CEB_05-27-03_Minp proper? oa-ncrs to let them know that they are in riolation and that the case will be scheduled for the nest Code Board hieeting which on rhis case \vas mailed May 1. 2003. He stated
the he fust became aware there was an issue when he rcccix-ed certified letter dated hlay 8'h as \vcll as the First class mail letter dated &lay 91h on or around hlay 12, 2003. ;\my
Goodblatt askcd Alr. Kepple when the propeq mdl come into compliarlcc. 1-Ic then asked that if they would put a carport made out of tarp will that be compliance?. his. Goodblatt ansuered
that ic may be stored in a carport or garage but that means a structure and it may require a permit and if the vellicle is operable and has a tag it can be parked in the dmreu~ay. Joan
Tardlff. tenant. spoke stating that she n-as not aware of all the notices that came to the House about the case, and only h e w abour the orange Carnaro. Her son w-as working on her
car pulling the engine to then be towed away \\-hen the Inspector came to her house and told her that ?that her son cannot work on her car in her drireway. The engine \\-as switched
to a \Y'hitc Trans Am to get i[ operable and then registered. -\my Goodblatt askcd AIs. Tardiff lvhen will the vehicle be operable. she said it is operable but it had no tag and that
her son needed to get license back in order to obtain the tag. Her son also testified staring that all he dld was transfer the engine from one car to another, so that he \\-odd ha\-e
a vehicle \\.hen he could gcr his drk-er license again which had been suspended. Laura hloehlenkamp made a motion to close the Public Hearing, seconded by -indrew hlcGaq. .\ll \vcrc
in favor. _i motion was made by Clarcncc 1,anc to find the respondents guilt\. of violating Longvood City Code Chap. 22, Sec, 22-38, he further moved to give the respondents 10 days
from the date of service to bring the property into compliance. or $10.00 per respondent per each a~ld every day of non compliance. .Andrew M c G q seconded the motion. No administrative
fees. .-Ill in favor. B. CER 03-05-305 Michael D., Sr. 8: Sandra Dorfman, Prop. Owners 1711 Grange Cir. Longwood. FL 33750 -4 neighbor complained about a commercial vehicle being parked
in a residential area. On -April 19. 2003 a Notice of Violation n-as issued by Inspector Honington to comply by -\pril 26, 2003. On -\pd 28. 2003 another complaint was received about
the rehclc being parked in the driven-a\-at 7: 15 -411. Inspector Hon-ington spoke with a man there \vho stated he n-as on call with DeLA1ir and had to have the van at his residence.
He \vas adiised as to being in violation of Ciy Code and \vould be uken to Code Board. Stated he would attend meeting as he felt he \vas being harassed. _i Pre-Soticc of Hearing was
sent to the propeq olvner on Alay 1. 2003 first class mail. On May 16. 2003 the Lotice of Hearing \vas semed on hlichael Dorfman by Longwood Police Officer Tim Cooper. On this dare the
propern. was checked by Inspector Price and the van m s parked in the driveway partially covered by a sheet draped down from the roof as shom-n in the photographs as evidence. Thls vehicle
is designated commercial due to the excessire signage. hlichael Dorfman, spoke briefly, he stated he has lired the neighborhood for abour 8 years and this is the first time he has been
approached \vith such ridlculous code. He said there are other pcople there who haw cornrncrcial \-chicles that use magnetic signs. He also stated that four times n non nth he is on
call therefore hc needs to have the vehicle at his residence. He was asked if he \vas on call b*. only 4 times :i month, must 11c hare the vehiclc there the other 36 davs, at \\-hich
he answered he worked 12-11 hours a day and came home late at night. I-Ic also stated the only other \-ehlclc at this property belong t his son. therefore making the Dcl-;\ir van his
p only means of transportation. Inspector l'ricc stated that an option was given to another 1-chicle in that neighborhood, and thar is to put blank magnetic signs to cover the signage
to come into compliance, at wllich point hlr. Dorfman said he \vill not haw a problen~p utting blank magnetic s i p over the sipage. He stated thar it will take hun about 6 \vccks to
get them. A motion to close the Public Hearing was made by Laura Aloehlenkamp. seconded by Clarence Lane. .\ll in favor. Luis --\lwrado. Member made a motion to find the respondent gurlty
of violating Cin-Code. Chap. 22. Sec. 22-32 and further moved to gire the respondent 90 days from the date of serrice of the order to bring the propem into compliance or a penalty of
S20.00 \\-dlb e impoxd for each and el-cry day of non compliance. S o administrative fees. The motion \\.as seconded by ;\ndrc\\-McGarry. City ;\rromey suggested thar the 90 days be
shortened to 45-60. Luis ,-\l\?arado further mox-cd to amend chis motion to 60 days, seconded by --\ndrcw AlcGarry. ;I11 in favor. C. CEB 03-05-306 Roberr D. Manning, Prop. On-ner 506
S. Grant St. Longwood, FL 32750 On Narch 5, 2003 Inspector I-lowington issued a Notice of Violation for a dcck being built p in the back yard u.ithout a permit, to comply by hlarch 12,
2003. On hlarch 6, 2003 a lcttcr n-as sent to the propcrh o\\-ncr adrising of the s-iolation. On hIarch 12,200.3 the tenant Bonnie Hellman, telephoned stflting that she had gone to the
131dg. Dcpt., and picked up a packet with the requirements. She advised she had to contact the property owner for permission to install thc dcck and then get the plans. Inspector Howington
ga\-c her a one week extension to contact the property owner and get the permit applied for. On *4pril 19, 2003 the tenant called Inspector Howington again and informed her that she
was waiting for the landlord's notarized signature. On March 29,2003 a Soticc of Non Compliance nfas issued to comply by )larch 31. 2003 because the permit had not been applicd for.
On -4pril 29.2003 the permit had not yet been applied for and the deck had been completed. On Xlay 1. 2003 a Pre-Notice of Hearing was mailed to the property owner. frst class mail.
on Mar 8' the Soticc of Hearing was marled to the property o\vner certified mail and signed for on Alay 13. 2003. On .\la!-13, 2003 a telephone call xas receir-ed from Mr. hlanning the
Property owner asking \\.hat \\-as needed to resolx-e the problem. He was advised that ,-\ permit had to be applicd for. -4s of &is date the propern. Lvas checked and the deck has not
been removed, they no\v have lattice surrounding it for privacy. Respondent was not present. A motion \vas made by Laura h,foehlcnkatnp to close the Public Hearing, seconded by --Indrew
h1cGarry. Ailvl oted in favor. Lnura hlochlcnkamp made a motion to find tl~ere spondent p i lo~f v iolating Florida Buildlng Code, Sec. 104.1.1 and further moved to give the respondent
35 days from date of scn.icc of order to remo\.e deck or apply for the permit or a penalty of S25.00 for * each and c\*cry d:~y of non compliance \\-ill be imposed. No administrative
cost. AIotion seconded by Andrew hlcGarry. .Ill in favor.
I . CEB 03-05-307 Reneen :I. Gornon-ich, Prop. Owner 61 3-617 I .and -4re. Longwood, FL 32750 On March 20,2003 a Notice of \-iolation as rrell as a Stop Work Order \vas issued to complv
by March 27.2003 for erecting a fence m-ithout a permit. .\ Notice of Non Compliance n.as issucd on March 29, to comply by March 31, 2003, compliance n-as not mcr. .is shown on the photographs
as evidence a chain h k fence n-as removed from the propern. and replaced from the side of the house to thc property line n-i& a different trpe fence. On -4pril2. 2003 there was a request
for public records regarding this case, on --\pril3* Inspector Howington visited thc property. since the property owner had stated to the Building Dept.. that no more than 20 percent
of the fence had been replaced, Inspector Ho\vington was able to see that the fence all along thc side of the properq-had also been replaced. Inspector Price dlsuibuted photographs to
the board members as e\.idcnce. The chain link fence was then taken down and completelv replaced with stockadc fence. A permit is required cither for repwing or replacing fence as per
Florida Building Code, SC. 104.1 .1 and L.D.C. ;\rt.IT, Sec. 5.3.3 hlr. J..\. Rarr as stated a friend of Mrs. Gornowich spoke on her behalf and informed the board that they had filed
a hlodon to llismiss with the City of Longwood and asked the Board if they had read this motion. ,-\my Goodblatt answercd that yes they read the motion as part of this hearing, and that
he was here just to give testimony and the Board to ask him questions. I-Ie also statcd that they objected that Inspector Howington was not present since she was the onc that starced
this process and therefore he cannot cross-csamine her since shc \\as the n-itncss against them. He also denied that they put a fence without a pcmit, and thasr they had only rcplaced
less 20'6. hlrs. Gornowith also spoke briefly on her behalf. \lr. Daiid ~rco\-iloas friend of the family also rcstified as to helping with the work. .I Motion was made bv Idaura Xlochlenkamp.
Xlochlenkamp. seconded bv Clarence Lane to close the Pubhc Hearing. .Ill in faror. ;\her some discussion, Luis -ilrarado moved to continue h s case For nvo more sessions, until July
2003 n-hen Inspector Hon-ington ndl be available for cross-esamination, seconded by Laura .\loehlenkamp. E. CEB 03-05-308 Xlatrhew T. P e q , Prop. Owner 880 Lms Dr. Longwood, FL 32750
I'roper~ in compliance prior to meelllg. Bob I.omas chairman called a 10 minute recess. F. CEIS 03-05-309 \la? C. Place, Prop. Owner
On hlarch 28, 2003 Inspector Mowington issued a Stop \Xrork Ordcr for a @rage being encloscd without obtaining a permit as well as Notice of Violation to comply by Apnl 4. 3003. On ,Ipril
22. 2003 a Notice of Kon Compliance was issued to comply by -\pi1 33, 3003. On Apnl24. 2003 Inspector Howington was advised that the l'ropcrv On-ner had gone to the Budding Deparunent
n-anting to apply for a permit but dtd not have propcrly drawn plans, therefore the application was not accepted. The application was re-submitted on hlay 22""but as to this dare it
has not been approved since the application is sull not completed. hlary C. l'lace spoke in her behalf, stated the reason the application \\-as sull not completed was because of all
documentation the Building Dept. required. but she hoped to obtain thc permit \\-idin a week as promised by the Building I>cpartment. Laura lfoehkenkamp made a motion to close the Public
Hearing seconded by Clarence I ~ n e . r\ll voted in favor. Luis .\lvarado made a motion to find the respondent gcul? of violating Florida Building Code Sec. lW.l.1 and furrher mored
to give the respondents 30 davs from rcccipt of final order to comply or S25.00 a day fine \\-ill be imposed for each and every day of non compliancc. Laura llochlcnkamp seconded the
motion. KO administrative fees. G. CEB 03-05-310 Jerelle Conner Trustee FRO Jerelle Conner 430 E. W'arren ,ive. I.ong\vood, FL 32750 Property in compliancc. H. CEB 03-05-31 1 Robert
Hunt Corporation. US-4 john _i. hleacham, Reg. -4gent 350 \V. SR 431 Longwood. FL 32750 -4 banner \vas at this business without obtaining a permit. ;\ Sotice of Violation was issued
On -4pnl26, 2003 to comply by .\pril 38. 2003. On 51ay 5,3003 the property \\.as s d not in Compliance and a Notice of Non Compliance --as issued to comply by AIay 6,2003. On May 6'.
Inspector Price inspected the property and the banner had been removed and it was Placed inside the \\-indon. \vhich at that point was in compliance. Inspector I'ricc explained that
the reason for bringing h s s case before the Board \\-as Because the company had been citcd before on March 1,2003 for erecting a banner without a permit. On hlarch 10, 2003 the Building
Department issued a permit for a temporary sign unul hIarch 28. 3003. I\ temporaq sign permit is issued for a period not to exceed 30 days with a ininimum of 90 days behveen the permits.
Jeff Alexander represented Robert I-Iunt P' Corp. Me stated they did receive the Notice of \Wation on ,4prii 26, but this violation was not relati\-c c o thc Xlarch banner and hey did
try to find a solution to the problcm and therefore they moved it to the she\\-room. -4 motion to close thc Public Hcaring was made
r br Laura hlochlcnkamp. seconded by Jack Greenhdgh. .-\I1 Tn favor. Andrclv lIcGarry made a motion to find the respondent not gdty of the violation alleged, seconded by Luis Ah-arado.
Not unanimous, 4 in favor. 2 against. 1. CEB 03-05-312 jcffrcy S. Ansbach, Prop. Owner 350 Isabclla Dr. Longwood, FL 33750 Complied prior to meeting. J.CEB 03-05-31 3Bicham Ranmarine.
Prop. Chrner & :\~LI Tuikaba, Business On-ner 767 E. Warren _ire. Lonp-ood. FL -32750 On lIarch 6. 2003 Inspcctor Price was called to 767 E. \Yarren ;irenuc, in regard to Removal of
tree u-ithout a pcrmit. -It that rime the respondents were ad\-iscd not to ~vork On the uee any morc. On -1pril9. 2003 Inspector Price n-as again called to this location and morc ~vorkh
ad been done on the tree as shown on the photographs in cvidcnce. the limbs hanging over the street had been taken down, and s cc~ra l limbs towards llr. Ramnarinc's property had also
been rernol-ed. ,it first they n-ere being cited for removing a tree without a pernit, but the wee was on City Property and it cannot. be permitted. 'The Citx Attornev sent Mr. liamnarinc
a bill for approsimatcl!. S2,818.63 for \vork incurred by the City in ;he removal and replacement of the tree. as well as sidc\vak repairs but to datc no paymcnt has been made on the
blll. Laura hloehlenkamp asked Inspector Pricc what csactly the City wanted from the Code Board on this case. Inspector Pricc stated that based on the letter that the Cin-Attorne!. Lvrotc
to the property on-ner the City was seeking pavmcnt for the expenses incurred for irreplaceable and irreversible damage. hIr. Ramnarine spoke brieflv, staring that he u-as not aurare
he needed a permit, nor that the tree was on Gin. property. he took care of the tree for 10 years but it had a lot of dead limbs. therefore he contacted Mr. -4tu Tuikaba to take care
of it. On the 6 I h of llarch he received a call that Code Enforcement, I'olicc Department, ctc. n-ere at his proper?. Hc stated he was adx-ised then to get an .\rbor pcrmir. He applied
for the permit. paid about 510.00 and receir-ed a message on his ansuwing machine and his cellular voice mail stating "is too late noxv. take the tree do\vn". \\'hen asked by Chairman
Bob Lomas if the person hat left d ~mee ssages had identified himself, his anslver was that it was a gentleman from the *Arbor Dept. I Ic contacted Mr. Tuikaba and told him to rake tree
dolvn since it nil not sun-ive. He clai~nsth e City nerer corrcspondcd with him escept for the Sotice of Hearing for the 13oard mccting. Laura lloehlenkamp made motion to close the Public
Hearing scconded by Clarence Lane. :\11 in favor. .After some discussion -indre\v hIcCrarry made a motion to table this case for the Ju.n*c 24. 2003 meeting for additional 11-imesses,
names. rcccipts, phone records. etc. 1 he motion \vas seconded by Luis rlh arado. All in favor. UNFINISHED BCSINESS: None