote.
14. Sits Plan - Inngxvcd Mini ]ioases. Mr. t]~acey stated that Hite was prq~erly
zoned and was n a flood prone are Itr. Ciwcey stated that there was a problem
getting fire Txurhsnarowd building and stated t}at t7r. Tan einford tad agreed to cut
back eadi building fiuE feet to provide adequate sparn. This rlan9e was indicated
fE plan, er BeFP gwstion~ velvet assurance City had tlwtMx. BinfoN
would cut Lack eadt building five feet. tk. Chacey stated Hat Mr. einfozd was wt
present; expactitg that s th plan would no cone up this early. on try ¢'nmissioner
F(epp, seconded by Commissioner etant that 5r e Plan be tabled to abait Mr. Rinford.
Nation caz-ried by :manvrous roll call mote.
15. Nut on by Ccmar shell, seocnoed by Cwmissiocer Hepp Hat Wayman Street
paving to renoved fmnrtableeWt carried on w roll call mote. Mr.
Ctaacey awtea mat th a pavir~9 wsi ~h~ one mandssion naa agr~aea to three atipmaeiona.
ae, if so percant of the Proeerty w,ners on t r~erea that m to Pa~ea,
tl~e paving as srzent will to 45/45/10 F'-rcent.s £bxty F ve Parrnnt to each abating
pr perty wmeceand ten Ecr t to tlx City. mnsi'~ced a thoroughfare
try the City and City in tes paving, the City will pay fifty percent of assesa~~t and
abating property omersrwill each pay tzenty fine percent. Three, if a ProFCrty amer
wim a r lot wasp usly assessed in a 45/45/10 paving as and the City
Tiated aesubsequent as t for another strc¢t, he would not Lc r Tiired to pay
and the City mould pick up tFn assesstmnt fee.
16. Camussioner Inniann gcestiaied what prornaure mould ~ used fox old streets.
Mayor tlske explained that if a property oanei' amed a corner lot and Fad previously
paid an assesgrent fee of forty five percent, tMn the 2nd paving fee mould to picked
vp bf the City.
17. Mr. Pinks stated that no mom siwuld be taken this :tight on 4wyaan Street paving;
ttat it cost to plarnd on the agenda and that ads to platad in ne+spapers and another
resolvtim prepared.
18, twn by Ccmnissioner xepp that City arbp[ Ordinance ron ming paving wArem
City assesses 45/45/10 ce streets Uat have petitions signed by 51 percent of the
proi~rty owners and Hat the City pay 50 percent with abating pxolxXrty wmers paying
25 percent on streets wMre the City inrtrates the paving.
19. Fh. [kok stggested ttat the Cmmission only ~sider an Ordinance on paving
wayrtan Street. tmtaon bJ Ccmnissioner Hepp died for lack of a sewnd.
20. hbtion lry Cc. issioner Mittltell, secmi~d by Ceram er Hepp chat City A[tomey
prepare resolution for paving Wayman Street with City paving 50 parcent and abating
pxocerLy o.~niers paying 25 pex'cent. Nation carried m wani;rous roll call mote.
21. City ArLVnistrator's Fnpart: Mr. Ctucey stated Hat he had rereived a letter fmn
a develoler mnceming the TaUm area ragcestinq that the City provir~ water and sewe
to ~proxinately 330 propwed w Mr. (Macey stated ttt Winter Springs has
aeprivately wined utility so City of Lm, ma would not to en marking er Springs.
. Chaay stated mat he believEd that City would receive finan ial LvneF~itstof between
$100,000.00 and $SSO,oo0.00 that could b° used in the purchase of a new cewer plant.flr.
Chacey stated there was no chance of Ixm9xcod annexing property.
`lyU
22. Mayor Uskert quesllored what would happen if Wintez Springs annexed property
and Mr. CbacMy replied tlut the City would tavE additional scorer taps and capability.
Mx. Chacey xegneste3 authorization to puesue matter as was done previously with Irng-
t ] G[een. , ~
23. Camussioner Grant stated that lie had no objections to Mr. Chacey piocce ling
but that he bslieved That the d=_velop=_rs should pay ~rore for water and sewage than ~
City residents. Mr. Chacey stated that they urould be diarged note.
24. m by Commr Hopp, seconded 61' Cantu ant that Mr. Cnacsy th
auHa(r~ized to ororeed an0 attanpt to develop a pxeggsal £ran the develope Pbtiai
passed on unanimous roll call mote.
25. Mr. Cnacey stated that he had written the M1Wyor and Coemnssioners wnwsning flu
need fora ter System Engineering Study. Mr. Cnacey stated that City does not have
full time engineer and he thought the antrcipated most of Hie project ($],000 - 515,000)
would be saved by acre efficient water plants and sexvice.
26. on by Comnissioner HePp• s anded by Canty. xmann that Mr. (liacey to
avUmxiz~ w oxcceed with engincering study on waterrsystem. Notion r>~-ied by
unanu~ous roll call mote.
2]. city Attorney's Freport: Mr Frocks discussed the Handy Way suit and reanmended
that City negoTiaTe settleemnt and grant approval for site plan. Mr Pinks stated
that M tud linked into the possibility of rezoning property and denying site plan
because t he s of properly zoned but he cited a 19]3 c of pale Cowty/vs
Williams wFgrercityatried to one pxoF 'ty to Yfeat a uit and the moat held Heat
this was wring and capricious and done to defeat law suits
za. e><s. virgin' resident of rongwoea craves civic Ass~iation s~xe and 11
read a Namorana~ oiiawr~ipting sevEral legal prace~„th whore ra ,nq naa heen _. J
used as m prevenr. permara fray Feing is uea. airs. warner seaeea chat sne
Fad a pzop~sedsordinance to acoxplish this action.
29. Mr [inks stated that when he first gave report and recremendaticros, the Crnmission
talking re Doing. He s d that [(rs. W indicated that three a mays
had agrced that xe Doing was a feasible defense Wt that Fe Fad not heazd fmmtany of
tMm and Fad not seen the M1k~mo o£ law before. Mr Ikoks stated flat City has two
questions to as thz City justified in denying s to plan and can City &iange
zoning aftee beingrsued. Sn his opinion the answer rs no.
30. Pinks stated that the o of zmung cases depend u(mn the facts of the
individual ca and in ew of Hie probable outwrm and the expectc+l exi» ses inwlved,
he reo~n~,~a settle,~,c.
31. Mayer Uskert questioned whether citizens mould in injunction Tn prevent
Camdssion from acting. Mayor Usker[ stated Hwt a majority of the G.nmission objected
to srte plan aopmval for Handy Way but that the Ca!mission must follwr the las.
3z. rarad that sre Fad o~n+ac a all me s rounainm sutai~isin„s and sFe
has £o~n,a o~u.ye~ pacple that aim,~t oppose Handy euay sip plan ~prwu. [ er
stacea H,at ahe ~~as deliversng a pmpcscH ordinance ~ 9.01 cin' oe~
and 9.03 of the city a,areer » H,e city clerk and rne~~ii~rea raiuest xo rim
City Clerk.
1
33. C rtmissioner Hepp addresse3 Mrs. W and stated tFat the Rmti.ssion was n ~
oploss3 to her remmendatrons; tlwt tFe City Crnmussion was for her but he Yelieved
that the ¢amission should £ollw Hie advice of the City Attorney.
~~t
39. Mr. Ned Mueller suggested that the C1ty rezone pxenezty and [ten find out wnat
mould haipen.
35. Qmnissioner Hepp questioned if it would nshmve a wmany such az Handy Way th
fight public opinion where it ss obvious that the people don't want a stpxe i.n azea.
36. Dick Shannon stnt¢d tMt he was very w cemea afoot s and telieved that
as the duty p£ the Cwartission to pursue ttn natter to full extent of law. He stated
that Mrs, War]ror had offered other mart cases that disagree wish the City Attorney's
repsrt and remmmndatims.
3]. Mr. Sidney Certel sryvke against the City settling law suit.
38. NK. Qiazles Parton spoke against the City settling law suit and q~psiimed the
is o£ the lawsuit if the City lose and had to pay Wth attorneys. Hr. Masks stated
that it could pact bly mst t txeen $2o0p.00 and $3,000.00.
39. Mayor Oskert questioned whether each Conmissiorer would be liable i£ The City
atta~Qted to rezone pxcpex'ty: Mr. Pocks stated that each Cmmissioner has M n sued
and stated that other side has not, but mould see]c to in{nse individual liabili[.
90. Mr. Fooks stated that his nane and views m Ming the Handy Wav sort had
lemrte so uel.l kno«n, that he xsmmended that theCity hire a special attorrey m
defend the lawsuit i£ the City chose that muxse of ac[ron.
41. Mxs. VirgiKa Warner suggested that ar, oxrlinance Lc drawn ~ protecti.ng individual
Cmnnissim narbem £mn liability.
42. Ch. Cnacey stated that he believed the suit should L defended on the basis TJUt
rre srnre wala oanstiture a traffic hazard and saia chat ne aia not believe The
c~daaionera uvula re liable if they oceyea Tlp laws of .h° acy bar. ha r.~n~a~
against using mzoning as a defense.
43. Crsmissimer [ormann suggested that City Mend against suet and qo th wort.
44. Mayor Ilskext stated that iE it was the desire of the people to fight the suit,
the Commission should m m.
45. M1b m by ComN.ssioner Hepp, secmded by Camissiomr Mitchell that City proceed
to defend against Handy way lawsuit and in view of City Attorney's previous opinions
that city appoint a special attorney. [boon was pazsea by a unaeuerous roll call vote.
96. Connassroner Thrown suggested that City appoint Haxvey A1pes to defend lawsuit.
97. Virgini ated that in ew of Cmmission's vote she wished to
withdraw Mr [ztitim fox inrteative and she picked up the affidavit fran the City
Clerk.
9e. Mayor oskert aTnrea that the mnndeeioa ra acrea th acmraanm with the aesiret
o£ the c rated that the decision was no reflection m !7<. Rinks, that the
city naaefmi wnfidenm in Rooks ana mnsiaerea him a rmeate,+t aetomey.
Commssrmer Inxnwn sWtea that she agreed with Mayor Uskert.
49. ta. Finks rep'~rtea on the Cede £hfoxcen'act Baaxd and stated that Fe had talked
with a representati~,s in Palm Peach, Florida. Pahn Feach enacted Ne board under
authority o£ a special ac of Js Iegislature a a pilot pro3ram. The bxr3 has
Veen effective and the City has not had to go teyma giving anyone a arcing. Mr.
Popks stated that the ode P]'~forcenvit Poard is tend>d +o ao away with tl'n
utt system and that it gives Teeth to City oxHinanms. Fcoks e~q~lained the
p aural rules of me bo3ra ana srama enae rte noara eoula rearh Lmal or £acewl
mnmusioas. violamra mina be finea Sspo.oo per aay for a aa,~i,~m of ss,ppo. po.
29`L
N . Rmks state3 that the Code Ehforcenent Board has not been tested to determine
50. Mr SinQSCn stated tlwt the City Attorney was mnect in teat the hard
endorsed by the Florida Ieoque of Cities. Mr. Sirtpson sryke strongly against
beard, s ring Nat it violated the seluration of the legislative and judicial
Wdies o£ gowr~et. Mr. Sinpscn questioned wheNU:r legislators had been adequately
briefed on the hill.
51. Ibbert Da s aq -a with t1r. SirtQSOn and spoke against t} CNe Q~forcemst
Boazd~ Mr suggested that the aakerq~ of Ne MaN indicated that it mould ne
used to hear~v violations and he questioned whether loarct could mver otlffir
orainances. Mr.aGracegy stated that th¢ Poacd mould mvzr those ordinances designated.
N4. Da s suggestSd that all City ordinances be examines to deterine whether tF¢y
are enforceable.
52. Mitrfell sta d that the City ra'luires additional re eazch m the
mac ciforSe~ne mars. laaror uskert swtea u,at ins legislatve has acne re ears,;
that this was an effort to help the c with a problem. +tayoc Uskert stated that
ne dtsagrted with the mnclusions of Mr.esSm~son.
53. Co stated Nat she thought pressure should be put on the State
Attorney'ssoffim to have City Ordinances enfor d.
s4. Hepp sNtea u,ae he naa talked to several pities and thae ue cities
nave ~aa laughing sto ~: beeaese Nev ean•i nape their o~anms enforces.
c~naieaioner tffipp aratea use ne diaagxeal with ru, si,~pson.
55. Mr. Ctacey statril that the Cose Eiforcermnt Acard was suggested by the Florida
Isague of Cities as a way to lave ordinances enforced.
56. Mayor tlskert suggested that decision on boaN be delayed for one w ]:.
5"I. m by Crnmu MitrAell that City conduct further study on Cale
Eliforrn~mnt (bard andsthat City contaR State A mey's offim to determine how
to prnssum Tallahassee to get state Attomey'sto£fice noxe Feip.
59. on bl' ~missioner t~epp, semndeid by Nnnissimer [a
site Plan for Mir;i-warehouses from table. Notion was passed by a wanrmsus roll
call mote.
60. Mr Binfoxd alnlogized forting late and initralea site plan indiratina
that 5 fce would to cut faun buildings. Mr Binford sta[e3 that he would provi~
a letter to Cmmission agreeing to t}nse actions.
61. Moti¢; by CamSSSioner Grant, seconded by Camu Mitdiell that 5
Plan for ttini-Wacelrouses b=_ appmved. tKrtron was passs3 by a warwnus roll call
62. City Attorney's It=lnrt on ordinance for Charter Advisory Cartaittee reose;rendation~
nr. reds approves r~naations of the darter Advisory cnamitrEe. ~
63. ~roeion by coma Hepp, seconded M mamissioner ror,ra„n that reo-re,enaacion . J
nwber five of the Charter Advisory Crnmittce, to t: that Cmmi wally appoint
City Administrator fora rm of one year, to disapproved and thatsSectia~ 4 of the
City Charter mava s is~ carried by a of 4 to 1. Cwnnissi0onus
Mitchell, WrnaemNand Hepp and1Nayor Uskert w ing Aye and Coamissimer Grant wring Nay.
X93
64, twn by Gmussimer Hepp, s corded by Camussioner Grant that City
xney draft an ordinanrn se tingeforth the approved remnre:datione of the
Chart r Advisory Committee as fl~aztcr a:mn Nn ts.
65. Mayor and Cmmissioners I+eports:
66. on by Cmmissioner Ipxnev:n, seem led by Grtnissioeier Mitdiell tbat Cmmission
autho[b e payrent of approved bills, irotaon was passed on a wairinous roll call vote.
6>. Cmmissimer Hepp questioned whether tl:e CVm:issim should take ~ the pr~sal
fox an ordinance on hwr future paving would ~ done. Mr. Fooks suggested H'at the
pxo[nsal First to liste4 as an ream on the agenda.
68. Nx:t on by (bmnissioner PlitcJxll~ second i by Cmmissimer Fkpp that "--Ling
be adjourned. t~btron was carried on wanurovs wee and m=eting was adjouxrnd at
10:00 p.m.
~y~'~Gry~ r~
A~:
Clerk -~
294
lang...bd arv crnmission
Sept >~i x 22, 1980
The Srmq.~ City Crnmission held its xegular :reefing at "1:30 p.m.
Present: Mayor Uskert
er Geant
Gmmiss'oner Senrav:
Mitthell
pavidsCnarey, City NNUnistraWr
Ftic]c 0.v ,Assistant City Attorney
mnald L. 'terry, City Clerk
Absent: Cam:~.ssroner ~iepp
Mayor Uskert called the meeting to order. Inwcatvon follo,red try Pledge of
Allegiance to the Muted States Flag.
1. Approval of minutes - 9/15/80 Fbrkshop on paving Long..road sTieets. tb on bf
Mitchell, seconded by Came viann that minutes of 9/15/80
a
r
sul-mitred. Ibtion carried by
Workshop m
Pavin9 longwmd s1'xeets Ce approved
2. Approval of minors - 9/15/80 Regular Meeting. Nation M CM~missieer [litchell,
seamded try Cmmissionex Inrmann that minors of 9/15/80 Regular Meeting be approved
as sulmitted. lotion carried e unanvnnus vote.
3. Canrussvoner Hepp arrived at 7:35 p. m. and joined tle Ming in progress.
4. Public Participation Perm: Mr. trout Wves auestieed the wrdinq n tM room
ing the Charges maw against Mayor Uskert. 'lfie City Clerk read the rtution
made by Cxnussioner Ignnae, seconded bf Cwmu Mitchell that Mayor Uskert
be considered ewnerated of any wrong Ming. rs asked the City Attorney if
M
id
d th
C
i
i
'
t
b
l
M
U
k
rt
l
i 1
J
cons
ere
e
omm
ss
on
s a
o a
so
ve
ayor
s
e
as imp
y
ng
with the provisions of 3.0] o£ tFevCity Charter. tr. O..en. advised that he believed
the provisions of the Charter bad been mnplied with.
5, Pesolution tb. 412 -Adopting present budget (19]9-1980) until 1980-1981 t=stratiue
budget is adopted. 14r. Q.ens read by Yule only.
6. on by Cmml er Mitchell, semndal ty Cnmussionu tkpp that l+esolution Nc.
412 te~alproved. tbtvon cazried on a unanvmus roll call vote.
]. O b. 499 - AMexatie of Etaten M'rtel, HigFnaay 1]-92. Mr. Chamy advised
that a date had not L n set fox public heazing. FU on try ~missioner Inmann,
seceded by Camussioner Mitchell that the Public Bearing for Ordinance 13a. 499 M
Octobsr 20, 1980. Nntvon carried by a wanv:uus roll call vote.
8. city i tninistrat~r's Deport: nr. clvacey advisee that the aty Cmmissioners had
d
h
l
d
d
t
i
M
i
i
d s
£
d
d
ow an
no
era
e
ncwre
us
ng auras.
vis
te
an
or
an
toure
t
e
Hepp questioned whether control of housing is take away fran the City if itsadu2TCd
tablisl d
tN0
i
M
Ch
d
i
d th
t
th
l
i
(
Pl
an.
r.
amy a
v
se
a
once
e p
an
s es
,
a
bus
ng e
mold core insaand build housing in appr pciat areas o£ the City. Irn:rnml eesiPents
would m ve first Priority for housing, folloning by Semunole County msidents.
Chacey stated Hat the (busing Assistanrs Plan was a way to pmvi~ 9md Musing fo[p
'
low and :roderate wage earners for aFpmxinetely one fourth of their incrne.
9. Cxm¢ Hepp stated that Fe tlvu2ht the loss of control by the City might ~ I
11
twvgh the le+:efits. Mayor Uskert stated that Fre didn't see an vmediate need for
lay and no3erate inmre housing. Mr. Clacey suggested Heat the Crnmissien might want
to hear fxem Mr. Wazxen E. I(no+les, City Manager o£ Sanford ron ming their s
with the dousing Assistance Plan. '14:e Oxmvsuon deferred actre until briefed ~,ss
Mr. Nnwles.
d`~5
10. Mr. Cnacey requested authorization to resuhnit a reyuest th IiCD for a
ter .Tystem thx3emizati.m Plan for the inrer City. tbtion by Camassimer
[4itcF~e11, seconded try Canwssione Eepp that the City authorize is reswtmit
request for azsistance in wilding water lines rr, umer City. Mxron cazried by
unarwnus roll call vote. b
11, Mr. CnaceY statsl that M }ad rere;r~d a letter fmn Me. George R. D:in ryned
requesting that the speed limit th lamved to 25 miles per hour on Fanga Line [bad
and that Sen9wwd Police EepazYnent patrol area to try and redure spreding. Tne
Cmmission agrced that the Police Cepac4,ent should provide additional patroling
m, Pange l.i„e xnaa but aia not agree mat spa limit sro,aa rP reawrea to zs ~sx.
lz. Mr. craear sratea that he has writeen earl, ~anissioner swggeating mat the
City return approximately $16,000.00 presently held by the City as deposits for
ce to custaress with goN rttvxds xiro have Coen cos re for five yeazs
Ceposits would he re umsd to Pro~s'ty om oc ham omens paYin9 watez
billsrfor rental proierty. Mrt aobert lives questioned why renters who have been
custarers of gwa standing fox five years mul~'t have their deposits ret,sned.
Mc. Gracey stated that meters noxnally ornate the largest problens in paying bills
but if U¢ ~rmission wisF,ed, ne tad no objectics to refunding the deposit to
renters month gcW records for five yeazs.
13. tro on by Cmmissimier Mitchell, seconded Lry Ccunussioner ~'SPP that Mr. Q~areY
im given authorization to refwd deposits to ter LEparGmnt cos who have
teen custarexs in of five years and have gooa revvrds. Notzw cazxied by
,sawmus roll callxwte.
14. Cede FY~form~mnt 'a. M153yor Uskert Questioned wMther me City could
of the Code Lhforcenvnt mara if it wRSp adapted and proved to
Ces,ausatisfactory. 14. Cna y advised that St mould M cancelled. The Crnnassion
agreed to continue a decision on the Code Lnfor¢nent &>ard for tw Feeks.
ls. x~ea mnv,l on eke Jane. Mr. aa«Y atarxk mat an aplieation has con„ sutr
mitTSl to EPA to use chemicals on Lake Jane to control undesixsl plant grwrth. t4.
Chacey read a letter fxrni Mr. Al Iand wr rning his siggestions fora re
pond and a kern arouW the 1-pri,reter of me lake. Mr. Chacey requested that heel
given an opportunity to try and resolve the probl~-sn by using chemicals te£ore building
on prna. Tne Wnni.ssion auNOrized Mr. Cnacey to use cF~ucals in Iake Sane
to sc~a if this would resol~m problem.
16. Mr. Ctwcey intc~uced Mr. Ikon Shank , representing the firm o£ Rlssell and Axon
wM had mrtpleted a 201 Facilities Stviy for Irmgwc~. Mr. ShaN;s briefed the
Cnmussim a, me study. the plan r amrends that s eatnent plants m
to utilized for ,aaztz+arer treatirente Altaronte Springs plant, two Sanlando Iltrli[ies
plants, Col,mbus ilaztor Plant, Skylazk Sewer Plant, ana tongaood Utrlities. 'the
Plan returnee tanuation of present no]e of waztEwater disposal for each o£
the i...gw.:od facilities, i evaporaVion peaolal'icn ponds. Mr. ShaNCS briefed the
Can~a.ssion on the recvssity to hola Public, t3eazings and g suggested format to the
City Clerk. 4d~en plan is approved b( DER, the plan will beeeligible for Federal F'unas
with EPA paying 75 potent of the ronstrvction cost and me City paying 25 percent.
4. Lacey suggested that Public Nsazings be F ld on t~dne day, atiTe 29, 1960 and
advised that a Thirty day no as acquired. ff. Shanks staTSd that after the
Public tieazing, a Ibsolutiontyrould in xequixrea ad piing the plan and that minutes of
the _ _"ling uvula nave m be sulmittea.
17. on by came o'mded by Came htchell that a Public
Heazing on the Inn9wod 201 F cilities Plan be Held onrtp~esday, October 29, 1980.
[boon carried bf a wanvrous roll call mote.
2~~
LB. city Attorney's Report: Fesolutice Flo. 413, WaYaan Stxmt paving. Ib
f5' Comnissiraier Ikpp, seceded by Crnmissioner Flitc}ie11 that dcoisim on paving
IVaynan Stxeet L ranoved frpn table. bbtron carried M unaninous roll call vote
19. Mr. O.nn read P.esolution No. 413 by title only.
20. Fbtion by Camussioner 1itchell, seconded by Crnmissioner [kap that Wayrzan
treet be paved and abating pro1*'rty omers L assessed 25/25 ~rcmt and the
City pay Ne resuinin9 50 perrent and Uut equalization bard L held an Fbnday,
2knbe 13, 1980 at '1:00 p.m. I~btim caisied by a waitim2us roll rill mole.
21. Ordinance FU. 500 - Px'o~sed changes to City Ct~ar'Tpi. Mr rnad by
title only. t on by Cmmissia~er Hefp, sewnd=d by ¢smiiasione~r Mitchell that
Ordinance No. 500 to passe3 w first reading. Ncrtxmi passed co ~manvrous roll
call vote. '
22. Resolution Tb. 419 -setting wliry fox paving o£ [rmgxcod Streets. Nu
read resolution in full. Came Mitrhell stated Gut paragraph tmn should
read fifty one (dl) izreent vvcesfi£iy (50) percent. rtr. O.'en made change to
Fesolution No. 914. on by Comm Mitcinll, seccmd.l by Gmnissioner Hepp
that [+esolutron No. 414 as aemnded Cesadopted. Nbtvon passed by wanvrous roll
call vote.
23. Itr. Robert Oaves questioned tFn terns collector and arterial streets used in
Resolution No. 414 and Mx. RVZn read Me definitrons to him.
Mr. Chacey advised that a public hearing had not been set for Ordinauw No
500. eon by Cpmmissioner Ft>rmvm, semnrkd by C®mu Mitchell Gat a
PublicPfkazir~g Ce set for Ordinance No. SOO for Nbnday,sOCtMter 13, 1980. Nation '
carried by a unanvmus roll call vote.
25. Special Attorney for Ikndy Way suit. Mr read responses frna Mr. Harvey
9. Alger and Mr. CanNne 14. S reeving tF¢ir willingness to represent the
City as a Special Attorney in the Handy Way suit. Mr. CFUcey stated that Mr. Jerry
man had declined. Camu tkpp que. eioned Mc. R.en if the City mould not
be b=_tter off to rezone property and IK. O.en stated that he mould rather not mment
Mr. Pinks and he kud advised City prnviously ce tkiat question. fNyor [ISkert
stated that F¢ was agavist. rezonang ~w. as a defense.
26. on by Crnmissioner Mitchell, seconded by C'mmissioner Inn~ann Gut City
apininttMe. Haevey n. Altar to represent tlg city as a special Attorney to tundle
the defense of the dandy Iiay sort. Nbtron carried by a wawrous roll call mote.
27. [4ayor and C7mmdssioner's import: Cartnissicner Mitchell suggested that it was
cv~e for the rtosquito rtachine to put into use again.
2H. Crnmissione stated that she Fad teen in mmmsu.cati.on with Beninole
Cowry Camuasioner Bob FYenrl: mnceming sidewalks from State Ibad 92] to Mille
School. She stated Mat Gsmussioner French had advised that the County Crnmission
mote o£ 3 to 2 had authorized wnstruction of Me sidewalks i£ Me City of
Scm9xar] would authorize pay~t for materials and have check ready for paym=nt.
29. on by Comm Mitchell, s waded by (Ymvm City
authorize Feyrent forsaaterials and that a check Ce pxePaxsl £or delivery. Nation .
carried by ima~vnnus roll call vote.
297
30. Mayoc Uskert stated Nat ]g tho:yht the City had an Ordinance mntmlling
bits in all City lakes of less Nan 25 acres but that I>e fowd Nat City Ordinance
orSy w red Iake indsox. M1Hyor Oskert suggested an ordinanm m in9 ail lakes
of less Nan 25 acres Nk. Cnacey inguixed if the City had received any mnplaints
and M1Hyor Uskert stated that he thcught {`SSt Lake was too small for pair Coats.
NK. (]wmy stated that the policy was if 51 percent o£ the msidents Dn the lake
wanted tD prohibit paw hwts thm they sMUld sutanit a petitron to that effect and
an ordinance mould be prepamd mverinq that lake.
31. Mayor Uskert read a letter Fran Mr. Richardson „ tlg Police Oapar t
for Heir per£oxmance.
32. hbtion by Cmmissioner MitcMll, semnded by IXaimissionu SgrnaM Nat :reeting
be adjourned. [btim was passed by unaninous mote and maeting urns adjourned at
9:15 p.m.
- 2<~lu~-
~ayor, City o Iongwoxl, Florida
~~ v~~~
Irm9:~ood City Crnmissim
September 23, 1980
"he Snngumd City Crnmission met in a urorkshcp sessron to discuss the prolnsed
Zoning Ordinance at 7:30 p.m.
Present Cmmissioner Geant
}lepp
Canmissioner Mitchell
David CJ:acey, City PzDninisteator
Marvin teaks, C1[y Attorney
IXna1d ltcxy, City Clerk
Absent. Mayor Uslcert
D.~vty MaYOr Ioniaem called the acting m order.
1. Mc. Ct:amy briefed the Comnission wi the status
and sta d that sarething needs to ~ mre to get p
their opinion tl:at the Zorting Ordinance should be treated separatedly fmn the Land
se Map. Mr. Cnacey suggested Nat tfe 2oeung Ordinance be passed and that the present
Doing s~ Sz mrrected to shwa all presort zoning n the category pxescxiked in Ne
ne+ zonrn9 ordinance.
2. Mr. Cnacey stated tha m the zoning Ordinanrn is passed, the City can
steps Tv adNnistratiuelytm ne the city as pminsed try the new zoning ordinanrnNand
then pass the Land Use Map, zMe, Chacey suggeuts3 that the Public hearing for Ne
premsed zoxting ordinano=_ to se at h}ie naxt acting. tr. Chacey stated that the
Oxdinano=_ anal Iand Use tM1Sp mold be approved within thst next 95 days if rzeetings
progressed as M suggested.
'Ly2f
s. nr. Chacey aaviaea that Hie wpamnent of mmmn,ity Affairs rasa aavisea Hwt
Hn state Has manaatea mat provisio:w for the ages ana nanaieappea mast he
provided in all zoning categories and they carviot be excluaecl.
4. Mr. CMaory stated mat he still proposed that the re Gently enacted
wh re property owres.'s nvs vse lots with mntininus footagelin ring Eront footage
requirarents to changed £or R2 and H3 to encourage law and v~ ate inane housing, '
5. Fk. B. D. sinpvm stated Heat he was stxrngly apposed [o the oresent proposed
oeting ordinance. tared Here were nwerous er and cited in particulaz the
xeluire~rent mat nzNests for oar and special%xceptions must go to the Land
Planning Agency. [ Sinpson stated that those reg~;ests go directly [o the Exrd
of Aljust~rant £or finat decision. Mr. Sinnson stafad that twving diffezent roles
For RZ and EU wind Ce illegal wrier the exclusionary vsming rules.
6. Mr Fay Vdv.tte stoke aginst Having separate roles for R2 and R3 zoning. H
ee~l~tested that me City perfect me prv2osed zoning Ordinance and have an o finance
that mold withstand legal challenges.
]. Ns. (-wcey s ted that he fwd remived a letter from the Semi:role Cowry Cmmission
mat did not provide for sideaaLks fran SR 427 to ltillwee Scrawl as C issioner
~ passed to hee for resolutirn.
8. Mr. Carey suggested mat for the forthcoming budget; that certain adrunistrative
erpe ses be charyed against Hie Vtility Budget. He ci d a Eortion of the C¢mmissimer's
salary as an exa~le of an expense that shoiil.d Ve reflected.
9. The «rksessian adjaumed at 8:2o p.m.
City of ng..vxl, Floria~a
City C