Loading...
LPAMin08-08-01clTV of LoNCwoou Lund Planning Agency Mimnes, August 8, 2001 Attendance: Board. S3gH: Denny Emory_ Vice Chairperson tey Sergeut_ Planning Division Manager John Kopack Chad Harvey. Planner George McKenzie Absent. Beverly Majors Planning Uivision Secretary . Al Schreiber District 4 -Vacancy t. CALL TO ORDER: Mr. Emory called the meeting to order at ]:00 P. M. W. Sargent advised the Board that Ms. Bullington had moved out of the City of Longwood and was no longer on the Board. Another member will be appoimed. Mr. Emory, as Vice Chairperson. would conduct the meeting end next scheduled meeting September 12,?001 thus would be en eleuion for Chairpetsoa 2. APPROVALOF THE MINUTES FOR Jaty t1,2001: Mr. Ko/mek mode a rrzo/lon io ayFirove the mmitres JJn[y Il, 2GOI nv~resemed Mr. McKetue mwndecf the motion. Zrie rttarlwr ivas' irnarilrrrwrrty approvad 13-0.) 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: there was no one present to speak dunng public wniment. J. PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING: A. AN%04-aI Annexation Daniel & Maria Ramos ]Il HIg0land SlreU Applicant: Maria B. Ramos Mr. Emory opened the Public Hearing on the annexation request and asked for proof of publications. Mr. Harvey provided proofand proceeded with the staff report as follows. Motior/Reco endat The planning Division o4 the Community Services Depanmem recommends that the Land Planning Agenoy re end w tha Ciry Commission approval olan annwetion (ANX 04- 01), to annex a lot than u 12,500+/- sq. ft. (.29+/. gcres) located at ] I I h~Iighlend Street, into the City to fulRll a utility/ennoxation agreanent between the applicant and the Ciry. E I t NH ckgrn!!ng. The applica s, Uenial and Maria Aemoe, are requestin6 volunteryannexationoftheirsingle- Lmily residential lot 12,500+/- sq- ft. (.29+/_ acres) located et'!I 1 Highland Street- They e reque tingthisa xation to fulfill theutiliry/an nagree mthatthey sigted with the Ciry_ Attachod ismereport eonouning thesubject prePorty for further details and review- The DRB, at its regular uheduled meeting ofluly 5.2001, recommended to the appropriate boards to approve the requested annexation. Implementation'. Upon final approval of the City Commission. S[aR Report: Chad Narvev: Exi~dupg, Future Land Use- Counry LDA (Low Densiry Aesidential) Parcel ld Number(s). }3-20-30.509-0000.0010 Location'. 11 I Highlauda Street Tract Size: I2-SO0+/_,sq. ft. (.29+/_ Acres) Existing USe: Single Famly Residential Unit. PropQ£ d Deye~meny. Tha applicant proposes to utilizethe property as permitted in [he Future [sod Use designation of LDR. This application is being processed due to the utility{annexation agreement between the applicant and the dty. Maximum Allowable Development'. LUR 4.0 UPA x ~9 acres = One Residential Dwelling Units. Recommended Action. The Development Review Board (DRB) rewmmentls approval ofthis Avncxation. Tha Future Lend Uu Designation is oomPatible with the surtounding area. Public IRyuS_ The Ciry has received no comments at the time of this Report Annexat on Reoory, I. Relationship To Adjacem Propert es: P rce o° I.andlJse Pa=stir ll~e North (County) LDR Single Femly Residential Eaat (atr> my warenonae South (aunty) LDR Single Femly Residential West (City) LDR Single Family Residential 11. Anelvs~'. Wekiva River Protection Area. No Area of Critical State Concern- No DRI. No Imerloaal Agreenienl (Svninole County)'. Yes Anelvsis of the relatiooeh'o ofthe amendment tp ha ooulai on projeci on There are no significant changes in population projec ions caused by this project. Habra for spec es I'sted as endan e ~ed threa erred or of so cal co No envnonmental issues have been noted on this property. e Traffic C'rculai on Anxlys~, I. Roadways serving the site: Functional Existing LOS gpad~ways Class'ficat on......... LOS Standard Richland Street Local NA NA 2. Roadway Improvements'. No improvements to ILghland Street are required due to this annexation. ~e_w_gr Ar gl s s. 1. Residemiel (Existing) e. Fa lines serving the site Septic Tank LOS standard: Residentia130o gpd/d u_ b. ImprovemenUexpansions already programmed or needed as a resuh of proposed amendment: No improvements are scheduled due to This annexation. Potable Water Analvs's I. Residemiel (Existing) a. Faulities serving the site'. City of t.ongwood LOS standard'. Residential: 3l0 gpd/du. b. Available capadty-Yes c. Improvement/rrpansions already programmed or needed as a result of proposed amendment: Potable water semce line hae beu wnnected to the residents Urainaee Anslvi s 1. Facilities serving the site. ew ting-ruidentiel Sold Waste 1. Facilitie rving thes City of Longwood-contact services LOS standard: Residennel'. Slba/day/d.o. _. Improvement/expansionsslready programmed or needed as a result of proposed mendment: Seminole County has adequate fecilitics at its Osceola Landfll]site in the northeast portion of the County. Recre on And Ooen Soace' 1. a Facilities serving the site: Gty of Longwood LOS standard: Residentia1020 Acres/] 000 Population. 2. Projected LOS under existing designation: Negligible. 3. Improvement/expansionsslready progratmned or needed as result ofproposed amendment: No improvements are scheduled due to this development. Following the presentation ofthe Staff Report. Mr. Emory asked iEthere was anyone present who wished to speak in favor of or against the amrexation reque t. There was no rte prase who wished to speak. Mr. Emory asked if there any q e commems from the Hoard. There was ao discussion and Mr. Emory entertained armohon. Mr. Kopack made a modmr ro c/ore the public hearhrg an 9NX OJA[. Mr. McRenele sernnded the modorr. Zhe monrnr x~as unmrimously approved (3-0). Ab. Kapack made a modrnr ro reevnmeerxt approm! to the Ciry Cammissirnr on ANX 0{.O! jot ][I Highlmid Street Mr. McRercie seconded the motion The motion was mrmrimously PPravaa (3-0). 5. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: A. SP 03-Ot Site Plan Hnited Hwitage Sank 640 Highway 634 East Applicant: Micbael daroch Mr. Sargent presented the staff report with visual eidr_ Mot onMeo raidati The Planning Division of the Community Services Depanmenl rewmmends that the Land Pimming Agency recommend to the Ciry Commission approval of Site Plan (SP 03-01) to conswet a 3 story building for general ofice and baNc use at 640 Highway 434 E. Exolanai oNBackground The applicant, Michael Iarocla of[ientley Arehitens and Engineers, Inc., has applied Cor site plan review w construct a 3 story building for general office and bank use at 640 wghway 434 E The DRB, stirs regular scheduled meetingofluly 5, 2001, rewmmended to the eppropris[e boards to approve the requested site plan with the following comments and exoeptions- Comments: • Extm care shall be takento protest existing trees on the lot (LDCSu 2155,3). • Nov es from the Qty Code wart requested for this project except as listed below` aSraff re s the right to additional commentx during conrtruuion and prio omplet6 • No modifiaetion ~or alterations of any kind shell be made to this site plan without the wriven permission ofthe City oPLOngwood. • No site work to be done until all appropriate property ownership documents have been submitted to the City of I..ongwood. • No site work to be done until all applicable 51. John s River N'ater 1anagement Disfrin (SJRWMD) or Department of Environmemal Protenion (DEPJ permits have been submitted to the City of Longwood. • A traffic Wady condoned by GMB TraRre Engineers has concluded that a traffic signal is ourtemly not warzanted for this projecC however, should a tml5c study be onducted in the future regarding the impact ofthis site, tnedeveloper will agree to wnttibute to the cost of obtaining a tralfle sgnal at that lime Exceotions/Waiv • TI s project hex on-flue retention which is located on [he south side of this property with 3: I side slopez The LDC requires a six foot high fries for all on ponds that have side slopes with horianntaVvertical ratios greater than 4.1. The applicant requests that [he LPA re end to the Gty Commission that the feriae be waived as it would not be aesthetically pleasing to Ne ei[e (see Bentley memo dated 7/19/01). Howevu, the eating City Engineer has submitted a memo suggesting that the fenoe should not be waived due to safety wncems (PDA memo dated'lR6/OI). I 1 nerve Upon final approval ofthe City Commission. Site plans expire I80 drys after final action. Following the completion of the roport. Mr. Sargent reviewed some of thecommentz Wyman Street on the north aide of the property meets the intuscuion that is being created for the office building on the south side. Atthis intersectionapossible traffic light may be required in the future. Across access easement would be required to connect the property to the south resident end to the east Pirza Hut and Feirwinds Credit UNOM1 The 51. John's Wetu Management permit and the DEP permit will be required on the site The site plan shows anuoaching in a wetlands area, St John s noeds to review that and makes a the applican is providing an appropriate design and compensation storage in that area and will be part of the St. Johns Permit. Thew r that the appiccan reque [ing is n the fence around the retention pond at [heback of the properry_The sloPei uehoe angle that ould raquirefneing the 'fhe pond is designed to be dry, but the slope itselfwould require the fnae by code One oPthe things That the acting City Engineer has reviewed oo this is that [he praperry directly oath ofthe site is zoned residential (there ere three or four undeveloped residential lots). Buffr~s squired becauu of the residential lots, but the slope angleE what warrants a fence. The access road would service thou three or four lots, and the on pond would act as the buff ,but anyone would have accessibility to go i to the retention pond. Mr. Emory asked what the buffer requirements are. According Yo city wde there coWd be a fifteen-foot buffer with an eight-f t wall, a wenty-foot buffer with asix-foot wall, or a thirty-five foot buffer and no wall. The applicant has the required amount of distance for buffer wish no wall. Buflu consists of e well with trees and shrubs Cor landscaping A wWl depends on the amount of open space. The pond is designed to be dry and that w whet the applicant ie basing their waiver request Mr. Sargent stated he would be happy to answer any questions and advised the eoerd that iheapplicanl, Mike Jaroch, was present. Mr_ Emery was wncemed abort[ the lighting He asked how many lights would be in the parking lot, how vhe building would be lit and how it would affect the residential area. Mr. Sargent explained that there was a lighting plan. Lights will not be Drojeued in the residemial mew. She lights m et up to go towards S R. 034. The lighting at 434 does not expand beyond the property line as far as direr lighting. Mr. Emory alu asked about the crows access easemem which Mr. Sargent explained and the possible tratRc light with visual eRea. Mr. Emory asked about the fence. Mr. Sargent said he would prefer the Board direct their qua eons to Mr. Iaroch. With no further quesions to Staff. Mr Jaroch was invited to come forward. He traduced himself, st [ing his e, Mike Jaroch reprau tiog Bentley Archite at 665 W. Warren Avenue, Longwoodamfhe fence ated and disc sled. The Board agreed that they preferred a fenc wall be nnalled t the retention pond along the south and east pe^meters to insure the safety ofthe future abutting residems and clWdren. there were no furthet questions fiom the RoarU. Mr. Sargent asked to explain comments regarding proof of ownership and explained that the property was under coviraa fr purchase pending approval oPthe site plea Documentation of purchase will be presamed to the City poor to beginning any site work. With no further discussion. Mr. Emory entertained a motion. Mr. McKerr:ie made a nrorimr ro recommend apprm~al jSP 03-0[ jm (hared Hanrnge Bmrk ro the C'lry Carnmisalorr snbjecr ra sraffeonrmerrrs addre3sed mrd n wall w j rce requherrtenron [he .south .side qJ the prolrra~ry and the eon ode np ro the dumpner wirh ]andscrryirrg as prerenred In rare sue ylmr. Mr. Krywrk.secorrded the mohon, lire rnoeion was unrurrmorrrly approved (3-0). D. SP 04-0t Site Plan Wildmere Business Park Phase3 135 E. W ildmere Avenue Applicant: KeiM Severns Mr_ Harvey presented the staff report on SP 040I_ this is the final phase ofthe Wildmua Business Park. ~?3Li4_~?~4mniepda[ion: The Planiung Division ofthe Community Services Department recommends that [he Land Planning Agency recommend to the City Commission approval of a Site Pian (SP 04-01) to build e 12.000 eq. R. ofilce (phase IIL) et 155 E Wildmua Avenue. ExvlanatoNBackeround- The applicant. Keith Sevens, oPKNS Construction, hae applied [ r Bite plan reviewto build a 12.000 sq. R. ofliee at 155 E. Wildmua Avenue. This ie the third and final phase of development for Wildmua Bueineas Perk. l'he DRB.atits regular scheduled meetin6 ofluly 5. 2001, rec mended to the appropriate boards to approvethe requested site plan wish the fUllowing comments: Com • Extra sate shell be taken to pmtaa existing trees on the lot (LDC Sea 24- SS l) • No vanevwsfiom the City Coda ware requested 6rthis projen, and wee are med. • Staffreserves the right to additional cvmmems during consirucnon and prior omPluion • No modifications or alterations of xny kind shell be made ro this site plan without the writ[en permission of the City of Longwood. • The City oft.ongwood Fire Divisionis requiring apos~indiceror vaWeonthe (4) inch PVC fire line Pot Phase I and Phase 111 of this projea_ Imolementa Upon final aPProvel ofthe City Commission. Site plane expire 180 days after final The owner, Marc MoLarnon was prerent_ There was no discuss~oo by the Board. Mc Emory entertemed a motion. Mr. Kopu<I: mole a moelnr~ ro recommatd apprornl oJSP OJ-0/Jot ~Idrnere B~~siness pmk. /'Iwse /1/. ~o rHe CiD• Cammksion. Afi- McKervie seco~Wed the motion- 7'he monnn uas ~~rrnmrnonsly rproveri (3-0). NEW BUSINESS: There was no new business [o discuss. >. OI.D BUSINESS: Mr. Sargent advised she Boerd that the r ised LDC Drag was being reviewed and that the Com nwould havethe second workshop she Pdtowing Monday. August l3 with Ms. Easleyssio He asked that the eonrd review the LDC Draft and a~tend the workshop with their a He asked ifanyona had a comment and would be unable to attend the workshop to pleasx notify him with rheie wnceros so he oould present ~hem~ 8. DISCUSSION AND SCREDULE FUR FUTURE AGENDA II'EMS: The next regular scheduled mcedng date is September 12.200E Mr SarSen~ advised the Board that there was a sire plan that was scheduled to come before them in September- 8. ADJOURNh1ENT: With no further items to discuss. Mr_ Emory entertained a motion for adjouament_ Mr. McKenJe rrrnde n merlon ro ndloivrz the meennR_ M.. Ka~xuJ~.s«or~rled rRe merlon. the motion uar ~marrzm nsly approved (3-0). Mewing adjourned at ].45 p, M.