BOA07-27-05Minr CITY OF LONC W OOD
BOARD OF AD.tUSTMF.NTS
Jaly v, zoos mmmrs
ATTENDANCE
BOARD: STAFF:
Barry Revels-Chairman PatricA MillerDirector
Scott Bevis Peul Sizemore-Community Services Coordinator
Maze McLamoo Christopher SChmid~-COmmuniry Services Coordinator
Lisa Vorhes--Recording Secmtary
ABSENT
Authur Ileintz
Lamenee Belnir
1. CALL TO ORDF,R
Mr. Revels called the meeting to ordu at x:06 P.M.
2. PLEDGEOF ALLF,GIANCE
Mr. Revels led the Pledge of AIIe6ianee.
i. F.LRf.T10N5
A. Chairperson: Barry Revels F.le<teJ
B.Vice-Chairperson: Marc McLarnan Elected
J. APPROVAL OF MINL!TF,S: Jme22, 2005
Mr. Mclarxon mode a mutton to approve the nrfnute,c Mr. Bevis secorcded the morlon. THe
motion u as urcan~moi~sly rspprovui
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
Mr. Revels openeJ the Public Hearing.
A. VAR OJ~OS Variance
Signage
]04 South Highway 17-92
Property 10 #: 04-21-30-504-0000-0060
Applicant: Joe Sandusky
MOTION/RF.COMM F.NDAT ION
r The Community Development Division ofthe Community Services Department recommends that the
Board ofAdjustment (BOA) review the requested Verian« (VAR U7-US) from Gmgwood Development
Code Article VI, section G.2.2 J to allow a sign that projects aver the roof of the building.
EXPLANATION/BACKGROUND:
The applicam leases a speoe at'/M South Highway I]-92, designated as OCneral Commerelal (GCJ on
the land use map He isanew businessowner and wishes to usethe existing flames tharareattachedw
wall facadeabove M1iuxihe Hls suhe is dlPferem flour theother suites in that it isatwo-stoD~suite in
Me comer of en"L- shaped building. fle curzemly has no other sign frontage other than the existing
facada above the roo[Iine- The applicant had originally hired a sign company ro put new panels in the
sting flames. The existing frames had never been permined and once the sign company had placed
the new panels in. Code noriced the applicant. Far the sign to be perminN, a variance is requred.
Mr. Sandusky was present to speak. He smted thatthe existing frames have been in place lormore than
en years. The flame i eed of repair but he did no to do anythine mil he knew a perm
ould bai ued. He didrnot knoweperm required Cor cepairs and new installations ofsigns. He
added that share is no other place on the property to put as7Kn Mr. Sandusky said ifthe Ivtdlord is not
wil ling m cover the volt ofa new sigre he will take caze of any cost.
Mr. Revels agreed that in order ro promote his business Mr. Sandusky will need to have a visible sign
rhea customem can su from the strwn
r Mr. McLarnnn made a morlor> ro approve pAR 03-05. hb. Bevis suonded rho motlon_
The motlon was appraveAunanlmously f3-0).
B. VAR O4-OS Variance
Setbacks
aoo iaabena Dd~e
Property ID#: 05-21-3D-521-DEDO-0060
Applicant: $oobatlra Gauthier
MOTION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Division of the Community Services Department recommends that
the Buard of Adjustment (BOA) review the requested Variance (VAR U4-U5) to reduce the rear-
vartl setback from tillecn (t5) fact ro four and a hal[(4.~ feet and fhc side yard setback from
en (T) feasts three (3J feet as re[ereaced in LDC Artielelli Seetioo 32.1 Tahie of Dimensional
Standards at 3001sahella Drive.
EXPLANATION/BACKGROUND:
~ The epplicaur wvs cited by Code Enforcement Cor constructing a shed withour appropriate building
permits. Ms. Soobadra Gnuthiea' is applying for a building permit eflm'the fnm for Ne shed As
cted, it encroaches approximately ten andahalf(103)feetinm the fifteen lbo[rearsmback and
Com(4)Peet into tAe xeven foot side setbaok. Defore the building permit could be approved.evariance
would have ro be gmnteU m allow the encroachment into the setbacks. The applicant rates that the
onfigurntion ix the only possble arrangement Char oNd al low her to have a shed doe to the
loci not other andm re Oak trce on bar property. The shed is approximetely8foot by
12 froa Before the building permit con he aDproved_a variance would have to he granted to above the
shed to encroach inm the setbacks.
Ns. Gauthier as pres t. She s ated that the shed would be used as storage for her family She also
added that she was not aware of a permit being eequired to put in the shed. Since teaming oPthe need
Pore permit shehas received approval from her Home Owner A sociation. ThexAedeocmachs inm tAe
setbacks ofthe reaz and the aide yet tt is not visible from the strmc
Mr. Revels said that ifthe FiOA does not have problem with the shed he would not haves problem with
Mr. Aarels made a ntorion ro approve VAR OJ-03. Ffr. McLmnarc seconded the morion.
THe mnrtmr was approved anonrmou,sly (3-0).
C. VAR OS-05 Variance
Setbacks antl Impervious SuRace Ratio
1034 Bucksaw Place
Property lD#: 31-20-30-5JG-0000-0510
Applicant Dennis and Regina Marston
MOTION/RL+COM MENDATION:
The Community Development Division ofthe Community Services Department recommends that
the Board of Adjustment (BOA) review the requested Vurtauee (VAR OSQS) to raise the
impervious surtace ratio from 42 % to 44'%. and reduce tAe front setAack from twenty five (25)
fens to DRum (1~ feet as referenced in LDC Article III Section 1.2.I Table of Dimensional
Standartle at 331 BalnpJt Place.
EXPLANATIONBACKGROUND:
The applicants own n single family residence at 1034 Ducksaw Place, designated I.DR on the Land
Use MaR They are the originnl owners of the home since it wov oovxtruvaed in 1989. The home is
legally nonconforming for its front swback, which is 19.8 f tat its closest point. The applicants
are planning on building a third car gauge and an expansion to the family and living roomy The
proposed additio ere (lush with the front edge oPthe house, however. doe to the shape of the lot
and the bend in Bucksaw Place the result places the closest point only IS feet from the front
property line With the addition ofthe proposed wood deck to extend oROf the back patio. the total
impervioux swface ratio will be 44%mther than bu 42% mgnired by the LDC.
Mr. end Mrs. Mnrxton w represent, Mrs. Moremn ewmd that Centex Homes, theconnaetors who built
6. I ddras r - d ' n board o send ~ ii~e and