Loading...
BOAMin09-06-89Bt1ILDING OFFICIAL FL RNANO TIELIER PLANNER 1. Mrs. Su ber called the meeting to order at ].3U P.M. 2. Approval of Minutes of July 19, 1989 and august 2, 1989: aav isea the E and e listenea t tha towhat He had thought he as aid i had hb aidddu~ing a i.acueeioo. tatea h has s but woula like to reserve enem u„cii Aaaitio~ai doiscuasio~oltemss o by M roll, e istri9s9 ana~A ucea ae ry~emic tea. apMOtion Carriea by a unanimous roll Call9 BVO[e. ARIANCF. REQUEST TO C RUCT A PRIVATE TO eOUR SINGLE F NLOTS. LICANI': ERSI eiED NR AL CSTATE S(W. P. WOOQ). LOCATION. O%FO RD STREET. aoNiNG R-IA. Suber d y d proof of publication for all po bl is Hearings on [he Agendas pl xea if aayoaa p of the re¢~escbe ooa e sieeac pot ko sieiea weal aoaMw aN here c aic eof t ooa eea ne naa a dopy oieat o from Piao~ioga r~gara n~g Mena ae~siey C ooa e tea h ana M Jami out ana lookaa a on,e ra o aena ixy ana ei a to be an avy o aoa ooiye o subject p and tney a e look adng t make required asquare f rage advised t Board ht eed ed i my f Oepar[ment aw the only o hat h e farha ing paved and tha tsH ople w e City o before a ewpricei of t ou la ey535U eogo/$ZOO PooU aran ge a t be ve ryhb neficial. t aty. pa othe project would meet eve yeCitygcodehwith the exception of tnetroad wi.d tH. tetl h n favor of t request and further t edUt wof Adjustment could n t give a it would be contra ryrdt'o se ri ion ]oU of Che C y Code but could only end t e City C the only o who had the right to grant the va r.vance. No one else p sent spoke for the va_van ce. sober a ked if anyone p bed t speak against t ioosn oxford s tea ne c ~epxio~ c vxningES ery a xea io~ts~with m ena~ e yrandfat he.reaMi and w eabu ilt before z and rope rty h e behind i nadv~ised andowner knewoue ctly wha tt theNZ inq w Emoryts pt edst t land owneracoula put a other boos eso red. ePa M ooa has h e land es .ingent u rthe Sv react ntne ara eighborhood Ch rs p.iec es ofaproperi yf 1 and r ulae open uB ae Pandora's box. teat the rene ing ember y theao s paid h ha den Ding f aeyxeat a of em ney for the slam ur e further s teasTbe re 1 o bards hip no ood o t landowner. nhe City just he ldW.i ing o e Comprehensive Plan and guidelines w early s trying t than Thos uidel andmt dr iyhtsr ifrt s granted ~a srproperties o i.lamere. orysw if he spoke foz eothe rs > eighborhnoa. as howko£ hands i the audience inflice ting tbaY they egreedr wit hsM Dry. cry a tad an ao' raalua i regnirea a end and of the a~i.ve, Loper w as ks for a tea he and has neighborsdes trong ly recommend the request be den ieaa Meltzer spoke against t request. Meltzer s [ed thatM heva ember of the ~ ted a the r _ t Lorathe mple r mof vt being a substanaa rda road. ted if the ity a ould c or same thing in ehe neighborhood as we 11 as throu9 out the Ce tYn f Eed upon t ondi~ctea a an dsi e ae as adty ri a lti[tle rappearedY using the property tapprais er's r old require n depths vey T e howl manyts ucturetl a e living u tea as far a wilamere x typefo Nagle t Nagle of ut etiny ~ ked w ie91.a a foruo roes requesting t i.n9 h veY ~ ing t egPro Pe rtYdaPPraase rs records and wrote the a g std31 te1989 memo. Mr. agle referenced attachment [ t 31, 1989 m icn w color c hags p ial for oDe.ing subd ividetl. d Dased o today, i appeared s Mof aeaiexesma l aena.ieias w ewnat niynerrc Hater inq oraiaan~e w pia allow t a milt coaay. Nagle s uolook a what i ua Sly the re edgran tibn gt the v t be a adverse as his m tea e °esa et8w1 that c pluses thet applicant's eprope rtys approximately 2 the Oxford and Wildmere uA Nagle furihero s tetl traffic impact directly approximately lOtat rps per day per ave ge s g e fam ilylhous e. arlyn Piloian spoke against the request s inq s ildmere f agora rty o h 1 1/2 a applied ab and i denied. m Smdit D, 909 Oxfnrd1ld inq he bought t of quality ofg Sandi in g. Jameshe opposed t Mthe r and g ba ge rs d be u pro atyn fi ~e hm ould adestroyal'.hew character of etnem neighbor oodt, i t hyt5 spoke against t inq s Heel a a~doa lotmana s area if this variance was grant edhthen she would also like one. Su ber allowed M a three m buTtal, ood red t s far as dens aty, [he Plannang 0 kind ought [ ooperate, and i r ethismrequest w e aensicv t tea c inq ith MS tea dhet has o in gls familylu ands later bought i e duplexes o property. ood s red M and also question ed`V the appropriateness n ember, atldressing the i ory and M ood u and M ory s red uh ked is ibtytA Hey if t Had a onf lict of I ood had ns rated, apart he CityeAetorn ey had assuredn him he did Hof. Public Heari g losed. Heel Coat if g red a abl is heae a grandT inbg tc hip o epplican chat red Sher dnid~nat believe the dreques to me[ the crateriaMfor by M roll that the q steel by Mr. Wood be denied. notion carried y unanimous and of Adjustment 9-6-89 Page 4 advised the applicant tM1at the motvon passedaandv [he varvance was denved. ftGOVESTED FOR (1) 2 T (2) 5' H 6' C RO P6 RTYEI. E (3) T NL20N UM "25 ALF NT. RONALD HENSON, iI. LOCATION. 362ES. GRANT sT. LONING AC P2 ICA opened t e public h ing. applicant, spokeSU erfavor o£n requestedon explained request e ardyan tetl h ral business ould be t copying the H anda he ould ch cTfive employees and about 1 to 3 c s per td ay. ted that nable t end b advised t n favor of tthe v inq requ es~edd abed did n t feel a wall w ary andat ing w [eda vn cl ieu of of a bl ocpkrw a high o ick grow.i ng c en tez and trees. No one else present spoke forgt he varvance. ked if anyone present w hed to s the Lipps, 460 Bay 5 adjoined o t 80 feet o old refer a bloc kewall a red a-athe rpropos edapa rkin geiou ldw~ pup t ted t e10 feet oof vt eapropcrdty w e had been placed incorrectly? which the prev iousa owner was awarec of. Nagle advised the B and that h regarding the o rship dispute. o xplainedtt whe~ he looked tM1e property i s his uncle rsst andeing t a10 f laded i the property, but when title s y line. e ehf~rxn ones cea c cro~x peo efeec nn angpescea chat tnat~ be gran rea for eneneegPei~liaa~no aope~cy line. e furthers [ed if he d of the 10 f wide s rip aadjoining M LoPps ome wall move back the parking and still mavnta vn a 10 foot buffer. As there were no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed. by m o grant t o~rla=~ on Prne st teat. Horton carrrea y „ by n ohaea by w a s' heage rn lree of ~~erelock wall on northe~n~~,roperevplrne. ara Of Aai ~e tmaat s-s-es Page 6 6. REgUEETEO TO A FOOT EU FFER REQUSREO 40 REQUEST TOR wnivey TH REqui REU e xiGx RE4U ~REO ON SOUTH s NT. CITYIO POS,ONGwO00. LOCATION, SOUTH STOP, OF F.. WARREN AVENUE. suber o ned t public hearing. Mz. Tiblier explained the e present s e for or against the variances, the Public Hearing was closed Po seconded y Mr. carroll to g ant the varran ces as requested. roll tea ene eaaea the wall. d is cusaed tnesm of aP bl ock owall due t e fac[Tt othe buffer is naaVily x eea. Tiblier s tea e telock wall t Dula be , t~iiea, M~ne r e co.r the ew rrn aaa a Bch 5 iae aaa born abuaccea a eee a main eta be p ~ a ~ao~cn. Mr. Tiblier scaceeeiesiaeat ial was to the aorcn aaa south. Tne Board recessed from 9:40 eM until 9:43 PM. . carroll a tea he w aea with t stns cirs, n of a block wall i stly, v uld s e.Pe~setx rea zo teet i a aeaaa ~ tea omprom ise Paht ae c sia yea, ena.ia riiake ws.xr~ .x. agreea. ou goes eioaaa tna cype of v eae ~ n icknama a caroie ~~eseii ow Gasmrae aaa tnat rt wo~laep~o~~aee ioox op y rthra y re. ended h o qra e for a 20 foot buff eravard ao r[h and s uth side of tproperty yin lieu of required 40 foot buffernand that a chain link fence with C olina Y s be r red i of the 9 foot high w dea b roll. nr. cratoa am Mr. carrot ~otiay ave aaa nra. s~oeoa~oe blgaaay th saber a tad ene m tabled aaa t T ed bt ha[ p Dula cgiveaThe Board members taddi[ionals Trme to look at hthe Boa rdlreserve Rt he i.9 Comments on an issue until after th p lvc had made their c s during Public li ing p of the m ing. Suber s ted tfollawing th p cedure would keep the meetings moving smoother and faster. z. aea embers i med is rely An aff if bt hey question aanyBi hat a of cp ing st ted that alttb ardcm oadv'ised eby staff of any c anges o e prior t in q. roll s uppo ~t roftM request he Suber s ted if t red, they bld p rofessional tuna ge whvch would wbe of eta both the t3oa rd aria tno City. 3. sober advised t embers a Conf~Nioit o required t tied erectly or v'ndirectl y, to a re ques tv being heabrarbya then soardre 8. AppxTlONat DISCUS SIGN ITEMS. eed w City`s A ney's opinion n hearing ht he T eiler r ith request Was ea furthervs tea the C y did n ity s ing why he believed t roper a eea ene coae e itykr requirements. stated ait w e going to go byvt ookn ne go by the boo k. He ted t requests w e f'il ed separately, bui he put t togethe ra under ho ayen da Stem. Suber asked if an yooe is aware of an error, to please not ifyMthe City staff. 9, ere et ing adjourned at 10:06 p.m.