CCMtg07-21-802% 3
Longwood City Commission
July 2 1980
I~. The Long wand City Commis lan held its rag ul ar meeting et s:30 p. m.
~I Present: r Us ke xt
~ I Commissioner Gx an
mmissioner Heppt
Commissioner L
Commissioner AfiteTell
d GDacey, City Administrator
n Rooks, City Attorney
Donald Terry, City Clerk
r Uskert called t e't ing to order, invocation followed by pledge oP
ellegianee to the h. se Flag.
1. Approval o - ']/14/60 Hoard of Equalization Hearing. Motion
by C mmissioner MZtchell, s and Dy Commissioner Lormann t approve the
minutes of s/14/00 as submitted. Vcte unanimous, mot don carried.
2. P-pproval o - ')/17/80 W hop C e L91 -
onCormingsl CC mmisslonerkHepp xeq OUestednt rag ~apho2b Ube
act ea to read 1958 v e 1948. Motion by- Commissioner Lormann, and
byrCGmmiseioner He pp t ve the minutes oC 7/1?./Bp as amended. sVOte
nnan~mo ,motion earr~eePpr
3. Approval of minutes - ']/1']/80 Wor ksbop on Budget, 1980-1961. Motion
by G by C nmissionex G approve the
snutes oP S'1/17/80tes submrtteda Vote unanimous, motionocarried.
!, Approval of minutes - 7/14/80 Regular lAeeting. Motion by Commissioner
~ Lormann, s ontl by Commissioner Gre nt to apFrove the minutes of ']/14/80
as submitted. ''/ote vnen imous, motion earr ied.
5. Public Parti e.i pation P 5a rbaza Whit to q estioned whether
y progress w made o therp dr oposal to he ve sidewelksuo e paths
d Milnee Middle S CommisstGner Lormann
ping scheduled Cor Suly 2101980 has beev rescheduled
PortJUly t~28,t 19BOPe
6. Idr. floDert G ned t oL e e Longwood
Budget Workshop whichgr ~nCees Por the
skylark s a Piant h sug gestea txomm$Se SOntoh$']650ea ovgh ['t would
take $9.56wt end deficiteenMr. Chacey advised t suggestedtinc rease t
$'/. 50 w vla~ minimum operating expenses anaht hat an Increase to $9.56
wo¢la cover aiiaitema aeairea.
~. wnita r aired t t the rasa i vicinity or saeona street
¢nd Fovxteenth street was in very batl conditionhend cars were getting stuck.
Mayor Uskert eloeed the Public Part3ciPSti on Period.
8. Public Hearing, Ordinance L92 (REZO ning Gre nt Property). Adr, hooks
cad the Ord inanee by Title only.
.~ 9. Commissioner Grant stated that h the property
and that he would file e CC nTliet oLeIntere sto Statement.
10. Rir. B. D. Simpson s tad that he w s the representative 0f Commissioner
end Mrs. Grant and made aaDrieP stetem ant in favor of Ordinance L92.
249
11.. Nr s. Candance Hirli.e spoke against Ordinance 492.
12. Linda Ashley, P silent Skylark Homeowners Association, presented
to the rCOmmissSOn a petition containing 624 signatuze s. The petition '`
ob3ecns to the r oning oC the Grant property a es is that the Com-
mission vote to defeat or change proposed Ordlnancee492.
13. Mr. William Mayo, Skylark SuDdivisio n, spoke in to vor of Ordinance
492 and requested that Dis name be deleted Crom petition because it was
14. Mr, y eabeneperg er spoke in favor of Ordinance 492.
15. Mr. Herold IYS It ere, Skylark Subdivision, spoke against ordinan ee 492.
16. lAr. Sim AO Wil dm ere Subdivision, spoke in favor of Ordinance 492.
1y, amble spoke Sn L rdinance 492, s sting t
become ran emotional issue and thetocommaesaoner Grant was a victim oP being
18. Mr. Lee Markowitz spoke against Ordinance 492, stating that he did n
k that the Commission had sufficient information upon which to base e
3e cision.
19. Mr. Tom Lundsford spoke in Tavor of Ordinance 492.
219 signature s. The petition supports end approves the re ing oT the 1
property s ing that it is the o f the petitionerszt it i 1
n the bestsinte rests of ell the Piti tens of the City oC Longwood t sup- 1
grade industrial zoned properties situated in predominately residential
neighborhoods.
21. Mrs. Evelyn Seh3PP spoke ngainst Ordinance 492.
22. Commis to ner Hepp stated that De ob3ected to the m r in which t
POD request w s being presented and .stated that the request w t follows ng
e procedures outlined Sn Ordinance 283. Comm is eioner N.epp s fed that a
-application c art ain documents such a
Mastez Lend Uee Planers et yemaprs owing crel at SOn to s unding estreete
and thoroughfares, b undo ryrs vey, topographic s a Mastez Land Use
Plan showing land u open space, e andvthoroughCeres plus a
table of proposed maxamum densities for res ids nt.i al land uses.
23. H. D impeon s t Ordinance 283 did n apply until t
prope~ty Dad been z ned PUDed Mra Simpson s fed t t PUD zonSng w act
oning, t hey m t do e erytning they s fed they would do soda itoistall
subf ec oaleter review by the LPA end the Commission. Mr. Simpson s
that 3P t PUD r est w f 38 duplexes w uldt bead
built on the pro per4y and the yp woulddcomplyx with the p ovie isns aL ordinance
283.
24. Mr. Marvin Rooks, city Attorney, states that he as re iewed
Ordi na nee 283 an could not give e definite legal opinionnas to vwhetDez
the reauirementsdot Ordinance 2H3 must De met before re onin o PUD. ~
that i ing c ang e, such a changezf rom Al to R3,
thesdeveloper down t comeoin with a sate plan until it has been rezoned.
a~~
25. Comaiss loner Hepp q stioned Mx. Chacey about Ordinance 283 end lAr.
C haeey advised that he did not believe that t requirements listed Sn
~~ Ordinance 283 had to be ace ompiishetl prior to rezoning to PUD.
26. Mr. Larrk Goldberg stated that it wa is a er a rm r
' ~ Commissioner het all plans w ouiredsbetorexPUe 2oningsandrtheetormer
c y ttor y ad stated 'L hat it must be done.
27. Mr. Ray Leibe ns perger s Led t t he w e former City Commissioner and
said that when PUD requests w ved byst he Commission in tD pest,
they ware Danalea exar y a an the p aent raae.
28, appee red Crom Ordinnnce 283 Lhat
Lain prelimSnarykstep emusthbe taken and certain doeum ants submitted
bePOre rezoning to PUD.
29. Simpson s Led 't o previous PUD r d Deen a enter
without a y plane being s bmittedt the s owner wouldn't spend
$12,000.00 0 oleos for PUD before it was zonedhPUDen
30. Mr. Lee Marko wi'tz suggested that the pr p y De zoned R2 instead of PUD
31 , Skylark Subdivision, spoke against Ordinance 492, ing
t. problem sbwith teenagers s andalism in a and s fed thatcPUD
zoning would only increase numbe roof children and traff is problems.
32. lfr. TIm O'Leary, Chairman oC the Land Planning A ncy stated Lbat D
thought it was important to give r y the L e down t e request
~' in the beginninh. The L A Celt t time, Pt haur he parcelbot pro-
~ arty to cat ed w e it w place for PUD, He said
LPA h de intimated thathresidentialnz of s ould be
betterhthan the z ing t s in t t present Lim e~muThor LPP. didn't
think that A3 a d Light Industrial w the m appropriate zoning either.
R2 zoning w red the most appxopxiat e in respect to e unding a s.
lAr. O'Learyasaidnt t basically the LPA didn't think the str eat sow e go od ea
oug h, the higher hd ould e e problems and there w inl
outlets close to theep p rt y. Busieally there were 4-5 ress ons whymthe LPA
turned St down.
33. st coned w e present pollee Cor ce w
atlevuate t ndl ea euinc re ase inepo polar ion c Led Dy PUD zo n3 ng?
Mayor Uske ~thadvisedtthat as the pop uls Lion grewPe so would the police force.
34. Mr. Percy Wh i'Ye s Led that he w s former Chairman of the LPA Por t
years and n a developer required to r, n Cront oP the LPA
themvv n his zoning. The zoning req est went to the Commrss ion
endntTen to that LPA.
35. Mr. Sim Mars hell s Led t t his biggest c raperty
old be developed and eaid that duplexee mere mvehrp referred tosfndu strisl
zoning.
36. Ma. H. D. 8.i mpson s Led t st Smat ed value oP the duplexes t
e built would b n the t$65, 000. OOt h'$80, 000.00 range. He stated t
(~ r requesting PUD z ing i of R2 is that R2 voningt .he
ouldnrequlree espee iel e ce pt ion f upl ex built. 8lmpeon s ated
that a twenty five foot easeme nv wool deh egrnnted xs a natural buffer. t
246
3Z, Commissioner Hepp stated that @renting a PUD c ange for t roperty
oula be like signing a blank check because there would be no minimum srz
e
lots or set becks.
38. Mr. Rooks st at ea that Ordinance 283 wa clear and e xtain things a e
~~
required. Mr. Rooke said you Quid agree t rage den ally pe .acre end
e
this would not limit n builaer
to e certain configuration. '
39. mmissloner Lo rmann s led that sne did not believe anyone understoo
PU- a q st ed that the Clty Attorney researen it, and nd vise the Com-
i
i
re d
m
ss
on.
40. Steve Rirc her stated that e t people w n Cavor oC
u
ted Lor
etti
oPU- z i
a
l
R2
h
eP f
t
d th
t
gges
g
up
ezes u r
,
e s
ng
ng.
e
e
a
plans for the Landings mere shown to the Commission prior to PUD zoning.
41. Mxs. Linda Ashley inquired as to the number of u s per a that
avid be b n property under R2 z ing. Mr. Cha cey ~a dvisedct hat a
t
u
duplex c n
be
b uilt o any R2 lot under special e caption, e R Li fty
awith 5000 square feet. Ne couldn"t say flow many duplexes could
be built due La varying lot sizes.
The Public Hearing was closed
.
42. Motion b ss 3O ner Hepp, s ono by Commissioner L n to deny
COm
e
htoti.an c rried by
n vote oP 4-1, Commisss oners Hepp,
the PUD request
Lormnnn and Mitchell and Mayor Us kart voting Aye and Commissioner Grant
voting Nay.
ldayor Uskert aeclaxed a five minute recess at 9:05 p. m.
,
Mayor us kart canna the meeting boor to ordnx at 912 p. .
43. Ordinance 491 - fiui lding m orium o all buila ing and c etion
f
i
l
t
M
Z
k
t
d D
nTitl
l
M
R
k
t
d
orm
ng
o
s.
r.
oo
s
rea
y
e on
y.
r.
ao
s
s
- on
uld h report for Commission on Tuly 28, 1980, LAO tSOnaby
and by Commissioner Hepp 't able Ordinance 491
s
lA
e
28, 1980. Motion ce rried by unanimous roll coil vote.
un til
MOnda y,
JU1y
44. dsford inquired iP the m ratori um was cont~.nuea. idayo.r
Us ker t4rsaid it was continued until Suly 28, 1980.
45. Aesolution No. 397 - a Avenue Assessments. lAr. Chacey advised
th
i
d
i
t
ll
t
t
f
n repor
s o ce
.ve
c
ng
ro
,
a
Tit le ronlyra A4o Lion Dy Commissioner Mitenellens and
Mr. Rooks read by
by Commissioner Hepp that Resolution 397 be adopted. Motion carried by
unenrmo us roll call vote.
46. flesolutlon 396 - Increastng Leee Cor requests for r oning, a atio
b
d
i
i
d
i
l
PUD
t
ti n,
ng a a
an
on
ng a ar
anees an
spec
a
reques
s, v ea
captions, temporary trawler permits, temporary mobile h me /recreation
v
P eview
Cnece
s the
hi
l
it
d B
ildi
t
n
.
y
e
c
e perm
s an
u
ng
ate we 'sally the same except Cor Site Plan re ew
which
was in-
v
a
$30. 00 to 350.00 to c ver the additional
expensea Snvoly ed
a Crom ~
with processing the requests end adding trailer and mobile home permits. ~
49. aalonnr Grant atatea t epponea t r Sn wnicn
w ritten
t this w o brona and snatmn~nw taw it
th
so~
~t i
;
e r
.
on
written to n raiese r teger ins. comaissionnx La rmann nvgga st ea that
the eleven items be broken down Into two or three groups.
Paz
40. Mayor Uske rt suggestetl tabling resolution and breaking down the fees
Purthex Snto difte rent resolutions.
~r 49. Mot SOn Dy Commissioner Grent~ seeo nd by Commissioner Hepp that a
i resolution be prepared for eaen administrative f Th otion was
defeated by a vote of 3-2. Commissioners Grant a d Hepp v ing Aye a
Commissioner Igo rmann, Commissioner Nitchell end Mayor Us kart va'ting Nay.
so. Mr, chaoey w regaeat ea to r ,se the soheanle or aamanaa,xat ave
raas into two or tnree resolutionseV
51. Site Pla*- for Bell Laboratory. Mr. Chacey s tad t the site plan
s properly z d for indu si..r isl a parking adequate a t drainage
eels Engineer's sThe c any will employ SOaemployees
and make Cuel additlvesgwhic Rea t highly ezpl o.sive. Plan w -
d by the LPA. IAOtion b _onex Gxe nt, second by Commissioner
Lo xm ann that Site Plan be eceep to ds s~
Mayor Uskert inquired es to whether thera would be e eminatton trom
intoxicating Base e. Chacey s that the plant would De operated
as a eo ntrol led env ixonment and that there eho uld not be any escape of gases.
. Robert Daves qua at toned wh e't her 't em icals w angexous i
hey w ccid ant ally mixed. Mr, Cha ceyts led t axial w
red in drums and the company would conPoxm toaP ixesde partment ~e9vixe-
ments~
' 1 Mr. Nepp sugge stedeneu rethe City ndgsi cuxDla nts oP this nature to install
r burglar alerrzs to afety a e a y
Poll ow ing discussion, motion was carried by unanSmoue roll call vote.
52. Mr. Chacey report ed t a letter h d from t
of T dvisivg t enCityesvx t Sax funtling
f orsatbike way w tepproved due o limited Punda available. The City's
request Por a gran tntor Ga ndalwood Park is etill under conside rs't ion.
53: IAx. Rooks stated the Y, he had i estigat ed a legal w y for the City to
repayment of Punds to be spent o raPtic Sight P r S.R. 434
e Township Piaza Shopping Center witnout using 4'l orida Statute 1']0.
Mr.tRooks suggested t e City issue s Performance Bond o n irrevocable
letter of credit witnovt plactng a lien o the c trib u'to r'sxpr Gpe rty. He
tad tnet if the Commission eo avthoxized~ he wont prep re the necessary
54. Adr. Chacey s hat t light w approximately 540.000.0
and that paymentstf rom the contributors would be made at the end o 18
h pax iad. MotSOn by Ca mmis.s io ner Nepp~ s and by Commissionerf Grant
that the Commission authorize Mr. Rocks t _re pe re necessary documents.
Mr. Chacey requested gu idanee as to whether Punds for traPPic light should
De borrowed or surplus Cunds used.
Motion Dy Commissioner Grant to avtDOrize Mr. Rooks to prepare n cessary
l~ d and t t Punds Por traf Cie 11g ht b City surplus
ondnDy Commissioner Mite hell. CommissionertHepp rescinded his prior
u"caption w ied by a 3-2 vote. commis io nex Lpxmsnn, commissioner
Gxant, and Commissioner Mitchell vot in P, Aye and Commissioner Hepp and
Mayor Uskert voting Nay.
55. Ma. Rooks stated that he feels a need Pox m e inPOxm¢t ion such as ~~
Site Plans to prevent his being unprepared os heowas in t e caee oP the
PUD Ord in¢nce. The Commissioners agreed that M Rooks needed adv¢nee
info rm anon to De r nsive and suggested t Attorney and
the City Adm inlstratopr owork It out. Roo kststatedlt
Wed a Laying within his Bud getrand the Commissionersa¢d visednhim
toxdo workuthat w¢s necesss y.
Mayor and Commissioners Report:
56. Commissioner G re quested 'that. the Clty Attorney 1 o the
procedures for Dreeking the c with the Cable TV Compenyssinee
the company was not living uP tort he contr¢~t.
57. Ca mm iss comer Nepp inquired aDO Ut the possibility oP requiring new
rci el busi neeses to provide s e degree pP aelP-help such e
burglar alarms a urlty sy s'tems~ Mayor Uskert st atea that an Ordinance
F that n oulde not be enPOxced. Cpmmiss comer Hepp requested that the
CS ty A't toxney look into the mat tor.
SB. Commissioner tormann requested LDat M Checey follow up o the
mpleint P Percy White e -Wing the poor condition of nt he
road at 2ndrstreet and 14th st reetCer
59. The meeting wss aaJpuxnea et 9:55 p.m.
1s, Zly9~~.~' ' ,~
Oft, City ongwooa~ FlFl oror i.da