Loading...
BOAMin07-14-86BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 14, 1986 Present: Frederick S. Pearl, Vice Chairman Rod Cable F1cCa11 inter Non-LOnfornii ng Use Mr. & Mrs. Ferris McCallis tar Onnie Shomate Ch ri s[ien Nagle, City Planner Yli gi nton Variance - Mr. Pete Glaze Buford Nelms, Building Official Geri Zambri, pep. City L1 erk Absen [: David Lewis (excused) Joyce Saber (excused) 1. Dr. Pearl called the meeting to order at ]:30 P.PI, pr. Pearl stated both Mr. Lewis and Mrs. Suber had requested to be excused From tonigh is meeting. 2. Motion by Mr. Cable, s <o nded by Mrs. Shomate to approve the Minutes of the June 9, 1986 meeting as sutmitted. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 3. Public Nearing -Non-COnformi nq Use Perniit - Sharon B. M<Call inter. Location: 365 [. Palmetto Avenue. Request to allow two separate electric meters in a single farlily residence. Zoning R-3. (NL-01 -66) pr. Pearl opened Che public hearing and displayed proof of publication. pr. Pearl asked if anyone present would like to speak for or against the request. There was ne present to speak against the request. Mr. Ferris McCall inter spoke for the request and stated they would have the meter ren oved if they moved or sold Lhe house and would be willing to do anything the Boa rd of qdj us tment bel ievetl was applicable. 11o [ion by Mr. Cable, s onned by Mrs. Shwma te, to close the public hearing. 11oti on carried by a unanimou seroll call vote. Mr. Na91e stated that although the ar oned for multi-family use, the structure did not meet the requirements for sa eaofisthe second unit to be considered a duplex. However, he further stated, they technically don't need a onfornli n9 se permit as the person residing in the second unit is [he mother and they all live together as one family. He stated the problem co n that if the house wa sold, with a separate meter in the second unit, there would be a possibility of it bet n9 ren tetl as a duplex and there would be difficulty, on the Li ty's part, in oni tort ng the activities of the house at a later time. Mr. Naq le stated that the only good way, if the request was granted, to as any conditions imposed by the Board would be enforced, would be to require tha tares tric ti ve co pants which could ru with the property, be recorded in the Court Nous e. Th iswco pant or ondi ti on would only surface, however, if Lhe house w sold but wovl den aid i Che enforcing if anyone who owned [he M1ouse rented itas It would still betdiffi cult to monitor and enforce. Motion by 1Ir. Cable, seconded by ^Irs. Shomate, to approve the no conforming us permit requested by F1rs. FlcCall inter subject to Chris Negle's recortanentlations, e Motion carried by a una nsmous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle stated the City would contact the Mc Cal li stern regardi n9 an agreement between the City and the McLal linters. Mr. Helms requested the Mctal7 inters to have the electrician contact the Building Oepa rtment to pay the fees for the permit and to also co tact the Li ty when the power is turned on and to request the electrician also be present at the house when the power is turned on. Board of Adjustment -2- July 14, 1986 4. Public Heart n9 - Variances - ApDi icon t: Joe E. Wigin[on. Location: 4.4 ac y site on VI side of CR 42] - Wigi nton fire Sprinklers. Request for v a s to re landscaping, tlri veway width, off-street loading, off-street pa rki ngaa ndnoutsi de storage requirements. Zoning L-3 and [-2. (V-0]-A6) Mr. Nagle stated the applicant is in site plan process for an expansion pf his i sting business. He stated, unless all the regves tad va s re granted, the applicant would have to resubmit the site plan for revt ew a9a ineby the IIesi 9n Review Board and the Land Planning Agency. Or. Pearl opened the public hearing and displayed proof o£ publication. Or. Pearl asked if anyone present would like to speak Far or against the request. There u+as ne present who wished to speak against the request. Mr. Pete Glaze, of Wi gi nion, spoke for the requestand stated he would answer any gves tinns posed by the Board. I[ was the co s of the Board of Adjustment to address each va requested individually ne^ins uNagle gave a brief explanation of the variance requested. Notion by Mr. Shomate, seconded by P1r. Cable, to close the public hearing on va rr once rl. Motion carried by a una nsmous roll call vote. t-0o Ci on by h1r. Cable, s con dad by Nrs. Shomate, to deny va requested to eliminate the 5' landscape buffer adjacent to cR 42I and existing parki n9 ar and to direct the applicant to install the required landscape strip between the proposed wheel stops and property line and that the required trees and shrubs be Dl an tad imned is tely to the east of the proposed wheel stops as per landscape ordinance. Motion carried by a una nlmous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle gave a brief explanation of va ce A2, a request that a ce be gra n Ced to the required landscape bufferronnthe east, north and was CVproperiy lines. Notion by Mr. Cable, s onded by Mrs. Shama ta, t close the public hearing on va rf ante request A2. Motion carried by a una nlmous roll call vote. Plo tion by Mr. Cable, s conded by Mrs. Shomate, to deny Lhe va requested that o landscape buffer beerequi red on the north, east and west property tines and that the following be granted: that a va ce be granted to wa ve the landscaping requirements on the north and east pro pertyal roes and the western property line that abut the m storage yard until snch time as lanes capi nq i regal rPtl by atlj qi ni ng grope rti esa a required by ordinance and that it be 'installed at that time - reference areaemarked in yellow on site plan dated June 20, 1986. Motion carried by a unanr mous roll call vote. Motion by llr. Cable, s conded by Mrs. Shomate, to deny the va requested that no landscape buffer beerequi red on the north, east and west property lines an0 that the fallowing be required: landscaplrvL es required by code be installed on the southwest co of the parcel, approximately 30 feet along west side of building, landsca pang be required on [he south boundary line of the property, a depicted in blue on the site plan dated June Z0, 19II6, as per the landscape code. Motion carried by a anon nno us roll cell vote. hlot'ion by Mr. Cable to deny Che variance requested that no landscape buffer be r required on the north, east and west property lines and that the fol lowi n9 be required: the bulk of the north property line, with the exception of the property line which abuts the old Ace fla rdware property be gra n led a ce to the required landscaping, also that no landscaping be required on the iengthf of driveway, approx- imately 60 feet in length, approximately 16' feet in width on the north property Board of Rdj us tment -3- July 14, 1986 line abutting Rce Hardware property but require that the fence be sl attetl with i nyl or wood stri PS to provide opaque sc nr ng as depicted to pa npls o site plan .~ dated June 20, 1906. Dr. Pearl passed theegavel to Mrs. Shona to d econded the motion. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle gave a brief ex Plana tion of va request k3, a request for a to the required 5' wide landscape buffer between head to head parki n9 and requirede end islands. Notion by Mr. Cable, s conded by firs. Shoma to to close the public hearing. (lotion ca rri etl by a vnani mouseroll call vote. hip tion by Mr. Cable, s conded by Mrs. 5homa te, to grant the va ce Lo waive the 5 fpot landscape buffer between head to head parking and end islands as requ estetl. Motion carried by a unanimous roil call vote. Mr. Nagle stated that the va requested on the driveway aisle width, 'va ce 84, from the required 25' to 13' w rea ted by the applicant as his proposed next building Could in a the ai readysexi sti n9 no -conforming driveway front 1]' i width to 13' i widths However, he further stated, the proposed 13' wide driveway as shownnis cceptable to the Fire Department as the length of the driveway is only 60' long and the Fire Department can access the sr to from the other side of the property. Dr. Pearl passed the gavel to Mrs. 5homa to and made a motion to close the public hea r'i n9. Nr. Lable seconded the motion. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call Dr. Pearl passed the gavel to Mrs. Shoma to and made a motion to grant the va to permit the 13' driveway is requested pending a notarized or certified statement letter frpm the Fire Inspector that he will allow the driveway to be na owed to 13 feet. (lotion seconded by Mr. Cable. Iioti on carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle 9a ve a brief explanation pf va request ~5, a request to wa ve the parking required by code. Mr. Nagle statednthe applicant had shown that based on past experience does not need the required parpi ng and would provi tle the required parking if it was ever needed. Piotion by Mrs. 5homa te, s conded by Mr. Cable, ro close the public hearing. Motion rarri ed by a una n~mous roll call vote. Motion by Mr. Cable, s conded by Mrs. Shoma te, to grant the variance to reduce the umber of parking spaces as required to approximately ]8 as shown on the site plan and that the site be assessed as the use of boil ding changes or e of building changes as to whether additional parking is sa ry and that asr the use demands, the parki n9 be provided. Motion carried by aeunansmous roll call vote. Mr. iiagle gave a brief explanation pf variance request :6, a request to waive the outdoor storage screening requirements. hlp tion by Mrs. 5homa te, s onded by fir. Cable, to close the public hearing. Motion carried by a unanr WOOS rail call vote. ~r llp ti on by Nrs. 5homa te, s onded by Mr. Labl e, to grant the v e tow e the outdoor storage sc ni n9e requ irements temporarily until suchat s theal and pn the north or east isedevel op~ed or complaints of a substantial decree as doterniined by the City Administrator a registered. Motion carried by a un n mo us r 11 call vote. Board of Adjusbnent -4- Juiy 19, 1966 Mr. Glaze asked iF he could have the 3oard make a nio ti on allow him to submit the re sed landscape plans, as per the Board's approval s, tto the City Planner to be pu tvin Lhe packet for distribution to the City Comm ssi on. M1lr. (lagle stated if flr. Glaze rroutd submit the re sed plans to him he would submit them to the Gesi gn Review Board and after re and approval of the Oesi 9n Review board, would vt en be salmi fled to the Li ty Coimni ssi on 9or 4i nel approval. He stated this was the Land Planning Agency's reconmenda lion also. 5. Additional Oi scussi on Items. rhere were nn aaa;t;onal di scnss; on ;tens. 6. Afeeti ng adjourned at 9:45 P.Pi. Geri Zamb ri, peputy City Clerk City of Longwood, Florida