CCMtg07-01-80230
Tiny 1, 1980
The Longwood City Commission met at '1:30 p. m, to review the Preliminary Zoning
orainanne.
eresent: rupnty wayor wrmann
Cwmuasioner Grant
Corzmtsaiancr Hepp
Coam~issianer Mitchell
David Chaeey, City Administrstor
Donald Terry, City Clerk
Aobert Coll, Placv~ing fonsuitnnt
Absent. MHyor Uskert
1. Mr. Robert Goll, P1aMing COnsultart, e ntinued th of the Preliminsry
Zoning Ordinance. The following specSCie eovwents sndeehengee were made.
Page 52 - paragraph 501.4.B 'r'ences end Wa11s, Mr. Goll suggested that
Fences be prohibited w thin the Front yard setback ar Doing but that
the prohibition against fences in yards be deletedffor P2sand A3. A 30
inch fence is n allowed i.n Al but any change would only be effective for fences
to be srected after passage of the Preliminary Zoning Ordinance.
Aobert 1Mves spoke against the prohibition of fencing in the Front yards and
said that he thought the prohibition was discrimSratory. Mr. Wves snggested that
all r etlons on Pencir,g De eliminated from the Zo*ilng Ordinance and that they
be continued in a separate ordinance a., they are now.
The C eept t e Preliminary Zoning Oralnsnee s
ouldtPrahibft fences in the f nt yards nT bamessln
Rl~and permltmsn30dl nefictence in front yards oP homes inrA2 and R3.
b. Page 54 - paragraph 502.2.D - BPECIAL E%CEPTSONS. Delete following
"3. ~y c and pre-echaCl Pacilitiee (See Section 6), 4. Swivwi~
senteneecomnerciel (SeerSection 6), 5. Cemeteries (See Section 6).
Page 58 - paragraph 503.2.D - SPECIAL E%CEPTIONS. De wing
entencee: 4. tiwi:muing Poole - .iai (See seotion 6), 5e Cemeteries (sea
9eetlon 6), 6. Day care and pre-sOhoolc2'soi11t1es (8ea Section b).
Mr. Howard Lefkowity spoke in favor of permitting day ca enters in ov roll
development; not in existing ho e, but a plannetl day care center far children
se up on en exception basis.
Mr. Coll s tad that the Board oP Fdjustment xould decide on the r
Por exceptionsta Except for o older section oL the city, t e is on~yson
R3 a ea that has v ant land available for development. Mr. h0o11 suggestedetheter
paragraph 503.1 INTENT could be ,mrded in e er prohibitizy Dny Care C
in an ting neighborhood. Mr. Coll said he would discuss with an ettorneyron
the matter.
d. Page SB -paragraph 503.2D wa changed by e a sheet to add
ieh r "8. sAlCbile Home Paa loped a oC
vottless then 30 acxese (Seeo9eetlon 610). Mr. Goll eWted that oouxte have held
provide s nable alternative sod i..at they can't "outlaw" billboards, junkyerde
and mobilerhomes.
~~i
e. Page 61 - 8umoary Residential Area Regulations.
Mr. Noward Lefkowitz submitted e letter to the Comm ssion and r
changes to page bl. Mr. Lefkoaitz's plea adds a oning c tegoryc, R1Anwhach
requires an or lz, ooo aq min~m~maor 1, Sao agnara reev of
livid ar a peraurit. Plan alsoer e theaa o 8,000 square Ceet end Moor
space to 1,200 s changes to P2 and R3 categories.
lfr. iefkewltz s gLedethatthisrsuggestfonsew an attempt t reduce ox hold the
prices d by cutting dovm onethe s of 1 xegvired and to
provide protectior. forehomeowners of Ssrger bomesaby Drovidi~ a H1A zoning
category.
mr. Cou svatea that he aia not s pace ror a R1A aoning pategpry bnt it
aaaea it ahonla pro~iae ror aeiarger inareaee Sn egpare rear to at leant
naooa4quare rect.
The Comviss ion de Ss ion on page 61 a~ o give further
study to the propoaal conteaned anoMr.dLetkowttv'e request.
P. Page 70 - paragraph 506.2.B - change sentence number two tc reatl es follows:
"2. Rsstauxant, w2th ox witY~out lounge,"
g. Page 73 - paragraph 50'1.2.A - change sentence number six to read es follows.
^6. Restaw with or without 1o,vge.^
The C at 1 10 p.m, next scheduled meeting oC the
orkshopato review the Pxelimi~ry Zoning Ordinance is July 8, 1980 at
'l:3oap9m n
ATTEST: b~pu~.~-/
Crty~ //