Loading...
BOAMin11-25-96PRESENT: Jim Daly, Chairman CarlPGOSli ne, City Planner sell H ontl John Groenendaal, City Aide Sve Wrlder These m represent a ummury of the acts ons which o red. e Ci tyn o t provide a erbatim r ord cof L autliotapes of all LPA meetings a ned a art of the wCi ty r ortls antl are available for lis teningcduring normal working hoursc ovember 2 1996 m ing of the B and o£ Atljus tment was called to order a[ 6:OOePtM. by Chairman Daly. Motion w made by Mr artmond t agenda items 2 and 3 to ack i the order t sider them ci tizens first. Ms. Wiltler seconded and motionopassed. 2. VARIANCE TO CONSTROCT A SIX-FOOT RTTYARD SETHACN ARE I-1 ZONING DISTRICT - ROJECT %VAR~O4N 96 ADAVID WRIGHT OCTOBER MEETING: . Daly a ced VAR-04-96 and a ked iF public no Li ce w made. M osline indicated that Che previous public n r the va indicates that i may be carried over andv no other public notice vas varran ted. osline explained the situation at ]44 Industry Rd. and why i s being r sidered. N n be official unless three members vo ten to appcove aorv deny the v GDSline continued t explain Lhe g ands for staff de ial vas based on the fact that ocher solutvoons exvs[etl. Mr. Daly op ned the public hearing and asked for those vn Favor o the v vid Wright the property manager for Rodgers and E explained the vandalism problem plagu explained that vandals a entering bo[h and a li<y e right c had exceeded $3,000 of out p ket exF and Che front of the building the LPA recommendetl approval. Mr. Gosline wantetl to add that address the vandalism issue cor. cause dif£i cul ti es for large trucks to Mr. Daly asked for any other opposi tior Daly r rated that bending the rules (i.e., £ ing i parking lots )te like oUers have, i not the solution n ands for p g the v vho ms osed st roginal heari ng 3asked whether other b Biness had fenced h the front lot. right then r and handed the Board photos of Che o that sw ant. elt that the vandalai sm along with thec other s Dthewindus trial park being in vrolati on was sufficient grounds to support the va rrance. Mr. Gosline explained hov fencing rn the front a of induatri al s n ngdale h vally becomes ae for ou ttloor s LThe end r sal tvoftvhi ch is less parking the busi ess which in turn ca ark rn the rightf of vay which in turn congest the roadvay~ p inquired if vandalism w plaguing any o busi essesrin the industrial park. M right responded that they had but not to the degree that his employer, mainly voula address the vandals issue fr rated that h thought the staff r endation w ork it still leaves the site open fromn Industry Roadl and Lhat aspreviovs fence placed there had been torn down by vandals. ontl s ted t e felt the vandalism i thanRg s for passinghthe v so Felt thatmthe policercannot patrol the site allathe tome. Daly asked if the staff felt a atlamant about denial. M Gosli ne indicated that the staff position was not as strongly felt considering the constant vantlalism Oaly asked for a approve VAR-Od -96. M and made that m and Ms.voWiltler seconded. The mote on carried by vovice votev 3nl. 3. eNCROACN SIX FE O 30 FO FRONT E RESIDENCE TAT 1209 S - PROJECT HVAR-07-96 - APPLICANT: C ILY E . Daly a ced the v and asked for public n . Goslinenpresented therpubl is n e that appeared inv the Nova ber 10 and 20 Sanford Neraltl. Mz1CDaly opened the public hearing. . Daly asketl for those speaking in favor of the va Debra Cus todio came forward along w rchi tectnM My ke L nch. Mr us todio explained herhfamily's p improve her h Oleander 6 She a ned the va needed 2t a lazgerrp and alleast replacev theeroof to its presentir Tfiecn oof w uld also protect [he parch from the elanentse M ustodio s wed the Bard the photos of other houses v onformi ty oand photos that showed the damage to 3209 nS C Oleander St. sidence. Mr Daly pointed out that examples of others houses onformity have n Valitli ty f n justifying a also asked iP she lived there and i vvll abe ea rent 1 O Mrs. Cuatodio saitl she would live there£but additional points 1 be built to c hurricane resvstant ro< will allow the house to be a open neighborly h sethe subdivision "tlon't m t the neighbors" m tality. s Lynch also pointed out [hat the sv Ce meets all other setbacks in abundance. Daly asked for any others in favor o£ the va osline point o that [he L A found the c made nfor the varvance was suffvcvent to recommend approval e Oaly asked for o si tion to the v osline ted t taf£ fel tppthat the s x-foot va not the ardship c ated by the acode1 The staff elt that othreehaand half afoot fair compromise vi thout being a e hardshi p.vM laGOSline pointed t that this va salt o a poor definition in the City Code. The house walls rmeet the setbacks but roofs are indicated that the up a ming Land Development Code would address making setback tlis tances more rational along with fence regulations. Motion w made t close the public h and passed. M and amade a n to approve the rv Mr. Li ns onded and the motion p seed u usly byvv vote. The board w ted it understood that the vporch be left open and not e Board began a impromptu discussion r garding Mr right's (VAA-04) inly regards ato outdoor w rage ing a Ge site. Mr. Daly asked that [he B and r sit thevva months to if it stopped the vandalism ana no ontaoor storage occurrede 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS sly a ked for a table elections u til all t and s Setl.tMr Goeline pointed out that Folding el ectiona of officers n aybe b iF both M and . Brown returned. T e board decided < electr officered, M Wilder Daly Chairman and and onded om Daly cepted the nati one and unanimously MMr. Hammond made the motion otD elect Ma. Wilder -chairman a Brown aeoonded. Ma. wilaer acoeptea antlvpassed unanvmously= 5. CONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 36, 1996 M .WT£S. Wilder made the motion to ccept the October 16, 1996 antl Mr. Hammontl seconded and [he motion passed. 6. OF RULES AN ROCEDURES. Mr. Gosl ins pointed o the changes i the rules, being the ing date antl time, the o of voting vi th less than mfvve members, and a new absence opolicy. Daly inquired about abstentions and Lneir effect on board vi th three members present. Mr. Gosline stated he would have check [he o with the City A hey. M Daly also pointed o the[ the Sunshine L oultl apply here a The rules uw e tabled u til the abstentions, sunshine law, and a my sspelli ng were corrected. Daly s ted that he had not r vetl any response to h letter of Oatober 1 requesting a fifth member for the BOA. M Daly a ced She would tu=n the letter o r to the press.=The B ardn discussed the i antl M asked the Boartl's opinion of his proceed a After m lh discussion the Board agreed to send the letter to both cthe Orlando nel antl Banford H raid. [hey suggested [he Chairman contact the mayor to explainvtheir intentvona vn this ega=d. e. Adjovremiertt. Respectfully Submitted Bonn croenenaaal