BOAMin01-05-81BOARD of AaIESTMENT
F I,ONGCVOOD
JANNARY 5, 1981
Present. Onnie Bhomate, Chairman
Rosemary X
Charles Pappaser
John Crystal
ooks, City A ney
Macvineryant, Building OfFi ci al
Geri 2ambri, Secretary
Absent: Ron Rarb
1. Meet ng was called to order by Onnre Shumate, Chairman.
2. Approval of M of N ember 20, 1980 Special M ing
additi onsro ctrons to November 3, 1960 tdi notes
were approved as wrr tten,
ACTION ON APPEAL OF MIHELL R INS: n fox Aequest: B ial
of Building P t by City Building OFfi ci alRtosbuild a Ingle family
home c t 26 Block 5, A ended Plat of Wi ldme re, PB 3,sPG 60.
nby M Papoas t approve the request of Mikell R inki ns t
bui ldn single family home o t 26, Block 5, Amended Pla tof Ni ldme re,
B 3, PG 60, s and by Mrs. xrrcher. Motron carried by a unanimous
roll call voteec
PUBLIC HEARING - REQOE ST OF WALLACE F. HTALNARE R, JR, ESQ. FOR
rthwe st C of Lake E oad and Longwood kkil is Road, Approx-
mately 3/4 a 200' X 15t.R ney St aln aker and M Pi loin w
present t represent S TheodoreATakvo rian, Owner. ney Staln aker
gave r s for w ing t put this facility at thistlocati on, saying
that thes~oads, if n ould be major a ial roads, that
the B-I z ing presently allowsnbarber shops, churches and v
other light c ial; and that tfr. Takvori an feels thatthere
will be a maj or~need by the oublic f r gas s this v nity:
will Eill a public need. ted that thisespeci al e ception
will n a precedent as thezesa only t other locations i
Longwood i II-1 z ing that have c ial e taDlishments, ted
that. Shop and Go will adhere t any ~ nable standard os guidelines
requested, and that the public i will be protected. also
stated that property immediatelynn rtheast and s uth is County property
but there i oth PND z ing,k which allows fox a
mall portionaof landnt ibeaused for Coavne rci al; t ref ore, he felt
that. this C ial a ould n t be disharmonious a will e rse
a public need.e He alsoestated that the Tuscawilla area, mainlyxa
request stating that Ord. 223 does allow for s ial e ceptions fox
convenrence stores, but not for gas statron. Ne stated that the Lo
Dora of Aa~ust
January 5, 1981
ood Hills a s primarily r sidential, and Chat this would decrease
the value ofrhomes i the a red that F C had r ned their
property from B-1 tong-2. Heacited a raff iczpatte rn
Dogwood Hills Road had been pavednan dastatedtthat a Commercial
facility would only i this traf £ic pattern e also
red that c s become gathering spotsnforrki dsHand
possibly vndesi rablescandtthat c and c es
Shahs said there w e five s ations betweenn 92 ]vandels4sr
and only 1.2 miles Fromethis a vthesn o Station on 434,
and a store planned o E. EeWWilliamson Road. Shahs
statednthai MreTStalnaker m ned the Tuscawi lla a a havingMa
and he ai dei s different becauserTUSCawilla w snfi ve
milesn£romtany c val a aThis a n question is vastly differe
as vt rs mvnutee fromcmany commereval areas.
6. Charles B rtlett, P silent of Highland Hills H s Assoc.
aidMhe wi 11 bring i a Formal petition a nst this regvestnerother
residents in the area spoke against the request stating that the area
silents felt much the s way H Shahs di d, silents who spoke
against the request w ucy Hadi, B and L SRalls,
ichael O nagerL M role Williams~aA1 B
Cathy Furlongs JMm Carne, Tom Anderson, Lee Markowitz and Aobe rt Hill
]. Shomate c d the Public Hearing and asked for c s from
the Members of thelBOOrd. M %iecher said i not in agreement
ith a does n t go alongrwith character oftn ighborhood. Mr. Pappas
had n Crystal asked if Shop and Go made a vey of the
eel i ctheea to looker said he did not believe s Mr.
St alnaker rebutted saying that any of the allowed u ould also
raffic ana s taa toot the orainanoe stateastnat a
stationecould n t be allowed; but that this was no longer the case, as
vt vs just a gas pump and convenvence store.
8. A REQUEST: Pappas made a reject
the Aegvest forTSpeci al Exception to B-1 Z ing t Allow Property [
be Used for a store with Self-se.rvi ce Casoli ne Station as
he felt i sCdet riment al to the s unding a Second by Mrs.
ttvrcher. tMOtvon carrved by a unanimous roll calLavote.
9. PUBLSC H REgUEET O WSUMB AN PHYLLIS J ELD
SPECIAL E%CEPTION T R-2 Z O CONSTRUCT FOUR DUPLE%ES (LOtstE
8 th ru 13, Block C, Wildmere Subdsvision, Plat -ook 1, Page 111.1
fro and side setbacks, which i than the
requirements; s of duplex un talsoelarger than the m m
requmred; number of parking spaces; stating that a ood privacy fencemu
ould be e red; that all large t roperty would be m ned;
xnat tnererwonla b all v ana m yea
appliances, e thatnwoolddbetincludedei nshe~s redo that o e
will facecChurch, o will face G andtt will face [i 1
the unpaved lessntrafficked s Bet. Shews red that duplexes
eethe m cal phase of building i todayas e omy.
Pappas gvestionednlfvthe lots would be fullynsodded. Shenanswered yes.
Board of Adjustment
January 5, 1981
Page 3
Shomate asked those against the request t eak. Ingalls
tepped forward with a petition with 15 n ofsthe r the
unding a who w against the request. wsumbnasked that
the rpeti[ion bearead torher. The P `'iThi ei a petition
to keep D sign Build A s fromtbuildi.nga4 unit duplexes (8
families)eo the c sofiGrant, Church and W n Street, L s 8, 9,
10, 11, 12 and 13,oBlock C, Wildmexe Subdivision re PB 1, YG 18-21,
Seminole County." Mr. Ingalls again spoke against the request, s ating
that n ants i Mrs. Ingalls, Lucy Grillo, George t
urgis, oG rudeeEll ingsworth, Willard Y ung, M t Smith,
and T m Smith all spoke against request. o against request
raffic, vandalism, s not septic tanks i
iagai nst harmony of neighborhood,adepre ciation of neighborhood
dueto duplexes i eighborhood, not wanting renters i ould
prefer single family dwellings with o s living i ehem ea
sub w s questioned from audience aswto rappro tal charge.
She stated in the neighborhood of $400 pez dup lexaunl ten
30. Shomate closed the Public N ing. She asked for c is
from the members of the B ard. Crystal asked M wsumb ifen
they planned t the un sell. She said probably sell.
asked what the selling pri cetwould be. She s ted i the n ighborhood
of $J0, 000 per building. Mr. Crystal asked the homeowners i the
audience if they e to d. Ingalls re plied yes, a duplex, and
2 didn't like i .rCrystallMguestioned why i should depreciate
the neighborhood ifMthey are planning to sell the building for S~e,oo o.
11. Mrs. K rcher said the plans w she s ted that s e lived
of single tami ly dwel lings,nbut would have n objections
o these units being in Ter neighbochood; however, the s e people
e here stating the s arguments against the request,aw
deny the request becausee they do n ant renters, but w chose to deny
the last request as not being harmonious, we cannot tell one no and the
other yes
12. Shomate said she felt i ould upgrade neighborhood, ted
that s e family homes c n be just a unkept as duplexes, and singlea
farm lyihomes can generate as much traffic as duplexes.
13. Bryant said he would like t ect a impression. aid
that harmony in this Ordinance appliescto appearances of bui ldHngs.
she w making a play o ords.
15. Pappas did n request.
16. ACTION ON AWEUMB/BROMFIELD S2E40EST - Motion by Mr. Crystal to approve
ond. Shomate s ted that they had t ither approve o
deny, appas then s onded the m oMOtiontf ai led with a and-
off v Crystal and M Shomatei~ ing Yea, Pirs. Pappas an dt
Mrs. Kircherf voting Nay. Request denied,ot
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Shomate Geri 2
/gz ~hai rman Se cretaryri