Loading...
LPAMin04-10-02CITY OF LONGWOOD Land Planning Agency Minutes, Apri110, 2002 Anendance: board: Staff: Denny Emory, Chaitpeson ]ay Sargent, Planning Division Manager George McKenzie, Vice Chairperson Reverly Majors, Planning Division Secretary David Richards )im Malouf Abscnn john Kopack 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mr. Emory. Chairperson, called the meeting to ordu ot?:00 PN. 2. APPROVAL OFTHE MINUTES FOR February l3,2002: Mr. Richards made a motion /o aPprnve the mirnrees o/February l3, d002 a,s prssented- M. McKenzie sacorcded the motion. The motion rear wvarsimoirr[y a/~prwed (f-0). 3. PUBLIC CAMMF.NT: There waa no one present m speak daring public wmmurt d. PUBLIC HEARING: Mr. McKenzie opened Public Hearing Proof of publication waa shown- A. ANX 01-02 Annexation 1060 Talmo Street Applicane Madeline Gutierrez-Thompson Plann'ne D'vis on Mof'uNRec endati The Planning Divi o of the Com nity Serv ws Department recommends that the Land Planning Agency recommend to the Ciry Commission approval oleo arrnexetion (ANX 01- 02), to anne<a lot that is 2I +/-Acres located at 1060 Talmo Street. imo the City m fulfill a utility/vnnexation agreement between theappliemrt and the City. ExolanationBackeround: The owner and applicant, Madeline Gutiernrz.~Thompxn, isrequcsting voluntaryeonexation oftheresidential lo[ (.21+/-acres) Iorv~ M et I Ofi0 Talmo SneeL The applicant is requesting this annexation in order to f (fill the utility/annexation agreement that they signed with the Ciry. The DRB. at its regulnr xheduled meetingofMarch 7, 2002. recommended to theappmpriate boards to approve Ne requested annexation Request Annexation Future Lvi~rse Existing: County LDR (I,ow Density Residential) Sum Owner: Matleline Outiermr'fhompson I060'falmo Street Winter Spdngs, EL 32'108 Parcel Id Nnmbe: 33-20-30.513-0600-0180 Wcation: 1060 Talmo Street Tract Sizo: .2]5 Acres +/-) Existing Use: Single Family Resident. Prooosed Develoo The applicant proposes ~to continue to utilize the pmpercy as permitted in the Future Land Use designation of LDR. This application is being processed due to the gtilirylannexetion agreement between the applicaru and the city. Recommended Ac[ion: The Planning Uivi ends oppmval of this Annexation. The Eu[ure LanA Use Desig anion is wmpatible with the surrounding area. Public Input: The City hasteceived no comments at thenme of this Reporc. ANNL'XATION RGPOR'C I- Relationship To Adjacent Properties: DIRECTION LSD S£ PRPSLNT OSE Norch (Cqunty) LDR Single Family Residential Fast (Winter Springs) MFR Multi Family South (County) LDR Single Family ResideoGal West (City) IAR Single Family Residential 11. Analysis We6'va River Protection Arco: No Area of Critical State Cooccm: No DRI: No loterlgcal Agreement (Seminole County): No soft sh'o erdmen gthe Dalai There snignifca[changes Din population pmjecons eased by this project. Habitat forscei es l'sted as endaneered threatened or of soec'al concem~ No e.~tvtronmentnl isvues have been noted on this property. TRAFI'iC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS 1. Roedwnye serving the site: Functional Existing LOS Roadwa s Classilication LOS Standard Talmo Street L«al NA NA 2. Roadway Improv Nu improvements weTalmo Street are regwred dae to this atmexation. SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS L Residential (Existing) Faclliti rving the site: Septic Tank b. Improvemen/expansions already programmed or needed as a result of proposed amendmem: No improvements are scheduled due to this POTABLE WATER ANALYSIS 1. Residvvtial (Existing) Facilities servivg the sire: City of Lovgwood b. Availanle capacity: Ycs c Improvemen/exponsions already programmed or veedetl as a result of proposed amendment No improvements are scheduled duerothis develapmettt Service line has been convected to the residents. DRAINAGE. ANALYSIS 1. Facilities serving the site: existing-residential. No improvement needed SO[ ID WASTE 1. Faciliuc rving then Cityofl.ongwood- 2. Impmvemen/expansions~already programmed or needed as a resin[ of proposad amendment: Seminole County has adequate facilities at its Osceola Candf l I site in me nonheast pottion of the Cowry. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1. Facilities servin6 the sire: City olLOngwood 2. Projected LOS undo existin6 designation: Negligible 3. Impntvemen/expansions already programmed or needed as result of proposed amendment: No improvements are schWuleddue to this annexation. Note: this initial review does not preclude wnformance with wncurreney requirements at the nme of developmene approval. Mr-Sargent preserved the smRrepon and rec endati ro the I.PA. There were no gnestioms rcgardin6 the armnxut on and Mr~Emory eskod for a motion. Mr. McKenzie mode a motion to recommend aypr~oval ro the Clry Contrrtisslon.VNX d]J12, jorthe,lnrrexation oJ1060 Talom Streetfiont Courrry to Ciry, Mr. Ridtards seconded the monan. The motion was umanimously approved (6 -d). Me Emory opened the Public Hearing on the Vacate. Lot Split and Small Seale Plen Amendment. Proof of publication was provided. O.I. VAC UI-02 Vacate and Abandonment 2. SD 01-02 Lot Split 3. SPA 02-U2 Small Scale Plan Amendment First aanaa cnnren or nnamome son rvonn sweet Appimanr. steee Newel Plannine Division MotiuNRecommendation: The Planning Division of the Community Services Department recommends that the Land Planning Agency con[inue these items (items4B I, 2 and3) until May & 2002 as Ne applicant urreble to present the Planning Dlvlston necessary information for foal analysis. Exvlana'on/eackeround-Will be provided et the May 8, 2002 meeting Imnlemenai on: Will be idendlied at the May 8. 2002 meettog. Mr. Sargent explained to the Board That all requirnnents had not been met on the Vacate request. There arc letters still due from the City of Longwood and Florida Power. Also, all of the adjacent property owners have not respondod. A letter from St Laurence Gronp also haz not been received. Mr. Sargent stated that 3aff does not have e Pmbletn with the reyucsta however, the Developer of the Commerce Park does have Jeed restrictions and they have a problem with access into the pazk. Mr. Emory asked if there anyone present who wished ro speak in Gvo oragainst the reque ¢. There no publi<Dres ot, but Mr. NevelefT, was prase and asked m speak. Mr. NeveleffexDlained that there es planned on the vested properry and there ould not be any ec to dNC pinking lot xcept f om the Cnmmeme Perk The parking site plan would be for the overFlow needed to odd an ottice in an existing building. Mr. Emory sated that the Vacate, lut Split and Small Scale Plan Amendment needed to be oonunued and azked for a motion. Mr. McKeuie mach a motion that VACOf-02. SDO[-02 and SPA d2-02 6a cominued to the May 8, 2002 LPA meeting. W.. Richards xecamded the motion. %'he moHOn was ously approved (A-O) Mr Emory azked for a moron to close Public Hearing. Mr. Richards made a mo/Ion to dn.sa 1'ub(IC Hearing Mr. Moluojsecorvded the moeion The ntotforc was urcarcimously approved (?-OJ. 5. DEVELOPMENT RF,VIEW: A. SP 03-02 Sife Plan Dube Medical Warren Avenue Appliwnf: Thomas H. Skelton piano o¢ Div'sino Mof n/Rccommendat an Th PI ring Div lion of the Community Serv es Deparvncm recommends that the Land Planning Ageooy rwommwd to the Ciry Commission approval rrf a Site Plan (SP 03-02) to t a 5,400 square foot medical building located on the north side of Warzen Streetjust mnh of UunkTn Donuts. Exolanatio WBackeronnd: The applicant, Thomas H, Skelton, lus applied for site plan approval to build a 5,400-square f tmedical otflcefor Debra Dube located on the nonh sideof Warzen Streetjust north of Dunkin Uonvta The O ftB, et its mgul m scheduled mwting oP March "!, 2002, rwommended to the approprime boaNs to approve Ne requcslN site play with dte following comments: Com cots Extr are shall be taken to Prot ring v n the lot (LDC Sec. 24-55.3). ~ Nov es 6om the City Codewere regaested for lhisp jeer, and noneare umed. c ~ Smfl'reserves the right to ndditionalwmmoms daring aonstmetion end prior otnplenon. w No modlilca[ioas or altemtlona oC uny kind shall be made to this site plan without the written pemrission of the City of langwood. w All required local, regional and federal agency permits willbeon file with the City prior to craning cwswction. Mc Sargwt gave the Staff Report and Recommendation with visual aide. Following his presenution Mr Emory asked if there were vny cmnmenLS or questions from the Roard. Mr. Richards stated he Md a comment to go on record for Mr. Skehon and the Acting Ciry Engineuto considu regarding thadischaga from the pond to therigbt-of-vay Werc will bee hrsdwall and that is a swcture in the right ofway and that could possibly propox or presem ~iabilityto the Cityifso to hiti and her endednm cred in with nergY dissipater end also xrme son of protection farm the swell perpendiwlar. I{ drtittage hit Ne eidetheswell could wash out and rouse damage to the roadway. His biggest ould he an wall in the right-of--way itself and does not think it is necessary, but wonia deter m ma ei~y ene;neer on ma iazne. Mc Sagest seitl he woultl bring the issue up to the Acting Ciry Engineer prior to going to the City Commtsaon. Mr. McKenzie asked about the traffic flow going in end out of the stmmure on Wares Avenue. Me Sagest replied That there was not csough tmEiic generation on this property to actually a problem any great degree. There is going to ba so traffic, but with the az they ere the vafFle Flow for the Medical Center willenot be as gnat az the erseclions bank. He stated the City has been looking at the cut ofl' by the bank to improve Ne imersecson and give mmc stacking distance. Thomas Skelton was preaem and askedwspeak. He replied to the issues of Mr. Richards. lie aced that theheagreed with theconcem regxrdingoutfalland euggcsted aculvert underneath the driveway to send it wider in. He did sot see a problem with that and felt It would work better. Ne replied to Mr. McKen o the «aFlle Flow and stated that it was a doctor's rrlTceand their peak Flow woWd rat bathe same as the bank. it is not 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. constant flow. Mr. Sagest added that the natfic analysisshowed an estimate on an average day there is l I2 trips coming out ofthe site. There were no further qua Mons or comments and Mr. Emory entertained a motion. Mr. MuYe..aie nmdeatn~nionts racmmnendSP 03-02 arprrsented tvlth the rerommer~ aon f uufver wlrh miner-and in.rwa(e instead Jaheadwall, jm Dube Mediralto cnnsrruma Si00-sgume joat meduaf building ]orated on the north side sf Warran S'rrevl. to the Clry Commission. Mr Richmdr,veconJedfhe rnotin.~ The mantas was wammausty approved (a-p) B. SI'04-02 Site Plan Semco Properties 955 Savage Court Applicant: Seott Banta Plan rte Divis to Matian/Btt~ommendation: The Planning Division of the Community Services Department reconvnends that [he Land Planning Agency rewmmend to the Ciry Commission approval of a Site Plan (SP 04-02) to a 1,542-square foo single family swcture imo an industrial offce and conswet 4,500 square foot of warehouse located at 95S Savage Coctt. Exolann'oNBackemund: The owner, Sco« 6anu, has applied for sire plan approval to convert a 142 Wuare toot singloGmily sweture Into an industrial ofliceand eonswet4,50asquare foot ofwxrehouse located et955 Savage Court, (located at theend of Highline Drive, west side of the road). 7'he DRB, a[ Its regular scheduled meetingofMareh'/, 2002, recommended to theappropriate boards to approve the requested site plan with the following eommenm: Com • Exw eme shall be tvken w protect existing was on the IOL(1.DC Sec 24-553). • No variances Gom the Ciry Code were requested for [his project except m listed below. • Stalfm es Ne right to additional comments during comswwon and prior ompleti • No madiYcations or ahemtions of any kind shall be made to this site plan withow dre wriveo permission oCthe City oCLOngwood- • All required local, regiotwl and federal agency permits will boon iile with the City prior to starting conswction. Gxceotions: • TheCiry gmnred an admi mtence forthe redueuonofone~foot Gom et back due o [he a tingstre • The owam requested sand DR6 concurmd that m this time the five-foot sidewalk requirement be waived. • No othu variances Rom the City Code were requested or assumed Por this prof one dition • Suhject to the owner providing the City with legal documentation of pond location. Mr. Sargent presentedthestatl'review and recommendation on SN 04-02. He sratcd that an Admi ve Varinnce was granted to the Applicant to save existing trees. The onlyrconditlon is that a lettu from the progeny owner to the west of the property is needed identifying Net Nay are re Net pan of v drainage syste which is a drainage will beexpandM and Ney have oobjec rts. It is inform inform nthat the Cirywantswmakesumthepropertyowner knows atbouL Thepropriy ownerhastbeen made areofthe iseveand the lever is needed for the file prior m corewction starting. There is litigatiore going on and it is taking awhile w receive tha Icvter. Mr. Richards noticed a pond was goivg inro the ingresalegass easement. He also noticed there isa dr- eeasementand avkW ifi[6ad to be vacate4. Mr. Sergen explained rhea uallyadainage utility easement; the ingresWegass as forthe property when w mint' through on Savage Court. The Applicant will idenrift' that this will not be the ac anymo and it will be betty nthe two property nod the City w1I1 not be involved In it. An addrew~ will havo to be received From County for Highland Drive instwd oPthe access ot9' Savage. Mn ltichazd askod why Ne notice was for 955 Savage, Mr. Sargent explained Natthatwas the oNy access at this time. Mr. Soots Banta of Semco Progenies asked to speak. He explained rho pmpeny was Alit a long time ago, access was granted Nrough Ne bowling s2lley property for Nat location and We wamr meter is actually on Savage Cotvt At dtesouN end ofthe bowlin6 alley thue isa driveway Na[goes to the hoaseand there laa mailbox Here. Thatwm Neaddresx the City has requested the applicant readdress on Highland Drive. This wil I be done and the Savage Coun address will probably be kept temporarily as existing mess. The expansion of the pond is in theexlming damage easement and basically all that will be done is fixing what over theyears has acaNly become a higher point than most of Werest of the property. Semco is plarmivg to fix Nesituation and also a parking lot that is on the south side of the bowling alley. There wue no further questions or comments vvJ Mr. Emory entertained a motion. Mr_RleHards madeamotion eo approve rewm enJation ojSP OJ-02 for Semco Properries«t rt tsazrAP, rinr;inl ,n;rr,n~rcm.e het,.rn;piWfire n„ecn~svaa a asao.rs>wra- foot arehau .vubmiued Mr.Mafoafiecondrdthe monon 7hemmeonune unan~mawiy vv.o.~ fa-0l-na 6. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Sargent [old the Board that the Ciry Commission had a workshop April9, 2002 on the Master Plae and Code Rook for the historiedisnict. There are workshops required to go through. The Hlswric Preservation Board will have a workshop next Wednesday. April I7, 2002 to go over (heir rewmmendatiovs, they are the Board primarily responsible for the historic distrieJ. LPA is responsible because it is part of Ne Lmrd Development Code to w. It will go to the Ciry Commission after liP6 for final review and hopefully app oval. When it comes before LPA e copy of the bookr will he provided far rerview. The Longwood Development Code is going before Ciry Commission Mondey, April 15, 2002 for Ne first reading. Minor changes have been done since it was before l,PA and ns have been made with the down ea lines. Nei icipeuvg the first ring oPMay (May 6.2002)for. and reT and hopefully¢Idoption. Once the[is do e LPA will be given a copy of the LDC in'luosoleaf form for nvy page changes. If there are any commend he asked war They be hroogh[ op because a regular review will be done. The Land USe ohangc isa Large package and will be brought Before the LPA in May. A quick form and summary will be pmvideA wish maps. '/. pLD 6U61NES6: There was uo old businese to discuss. g. DISCUSSION AND SCBEDUhF. FOR FUTURE A(tENDA ITEMS: The next regnlm uhednled mewing dote is May g, 2002. The Land Use Changes and rbe Vacate, Lot Split end Small Scale Vlan Amendment for 900 North Srteet will be on Mvy s agenda. 9. ABJOURNMENT: Mr_ Richasds mada a motion ro adjourn the rneering. Mr. Maloafsaeonded the motion Zhe motion was unanimously approved (3~0).