Loading...
Ordinance 07-1835 ORDINANCE P(0.07~1835 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COMPREfl:ENSIVE PLAN; GOALS, OB.:VECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA, ADCIPTING A NEVV PI7$LIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT, AMENDING THE CAi'ITAL IMPROVEMENT .EL]EMENT, AND AMENDING THE INTERGOVERNIVIENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT AS THEY RELATE TO THE .STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COIVIMIJNITY AFFAIRS (DCA) RECOMMENDATIONS; PROV[DING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFEC;TTiVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes requires the City of Longwood to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Flan of the type and in the maiuler as set forth in said Chapter; and WHEREAS, the Seminole County School Board is respo~isible forproviding Public School Facilities to City re~si.dents; and WHEREAS, the City, and all other non-exempt local governments within the county, have entered into a Public Schools hlte~°local Agreement ~-vith the School District, wluch sets forth matters required by state statute related to school concurrency, and. which is intended to achieve a uniform, countywide Public School Concurrency system;, and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a Public Schools Facilities Element in accordance with state statutory requirements; and ORDINANCE NO. 07-1835 CPA 02-07 Page 1 of 3 ~6'HEIaEAS, the City of Longwood and its Land Plainung Agency have complied with the requirements of the aforesaid Chapter and with Chapter 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code in amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Longwood, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Longwood has held a public hearing subject to Section 163.3104, Florida Statutes; WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Cormnunity Affairs (DCA) has made recommendation to the City of Longwood with respect to the data and analysis as this iiifonnation relates to the Public Schools Facility Element and its relationslvp to the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; NOS, THEIZEEOIZE ~E IT OIZDAINEI) THE CITY COIVIliZISSION OF THE CITE' OE I..ONG~OOI), FI,OI~iI)A, AS FOI,I.,OWS: SECTION 1: This ordinance is adopted in conformity with and pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code. SECTION 2: A copy of the amended Comprehensive Plan, Goals, Obj ectives and Policies, and the Comprehensive Plan Data and Analysis are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable and if any section; paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance or the application thereto any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not effect other sections or words or applications of this Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 07-1835 CPA 02-07 Page 2 of 3 ~ SECTION 4: All ordina~lces, parts of ordinances, resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION This Ordinance shall be in force and take effect 21 days after the State Lazed Planning Agency publishes a notice of compliance in accordance with Section 163.31 ~4, Florida Statutes. TRANSMITTAL RF'.ADING : Z .FIRST READING: S' ~ ~ r S Z Cx~ SECOND READING: ~ a.~ a ~ I , Z C7D ~ ~ ~ S PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS o2 ~ S~DAY C)P ~a~ua,v~~( , 200 JOHN GOT, MAYOR ATTJEST• ~ i SARAN M. MIi? US, CMC, CITY CLERK Approved as to form a~id.legality for the use and reliaaice of the City oi~Longwood; Florida, only. _ 'C~~~A ROPE ~ ITY ATTORNEY ~ ORDINANCE NO. 07-1835 CPA 02-07 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A Cu4g~ ®f ~®o~~w®~~ G~~®~a®se~ Q~ueo~~u~eo~a it® fC~e ~®o~~rreG~e~~6~e ~~a~ ~G~Q ~a~a~ai D~pp®~seu~~eo~~ [~~e~e~g ~e ~~9~~G~C TD~~~' ~C~®®L C~~~CtT~ V~~~®~ ~6~C A[~~G~~S~~® C®NS~~T~~T @~99TG;1 TG~~ ~®®I~TE® ~C~~C~~ ~GG~~9~C~ ~T~R!®~G~®~ G~®6~ G~~~~tC ACC=-9®®~~e ®~~eo~uve ~9 ~a ~~op~Deo~oe~~~ ~o6~o~V C~~oa;au~rrerucy The City shall adhere to the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning ~~nd School Concurrency as Amended JanuaN 2005 to coordinate the approval of residential subdivision approvals, site plans or their functional equivalent to ensure adequate school capacity is available consistent with adopted level of service standards for public school concurrency. f~®Bu~y ~e Consistent with the Interl~~cal Agreement, the City and School Board agree to the Level of Service Standards of the Public Schools Facilities Element. G ®~ooy ~e The City shall ensure that future development pays a proportionate. share of thE~ costs of capital facility capacity needed to accommodate new development and to assist in maintaining adopted level of service ~~tandards, and appropriate methods in development conditions. L~®ioo Ce The Cit hereb +r y Y Y ~ ~ adopts by reference the Seminole County School Board's capital improvement budget which was adopted on September 11 2007 for the fiscal years 2007-?008 through 2011-2012 which is a financially feasible schedule of school capacity enhancement projects~hisf-i and includes school capacity sufficient to meet projected student demancls, in consultation with the School Board's projections of student enrollment, based on the adopted level of service standards for public schools. i1r~=t FJI ^ p~,,,~,~ Diihl'n nhnnl C~nili^~~ P'a cx in-inr~ /G` n- nnlr ('n in}~ v wiry L-a~~ ~ - -;-889 - nio,a~ nni,~~~,~,r ~2-~89-9-88 _ _ - - €ie~F - ~~989;898 X8;898-089 - - ~~18-} ~ - ~8 s~83;888;988 - ~5; 9-88; 9-89 ~~Q~B~~~ ~B'4'D~PO!/~QV~r~~ f~9~u~oea~~ ~8-AAe~laf $3~1-X9;988 - - - - r L,~~; ea;r~ S7't-cJ ~ l-!GV ~ t7G i,rYr:f'~ni! I I .~rna~.r n_rb f7 n~ iA Cni ~ c /Cc innh t•`ni ~nfi.\ -r;=r„ r.---rs..c-~~-rte ,r^vQ.. ~ ~'r~r arc-vc.., ,.p7 Qcoi~ni~o ?nn7-,~-;?nom ='l3-~ `?G~'4!1 r~~n~ ?nlalg~ viv sv~-v I'c°c Std ; -rv 3 ~ v~ G°~ QGi-r=vv~ti~`-"v~ ~S~` a~c0~-~..v ~1-d ~1~dW-i-~ Si-1~~cJ-~t-c7 -td DG('n fl/1~inFcnonno v'~dod~dd SVF! ~dd-d~9 S~c59~9 q p~~~~ i i e i o i ~ t~/~~~\\app`t~~7d~~-t~Vi-tt~.~ Q~~~~~++Q~ ~(~~~A~ QQ~~~~QQ ~~~~+AA ~~~~~~~0~ Q~]~+ n~~++A~ rp ~G+~^ uVf~-t7-d gCGtrl7C7't `-t S3ctt7G~Hti`'t ',9t~`t E3`t } Q~Z n~~ Tan ~~g~rag X71 77~ nay ~-7-a~--ar4~c 4~g q~ 4~-v-rP ~-.ro ~ , q'r-.-L-ivooo i ~ , C oC o lv~n°~i-uic ~ C~~-Q-~~_4, ~-8 ~ a 7 7 n F a O Q a r 0 ~4--~4~4-~6~ a~~ c~n~~ n~n~n~ nn 4•~ ~n~n(~ n(~n(~n(+ iCnne nn i ,nnn I m n o o ~ Stciz-JtltJ ~ CCd ~ ~ dtt8 ~ 999 7~ttH1~-~t S~c3a~ti~n ttti 4CCti ~~n~lina Tov Dofiin~ W-t7 9,~-vti CS3-1-~~~~g q>-t~8~~1788 4^~_~g~88~ bp~tAt~i-~ d tZl'°cl-~t , ~ X1;889;899 X1-;9-98;888 ~a;898-;9~9 ~889~999 X99;889 i Imnrn.~omon~/I nFo rock ' TrT~' P'v~rc~~~-rc"c ~-Rr~Q+~a#~ ~9;-999-,989 ~~~-~e~al ~7~ ~r;>; ,~99~-1-~~? X88--89~6~- a~~4-~-8?86~ X93-Q~-1-1-3 j q-. L~.-.-L~oo ~ , ~ > > , hrinr Voor ('orn in~ror Qom. aSo_a.oTS2~r @`J7 'I~~TOOF= @11 n~~_.o~o_o Q7 ~ i c~~F ~7`~ ~r;~ Qo~ ~a7 7FS2 Q'1~7 X1;7 ~1~`2 ~1~~a-164 Qa7 ~~F ~aa 4-rzv~ rr-L~vv q`JVZ-~~r-rw Y~-vcc`~ ~r~•r,~W~l Imnr~r~r~nT !71~n c'nr Carr.inn Lg_~n.i C nilr±~,~c /_1 rJ rl~nn /IR mnrl I'n / mine O r D o m n_-rrv~grnn ~n 7~9y ~ 99-gi~~ ~ -ti3; -F9 ~C-~ 7i-rt ~z-~-~,~ ` 4 r7 r7~rn-rcu (~_'rr~ornninnrl I ~Loc _ ~9p899 Cg3-1 ~~GH9~Ca9 _ ~ flfl~AA-r~~..~~.IIn^^-vrw'~ ~ icc.~. i #~ft~l~t~ ('~ccolhorni _ _ _ I ~-1;888; 998 ~-~988 ~ 899 IIiJ~ilhniilAc 4Amin _ _ i VcyCC-~~Cty - ~ I~ Lcnn I-loinhfc _ QQ~~nnnn nnnnnn QQ~~ - - i Dni inrl RIrJn ' '~v-cr~v-~T°5 n ' c~u-rti:-v ~~°ynr'i~ ~-1~-999~t+9 _ Q~(~ _ D i n~-rr-r°cvrcvt - - g1Yi Cb'7tJt+C ¢7-n7-i C't7C-bi t7b 9 . 4rlrJiFinn/Dcmnrlclinn I Ccminnlc Llinh P~-1$888-988 c~~r_~g~8 _ _ C n riC nvprrn9zanr°. - X99 ~ e ~~I'~ - ~~999;999 $-~888~988 1A/ilcnn/('_cncv~ _ _ _ /7\ C~l ~ v _ ~ _ _ n~iicrln {-link ;999 ~ ~ - - - ~1 ~~~u$~~ Du~p~p®d~ov~~o~~ ~D~~~~t~ ~u~~/ ~®r~~~~~®9 GAG'®~®~~~I ~o~~~~G~G~G~~ ~G~~ ~®o~~G'~~~G~~u~s~ ~~~m~ ~G~~ ,~,.,a-~+g - ~1~~988 ~-~989~999 - - ~~a~2~ °e~~ ~-~-1;989;989 - - ~iLTI~T„l~~iZC q nnn nnn ~ ~ ~~p~a~aU ~o~p~~®~~~~~o~~ C 8~o~~a~~~ ~u4~y ®ff ~®~~w®®dl G rr~~~~e~ ~anroeo~®9o~ueo~~ g® ~~e ~®u~p~peV~er~euese p~a~ ~~Q ~~~ep~~ve~o~~e~tka0 C®®po9u~aigu®c~ ~Be~e~vit ®A~ VD: C®~L~a~®~~Tl~ ~N® C®®V~D~N~T~ ~9VTC~ ~C~~ ~~~~®IL C ~~R~ ~~V~i~V'~®~G C®~DV~T~ T~ ~V~9~1~~~ V,~~~C ~ ~~ALiTV r~~~iL u~ ~C~®~~ G ~CQLOT~~~U!tGC~VC~`;I TG~G N~~~~ TG~~ C~T~f'~ ~~Y(I~T~N~ ~~9~ ~~T~D~~ P®p~IL/AT0®N, ®~~~e~~u~e Ff: ~~~®®D ~~4e~0~~a~ /~~~eec~em~4 The City will implement the 2007 /nterloca/Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008 with the school board, municipalities and county providing for close coordination and evaluation of development proposals. ~®Vu~b A: The City will adhere to the notification and coordination .provisions of the agreement., to include: 1. Notifying the school district of Land Planning Agency meetings 2. Participation in the school planning activities of the Planning Technical Advisory Committee. 3. Requiring a School Capacity Analysis Letter of Determination (SCALD) from the school board prior to the approval of subdivision plans and site ~ plan approvals for residential projects as defined by the agreement. i ®~~eotruve ~9Ua ~~S~e~~®ve~o~~oeo~~ai0 C®~poluo~at~u®a~ ' The City shall strive to maintain and enhance joint planning processes and procedures for coordination of public education facilities for planning i and decision-making. p~~u~y ~o On an ongoing basis, the City shall establish new and review existing coordination mechanisms that will evaluate and address its i comprehensive plan and programs and their effects on the system of , public schools and the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008 ~i ~~t~~~~®~r~~~u~~s~~~~ ~®®o°~luo~a~a~u~ C ~8~~ ®ff L®o~~w®~dl V~r®~®~e~ A~e~d~e~tk t® $6~e ~®~~rreG~eraal~ee G~Pau~ GSA ®~~®7 ~C~C~I'0®V~ ~V f~~D~LL9G ~C~®®LL f~AGILV`~~E~ C~~[~I~iGR9T 9V~1T~®®4~CT9®~',I~f~aGl~~~®Q~fl~® The Public Schools Facility Element includes objectives and policies to support the provision of public school facilities in a timely manner. The City of Longwood does not have the authority to directly provide school facilities, but is required by State Law to work with the Seminole County School Board to address the coordination of public school facility planning with land use planning and development approvals. Legislation enacted by the 2005 Florida Legislature mandated a comprehensive approach to school planning by revising laws that govern both School Districts and local government planning. A new 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public ScFaool Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008 that included pro~;edures for coordinating land use planning, development approvals and school planning was the first step in this process. The Interlocal Agreement, including the process for `school c:oncur-rency' (coordination of planning to ensure school capacity availability as needed by new developments in accordance with State Law) is required to be adopted by the Board of (~ourrty Commissioners, City Commissions, and the Seminole County School Board in 2007 and was amended in January 2008. The new requirerrients of the 2005 Legislation also included adoption of a Public School Facilities ~ Element containing aproportionate-share mitig~rtion methodology within all local comprehensive plans, and the following additional amendments: o Adoption within the Gity's Capital Improvements Element of the Level of Service standards applicable countywide that est;~blish maximum permitted school utilization rates relative to capacity; o Adoption within tl~e City's Capital Improvements Element o~F the financially feasible Public School Capital Facilities Program addressing school capacity improvements that is adopted as part of the Seminole County School Board's overall Capital Improvements Program; o Amendments to the City's Concurrency Management Element to include school concurrenc:y in the Concurrency Managerent System; and o Amendments to the City's Intergovernmental Coordination Element to revise objectives and policies that address the City's pi-oce:~s of coordination with the School Board. Exhibits illustrating school capacities are included in the Public School Facilities Element and the Concurrency Service Area (CSA) boundary map is included in the Support Document. ~®~L As a basic tenet of community life, it is the goal of City of Longwood to contribute to and maintain a high quality public school environment and diverse education system. ,Danuary 2008 Pale ~ of 20 Paablac Schools facility Ei~rrrent ~u~~ ®ff L~~~~®®dJ G~~®p®~edJ ~~e~~~~ae~~ a® tie ~~~p~eG~eo~sfi~e G ~a~ ®C~~~~TV~dC~ ~ LL~F~C~L ~~~~~~C~ ~T~~®l~~®~ AV~9~ ~C~f~Q90~~ ~®l~~l©A~VC~~ The City shall coordinate with the School Board in the School Board's efforts to correct existing deficiencies and address future needs through implementation of adopted level of service standards and appropriate public school facility service area boundaries. The level of service standard is a countywide standard specified in the "2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008", wherein the following terms are used: Permanent FISH, meaning the permanent facilities within the inventory of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities used by the Florida Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities; and Level of Service (LOS.) Standard, meaning a standard established to measure utilization of capacity within a Concurrency Service Area (CSA). Current LOS within a CSA is determined by dividing the full-time equivalent student count (FTE) for the Fall Semester at the same type of schools by the permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools. Projected or future LOS is determined by the dividing the projected enrolled students at the same type ' of schools within a CSA by the planned permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools. I G~®~Bcy ~ l~dla~~itu®o~ ®ff Level ®f ~e~ru~e ~~a~~dlarr~a QLO~~ I To ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth, Seminole .County, the cities within the County and the School Board agree that ~ the desired LOS standard shall be 100% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for each school type within each Concurrency Service Area (CSA.) I o financially achieve the desired LOS standard, the following tiered LOS j standard is established as follows: 2008 - 2012 Beginning 2013 Elementary and Middle CSA 100% of Permanent FISH 1'00% of Permanent FISH j Capacity Capacity High School CSA 110% of Permanent FISH 100% of Permanent FISH Capacity Capacity f~®VBc~ ~ use 0~ Le~eO ~e~Bce ~~a~~arro9s QL®~9 The City shall use its concurrency management system (CMS) to coordinate with the School Board to ensure that the level of service standard (LOS) that has been established for each type. of school is maintained. P®~uc~ ~ use C®a~caa~pecucy Se~iBce ~~ea Q~SA) C~®a~u~~apfles The City shall apply school concurrency using clustered Concurrency Service ' Area Boundaries (CSAs) as adopted by the Seminole County School Board. ~®~ucy ® CSA e~c~O g~~e o~ sc6~~~~ Je¢~e~aPy X008 Wage ~ ®ff ~0 Fub~ac ScVt®o4s Feca{6ty Elerneu~g Citty L~®~~~~®~ P~®~®se~l G~r~eo~~ru~e¢~st tie C®o~ai+~rrelheo~~uve G~6a¢~ CPS The CSA boundaries estak~lished by the School Board will be based on ~ clustered attendance zones 'or each school type (elementary, middle and high school) and will be re-evaluated by the School Board as needed. P®iuoy ~ L~evie~d b®~c~dlarry oh~~g,es The City shall review proposed public school facility service area boundary changes and submit comments to the School District within forty-five (45) days of receipt. P®iucy G~ C®®pc9u¢~atu®m~ ~ch~®D ®'~istr~uo$ CaPitaiU Pr®~rao~o a~~ P®4entuai ~erlou~e ~~ea CS®auo~dlarry ~6~a~o~gle~ The School Board annual update of its Capital Improvements Schedule will include review of service area boundaries, and, if necessary updates to the CSA map. P®VBc~~ ~ ~a.oio9eDioves au~dl ~tar9dlapds ff~p tV~e ~®du~ioati®o~ ®f C®ovca~r~r~erDC4r ~errvu~e ~rea~ Any Party to the 2007 Interlacal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School ConcurrencV as .Amended January 2008 may propose a change to the CSA boundaries. Prior to adopting any change, the School Board will verify that as a result of the changE:: The adopted level of ser\iice standards will be achieved and maintained for each year of the five-year planning period; and The utilization of school capacity will be maximized to the greatest extent possible, taking into account transportation costs, court approved desegregation plans, and other relevant factors. The City and other partie:~ to the agreement shall observe the following process for modifying CSA maps: Changes in school attendance boundaries shall be governed by School Board Policy 5.30, Section 120.54 F.S. and applicable uniform rules for administrative proceedin~~s. At such time as the School Board determines that a schools} attendance boundary is appropriatE; considering the above standards, the School Board shall transmit the revised attendance zones or CSAs and data and analysis to support the changes to the Cities, to the County, and to the PSFPC. 3. The County, Cities, .and PSFPC shall review the proposed amendment within the times prescribf:d by Section 120.54 F.S. 4, The change to a Concurrence Service Area boundary shall conform to revised attendance boundaries and become effective upon final adoption. ~ January 200$ Page 3 of 20 Public Schoolls Facility element Cu~y ®f ~®o~~w~®c9 fir®~®~e~ Ao~~~~~eo~it it® ~~e C~a~~rreVbea~suve f~aa~ ®C~~DC~CIf 9~C IV ®C~~d~L®PV~~V~T C~~G~©~I~ATi ~~~9 T® ~C~~~~9~ C®~NC~~1~~~9C~f The City will coordinate its development review efforts with the Seminole County School Board, Seminole County, and the cities to achieve concurrency in all public school facilities serving students who reside in the City of Longwood.. ~®~u~y ~ ©e~eel®~au~oeo~~ ~e~uew err®ce~s fro new .development orders approving. a site development plan will be approved by the City until a School Capacity Availability Letter has been issued, pursuant to the availability standard specified in Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S., unless the development has been found exempt from school concurrency. ~~~u~~ ~ ~a~~~eit6®o~ ~cC~~®V ~~e~c~apPeu~cy ~~~~uDa~u~o~s ~ , i~ ~i„ n ~nns~ Longwood shall adopt school concurrency provisions into the Longwood Development Code (LDC) consistent with the requirements of the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School concurrency as Amended January 2008 fo,~~~-,~,-ted °~°nn'.,n cc-h-e~: ~er~;-~r-~-e~y. The City shall begin implementing the school concurrence management system on January 1, 2008. ~~~~CT~~9~ X80 ~®®~d~~9G~T~®V@N ®F C~~S~~T~~~~ ~V~~ FLDTQ~V~C~ ~~G;I~®~ F~~~L-ITilf ~ G ~~4~G~96~9~ U~6BTC~ T G~~ ~~T~G ~ LQ~~ ~S~ C~L~~~~V~T A6~9© ©~QO~L~P~C~~T ~~~G~®Ff~aL ~'~®CC~~~ The City shall coordinate future siting of schools and capacity needs with development permitting and changes to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). P®~ucy ~ C®®rrc9a~~a~l®u~ ®f c®uvo~r~e9~e~~uve ~Dam~ ao~oeo~du~ueu~~s a~~ facuVuity ~~ei~vu~orug I he City will coordinate the timing and approval of administrative and privately submitted comprehensive plan land use map amendments with the availability of school facility capacity. P~~ucy ~ ~6$e ~fi~es aru~ c®-~®cattu®~ u¢~ L~u~g~~®~ The City shall follow the site selection process identified in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School concurrency as Amended in January 2008. In addition, the City will work with the School District staff to identify sites for future educational facilities, in the City limits that meet the minimum standards of the School Board where possible and where consistent with the provisions of the Longwood Comprehensive Plan. When the size of available sites does not meet the minimum School Board standards, the City will support the School Board in efforts to use standards more appropriate to a built urban environment. To the extent feasible, as a solution to the problem of lack of sufficiently sized sites, the City shall coordinate with the School Board to achieve co-location of schools with City facilities. Jau~uary ~00~ Page 4 of ~0 ~ Pu6~Bac Sc~®oEs Fac6lity ~leru~ent duty L®o~~w~®d1 ~r®~~~edl ~au~ue~ndo~ern~ ft® tG~e C®o~~~eCaeo~~uve ~Da~ CAA ®~~0~ ~ G ®iucy ~ Cuty ~argBcup~a~tu®~~ uu~ Ptau~rsum~g TecC~o~IcaV Qdle~l~®~y C®u~o~6ttee QPU~C? The City shall be represented at the Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) meetings, as providad in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning anti School Concurrency as Amended in Januan/ 2008, for purposes of discussing population projections and other data. P®Eucy ® Qe$eru~auovBu~~ t~pacits The City and School District staff shall coordinate the determination of school capacity demands of new residential development through the development review process, during which time the School District staff shall apply student generation multipliers consistent with those applied by the Seminole County School Board as well as supplemental multipliers for mixed use development, and the Department of Education (DOE) student enrollment projections. P®IBcy C R~otu$ucatu®ra o$ ~aaU~rm~ut4ai fi~e~u~ero4uaV A~~Vucati~~s The City shall notify the ~~chool Board's Planner of the submittal of all residential development preliminary plats within fifteen (15) days of submittal to the County and shall provide copies of subdivision site development plans and site plans with residential development for review. P®@dcy F ~®tu$icatu®u~ age~~as The City shall continue to ~~rovide the School Board Planner with agendas containing proposed residential developments, Land Planning Agency and City ~ Commission meetings. ®~JIECTU~IE i@~ C®~9C~~F~~P~C~f The City shall require that public school facility capacity is available concurrent with the impacts of new rE;sidential development, as required by Section 1G3.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes (F.S.), beginning on January 1, 2008. G ®ticy A Tu¢~irog C®cocasrrrerocy ~e~~iew The City shall require that ;III new residential development be reviewed for school Concurrency at the tirrie of preliminary subdivision or site plan submittal. fP®9ucy g G~esuVts C®rDCUrreo~cy review In compliance with the avail~~bility standards of Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S., the City shall not deny a preliminary subdivision plan or site plan due to failure to achieve the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public school facilities when the following occurs: o Adequate school facilities are planned and will be in place or under construction within tF~ree (3) years of the date of approval of a final subdivision plan or site plan. o The developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities consistent with the methodology in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended ~ January 2008 Page 5 og 20 Public Schools Facility Eierment c~ut~~/ L~®o~gw®®~ f~~~E~~se~ Qo~eo~dl~e~~ a~ ~~e ~®~pceG~r~o~su~~ G~Gam~ January 2008, which has been adopted into the Longwood Development Code (LDC). P®Gu~b C G~esudeo~tuaV uses ~~e~~~ ~~®o~o tthe ~e~a~u~e~~eo~~s ®~r S~~®®i C®rnc~u~r~eu~oy The following residential uses shall be exempt from the requirements of school concurrency: o All single family lots of record at the time the school concurrency implementing ordinance became effective. o Any new residential development that has a preliminary plat or site plan approval or the functional equivalent for a site specific development order prior to the commencement date of the School Concurrency Program. o Any amendment to a previously approved residential development which does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the type of dwelling units (i.e., single family to multi-family, for example.) o Any age restricted community with no permanent residents under the age of 18 (a restrictive covenant limiting the age of residents to 18 and older shall be required.) P®Guoy ~ ~9se ®f ~evena~es ~eoeu~red Thy®~gh ~e®p~®r~6®na~e Shape ~v~8uttugaitu®~ Any revenues received for proportionate share mitigation are to be spent on capital improvement projects to expand.. capacity for school facilities to enable them to accommodate students. G~®Gu~y C~ ~p®~®r~u®o•uafe S~a~e G~~u~u~a$d®o~ In the event there is not available school capacity to support a development, the School Board may entertain proportionate share. mitigation options and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional school capacity, Q~~ When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer's proportionate share will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to achieve the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined and published by the State of Florida. Q~~ The methodology used to calculate a developer's proportionate share mitigation shall be as follows: (~~o~~~tuou~a~e Shame a Q'®e~eG®po~veu~~ stagydents ~ ~daBGailbGe Ca~aoBt1~) x zT®ta9 C®s~ Gae~ sfuden$ state®n Where: 'Development students =those students from the development that are assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available capacity. January X008 gage 6 of ti0 ~ 6~ub~ac SchooBs ~'ac696ty ~6~rnen$ ~utt~/ ~®~~w®c~o9 ~~®~®~e~ l~o~eo~dlo~eu~it g® ~C~e C®~~r~~G~~o~~Bve ~Ga~ C~~ 2Total Cost =the cost per student station as determined and published by the State of Florida. ~3) The applicant shall be allowed to enter a 90 day negotiation period with the School Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a mitigation option deemed financially feasible by tree School Board, the developer shall enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the School Board. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the impact of a residential development must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Capacity enhancing projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan shall be considered as committed in accordance with the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within the same CSA as the proposed residential development, the developer may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed development in accordance with the formula provided in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January .?008. 3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement Plan, the ~ School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the impacts from a proposed residential development, if it is funded through the developer's proportionate share mitigation contributions. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to: Contribution of lane or payment for land acquisition suitable for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school capacity; or Co. Mitigation banking based on the construction of a educational facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits; or Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable for use as an educational facilities; or d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational facility; or e. Construction or er:pansion of permanent student stations at the impacted school wig:hin the CSA; or f. Construction of a educational facility in advance of the time set forth in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. (4) For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost to construct the mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future construction costs at the time of the anticipated construction. Im~~rovements contributed by the developer shall recE:ive school impact fee credit. ~ January 2008 Fa~a of ~0 9~ublic Schoois P=ac6lity Elarnant Gutty ~®o~~w®~d G p~~~~eo9 G~1o~ueo~dJuv~eo~tt ~fhe C®~~r~eG~en~uve G~G~o~ Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate share mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees that would have been used to fund the improvements on which the proportionate fair share contribution was • calculated. The portion of impact fees available for the credit will be based on the historic distribution of impact fee funds to the school type (elementary, middle, high) in the appropriate CSA. Impact fee credits shall be calculated at the same time as the applicant's proportionate share obligation is calculated. Any school impact fee credit based on proportionate fair share contributions for a proposed development cannot be transferred to any other parcel or parcels of real property within the CSA. QED A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be subsequently amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to reflect a reduction in planned or constructed residential density. 4~9 Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share mitigation total. Q®~ Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. • Q~~ Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second Determination Letter shall be issued. If mitigation is agreed to, the School Board shall issue a ~ new Determination Letter approving the development subject to those ,mitigation measures agreed to by the local government, developer and the ~ School Board. Prior to, site plan approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and binding agreement with the local government, the School Board and the Developer that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer and the relevant terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the Determination Letter shall detail why any j mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is not in compliance with school concurrency requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate capacity is available, or that there is not a negotiated ; proportionate share mitigation settlement following the ninety (90) day negotiation period as described in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School concurrency, constitutes final agency action by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S. Q~®D ~~~ea0 ~~®oe~~. A person substantially affected by a School Board's adequate capacity determination made as a part of the School concurrency Process may appeal such determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S. ~.J Jaeaa~apy X008 Pale ~ off ~0 Peab9lc ScV~®®9s ~aculuty BBeon~nt ~u~~ ®ff ~®~gw®c,dl Pp®~O~e¢~ Ao~ueu~d¢~ueo~tt t® ~~e C®o~oPcef~eu~~u~ae PBa~ CPA ®~e®7 Q`I~) The Praportionate Share Mitigation methodology will be contained within the Longwood Development Code (LDC} a~e~ ; ~s8. The methodology is also 'included within the "2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008". P®6Bc~~ ~ C®o~sudleraitu®ro ®ff Adilac~~t ~9®a~currrea~coi ~er~li~e areas If the projected student growth from a residential development causes the adopted LOS to be exceeded in the CSA, an adjacent CSA which is contiguous with and touches; the boundary of the coneurrency service area within which the proposed development is located shall be evaluated for available capacity. An adjacency evaluation review shall be conducted as follows: (1) In conducting the adjacency review,. the School Board shall first use the adjacent CSA with the most available .capacity to evaluate the projected enrollment impact and,. if necessary, shall continue to the next adjacent CSA with the next most available capacity in order to ensure maximum utilization of school capat;ity to the greatest extent possible. (2) Consistent with Rule~6A-•3.0171, FAC, at no time shall the shift_of impact to and adjacent CSA result in a total morning or afternoon transportation time of either elementary or secondary students to exceed fifty minutes or one hour respectively. The transportation time shall be determined by the School Board transportation routing system and measured from the school the impact is to be assigned, to the center of the parcel/plat in the amendment application, along the most direct improved public roadway free from major hazards. ®L~J~CTV~9E ~ PVC®CE®~U~CF F®V~ 1~~G499~,~~ ~P®ATi E ®G~ CA~B~'AIL i~P~O~9~~L~~T ~~E(I~~C~~T The City shall be responsible for the update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan to ensure inclusion of those projects adopted within the School District financially feasible 5-Year Capital Improvements Schedule that are necessary to meet Levels of Service (LOS) for existing and. future demands: P®iucy A ~c~r~ua0 ~DPdate Cap6ta,B Imps®ve~voeu~ts fE~ecroe~t On an annual basis., the City shall update the Capital Improvements Element to include the School Districf. of Seminole County Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule for school capacity ~~rior to December 31St P®iicy ~ Adc~utu®ro G~de~r Firsa~uvciaiiy fFeasi~ie gth Year Pr®Dgcts ©urung ~ac0~ update Each annual update to the Capital Improvements Element shall include a new 5th year with its financially feasible school capacity projects that have been adopted by the School Di:~trict in its update of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule. January X008 Page 9 ®f ~0 • Public ScG~®:®Bs Facility ~ieeroent Cu~y ®ff ~®c~~w®®c3 L~~®p~®sed ~~eo~dlo~~u~it $~e C®u~~~e6~e~s6e~e G~~a~ P®~acy C C®~~ap0ua~oce with ~~®r~uc9a ~~ait~'se 6u~ ttuu~er~g ®v Ca~ufa~ 9ro~pp®de¢~ue~~~ ~~e~c~a aa~~a~e The City shall amend its Capital Improvements Element to reflect changes to the School District's Five-Year Capital Facilities Plan in compliance with timing p~~a p® re~gp ui~rge~m@e^nts o,~faFl~orida Statputes. ry~~ p~ ~ ~p pp p~ p p ®~e-01:~4~TIC91~ C?~ EtlV~~Y h"~~tlV~ 'lr®Ilf/~P~T~~~L~OTY VCY~~W ~~h-'O~®~tl`t7®~YV~ L~tlV© IuJ~E~y ~6LiA4,~~a®4~RI~~at~~~8pR4~ ,,{q~,, ~®~IppL®CATB®~ ~9~5(N~ I~I2~~~*PV~G22~~~®pp PGv~pp~TE~22/~C®~r~4~911~fY~ FW~sOLOTVI~¢3~y ~®~LWTG®Ytl VYV P~®6411 tlVPVTY RL~a3V®LS Gtl~~~'L- ~IfO LS~~ 0 ® L~tS , ~~I~F~~® ~~f~ f~~9~R~T9®V~9 ~ C®I~~fit41~G'901i'gf ~®C~L P®G~9T I he City shall ensure compatibility of school facilities with surrounding land use through the Development Review Process and shall encourage, to the extent feasible, co-location of new schools with compatible City facilities, and the location of school facilities to serve as community focal points. P®Uucy ~ ~O~~walb~e ~®cai~u®o~s ®ff sc~®®D sides arna~ o®uvap~a`,tubuBu4y sta~~a~~s School sites are allowable within any land use designation in the City except for those areas designated Conservation (COf~). Determinations of compatibility with adjacent land uses will be ensured through the following measures: i o i~ew school sites within the City shall not be adjacent to any noxious industrial uses or other property from which noise, vibration, odors, ' dust, toxic materials, traffic conditions or other disturbances would have a negative impact on the health and. safety of students. o Public school sites shall be compatible with environmental protection, based on soils, topography, protected species and other natural resources on the site. ' i o An assessment of critical transportation issues, including provision of adequate roadway capacity, transit capacity and bikeways, shall be performed for proposed school sites to ensure safe and efficient transport of students. o Blew school sites within the City shall minimize detrimental impacts on ' residential neighborhoods, hospitals, nursing homes and similar uses 1 . through the Development Review Process by, at a minimum, complying with Performance Standard requirements of the Longwood Development Code and City Code with respect to noise and light glare; provision of sufficient parking onsite so as to ensure that surrounding neighborhoods are not impacted; provision of sufficient internal vehicular circulation to ensure that unsafe stacking of vehicles on ' access roads does not occur; and compliance with relevant landscape buffer and setback standards of the LDC. o The Development Review process for the City shall ensure that facilities such as sanitary sewer and potable water will be available at the time demanded by the new school site Jan~aapy X008 Page 10 of ~0 Pa~b6fic ScV~ools Paci9Bgy ~lemant ~a4y ®i~ ~®n~~o®~a®9 G ~®~®~edl Q~e~u~~owe~~iG a® ~G~e C®o~p~~eG~eu~~u~e G~Gar~ CPS © flew school sites in the City shall have safe ingress and egress for ~ pedestrians, bicycles, cars, buses, service vehicles and emergency vehicles. High schools should be located with access to collector or arterial roads, rather than relying solely on local roads. ~®Uficy ~®~~®ca$uoo~ andl C~o~~v~u¢~ut~:y ~®caV G~®au~ir Recognizing that new school: are an essential coirponent in creating a sense of community, to the extent feasible, the City shall encourage the co-location of new school sites with appropriate City facilities, and shall encourage, through the Development Review Process, the location of new school sites so they may serve as community foc~~l points. Where co-location takes place, the City may enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the School Board to address shared uses of facilities, m~iintenance costs, vehicular and bicycle parking, supervision and liability issuer, among other concerns. ®~~[sCTG~G @!6~ ~R1Sl~RB4~~ PGA®~G~G®~ ®f~ ~~C~~~ARY GG~96~P.A~~R~C4~D~ The City will coordinate with tl~e School Board to ensure the provision of public facilities to support the neces:cary functions of public school facilities. fP®~oc~ Q f~Aau~ov~azaov~ effucueovcy ®i~ Bu~~d°a~$rrauctka~~e During participation in the future school site identification process detailed in the "2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended J~~nuary 2008", the City shall seel: to maximize ~ efficient use of existing infrastructure and avoid sprawl development by identifying future school site: that take advantage of existing and planned roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, parks and drainage systems. ~®Gocy ~a~e sta~deo~is access The City will ensure safe student access to school sites by coordinating the construction of new neighborhoods and residential developments, expansion of existing neighborhoods and developments and redevelopment or revitalization of existing neighborhoods and developments with safe road and sidewalk connections to school sites. Jan~aaPy 2008 Page '01 of 20 Pub9ic Scho~Gs ~~ac616ty ~lervaeng gutty L~~~w~®c~ Gip®~®~e®9•Q~e~o9~ueo~a ~~e ~~u~r~~peC~eo~su~re L~~~c~ G ~9u~y ~ ~ucyoDe Q~ce~~ and Pedle~~~ua~a c®~o°oec~u®r~ The City will coordinate bicycle access to public schools consistent with the Seminole County countywide bicycle plan adopted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization, METROPLAf~. fn addition, the City shall revise the Longwood Development Code (.LDC) as .needed b7 ~ 2-gl~ in compliance with state law to specify that performance standards for new residential developments adjacent to existing and proposed school sites, other than age restricted developments, shall include pedestrian connections between the sidewalk network within the development and the adjacent school site. P~iu~y C ~®~r~dlo~atru®o~ eo~~a~rre o~ece~~arryy ~~f ~u~e uu~p~p®~errroer~a~ During the Development Review process for a proposed new school facility in the City, the City will work with the School Board to determine responsibility for the costs and construction of any needed off site improvements, such as signalization, installation of deceleration lanes, roadway striping for crosswalks, safe directional/warning signage and installation of sidewalks. The City shall revise its LDC as needed "may-~;,~ ~r?gg in compliance with state law to specify that performance standards for a new development adjacent to or sharing an access road with an existing school or future school site shall mitigate the traffiic impacts of the development on safe access to the school. Such mitigation efforts may include, but are not limited to: developer striping of crosswalks, developer installation of sidewalks, payment for safe directional/warning signage, and payment for signalization. L~®uo~y L uo~cBa~su®o~ ®ff G~r~vusu~ru~ ff®rr 5~6~~~u pauses The City shall revise its LDC as needed to require the inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new residential developments other than age restricted developmentso ®C~JE~T~ V ~ @9~0~ ~®OG~~~~L=~T~®~~ ~i~~TC~ ~~C~®®L~ ~®/~G~~y ~®1~~9 u ~ ~~V~ ~~T~E~ The City shall coordinate with the School Board, Seminole County, and Cities as specified by the procedures in the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008 and provide information by the School Board and Cities for emergency preparedness issues. P®6acy ~ Pu°®or6o9uo~g 6rDf®rovaa~o®cu ~~a~ fi~au9f6u~uu~g a,~9 ~es~®o~siCrusut~es sp~eoufurdl The City shall provide population projection and development approval dafa, including site plan and building permit data, to the School Board and shall fulfill all responsibilities as specified by the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities Planning and School Concurrency as Amended January 2008. . Januao°yy ~®®8 Page of ~0 Public Schools Paci96ty ~lerr~~rst ~ott~ ®ff ~®c~~w~®~1 ~p®~®se~ ~~e~~d~e~it ~~e C®r~a~refraeo~~u~e P~a~ CPA ~~~®7 ~ P®(lucy S Ppo~sudJuo~~ re~pe~ec~ta~u®c~ The City shall assign representatives to take part in all committees and participate in all meetings as specified by the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities ,Planning and School Concurrency as Amended Januan/ 2008. A staff repre;senfiative shall be assigned to the Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) which shall meet as specified in the Interlocal Agreement. An elected official or designee shall be appointed to the Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) which shall meet as specified in the Interlocal Agreement. P®~u~y C ~dvo~u~~ ®ff ~p®~o~e~ ch~~~~e~ I he City shall provide notification t® the School Board and any adjacent cities of proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map (PLUM) that may increase residential densitie:~, and any proposed preliminary site plans, subdivisions and plats, a,s secified by the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public Schaol Facilities Planning and School Concurrency as Amended Januan/ 2008. P~~ucy ~ Eo~oer~eruc~ ~pe~a6~edlo~e~~ The City through its Fire and Police Departments shall continue to coordinate with the School board, County, and Cities for emergency preparedness purposes. Ja¢~aaa¢y X008 Page ~3 0$ ~0 PaabOuc Bch®oes (~'acfilBty E9ern~u~t City ®f ~L®ngw®®d Pr®p®sed Amendment t® the C®mp~ehensive Plan ~XI~~ING ~®lJ~,~°~I®P~AL ~L~V~T ~IA~ Harnitr•n Elerr,en7ary Hippor~'~rdmm~t` . „r l\ E ~~.n~ Y211sor: Elementan O ~ / tEdlvdiaae~GrnaM=nr-~~~~~ ~~?a _ r~' Ella riltamUl o)Chiicdle-i- _7J hOtwny Elem: Weary Hc~hro:v ElemcrFcry'J,~'~- Sac fe rd Widdh~ Cy_4a1 L•Iw El:mer4ey Nfcldeav Elem_n4ar yJ~ ~ 1 ~ : lle5t: iEO Etnj ~ ~ \ Crf OnS HCadET't of t~lTRteL~00 i1'~NI)fy "j l., Go'd.toro Ela rr, cl(-ry L_I:a N.'~y Elam>ht~ y `Pn@ Cre'_t ELnErCa,~L ' i ' ( ~ ~ minol=ll:gh •Millennium Alirdle 3fe ~Gon.va ~amen2yry I :r- I CreeSrwoe La~e_Mdele r r 11 J-\ HI~I•d-.,d..I::mar::ry - ' f ' ~I.acEh4ayr:ldn xncol ~ I •m>odl_nee Eler,on:ary . v L. ErA Lake NHdle 1 ' Ca4rl font [I<rc:cr.4>ry~ ~ ~~'~---~^~r'~~~ ~1 ~ yr ~..~..J~~ L§}el 8err:entir'1'`•~ ~ . ;Ne Klc2 Eleme niar w.^, ficT ~•ia~5'Hiph ti i6 ~ }'~-4) ~ loci¢n Trd; ldlddL La rc 2ranfl~igh~''-~ / / j,>„ { ~ ~I~cc6 -clcmi nlar7 i Fnro:t City Ea~a / Yf/ 1` ~ '~1` c^^:ear Lao? EEmeSiay / _ ~J"/tip ; 1 ?l;amonte clema_ntar'r if J ~ ~~pDksEBn?~3r1 :p1ng la?:e Elenen;ary \ a:itin EI tory T>_dA Jc tAIdUE GCicp ~~Jaah an Ile i~ka Id idel< El_tl Park E___tit` \ \ `t_>s Lor.groo ad Elamar. Lary f/ _ ~ _ \~;~..O,neCO_klch.'.'_ . . ! ~ cotnn Ele rt:eTt2tnS i GSeicas FLaa:ning J t Ea Rtroek Ei?mentarv\\\ ~~~`,t - Elc.._ vary I cdsseDar:yElerce,~ry \ `[>rn:tiam~r.tary I n osenruald ES.E, Ceulel r :lidna l•l iidle Lake Urien;a Elem EntuY ~ o~ch 5cmnola Nlddle \ \ Carllun Elam en;ay + ~ !y~run Flidh \\~'14i rc:r Sprin3c Elancntary i IJi lu co Alidtlc i ~Ra1r.DOU EE mehtary En Qluh E_le tca Elem c~ilary ~Rad aup Elnrrmnnry • ~Tu:4vuiila r.lij dla late Hnmet Hi7h i i I I I t ..~1 January 2008 Page 14 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element City ®f L~n~vr®®d Pr®pc~sed Amendment t® the C®mprehensive Plan CPA 02m07 ELEMENTARY E®UCATIONAL PLANT IMPR®VEMENTS t .y, gar ~~~e s~ ~ _ - . ! 1~ ' ~ ~ LSFi9` ,r ~ d ~yA T~ ~ :f j _ .uiJ~tiitrm.- .jri~ - 1 d 11M~ _ x f'~. LE~~EI~~C+ ~ b~i,_1 h eye January 2008 Page 15 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element pity ®t L®ngv~s®®d Pr®p®sed Amendment t® the ~~rnpr~h~nsio~e Plan MI®®LE SCbB®L E®UCATI®NAL PLANT IMPR®VEMENTS .IY~" I _r.?~ s-~ J _ ~ f - m a ~ ~+~i.' - ar. 4~ L ' ~ m ~i~ .c a a • ~ ~ ~ ~ y _ N1 Are- ~Y= '1ir °+s ; ~-s,u~'i f `!-lrt ~ I t U f : T~jT lip ~ t Q ~ ,i s ~ - . F,9odl? ~~~aot y; ~ !31 !r~ zr , ~ r.,~~ ~1 r~-, g ~.`~r1! ~s:..~5 January 2008 Page 16 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element City ®f ~®n~~oo~l Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan CPA 02-07 HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL PLANT IMPROVEMENTS r ,t - _ ~ 54 - 1 f t 3;: 1 '~ij J I ~ ~er .ff+! r`I j y di~E + i F ~ Q :71L _ ~ j~~. s , rr ?r 3 j. - F.~~}3+~ January 2008 Page 17 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element pity ~f L®ngwf®~d Pr®p®sed Amendment t® the C®mprehensive Plan ELEMENTARY SCH®®L C®NCURRENCY B®UN®ARIES L~, R'cnrce E-9 t _ _ ' ~ _ ~E10 i E-6 _ ~ , Lake t Han=y ' LaAe E-8 ~ Jesu E-1 ~ w ..A , ~ E. - F y 2 N LEGEND ~ ~ Elementary School Locations P:iajor Roads Elementary School CSAs CSA_NUMBER O E-i O E-2 O E-3 O E-~ Q E-5 O E~ O E-7 F_-9 0 E_g O E-i0 Q LAKE JESUP (E~rective dale of in;orinah'orr: 7!202007) January 2008 Page 18 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element City of Longv~tood Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan CPA 02-07 CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY SERIES MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY BOUNDARIES labs ' R?cnrct M-1 f t ay..? ,r ~ ~ Lake t ~ Faney i ~ " LaFe V,. M-2 M-4 ~ M~3 ' t l ` •F _ t~ LEGEND ~1 Middle School Locations Prlajar Roads Middle School CSAs CSA_NUMBER 0 r~~~- i 0 h.1-2 P,~1-3 ~1' i-a LAKE JESUP (Effective date ofirtfonnaaon: 7/202007) January 2008 Page 19 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element pity cf L®ngv~rr~®d Pr®p®sed Amendment t® the ~®mpr~hensive Plan C®NCURRENCY SERVICE AREA B®UNDARY SERIES HIGH SCH®OL C®NCURRENCY B®UNDARIES lal a Mcnrc e H-1 4 r j ~ - j r i . ~ Lai s E e Hill?Y ' LaAS t H-2 ,es~o H-4 t l H-3 ..,y.. r f ~ L~ 2 ~ w~ ~ N LEGEND High School Locations fa9ajor P.oads High School GSAs CSA_NUMBER Q H-1 N-2 H-3 H-4 LAKE JESUP (Effective date ofirafonna6on: 7/20,2007) January 2008 Page 20 of 20 Public Schools Facility Element