CCMtg03-01-10Min IL®m~~~®o~ ~n~ (C®mrn~a~sio~n ~h~~nl~~rr~
~"7~ Wes ~~~°~°~~n ~~~~naa~e
ILo~~'o®cll9 II~'flo~gdi~
M~l~IU~']~~
Mf~q~~~ ~9
o®® ~aM.
~rescffite l~~yox~ ~olIlIln C. l~l[~iffigot
g?eg~Iln~y M~yo~ hoc ~Ila~so
,~®Il~IlffiissioIlner Bob ~o~•tes
`l.®%%IlIlY11ssIlOIl]t~Il' ~s. 66B?Il~Cll999 9SlIlIlflQ~y
~:oIlYIlIlffi1~~IlOfficr B~°ian g?. SaC~ett~
l[~~Ilagefl 1[,~ffigley, ~itiy t~~toIl°ffiey
Ka$Il nffi~ ]Poweii, pity AdIlffiixnis.ti~ato~
S~~~pn M. I~[i~°os, ~ifcy ~lcrrk
~o~ffi ~~Ci~soffi, )Police ~lnie~
llC~ M1 !IlIl°]~1fl3', Assis~~ffi~ to tlIle ~nt-y AdIl~iffii~~~a~®x'
l~i'Il'r~Ilfl IV~eli, Jf~i~°eCiorr of 1LeisIlxIl•e SeIl-vice~
®~Ilffi P~t~Il°s, l[?irreCtoIl• of ~raliliC VVoa-P~s/~Ilty 1JffigIlffice~
Kelly MO~~-o~~v, ~1~~ffieIl°/~COffioIlrIliC ~evcloPIlIl~effit/G~affi~s ~IIl°iteIl°
Slzer°yl l~ovveIl°, ~DiIl°eCgorr o~ (CoffinIl~rai~y ~Devclopffiaeffit
CAUL ~)~)ER. Mayor Maii~got called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
A ~raoffineffif~ of ~glL>El~'~' 1~1[lv~?Lt'g'A'>['~®l~ was l'olYowed by tie PIL]E~?~>~
ALIL]E~~r~1~C1J.
c~®I~][l~!1[~Jl~~'J('~ Alm®~J1~~lJI~lEI~7I'S. None.
)~~®~1~1('>~'~~l~tS/1P1~~~lLAl~1[A'I['g®l~T~:
A. ~ist~IlCt 1~oIlffiiIlIl~~goffi of tlIle BusIlffiess Persoffi oi' ~l~e MoIlatl~ Awarrdl
®Il° Mc`IlIl°Ch
Commissioner Sackett nominated Longwood Healing Center & Spa, 21.2
West Bay Avenue, for the Business Person of the Month Award for March
2010. Nomination carried. by a wlanimous voice vote.
B®A1~ APP®~laT'>['M]El~T`)<'S. None.
6. ~~JBIL)[~ ~~~J'IC.
t~. P~n&~liC ]P~Il•~iCig~~~ioffi.
Bruce Kubec; .1415 Hearthstone Lane, commended the Police Department
and said the last two to three weeks as he has traveled tln:ough school
zones there have been police officers present making our school zones
C~C 03-01-10/53
safer. He inquired if one of the Commissioners would talk during their
report. about economic development in Longwood. He said ho just learned
of anothf;r business that was leaving Longwood due to the wide~ung of
State Road 434. fIe inquired if the City was doing anything to encourage
those businesses to relocate within the City of Longwood and whether
they were doing anything front an economic development perspective to
try and get other businesses to come to the City.
~~l~l~~lN I~1'~' A~GIEl`l~A,
A. Apla~°®v~~ I~i~a~ntes ®f tihe >Ecfl~rr~n~rry I~egufl~~° Mce~iaIlg,
l~. Ap~~°®v~~fl ®f the Ma~°cflfl lE~pendi~~ar°e~.
A~Hfl91C'®vC'. Connnn~~ni~ ~ercvicc5 >~fl®cfl~ ~~an~ Anaea°ie~n Rec®s~~rry ~n~I
Rei~nve~y:ancxnt Act (CS~~-~)11~~y C~m~ err®~icfle~° A~rrcenneffif~.
Commissioner Cortes moved to approve the Consent Agenda as
s~.ibmitted. Seconded by Deputy Mayor Durso and carried by a
unanimous roll call vote.
>~~JI~><.,><~ H~A~fl~l~l~~,
A. fee®an~ n•~a~gng end ad®p~i®~a ®fl' ®~°~an~~nc~ I~l"o. ~®~fl_9g4•• ll~cvi~i®ffis t®
Lh~ l[.®n~~v®®d[ ~Dcv~fl®pnnen~ ~C®do (IC.~C) A~°kicfle ~Il, S~cf~n~?n ~.6,®,
e~nYi~fl~~fl f6Tlenng~®rr~ay Sig~~" ~n~ Arrticfle ~an~i~flr~cl "g3[arra~~flni~
~~lli~ff
Mr. Lan€;ley read Ordinance No. 10-1:914 by title only and an?iounced
having proof of publication...
Mayor M[aingot opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor or in
opposition to the ®rdinance.
Commissioner Sackett moved to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Con~nnissioner Cortes and carried by a unanimous
voice vote.
Conunissioner Sackett moved to approve Ordinance No. 10-1.914,
as presented, Item ~ A. Seconded by Deputy Mayor Durso and
carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
9, Jf~~GgJL~R >~~JS~1~1lE~S,
Ap~~~°®v~fl ~flIl~ R~~nfl~ing f®~° >{'~°®I'e~si®~~ll ~onsanY~ifl~~ Se~i~e~.
Corn~nissioner Cortes moved to accept Regular Item 9 A, as
presented. Seconded by Mayor Maiilgot.
Mayor M:aingot said he had some concenis about the list. He questioned to
what extE:nt the City promulgated participation by firms that have
CC 03-01-10/54-
businesses within the City of Longwood. He stated They would have to
meet the criteria in order to qualify. He said until that has been done, he
would not vote to support this.
Commissioner Bundy said he had a concern in that the City has a long
standing relationship with an architectural firm t11at understands the
premise of the City and what our vision is. He stated ACi has worked with
the City as a Consulta~lt, has done more both from the planning and design
side, and they were not at the top of the. list. Ide said lie would be voting
against this.
Conunissioner Sackett said lie agreed with what has been stated. He stated
he was disappointed in that they do not see the categories of the rankings,
only accumulative totals. He inquired how the. merits were made up of
what was .good and negative. He said he was not in favor of moving on
this- until he sees more nlfoimation.
Ms. Powell said they should have included. the Request for Proposal (RFP)
information for the Commission to look at. so that they could. see the
criteria. She explained there was a panel of a minimum of three people in
each category that reviewed the proposals.
Mr: Peters said that everyone on the tabulation sheet was who submitted.
He reviewed and explained the process. He stated the Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) was very specific in stating the types of projects and
work the City wanted. He said eaeli consultant put a lot of tinge and effort
in putting together a package.
• Deputy Mayor Durso said the. Mayor did not imply that the City should
show favoritism; but that every effort should be made to give local firms
the opporhulity to participate in the process and that was not illegal. He
suggested it might be better to pull this and revisit it.
Mr. Peters said the bid was advertised and they had seventy-siY (76) firms
apply.
Commissioner Cortes inquired as to the process used for advertising.
Mr. Peters advised it was advertised in the local newspaper and Demand
Star which is the primary source for vid documents, 1ZFP's and RFQ's.
Commissioner Cortes said a lot ofpeople do not subscribe to Demand Star
due fio the cost involved. However., they still should be able to participate.
Ms. Powell said this was placed on Demand Star, the City's website, anal
also a legal ad.and amlouncement in the local newspaper. She stated
people were not called individually. She advised the bid package can be
obtained tluough the City's website or businesses can contact Purchasing.
CC 03-01-10/55
i .
Coin~nissioner Sackett reiterated he did not feel comfortable in moving
forward with this without seeing any qualifiers as to what these numbers
were based on.
Ms. Pov~Tell said they could pull the Item and she would provide the
Commission with the actual RFP that will show the rankings and how the
points were detei~nined by the individual score sheets. She inquired if the
Conunssoii was looking for staff to individually contact these businesses
and. send out the bid package.
Commissioner Sandy declared they want to make sure that local firms are
given the opportunity to participate.
Mr. Peters advised if they inquire of people and they indicate they would
have wanted to put in a proposal, the entire package will need to be re-bid
as the process has been closed. He explained at this point firms know they
received a low ranking for specific reasons and they will have an
opportunity to revise their package.
Mayor Maingot said he would prefer being criticized for being thoroLigh.
He said there were -firms listed that are top of the line, but there were
others they need to reach out to and provide the opportunity t~ participate.
If they fail to meet the criteria, then they do not make the cut.
Commmissioner Cortes inquired if they woLild have to re-bid all categories,
or could it be separated.
Ms. Po~~ell advised they would have to put the entire package back out to
bid..
Mr. Langley said if he was asking. if they could go ahead and move
forward with awarding .some of the groups and. then re-advertise the
RBQ's for the other groups, he believed they could do that.
Mr. Peters said the way t11e RFP was structured nothing prevents the
Conunission from approving certain groups and go out for re-bid of
others.
Mayor Maingot said they need to see that in order to say they have done
their j ob properly.
Commissioner Sui~dy agreed that he wanted to see the criteria in order to
see how the rankings were derived.
Ms. Powell said if the Commission desires to put this back out to bid that
she would ask that they allow it to be put. back out to bid as it is written.
CC 03-01-10/56
Mr. Langley said it was not time sensitive in nature to where if they do not
npprove it tonight, then they lose it. He stated they need to decide which
direction they want to go as a Conunission, either re-issue the RFP to
allow new applicants to submit for all groups, or postpone the matter and
. have staff bring back more information and then make the judgment call at
the next Commission Meeting whether they want to move forward with
some of the groups.
Cormmissioner Cortes said he felt the appropriate course of action would
be to come back with more infoi7nation to see if it warrants even going
that far. ,
Commissioner Bundy said Iie did, not have a problem with going out to bid
with the RFP again.
Mayor Maingot inquired if it was the consensus of the Commission to go
back out to bid again. '
Commmissioner Cortes withdrew the motion.
Mayor Maingot withdrew lus second to the motion.
Com~nissioiier Sackett moved to have staff re-advertise the RFC
for all groups under one package. Seconded by Commissioner
Bundy and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
~e ~Il~canssg®ffi offi ~ever°ffi '~'rreffi~ lEffiv~r°®ffianeffigall ~ercvfee5 C®antirc~~to •
Commmssioner Cortes moved to approve Item 9 B, as presented.
Seconded by Deputy Mayor Durso.
Commissioner Bundy said he would like an update of total costs on a
quarterly basis placed in the Commission mailboxes.
Commissioner Cortes said he would like to see what Severn. Trent has to
say regarding the contract before going-any further with this.
Deputy Mayor Dlll'SO said he has been a big proponent of getting rid of
this contract. He stated it has cost the. City more money.
Mr. Peters said they have a process that has been implemented for cross
(racking. work orders and projects. He stated they will be tracking every
requisition on this project and will know the exact. costs.
Mr. Langley advised if there is a separation agreement negotiated, that
will be brought back to the Commission for consideration.
CC 03-O1-10/57
1l~Iofion carried by a four/one roll call vote with Commissioner
Sackett voting nay.
I[Dn~cu~~sa~®ra ®n ]~~°®~®sed ~~°cen "~nal€Ign~ Orr~dlr~~.n~~ ~T~?anu ~®)a
Deputy P?Iayor Durso said this lays a foundation for a green 1uilding
program.. He stated a green building program will serve as a foundation to
build on and expand efforts in land-use regulations, recycling, water
conservation, stoi~xnwater, and sustainability to promote coordination
among City Departments. He said with this Ordinance the City would be
taking steps to build value into properties by increasing durability with
low operation and maintenance costs, and high salvage vah~e. He declared
green buildings help cities to be more proactive in how they plan and
permit fixture development. The Ordinance is targeted toward
environmentally friendly commercial projects and will provide efficiency
incentives in the permitting process. He said this particular model
Ordinance has been used. by other cities and counties. He stated this green
Ordinance would establisaz clear, consistent forward thinking goals,,
programs,. and procedures that will help Longwood become amore
sustainable community. He said the program would promote economic
and environmental health in the City and provide leadership to both
private acid public sectors in the, arena of green building practices. He
stated the nice part about this Ordinance was that it does not impact
current development or developers. It is just another tool for people to
develop in fhe City of Longwood.
Con-imissioner Cortes moved to proceed with bringing this back as
~m Ordinance. Seconded by Commmissioner Bundy.
Mayor 1`?Iangot said he spoke with the City Attorney on how they could
proceed with this and changes to the Ordinance.
Mr. Langley said it would be appropriate format of regulations such as this
to adopt: a framework for creating this program in the Longwood
Development Code by Ordinance. He stated if they want to give
themselves some flexibility in perhaps changing the method of
implementation of that program, perhaps the Ordinance could specify that
the Conunission can adopt policies that implement that particular program
tluough a Resolution process. He said it was a good idea to have a
legislative enactment to create a program that gives incentives and they
could work with this Ordinance to accomplish that.
Deputy Mayor Durso inquired if he was saying the overall framework of
the program would be as an Ordinance and they would be able to change
the spec;ifics or working parts by Resolution.
1VIr. Langley said that was the .goal and they would just have to word the
Ordinance to accomplish that goal.
CC; 03-01-10/5~
Commissioner Bundy said this would be an ever changing and evolving
matter with new tecluiologies and products. He stated it was a good
direction for them to go.
Deputy Mayor Durso said his goal in this was two-fold.. He stated it was
tune for the City to take more progressive sfeps in afield that a lot of cities
are starting. to embrace. Also, it provides the City Administrator and staff
ano"then tool to offer businesses that want to come to the City. He said it
provides the City the opportunity to step up and say there is a better, more
efficient way of doing this.
Commissioner Sackett said he would like to see snore incentives and
agreed to move it forward.
Motion carried by a unanimous. roll call vote.
IDe IDg~ctassi®ffi ®ffi ®rrg~ann~~t'g®ffi~fl ~t~ucttnre );3I~~~ffig/]Pr®~®fcn®ffi Ir~~cze
(M~affigo~).
Mayor Maingot said this was an Item regarding a 1VIetnorandum dated
February 11, 2010 that he put before the Commission where he set out the
rationalization he felt they should do with regards to organizational
structure and ahiring/promotion freeze: He stated this provides that the
City Administrator would recommend to the Commission that a position
be f lled because it is either justifiably essential or would result in a
substantial fina~icial benefit to the City. He said if organizational or
departmental structure changes are recommended, the request will be
required to come through the City Administrator with justification for
approval by the City Co~ninission.
Mayor Maingot moved that the City Commission institute a hiring
and promotional freeze,, effective immediately, as outlined in his
Memorandum dated February 1 1, 2010. Seconded by
Gonunissioner Sackett.
Conunissioner Coi-tes inquired as to the timeline. He asked if this was
through the fiscal year and then they could discuss it during the budgetary
hearings.
Mayor Maingot said that was a point raised by the City Attorney. He
stated as soon as they could discover they were on an upswing in terms of
the economy and able to recover in .some of the areas they f nd themselves
in difficulty at this time, they can rescind this. He said wren they have the
Budget Work Session they should have a better idea of where they stand
in ternls of revenue.
CC 03-01-10/59
Conunissioner Cortes inquired about the current police officer position
that they were interviewing for anti whether it would be included in this
freeze.
Mayor Maingot said they would have to take that into considr ration as it
was a sniffing area that needs to be addressed.
Deputy Mayor Durso said he has given the idea of the freeze aloe- of
thought:. He agreed that limiting. spending was very import~int, but at this
point, he: was finding himself questioning the need for this particular
move. He stated the Commission has given the Administrator the guidance,
that they don't want her to overspend or expand staff rapidly. He said the
City Administrator has indicated to her Department Heads that they should
look internally to save money. He declared this borders on the
Conunission as a whole interfering with duties that they don't have
justification for at this point. He stated they need to focus on the actions of
the City Administrator anal she has reacted very responsibly. He said this
would slow processes and bind her hands when making shifts to the
organizational structure that she may need to make intei7lally. He agreed
they need to contiliue to be very cognizant of the spending, he did not see
a point i:n the need to deny her t11at flexibility.
Commissioner Bundy said this borders real close on interference with
Admiiu~itration. He stated the Budget was set by Ordinance and authorizes
those positions by Ordinance. He said. he felt this would be in direct
contravE:ntion with regards to modifying, an Ordinance. He stated the
Administrator understands where the Coinrnission was coming from and
he did not see a need for this.
Mayor Maingot said he'had discussed this with both City Attorneys with
regards 1`o any possible infringement per the Charter or interference with
Administration and he was told that it in no way attempted to breech that.
He stated with regards to the timeframe, this should be apphicable
throughout this entire budget period. He ,said with regards to the
interviews for the police officer position that it would not be affected. He
declared. he was convinced that they need to re-enforce their position. He
stated his Memorandum should in no way be interpreted as dissatisfaction
with her performance. He stated that the City Administrator and her
executive staff have done an outstanding job in controlling costs. He
declared. the intention of this was not to tie her hands, but to re-enforce
their decisions and that was why he brought the Item forward.
Mr. Langley said with respect to the issue of the Budget being adopted by
Ordinance, the typical rule is that you can only amend an Ordinance by an
Ordinance. However, in the Budget process, the Charter of the City
specifically states in Section 6.0~ than Reduction of Appropriations in the
Budget can be handled either by Resolution or Ordinance as does State
Law. Hc; would recomr~lend a matter like this be adopted by Resolution.
CC 03-01-10/60
He stated whether the Convnission believes what the Mayor is asking is
inconsistent with their role as a policy maker or not was not as easy for
him to answer as the Charter was not.as clear in their role on that. He said
it was clear in that the City Conunissoners were not to give orders to
employees that report to her. With respect to promotions, if that is a matter
of freezitZg spending to prevent further promotions, then that is something
that is probably within the purview of the Commission's budgetary
authority to freeze hiring and promotions. However, he cautioned the
Commission if the intent is to use. that to select individuals for particular
positions when the Administrator comes back tq say she would like to hide
a particular person, it would not be appropriate for the Commission to
request to see their resume and make that decision.
Commissioner Sackett said he would prefer to do it by Resolution and
adopt this hiring/promotion freeze. He would like to leave this position
within the Police l~epariment and not infiinge upon that. He stated the
Commnission was told in May they would have .abetter understanding of
where they were with the Budget. He would like to make this Resolution
. more time sensitive over four months.
Ms. Powell inquired if they were talking about reducing the Budget. She
said if they were not reducing the Budget then they did not need to do this
by Resolution. Secondly, if they do it by Resolution and reduce the
Budget, then it would serve no purpose for her to come back to the
Commission with the positions sle needs to fill as they would need to redo
the Resolution to increase the Budget.
Mr. Langley advised 11e was not recommending a reduction in this case.
He said the Mayors motion was to implenleiit a freeze on the funds for
luring or promotions.
Commissioner Bundy said if the only way they can do it by Resolution
was if they were freezing spending or lowering spending, then this was
freezing personnel and a hiring freeze, not a spending freeze. He stated
there was an employee getting ready to retire and they would not be able
to promote an individual to that position.
Ms. Powell reviewed-the positions that need to be filled at this time. She
affirmed they were getting ready to take over a contract of $500,000 and
these employees were being paid $11.3n~ an hour/$24,900 a year. She
inquired-where the Conunission wanted her to save the money, from
personnel costs where she can save $130,00,0 or save $500,000 by taking
over this contract where she would need these employees. She asked fc~r
guidance from the Commission as to what direction they want her to take.
She said she understands what the Mayor was .saying with regards to
bringing to the Coininission organizational changes, which she would do
anyway. She stated she was concerned with having to come to the
Conunission every two weeks to fill laborer positions. She inquired where
CC 03-01-10/61
the Commission wanted her to save the most money, on the persoiuiel side
or across the board spending.
Deputy Mayor Durso said everyone on the Commission wants to save
money. Fle stated the Administrator has indicated that there are portions of
a freeze she feels would be beneficial and supportive ajzd other ways that
would hinder her operating and running the City. He said if they were in a
positionwhere they had to check up on her hiring basic positions, then
they neeel to revisit whether or not she should be the City Administrator.
He declared something as simple as an entry level employee was not the
type of tlung~the City Conunission needs fo concern itself with when the
City Adnunistrator's job is to operate the City. He suggested iii an attempt
to save both sides of this, since there are seemingly some .issues they both
agree upon, that it be brought back at the next Meeting and work out some
type of agreement where there is a substantial hold on-spending, but gives
her the flexibility to hire .employees that slie feels are inunediately
necessar~r to meet the needs of the contracts the City is taking over.
Ms. Powell said she would bring any organizational changes to the City
Conunission. hz addition, if there are any promotions she would also bring
that to the City Commission for approval. She would request that if she is
just hiring boots on the ground that the Commmission allows hc,r to move
forward with that as it affects the operation of the City and ultimately the
bottom line with regards to overtime. She declared these employees were
working hard and they know we are taking over these contracts and they
are open to that and want to have more ability to make the City look good.
C'onu~iissioner Bundy moved to amend that until June 1St that any
promotions or organizational restructuring be presented to the City
C'onunission for approval and eliminate the hiring freeze.
Seconded by Deputy Mayor Durso.
Mr. Lan€;ley said in this circumstance the Corrunission could give
direction to the City Administrator by a vote if they desire to do so.
Commissioner Cortes said a Resolution or Ordinance would tie the hands
of the City Administrator even further. He stated the Conunission wants to
give her direction and maintain cost savings.
Motion to amend carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
ItZain motion cai~ied, as amended, by a four/one roll call vote with
Commissioner Saelcett voting nay.
flQD. CJ['1['~ A~DI~1<l~1flS'fl']L~A'fl'®)f~'~ fl2)EP®1[~'fl'. No report.
flfl. ~A~CD~g Al~~ C'~1~I~I[>I~S>[®l~l>~)~~9
~as$~gc$ #4. No report.
CC 03-O1-10/62
~n~t~°net Commissioner Sackett reported the Opening Day Ccreillony
for Babe Ruth Baseball was the best he has ever seen. He commended the
staff and t11e Fire Department. He said the fields looked great, bu'c the
weather was not cooperative.
~IlStir°Ict #>l. Mayor Maingot reported on February 16t1i, he and the City
Administrator attended the Mayors and Managers Meeting where the main
topic was the third generation of the one (1 cent sales tax. The eunent
one (1 cent sales tax is up in November 2011. On February 17tf', he
presented Ms. Josephine Young with a certificate for her 105th Birthday..
He and the City Administrator attended the Tri-County League of Cities
on February 18th. He attended the Seminole County Prayer Breakfast on
February 19t~' and. he also attended the Envision Seminole Seminar.
~ii~trrnct ~r~. Deputy Mayor Durso tlianlced everyone for their support on
the Green Ordinance. He said there were a lot of issues coming before the
State Legislature that will affect the City directly, specifically Amendment
4-, Red Light Cameras, and some mobility fee exercises the Legislature is
going tluough that will be extremely bad for our budget. He encouraged
everyone to get involved. He reported there was a water main break in his
neighborhood on the corner of Grant Street and Maine Avenue. He stated
there was a significant breakdown in conununication from t_he City to the
constituents that live in his neighborhood, including him. He said this
breakdown in communication was unacceptable and he hoped this was a
lesson learned. He commended the City for their response and said there
was immediate reaction once the issues were discovered. He stated there
was more immediate action to get out and let people lcnowwhat they were
doing and a letter was sent. He thanked the City for paying attention to
this matter and taking the steps to address it in the firttue.
ll~n~t~nefi Corrunissioner Cortes gave kudos to the Leisure Services
Department and said the ball fields were looking awesome. He said it was
a great event aril based on comments,. people have noticed an
improvement. He reported he received an additional list oftwenty-one
(21) new businesses coming into the City. He stated he has been
contacting the businesses to welcome them to the City and he would.
continue doing that. He said he agreed with what Mr. Bruce Lubec stated
earlier t11at the City needs to do as much as they can to try and retain the
businesses that are here. He said the City has an excellent Ordinance for
the -cure. plans. He inquired if the City has contacted the owners. of Burger
Ding to try and keep them here.
Mr. Petei-s said the Burger King was in the cure process. He stated we
have attempted to obtain information from the Attorney representing the
owner in an effort to keep their in Longwood. He said it was more of
financial reasons for their not staying.
CC 03-01-10/63
Commissioner Cortes discussed the earthquake experienced by Chile, and
said lus heart and prayers go out to the people of Chile.
Mr. Langley reported on the First ~nerican Fireworks case against the
City Business License Clerk that there was a case management conference
tomorrow where he will have some timeframes for discovery and trial. He
also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that he provided a copy to the
Commissioners by electroiuc mail. He reported he would be filing a
Motion to Dismiss the Al(ied Veterans case. He said he would like to
schedule. an Executive Session of the Commission for late March or early
April to discuss that case further.
IlJo R.~~ Il ~JL~~ICO.II'~9'~ Y~1I_'~ll ~E®JL o
A, ~~escl~edulle ®II° cancell the ~t~nly ~®fl® J~e~~nl~r ~Itiy
~;OIInIIIIflII3SII®n I~ltcctgIIn~e _
D/Is. Mirus reported that July St'' was a scheduled holiday for the
(:ity. She inquired. if the Commmission desired to cancel the July 5,
2',010 Regular City Commission Meeting or reschedule it.
Goinmissioner Bundy said in the past they have rescheduled it with
tL1e instructions to staff if there is not any pressing business it can
be cancelled.
1`?Iayor 1Vlaingot said the Meetings have been moved from the
1`?Ionday to Wednesday.
Commissioner Bundy moved to reschedule the July Stt'
Meeting to July 7tn with the proviso that if there was no
imminent business necessary, two weeks out they can
cancel it. Seconded by Cormmissioner Sackett and carried
by a unanimous roll call vote.
]L~e I-~~D~®><;~lf~l~d, Mayor Maingot adjourned the meeting at 8::59 p.m.
F
• 1/~/~/
~'It'~']E~')ce
~ ~ ~1.~
S~~°~ln lie 1~1[l~'~~~y li'1I1@/I[cLy I~1[l~A, Cflty ~le~~
CC 03-01-10/64