LPAMin06-12-02CITY OF LONGWOOD
l.lapd Planning Ageney
Minnres, dune l2, 2pp2
Attendance:
Board: Stag:
David Richards. Pro-Tam Chairperson Jay Sargent, Planning Division Manager
John Kopack Beverly Majors.. Plarming Division Secrcrary
Jim Maloof
Absent:
Ornny Emory, Chairperson
George McKenzie, Vice Chairperson
I. CALI. TO ORDER:
In the absence of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, Mr Sargent asked the Board to
nommatea Pco-tam Chairperson.
Mr. hfaloofnominated Mr. Rlclrards ro be tha prwem Chairperson. hb Kopackseconded
the nomination. There mere no other namlrca(lons. The nominaion tras approved (2J1~,
Mr. Richardr abstaining but ncrepting the nomimarlon.
Mr. Richards look the gavel and rolled the 1.PA, June 12.2002 meeting to order.
2. APPROVAL OF THB MINUTCS FOR May tl, 20U2:
Mr Mnloofmade a motion to approve the minutes oJMay 8 2001 as preserved Mr.
Xopack.reconded the motors The mottm+xaa unammr usty Proved /3-0).
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
There wns no one present who wished to speak during Pubbc comment.
0. PUDLIC HEARING:
Mr. Richards opened Poblic Hearing.
A.f. VAC OI-02 Vacate anU Abandopment (ContinoeU from Apr1110, 2002.)
2. SD UL-02 Lot SPlit (CootinueU from Apri110, 2002.)
3. SPA 02-02 Small Scale Plan Amendmen((Cootioued from Apri110, 2002.)
First Baptist Church of ABamonte
800 North Bfreer (Property ID kU1-21-29-SCK-'IiOA-(IUOU)
AppBrsne ste~ene.e~ea
MotiaNReeammendation VAC OI-02
The Platming Divis n ol'the Community Sorvioes Depanment recommends that the Lantl
Planning Agenry recommend w the~ty Commission approval to Vacateand Abendon(VAC
01-02) tbeunimprovedright-of--ways (mown as Alberta Street (25' ROl4~ vnd Lyman Avenue
(50' ROVA~, providing that the emire areas are malnuined ns a Drainage eod Utility
Faarments anJ in accordance with the Planning Divison Rewmmendetion below.
S"?x'pJ4P?41PnBacS¢mund'
The applicbdon by Steve Neveleff, Gulf Realty of Oriando_ Ud., is on behalf of the Flrst
Baptist Church of Alumonte Springs requesting the City m vacate two rightrof-ways -
Albena Sveet (from Lyman Avenue westward approximately 1,141+/_ t'ect) and Lyman
Avenue (from North Street mnh to Alberta Street).
The applicant has notified the adjacent property owners as well as wilily companies in the
e if there any objections. There has bee no objections misud that are not
responded to nihe conditions listed in the swfT repor
The right~of-ways are loeared near or within a wetlavd area. The Ciry has no plaru mpave the
right-of-ways. The right-of-ways do not serve as [he primary frontage forany ofthe adjacent
properties.
The DRB, at it regular scheduled meeting ofMarch ].3002, wanimously(5-0) recommended
to the appropriate boards to approve Ne requested vacate and abandonment in accordance
with the rcwmmendations on the auached staff report (VAC 01-02}
Sufi Renon VAC OI-d2:
Steve Nweleff. Oulf Rerelty. To vacate and abvtdon two right-of~weys:
• The first being Albnrla Street (25' unimproved, 1141.56+/~ feet).
• The second being Lymao Avenue (50'unimprovcd, Il08.46+/-feet).
the following me based on the application dated February ].2002 AI I citations oC
regulations refer to Chapter 24 ofthe City Code, unless stated otherwiee References to
the Plan or Comprehensive Plan, mean the Comprehensive Plan of the City adopted by
Ordinance 1019, adopted July 20, 199?.
Theapplican~ s. Steve Neveleff.OulfRealty ofOrlando. Ltd. is on behelfofthe First baptist
Church of Alumonte 3Plfngx requesting Ne city to vacate the two previously mentioned
rightrof--ways (Alberta Streit and Lvman Avenue)_ the applicant has notified the adjacent
proDe+tY Ow .well av udlity comport in then to theirobjection.
"1'he right-of-ways me located nearor witA n a wetland area. The City hasnoplans to pave the
right-of-ways. The right-of-ways aze not the primary fromage of any of the adjacen[
properties.
Stiff AOalvsis'
I. Consistency w'th the Comorehe u've Plan:
The proposed use is consinent with the Comprehensive Plan. by vocating
these right~of-ways, the applicant will gain re land and must comply with
the C.rmprehensive Plan and other applicahle wdcc
_. LlTen on anv Publ'c Aaencw
'Che applicant has provided documenmtion that the ~abmtdonment will not
impact any oCthe City depmtments or Iocnl utilitirs.
3. Asst of he Et'Fzet ov Ad'ac nt Prooen'es
The elTec oPvacating the easement should be minimal on neighboring
properties.
The properties to the north ace pen oPe platted subdivision (Florida
Commerce Industrial Pazk) and do not rely on the right~of way (Alberta
Street) for ingress regress.
The properties to the east of Lyman Sveet have been notifed ns m this
pmpOSed vaente. These proPenies will gain onrrhal(of the right-of-way
being vacated.
J. Ad'ncent[antl Uses Zovin avd Site De~eo ment Criteria:
The adjacent properties to the voM and east hav a land utt designation oC
Indnstrial on the Future Land Use Map. The properties to the west and
south have a land use desigvation of Medium Density Itesidemial, with
most of the property having n conservelion overlay designation.
5. Other Information:
Plannine Division Recommendations:
Thr Planning Division recommends the LPA recommend to the appropriate boards to
APPROVE this vacation and abandonment (VAC 01-02)_ to vacate and abandon the 2S
rigMrof~way known-as Alberta Street and the 50' right-o(-way known ns Lyman Street
with the Ciry retaining an Utiliry/DrainageP amen[ ovar the entire nghtbi=way of each
dgnoor--way N~ring vaaatee.
Also. providing that this property be rutricted in use for a parking lot to sorviee the
property Just votth of the subject property, more specifically kvown as Lot 31 of hlorida
Central Commerce Park and that no public access be Granted to this property other than
drzougN the aforem ned Lot 31. 'That no public access will be granted to this property
from Alberta Sveeteto the east.
Finally. that the First doptist ChvrcAt of Ntamovte Springs be required tc fulfill the
Iandscnping regairementx Placed on the site plan, more particular the street tree
requirements along North Street_
Mr. Sorgent gave a brief explanation of the vacate, lot split ovd small scale plan
amrndment with visual aide.
All requiremenu that the LPA Irnd asked foe hnd been met. Certified levers had been sent
to the adjacent propevy owners In regazd to VAC 01-02 who hnd not responded. lbere
still one who has not responded and there was one objection.
Mr-Sargent told the Board that he had asked Richard Taylor, Ciry Anomey, if a vacate
Quid still oc with the objection xnd then response. Mr Taylor advised Mr. Sargev
that it could. Mr. Sagent will review this again with Mr. Taylor.
There were no questions fiom the board. Mr_RieArertls asked lPthete was any wmment
from Mr NevelefC Mr Neveleff awted all the previous demeuds of the LPA had beau met
and asked the board to approve the requests.
There was no one eLve present who wishes to speak in favor ofor ngainet VAC OI-02, SD
OI-02 orSPA 02-02. Mr. Richards asked for a motion to close [he public hearing on VAC
01-02.
Mr. Xapock omde a mollnn to close the pub/ic herring on VA(' O!-Od. Mr. MulaoJ'
seconded the motion. Tha motion was unanimously approved (3-0).
Mr.Y.opock madeamotion to recommend approval Jude Ol-02 as prasenred lne(tding
PLtzring Division Recmnrrsendatiun. ra the Cfry Commission. Mr. Muloofseconded the
motion. The motion wa.e tmanimaualy approved (3-O).
2. BD 01-02 Lot Split (Contlnoed from Aprfl I0, 2002,)
Moi oNRecommendafon SD OI-U2:
The Planning Division of the Community Services Department rewmmevds that the Land
Planning Agency recommend to the City Commission approval oPa Lot Split (SD 01-02) at
900 North Street iv order to establish two (2) conforming Iota.
Exolanai oNDackeround:
The applies( on by Steve NevelefY, Gulf Realty ofOrlando. Ltd., is on behalfof the First
baptist Church of Altenronte Spcings, requesting the City to allow the spllning of a lot of
record (40+/-acre vnet) into two lots: the first being 3].I S]+/- acres: and the tteond
being 2.843+/- acres.
The DRB, at its regular sche4pled meetivgofMaroh ], 2002, unanimously (SO) recommended to
the appropriate boazds to approve the requested lot split in accordance with the recommendations
on the nvached staff report (SD Olal2).
S a1TR¢tan SD OL-02 (Lot Sol'tl-
Applicant: Steve Nevcleff. Gulf Realty
To Split a lot of record into two lots.
Thellmt being 3].157+/-acres.
• The second being 2.843+/-acres
All ci[ations of regulations refer to Chapter 24 of the City Code, unless stated otherwise.
Ref noes to the Plan, or Comprehensive Plan_mean the Comprehensive Plan of the City
adopted by Ordinance 1019_ adapted July 20, 1992.
Aool'cant Rea
My wmm are based on the property survey sabmltted Pebntary 1.2002. The applicant
Steve Nevelefthas reyuested on behalfofFiat Baptist Church oPAltamonte Sprin¢s to split
their 40.acre parcel located on North Street into two conforming lots
SIat7Analvsis
t. Lois of record may be divided into Iwo parcels.
The parcel did exist prior Io March 21, 1981 per section 2491.11 of LllC.
z. The proposed bt splits doe any no onform s. The split wit I
two legal lots. "Ihe eppl~can ~s providing ac o this parcel
Through the lot w the north and notaccoss will be required from a public
right-of-way. 'Che applicant is proposing to amend the Fmnre Lend Use
Mnp 6om Medium Density Residential to Ivdustrlal, Io allow a parking
facility to be wnstructed in snppon of the adjacent industrial developed
propery to Ihe nottlt Any new conslniction will be required to meet ell
requirements of the current Development Cade and Comprehensive Plan.
3. Adequate public facilities are available.
"[here s adequere public facilitios end easement to support development of
either site.
Plann'ne Div's on Recommendation
The Planning Divi ends approval of SD 01-U2 providing that ingres and
egress ONLY from dre parcel to the north is documented and recorded, and that no access
o adjaoem public right-of-ways witl be requested or provided. The Lot Split should vot
be finalizN or ovmership [ranslerred until the required utilities and ingressleyrzass can be
obtained, approved and documented and recorded to the City's satisfnotion.
Any approval should be predicated on the recommendation that the Firet Raptisl Chm<h of
approved site plum, along Nonh Street.
+WW+arrrWr*+rrrr.v+v.r+.•.«.aa.a..x..u..~rvr..irr.WrxvWrWWrWrW+rWwrrrWrrrr
There were no questions from the Board tegazding SD 01-02. Mr. Nevelefiagain
requested Ilte LPA to approve the lot split There was no one prcsem who wished to speak
in favor or against the lot split request.
hL. Kopaek made a morion rn cloe~e the ptt611c hearinyon SD Of-02. Mr. Mrs(oaJ
srsorlded the morion The marfon was vnonimousfy %iproved (3-0).
M.. KoPnckmade a morion to rerommeMapprooal of SD 0]-02 fneluding Planning
Dlvlsfan Raeommsndmionr ro the Clry COmmiasion. hh. Malo fsvsonded the ntorlan
TFr motion r~~as unmtimnusly PPrared 13-0).
3. SPA 02-02 Small Seale Plao Amendment
ModoNReoe mmeudat on SPA 02-02:
The Planning Division oPthe Community Services Department recommends that the Land
Planning Agency recommend trr [he City Commission approval of a Future Laod Use Map
Amevdmem (small scale) (SPA 02-02) fora 2.843rl- else parcel of land fiom Medium
Density Residential (MDR) w Industrial (IND), per the attached staff report and
recommendation, for First Naptist Church of Altamonte Springs.
F I i NB k d
The applica on by St ve e Nevele%; Oulf Realty of Orlandq Ltd., is on behalf of the First
Baptist Church ofAl[amonm Springs, requesting [he tity to allow the Future Lund Use Map
(small scale amendment) to be amended fiom MDR to IND fora 2.843+/-acre parcel ofland.
The applicant proposes to utilize the property as permitted in dre ILNre Land Use
designation of Indastrial. providing parking for the existing industriol usejust naM of this
property. thus allowing the applicant the ability to convert some warehouse space into
industrial oliice areas.
The DR6. at regular schedolW meting of March ], 2002. u ously (5-0)
ended to the appropriate boards to approve the requested Poture Land Use Map
Aurend,nent (small senle) as requesved providing [he recommendations for the vacation and
lot split arc applied.
Stiff Report SPA___0.2-02 Land Use
Future Land Use
From: Clty MDR (Medium Density Residential)
To: City IND (IVdustriel)
Ovmer ~ First Baptist Church ol'Altamontc Springs
900 Nonh Street
Longvood_Florida 32]50
Applicant: Steve Neveleff
Parcel ID Numbu: OI-21-245CK-]40A-0000
Loc 900 North Street (northeast comer ofparcel)
Tract lSrze 2543 Aces+/-
LkisfagUse Vac
Proposed Developmem:
Tne avvhcant ernpnaes to ataizc me property as petmntea in me Pumre Lana us<
designation of Industrial, providing parking for the existing indusrial use just nosh ofthis
property. Allowing the aPPlicam the ability to convert come warehouse space inw
industrialloRce areas. (see attached letter dared 0221/02)
Rec ended Action:
The Development Review Board (DRB) recommends approval ofthe future [arid Use Map
Desigrtetion amendment fmm City MDR to City MD.
The Famm land Use Designation is compatible with the suerounding urea.
Publ'c Ino ~ The City has received no oommems at the time ofthis Report.
•rrraWrrrrr~+tYttYttYttiYViW Vi+sWrarrxr~«tWitta43tt+.~.~~...~...a....W.•
Them were no questions from the Board. Mr. Nevelel'f had no comment.
David Woods of 1355 Bennett Drive asked if the land use change would have any effect
on the setbacks. Mr. Sargem responded ro this question.
Mr_ Kapack made a motion ro closepuDfic hearing on.SPA 0?-02. Mr_ Malaojxeeonded
the morlor~ Zhe motion was unanimoust~• approved (3-0).
Mr. Kopack mode a motlon to recommend approval nfSYA 01-01 with recommendarlorr
as prevented indudfng recommendattmtr fFAC n]-02 and SD 01-02 to the Ciry
Comm as presented Mr_Ma[oofseconded the motion. The motlon tras
unammosuely approved (3-OJ.
B.1. ANX U3-112 Annexation from Conn[y to City of Longwood
2. SPA 113-02 Small Scale Plan Amendment
605 Highland Street (Prolrurty ID k33-20-30.505-0000-OOJB)
Applicant: Leslie G. Williams
Motion/Rttommenda[ion ANX 03-02:
The Planning Divi n of the Com nit} Serv es Department recommends that the Land
Planning Agency recommend w the Ciry Commiasion approval to Annex (ANX 03-02)end to
amend the Future Lend Use Mop (small scale) (SPA 03-02) Por a lot that is 6.621 sq. R. +/-
(.20 Acres+/.), loeared et bOS I~Iighland Street, into the City tq fulRll v utility/annexation
agreement buween [he applicant and the Ciry-
FcolanaioNBackeround
Theo and applicant, Leslie Williams, is reque ring voluntary an nofdtesingle-
f 'ly residential lot, 8,625 sq. R.+/-(20 acrts+/-), located at 60511ighlend Street. Thc
applicant is requesting Otis vnnexation to fulfill the utility/annexation agreement that she
signed with the Ciry_ Anached id n report concerning the subject property for furcher details
and review
The DRB, at rts regularscheduled meeting of May 2, 20(12. eecommended to thv appropriate
boaNs to approve the requested annexation and land use amendment.
Staff Reoort~
Armex Lea I~u
From: Countydo LDR (I,ow Density Residential)
To: City LDR (Low Density Aesidendal)
T met Siae: Approx. 8625 sq. fi.+/-(yO ACtes+/-)
Ekisting Use: Single Family Residential Unit.
Proposed Development:
The applicant proposes to utilize the property as permitted in the Etitum Land Ure
designation ofLDR. This application is bring processed due to the
utility/annexation agreement between the applicant and the city.
Recommended Action:
The Planning Division recommends approval of this Armexation and Future Land Use
designation to LDR. The Future Cand Use Designation is compatible with the surounding
Public lvo The City hav reewved no rommente at the time of this Report.
Annexat oNLand Use Reoon
I. Aelationship'I'o Adjacent Properties:
)~ Land Use Present Ux
NoM (Cowry) LDR Single Family Residential
Fast (County) LDR Single Family Residential
South (City) LDR Single Family Residential
West (City) IAR Single Family Residential
2. Analvsi
WekivasRiver Prot on Area. No
Area oPCritical Stete'Conuern: No
DRI: No
Intedocal Agreement (Seminole County): Yes
Ariel sis ofthe relationshi oPthe amendmem to the ulatio
There are no sigmificanr changes in population projections caused b} this project.
Habitat fors es listed as cndan a threa ned or ofs cial co
No environmental issues have been noted on this properly.
Tmfrlc C'rcula'o_p Anatvv'u~
I_ Roadways serving the rile:
Func[ional Gxieting LOS
Roadwa Cloasif 0 I.OS Standard
Highlmd Street Local NA NA
Roadway lmprovemems:
No improvements to Highland Street are required due ut this annexanun.
Sam arv Sewer Analvsis
1. Residentivl (Existing)
a. Facilitie rving the e: Septic Tank
LOS srandard: ftesidemial 300 gpd/d.u.
b. ImprovemenVexpnnsions already programmed or needed as a rzsnlt of
proposed amendment: No improvements are scheduled due tothis
Potable Watu Analvsis:
I. Residential (Existing)
a. Facilities serving the site: City of Longwood
LOS standard: Residential: 330 gpd/du
b. Available capacity: Yes
i. JmprovemenVexpensions alrwdy peograntmed or needed asarealt
of proposed amendment: No improv scheduled due
this developmwt. Service line has been wnnected w the residems.
Drainaee Analvsis
I. Facilities serving the site. ext ring-residential
Solid Waste
1. Facilities serving the site: City oCLOngwuod-wntrad services
IAS sandaN: Residential: Sibs /dayld.u.
2. ImprovemenVexpansions already programmed or needed as a resnlr of
proWSed amendment: Seminole County has adequate fvcilities at ire
Osceola Landf II site in the nonheazt portion ofthe County.
Recreafon And Oven Snnce
1. F'acilitles serving the site: City of Longwood
LOS sandard: Residential U.2U Acresll 000 Population
2. Projected LOS under existing designation:Negligible
~. ImprovemenVexpunsioos already progmmmed or needed ay result of
proposed amendment No improvements are scheduled due to this
development.
Proof of publication for ANX 03-02 and SPA 03-02 was presented.
Mr.Sargent explained that the annexation isaresult ofa ciryw ragree t. The EOard
had no comment and there was no one present who wished to speak on the reque ts.
Mh. Ma(ooJrrrade a motfan ro dose-~~Dlic hearing on ANX U3-02 and SPA 03-02. Mr.
Kapackseeonded the motion. The mot]on was unanimatesly approved (3-0~.
Mr Kapack made a morian ro rerommend approval of ANX 03-OZ and SPA 03-01 ro Ciry
Gmmissian. ,Nr. IJaloofreeonded ehe nrotton The motion wan ttmaniotously approvad
~-n~.
C. CPA OIAI2 Aorendmenf to GmDrehenaive Plan and FLU Map
Applirsnti Ciry o[Langwood
MotioNRecommendation CPA 01-02:
The Planning Division o(the Community Services Depanment recommends thm the Land
Planning Agency recommend that the City Commission approve a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (CPA OI-02) and an amendment to the Furore Land Use Map (PLUM) and
transmitthe amendment and amended map to the Deparcment ofCommuniry Affairs (DCIs).
LcplanatipNEackground_
The City Commission has requested that The Gail Easley Compmty review and make
ended modify polici n the Comprehen e plan s they relate o the
Evalue eod Appraisal Report (F,AR) and Futuro land Use Map, in accordance with tfie
w Lovgwood Development Code. 'fhesuggested amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
are attached.
The suggested amendments are in atcordance with the EItA. The Iaoguage is In compliance
with Florida Swte Statutes and [he Florida Administrztive Code. The Ftrctve Land Use Map
(PLUM)has been prtpared in amordance with the City Commission'ssuggested amendmene
Proof of Publication was presented.
Mr. Sargent gave Ne statT report with backgrountl of the history on the EAR Report as
preparation and update For the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
The FLU Map was explained item-by-item I - I I with visual aide.
The LPA chose not to review tha Comprehensive Plnn page by page vs they had reviewed it
individoally in their packets. There was no discussion
Mr. Sacgent explained that following the Ciry Commission Public Hearing and Adoption
that the Comprehen ve Plan ould be sent to DCA for acceptance. The process would
probably lake approximately four months.
There were na comments or qne none Gom the pablia.
M. Kopack made a morlon eo close yirbh'c Nearing on CPA 01-02 Mr. MalooJseconded
the motion the motion x~as unanlmow~ty approved (3-0).
Mr_ Maloufmade a morlon ro reum~mend a0proval ro Ciry CarnmisslonJor CYAO]-01,
Amendment ro Comprehenrfve Plan and FL.lI Map as presented. Mr. Kopaek seconded the
mnnan. ]he moron nos tmontmr~u'ly approved (3-0).
D. LDCA 01-02 Longwood Development Cade
historic District Code Dook and Maser Plan
Applicann City of Longwood
MofoNRecommentlaFon fDCA 01-02
The Planning Division of the Community Services Depanment recommends chat the Land
Planning Agenvy recommend to the Ciry Commission approval of en vmendment to the
Longwood Development Code, Chapter25 (LDC 02-0I) to include the Longwood Historic
District Code Book, pursuant to the regairements of the City of Longwood and Florida
Statutes.
GxylenetioNBackeound-
The Ciry oontramed fhe services ofthe Uix~Nunce fnv far the preparation ofthe Longwood
tistoric Distract Code Book and Master Plan. The enaehed code book will be referenced in
the new Longwood Development Code, and replacing the retained Sections 34-27 and 24-96
of the Land Development Code pmswmt to the sgWrements oPthe City of Langwoatl turd
Florida Statutes.
The IiPB, at a special meeting on April 1 ], X002. approved (4-0) recommending approval of
the Longwood Hiswrie District Code Book with thecorrm7ions or amendmenss az discussed
dmiog that meeting
Proof of Publication for I..DCA Ul-U2 waz given.
Mr. Sazgem reviewed the process for the LPA and Public.
He explained the Master flan was to be reviewed by LPA. brat it was «r be approved and
adopted by the City Commission. The Master Plan is a preparation for the Code Rook
The Code Book N before LPA The Hisoric Code was pan of the Land Development Code
end Nat the Historic Distrmt Section of the Old Code would remain v pmt of the Longwood
Development Code book until Ne new Historic Code Book could be completed. Dix
Nance was the hired consultant to update the Master Plan and Ne Historic District Code
Book The Code Rook was prepared and presented at a Ciry Com ring to star
the r w prac s of what es put together. The word "final drag"twes pure n the books by
thew sultan and only in s that as their final dmfl before presentation to the Clty of
Longwood. Itsis not the final draft for the City.
Thu Hisoric Curie Book will become v part of the Longwood Development Codu but wil I be
a separate ordinance to be adopted and accompany the LDC.
The next pmcess efiu the LPA is to go to City Commission through the Ciry Administator
wiN Ne LYA recommendedovs. 'ihu City Administrator wil I present to the City
Cora on for adoption. How r. the Hist is Prase on Board has asked for
workshops so all Ne residential and business properly holders can review Ne codebook and
hav input prior to City Commission adoption.
Once workshop dates ere set by the Clty Commission votifeetiavs will be scut to the
property owners, Ne HPR, Ne LPA, City Commission and Ne consultant, Dix Natce.
The HPB had a special meeting to reviewthe document; those minutes with their changes
are part of your packet and should be mandated with Ne I.PA recommendation of approval.
After explaining the prooess ofthe Historic Code HOOk there was public comment. Mr.
Richards asked if any wishedmspeak on the process itself Public voiced Neir desire to
apuak. Mr. Richards hatl received the Request To Speak form from the f Mowing:
First parson to speak was lean Ridel la (a merchant of the Apple basket ov C'hurclr Ave.)
she read a letter that Judy Pu¢, 2811 W Wartev Ave., had writtan to the LPA. Copy of this
letter will become pan of the file (Exhibit A, all documents presented.)The letter in
summavon requested workshops.
Ms. Ridella 218 W Church Ave. also spoke on her own behalf and had a copy of a lever
John 9rock Cnmmwiry Services Director had wrinen Decembu2I. 1999 regaNing the
tact that Nere would be workshops. Also attached was a letter she had written December
20, 1999 m Mayor Lovestrand and Commissioners and a newspaper clipping wiN quoces
from ]ohn Drago. City Administrator. (Also in the file. All mfereviced items arc Exhibit A.)
She asked the LPA to postpone any decision until after workshops involving Ne communiry
were held.
Ms. Virginia Damron Sienkne<ht, 2I I W Warten Ave. asked the I,PA to postpone Neir
recommendation omit workshops are held involving the community.
Sondrz Lomax, 141 I Parent Way. a member of the Historical Preservation Board spoke
She told the LPA that she had made o motion at Ne HPB February 12, 2002 meeting [hat all
property otmers in the Historic D16Irla be notified of al I the meetings regarding the Master
Flan. Them usly approved 4-0. She said that when she w
eating because of illness that motion got chonged around avd somehow that motion got
cintled and another Nought was brought forward. She asked the LPA to table the item to
allow time for Ne residents to know about Ne Master Plan
Linda Johnson. owner of the Apple Basket on W Church Ave. Shc wanted to add she
agreed wiN all the other speakers and asked for postponcmem also.
The last speaker, Pamela Redditt, a member of the Historic Preservation IIoard and a
business owner on Church Ave., The Culinary Cottage. She spoke as a merchant and
expressed Nat she too fah it was imponant m get inpG from Ne residences and merchants in
Ne Historic District.
Mr. Richards then tamed the meting back w Mr. Sargent. Mr. Sargent suggested instead of
going through the Codebook page by page that the LPA make a recommendation to the City
Comm ro take i nsidera on Ne HPB co is from Neir ring and Net
workshops be held. Workshops should irmludc entice to Ne LPA, HPB and the property
(business and residentiap in the Historic District. Once the workshops are eomplGCd and
they have a Onal document Nat it be brought back to the LPA for their review. He stressed
that the LPA be involved in the workshops to simplify their review when it was resumed to
Nem. The LPA is responsible Por Ne Codebook, not Ne Master Plao. However, what
drives the Codebook is the Master Plan.
There m Nat the Com ould not hold worksbops and the fact that Ms
Lomax had made a on to Include the historw wmmunity In the meetings and that had
not been done m date I
Mr. Sargent stated that yes, Nerc was a motion. the minutes she referred to were provided at
Nem ring she did no end, but to her apacket. The Hist is Preservation
Board chose not to include the merchants and residents in Neir enacting so ga over the
Master Plan and Codebook before it went to the LPA. That is why the historic rommuniry
otified. however taking that motion she made before that time, Ne motion has
been extended, even thought the }IPd rescinded that motion for their own meeting, it was
put in the City Comm workshopx It is the City Con n that need re make Ne
final decisions and they are the people that should hear the eommuniry input
Mr. Richards asked ifthere were any foMer comments fiom public.
Ma Ridilla asked if there was a gaarantee that workshops will be heltl by the City
Commission, She crated that these workshops were supposed to be beld in the formation of
the Mater Plan by Dix Nance.
Mr. Richads stared that the LPA mould not gnman4ee dtvt, but recommeWation for
workshops would be Included in their motion
With no other comments, Mr. Richards asked for a moriou ro close the public hearing o0
LDCA Ol-02 Historic District Codebook and Master Plan.
Mr. Mal fmade a morlon ro close the pu611c hooting on LDG O[~01. Mr. Kopack
sscanded the motion. The morlon was urcunimourly approved (3-0).
Mr. Maloofmade a morlon ro recommend approval char LOCAOi-02 Flisrorir Dutricr Code
Book and Master Plan go before +h~ r ry Cnmmvsion for review with the nlpularlon that
the commisslmr schedule rvarksh~m ~ ~ whh nnri/Iearlon fm inprr+j onr the residents, praparry
nr n r and hw'ircesr oumerv (o r ~ miry ra voice their feelings ar war'
mendod by h H' micA~: Also that rho Crry Camrnlssian notify
+he NPB and the LPA ofsclreduled , -.. mdrhar the recommended change oJ'
+he HPB, pr¢par d r the i.,! n tpril l7. 200E be nrada parr ajrha
vart hops Alsn. rhm the ~ uk is ~ - ~~-ed andchanges made and that Ir be rrtnrned
+o the Land Planning AgenevJ _ .:pyrovar and rerunreAro the Ciry Canrnrissionjor Pu61ic
Pleating and Adoption. Mr. Kopeck secorWed the moriorc. l'he moron was unanimously
approved (JlIJ_
5. DEVEU)PMENT RF,VIF.W: There were no development reviews.
6. NF.W 6USINESS:
Mr. Sargent advised the LPA that site plans would no longer be coming Before them for
under the new Longwood Development Code. Sulinow has the authority to
approve site plans with their reviews. If there were any disputes site plains would go
direc0y m City Commission for final approval or denial.
He also advised the LPA that they could now destroy their copy ofthe old Larrd
Development Code.
]. OLD BUSINESS: lltere waz no Old business to discuss.
S. DISCUSSION AND SCUEDULF,FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
1 he next regular scheduled meeting date is July 10.2002.
9. AUJOURNMF,NT:
Mr. Rlchmdr owde a motion ro ag'uurn the mae+ing Mr. Kopad remnded the rnorinn
The motion ryas unanimously approved (3-OJ.