Loading...
LPAMin06-14-00CITY OF LUNG W OOD LAND PLANNING AGENCY Minutes, June I J, 20110 ATTENDANCE: Board: SteR: Bobbi Bullington Chairperson Jay Sargent. Planning Division Manager Nancy Childers. Vice Chairperson peverly Malors Pluming Division Secretary AI SehreiMr (arrived ]:OS P.M.) Richnrtl Tnylor_ City Attorney Joyce Helcher Lorraine Porzes~ Acting Secrexary Denny emnn~ went I. cALLTOORDER: Mx Bullington called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. 2. APPROVAL OF Mny 10, 200q MINUTES Ms. Helcher made n moon ro approve ~Fe M~v 10, 2000, mmtt[es w presented- Hh Emo!v seeortded the madorr. The morlo~v .rvs tmmtiniotuly approved (5-Oj_ i. PV'HLIC COMMF,NT: Mr. Sargent ecplained to the pubhe that forms needed to be completed 6y anyone who wished to speak during public commem or public hearing. Ms. Bullingon opened public comment. There was no public comment. Public comment was closed. 4. PUIII.IC HEARING: Ms. Bullington opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Sargent stated that the firs[ Ouee items A, HI and B2 were on the same property and would be addressed together, but voted on individually. These are continued items from May 10, ?000. Ms Bullington opened public hearing on VAGOI-00, SPA-OI-00 and RZ-01-00 and asked if there w anyone present who wished to speak in favor r ageh st these Oems. Mr. Sargent presented the Stafi Repott for VAG01-00 wi[h visual aide There is no opPOSition Gum the utility compvnies with the abandonment of the right ofway. A. vacol-oo co»r,nedh,,,»,norooM~mR 7'T of Longwood, Inc (OBA Fairbanks Mazda) i00 N. Highway Il/92 9usnn R. SDradley, Esy. Planning Division Stag Reaort~ Comments are based on the applicelion dated Mareh 1, 2000. All citations of regulations refar to Chapter 2R of the Ciry Code. unless steed otherwise. Referurees to the Plan, or Comprehensive Plan, mean the Comprehensive Plan oftlre Ciry adop~ed by Ordinance I OI9, on JuIY 10.1992. The vpplicani has applied to abandon and vacate the undovelopecl right-of--way Nay divides Their propetty (See anached map). The requesmd mea for ring curzcntly is overgro and is oadway. The aindu of the righ~-of way, south of'the subjec mea i a paved road that xrvices several residential homes. S'TAF'F' ANALYSIS Consisfencv with the Cumorehensive Plan: The proposed use is not ineonaistem with the Comprehensive Plan, and vacating the righ~-ot way does not veggie any morer roadway pion. ERect on anv Publie Aeencv: The vacating ofthe righ~-of--way will not curzently impact any of the City departments' or local utilities The applicant haz included leuusofno objec~ion from all the localn lilies However. any ev s Ihvt within the ar a regves~ed Io be v a[ed would not hereby be vo ored with This act oa (i.e ~ AT &T easemem). The Ciry should also insis~ that the entire right-of- way be rededicated as a utilityldrainvge easemem for lire perpetual use of the pnbtic. Assessment of the ERect on AJiaccnt Pronerties: The oflect ofvacating of the righluf--way should be minimal on neighboring properties. ns this property is notused at this or planned to M utilized for any oNer purposes otMr Ihun None ofthe edjecen~property owners use the rightbf--way for teas m their properly. as the applirnm owns the propuly on el16er side of the right-of-way. a~ The applicant has sfnted That They will work with the adjacent propuly owners Io avoid hevlug any objet s. As a result of a community m ring between the neighbors and the applieenL neighbors have addressed their wishes concerning the development of the site if the ebandormiem is approved. If thu abandom:wat: is approved,:he issues will be eonsidered at the lime of site plan appEre~ion. r Ad'acent La d Uses ] sin and Sire Develo m nt Criteria: The imn>edimely adjacent propertie re designated to the e t and west is Mediam Deasity Residential on the Future Land UsesMap and is zoned R-2.• s • Concurtemly with this application, the applicant is requesting to change the firture land use desigtw and zoning on the lots o the es and w io Generzl Coivn ual and C-3 respect vely. Tne property to the east is a scriber's erzar on the fuwre Ivnd use and inning n~sps. The eunem Mazda dealership has an approved commercial site plan on file with the city and ocwpies the subject land area immediately east of the unused eight~ofway. PLANNING DIVISION RECOMMCNDATIONS The Platming Divi ends the IPA rec lend that the City Cov n appro the vbandotunent (VAC 01-0B) of a ponian of Lake Gem Drive right-of--way sowh ofOrange Avenue and maintain the area as a utility and drainage eaw.ment. 11.1. SPA-Of AO Cunrinnerljram 5/!0/OO Meering 'rl' of Longwood, Inc (DBA Ralrbanka Mazda) 4110 N. Highway I]/Y2 Susan A. Spradley, Fsy. 2. RZhI-o0 Conrlniredfiom 5/IO/00 Meeting ~ TT of Longwood, Inc. (BBA Fairbaake Mafia) JOd Y. If ighway 1'IN2 Susan B. Spradley, Esq. Plannine Division Stag Report: Reouen Land [ISel ltczoning r_mi_~ana use Reaonig From: City MDR (Medium Density Residential) R-2 (Res. Duples) To: City GC (Gereral Commercial) G3 (Commercial General) Owner; T: C. of Longwood (DBA Foirtranks MUWa) i00 N- US Hwy I'//92 Longwood, FL 32~So Renresenta Ms. Sown Spradlef Grny, Harris & Robireon. P.A. ravel Ie rvambu<rsr. 33-20-30-.i05-0000-0060, 33-20-30-505-0000-00]0, and including a portion of [.aka Gem Drive mouth of Ormrge Avenue. Loc _L Westerly portion of Lot J and LoI b (leas the westerly 100 feet) ofEntzminger Farms Addition. (Y.xhlbit A) Tract Sire: Approx. 4.G Acres F.xisting Usc CommeroiaV Vacant/ unimproved eightoFway (vacated). rropoeed Development: The applicem proposes to wnecta City seribe~senor and change the future lend use designation pima remoinder of the'v progeny m expand she vehicle oregear ntheir ring co cial sit,'fBe applicant .mould likes rcloc ethev wetar ruemion an1d londxape buRer between the residential area and their commcrc:el Maximum Allowable Development: F.xisting: R~2: 2.00+/. accesx I1.9 (mnx units per aere)=24 dwelling units R-2°: 26]+/-acres (no change existing sito plan) Proposed: C-3: 2.0~/-aaesx .50 (FARJ-43,560 sq.ft•' "Scriheis n. pure land use and zoning map "Shop requ iersve plan' aPProval. Recommcndwl Aelion: The Development Review Doard (DRD) recommends approval of the f Mowing union with L Future Lmtd Use Desigrwtion fiom Cif to Cit' CC . _. Zoning District Classilieatiov kom C{tv R"S to Cirv C-3 . The Future Land Use Designa ton and Zoning Distnu Classification are vompatible with the surrounding ar a. Comment: The western portion of the properly. approxinwtely 200 (et (1.93 Gres) shall be used only 6r retensiou, landscaping and bumeeing fiom the residemial ea (to be addressetl during the sire plan pmcess7. Thls portion ofthc property shall not be milrzed for my vehicle storage Tliu approval is predicazed on the vvcoting of n ponian of the Lake Gem Avenue tightbf- way. ramie lapin: The City has received e later from a resident nughboring the subject property wtdch adaresses come eeneerne tatrarhed~. LAND USE /ZONING kl'iPORT I. RELATIONSHIP TO ADJACENT I'ROPER'CIF.S: DIRECTION -...~.~ ZONING PRF~F.NT USE North (City) MDR R-2 Duplexes S. Commercial (non~co~rrming) Lan (City) GC C-3 Mazda Dealership/Hwy. I ]/92 South (City) MDR R-2 Single Family 1{omes West (City) MDR R-2 Elementary School II. .4NALYSI3 Wekiva River Protection Area: No Area ofCritical 3tateC ncem. No DRI: No lnterlocel Agreement (Seminole County): No Arialvs's of the relot Tulip of the amendme othe oupula'on projec s 'Chic will reduce the projected popnlntion by 6] persons (24 unit ~ 2.8 ppu). Honsine Needs NA HHabitet for spec'es I's ed as endaoeered dvea coed or of svecal wncern No envnonmental issues have been noted on this properly. 'CRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS 1. Roadways sen'ing the site: Fltncrionvl Exi»ting LOS Road a Classife L03 S d d Ornnge Avc. I,ocal3tree * C DS Hwy I]/92 Smte Anerinl Ds. pr. "No Study Conducted "" Backlogged facility (per [he Comprehensive Plen) prior to curre nt improvemema. 2. Projected 2005 LOS under iheexistiog dcv'igoation (e.g., base condition ProjeereU 'Trips per Day Roadway(s) LOS tEat n atedl US tiwy 1]/92 D Res. 24 du = 240 nDT US Hwy 1'//92 D Comm. Existing 3. Projee[nl 2005 LOS under proposed designation: Projected Trips per Day Roadway(s) LOS fEStimatcdl US Hsvy 1]/92 U Rea.# 24 du=240 ASYI' US Hwy iJ/92 U Comin.ktt 43,500 sq.fl. Q48 AU"1]1000 Sq. R.-2088 ADT d Land Use 210 (Single Family Resideniiaf) uu rand uae ea i Mew car saleal * No building improvemems are scheduled at this time, only addi~iorul vehicle storage. Note Thee sting parcel(s)isexpeciW SO geneate approtiuna:elyy40:rips per day.lt shouid'lie noted Thal Ore aMve trip geneeadon will resoh in a net mcmase oP I~ trips per day fiom tha existing lend um desigratiov to the proposed land use designation. These calculation are 0ased on the'I RIP GENERn'pION, Fifth Edition. 4. Roadway Improvements: The US Hwy I ]/92 roadway was recently improved. Ban rvSexer Analvs 1. Residmitisl (Existing) a. Facilities serving the site: City ol'L.ongwood LOS standarvi: Residential 300 gpd/d.u. b. Pmjocte0 total demand under existing designation: 24 du (Idu x 300gpd)=],200 gpd c. Available cepaciry~: Yes ~` 2. Commercial (Proposed) a. Facilities serving the site: City ofLOngwood LO6 stradard: Retail/Carom: 225 gpd/1,000 sq.fl. b. Projected total demand under proposed dcsigvaflov: 43,500 sq.d./1,000 x225 gpd = 9,]90 gpd c Available capacity: Yes d. Improvement/expansions already programmed or needed suit o[proposW amendment: No improv scheduled due o phis developme t. Additional imp ov is / expan will be addreascd at time of site plan reweweif en needed on Potable VVVter Avalvsia I. Residential (Existing) a. Facilities serving the site: Ciry of Longwood LO3 standarJ: Residential: 330 gpd/du ~ b. Projected total demanJ under existing designation: 24 du (Ida x 330 gpdp 1 ]_820 gpd c. Availnble capvcity: Yes 2. Cmmmercial (Proposed) a. Faciliti ing the site: City oCLOngwood LOti stnndard: RetaiV Cam: 250 gpd/I 000 sq.ft. b. Projected total demanJ antler existing designation: 43,500 sq.ft/1,000 x 250 gPd = 10.8'/i gpd o. Available capacity: Yea d. Impruvementlexpavsions already programmed or needed anl[vf Proposed amendm No improvemen~s are scheduled due to this devalopmenlent Additional improvements/ expansion will be addressed at time orsne elan rceiew ifneaaea. Uraivaee Avahsia ~ 1. Facilities serving the site: mtural-nol developed. 2. Projected LOS under existing designation: residential per mde. 3. ProjecteU LO6 undor propalzd dosignatiou: Consistent with St. John's River Water Management District (61RWMD) and Florida Uepenment of Envu emal Prv on Rules. Dosigtred ppndst modate ooff' from the 25 year 6 hour srorm plus the first one-Inch of amf~ll on~site. A. Impro eat/expan required upon tlevelopment: On-site t retentioNdctemion pond in accordance with No. 3 above. Soli) Waste 1. Facilities serving the site: City of Longwood -contract services LOS standartl: Residential: Sibs./dayld.u. Non Residemial:3 2516s./dayll,000 sq.lt. _. Projected LOS onUer existing deeigvatiou: 24 du (du x Sibs./day) ~ 12016e1day 3. ProjecteJ LOS nnUor propasdf designation: ~ 43.500 sq.ft./1.000 x 3 25 gpd = 141 16s./day 4. Improvement/expansions already programmed or needeU as a result of propoaed amendment: Seminole Coumy haz adequate Gcilities at its Osceola Landfill site in the northeast pon~on oPthe Coumy. Recrcat on and Ooen Space I. Facilities serving the site City of Longwood LOS StaoUard: Residcntia10.20 AaeNL000 Popolvtion 2. ProjecteU LOS under esistinR designation: Negligible 1. Projected 1,05 under proposed designation: NA 4. Improvement/expansions already programmed nr neetleU as result of proposed amendment: NA Discrission foho.ved the staff reports. Mr. Sargem stated that there were residents who were opposeU to the development of the aree. Letters received from the resitlents were pan of the flle_ reviewed nM discussed during his staff report. The applicant had made proposals to ~ ompliance with the neighboring residen ncerns. The majoe contain of the residents was the bufl2r between the school and residents- kle emphasized that the ar a ofconcem would only be used for retenvon. and that is aII that could be accepted in that area. Mr. Taylor has been provided ler review a preliminary document w identifi~ the wording. Mr. Taylor iterated that the bu8er area would not only be rcstr;eted with the Mazda dealership. The a ould be on the inning map as cted and re orded in the public ords to eliminat any mbsequent pwchaser being able'to davelop h as wtmnercial property. Atrother area ofconcem was the wall. Mazda has agreed to the height efthe wall and twtntevance ofit. All areas ofconcem fiom the residents and school would be addressedm the site plan review if the v ring, small-male plan amendment atW retuning were vpproved in this process. BulierinS would be brought up to code. There will be a sidewalk that would tie in for the school and landscaping will be unproved. Another area ofconcem regards the trucks that deliver cars. The applicant u notifying the Transportation Companies that an area wJl be set np for this. artd that the trucks wlI not M wing Orange Avenue. Mr. Sargent asked ifthe levers received from concerned rasidems should be made e Purt of the minutes or ifthose residents wished to.vpeek. The latest letter recelvad wan @om L'laine Billy, she lives on Orange Avenue on the north side and is contained vbout what has happened in the previove years. tier lever read ... "I vin still opposed co the general inning request cited above. Iiistoricelly, this Martin dealership, regardless who has o.med it. has been a deplorable neighbor ar cired'm my letter of 4/2g/00." She also wrote about the neighborhood, some of the debris, and things chat we tit that area. Me. Bargain Itnd copies of the lance for the Board. Nrs. Billy u-av not present, but her husband was. Mr, Swgen neluded the stalTreport and the issuo was open for disonssiov and comment. Items discussed were lighting, the gees iv the retention poM area, and the height ofthe mlid wall. Sidewalks were alm discussed. Boad completed their disensson and the ApDllrant was asked ifthcy wished to speak. Susan Spredicy, Attorney with Gray. Harris and Rob'inmv, Oclvndo. Florida spoke on behalfofthe Applicant, TT Of Longwood, DBA F'airbenks Mazda. Alm present fiom her otflee. Jame.. lohmm~, who has been working with the msidents, meeting with them, and addressing the'v contents anti Mark Dowst, the Project Engineer. Ms. Spradley smted that her cliene Tl' ofLongwood agree to all the restrictiorrs that Mr, Sargent presented. "We" agree that the properly wll never be developed in your typical commercial setae that it will only be for storm water retention and detention. (A copy ofthe lever lain to the residents is on file.) All agnomen[ requcss will be incorporated into the final site plan. A Developers Agteernerit will h given to the City azsuring that ell the hems promised will happen. The Applicant has no problem agreeing to the easement atM vacating the rich[ ofey. As w the truck delivery iss e. Mr. PairbaN;s w u the Trnrsportation Delivery Company and indicated that from Jane 2, 2000, tMre would trot be anyone with authority to accept deliveries after 9:00 p.m.. Monday through Sunday. Mr. Emory asked that the TransTOnationDalivery Company also be advixed that [hare be no deliveries on Orange Avenue. A letter stating this will also be sent, When Ms. Spradfey completed her oration, Mr. Doves spoke. Idr. Dowst introduced himself As the P gineer. he was first asked to solve the parking problem ov site. Thcrc woe other problems and concerns that needed eddresxd. Problems silted with the vagrancy. tmlfic cut through. and the walls. l'he wlution was presented to Staff, cud, in his opinion, is a beneth for [he ADPGCunt and the Residents. He addressed same ofthe comments made. Ile addresud lighting, and said there would be no IigMing at the back area, which is the retentioa wee. LlghtinE on site would fvllowthe current codes, wWch would include shielding and directing to the ireide. He also commented on the pond. Once approval is granted, the pond design would depend on the surveys of that area. He addressed Ne quesuon on maintenance ofthe rear artre, and gave the public the intemion of the buffer. He assured that there would be a se<urily fence Nr. Emory asked about the loud speakers. Ms. Spradley replied that ifthe speakers were acted it would M after ell the wells were cotuaucted, N compliartce with the code, and the esidents would be involved. Ms. Bullington asked if there was anyone else to speak in favor of the project. Dartell Bartz, I I i Lake Gem Drive, vsked to speak. tlis house is right next to the nalL He spoke of the emblem with people cutting tlaough vhe woods aM leaving debris. He was wncerrnd with the lighting wd notes. He sated he wvs t'or the p jest as an improvement. Wayne Smolt 114 Lake Gem Drive. He is located on the south side of the pond. He too is for the projua. His s the "dump site". he Put np a privacy fenc void the w His major concern u the ell, and he had spoken to the applicant regarding this. He would like to see the wall higher. He feels that the project would increvse the value of his property rather [ban huff tt. Robmn Blly. 911 Orange Avenue, also spoke In livor. His concern was the light, and wax glad that there would not be lighting in the retention atra. He was impressed with the plans and kh h would benefit the area. Elizabeth Handley. 113 Lake Oem Drive was the lest to speak She too spoke in favorof the project. Most of her eoneems had already been oddressed. She asked ifihe barbed wire would be estertded. Me. Bullington asked ifthere was anyone else to speak N Ihvor at this lone. Mr. Dowst thanked the rasidents who spoke lie addenssed some ofihe questions. That being lightivg, the vagrancy. the height of dre wall, barbed w've, and the delivery vucks. Ms Bullimgton asked ifthere was anyone else :het wished to spank. There was no one She they asked ifthere were questions 6om the Board Mr. Sargent commanded the residents and Mazda for workwg together ov these projeus. W th that Me. Bullington asked for a motion to close the public heerine. Mr. £ntory mode the morlon ro close the puGllc hearing Ms. Hrlcher seewrded the niotian. i'hc n:utimr:.ns unanimon.Ny npprnved (5-U). Ms. Bullington entertained o motion far VAC-OI-00, SPA-Ol-00 and RZ-OI-00. 4fr_ Emory made o motion to approve VAC-Of-00 ax presented Mr Srhreiber secondad rNe moron The morlon was unanimotevly approved (5-O). There was no discussion Mr. Emory made a morlon to acce-t SPA-O]-00 ¢s presented Ms. H¢)eNer seconded the monorr. The motion was:mnnimorm(y approval(=0). There was no discussion. .N~. Lrnary made u morlon to acevpt RZ-Ot-100 as presented. Ms. Helclrer seconded the mono.,. me mot;nn trn>, nnenlmn„sip npmnaee 1s-off. 5. DF.VE.LOPMENT REVIEW: A. VAC-02-00 Vacate and AbanJonment SanforJ Orlando Kenael Club aatl Jack C. Collins 301 Dog Tmck Road Notion/Reeommendatioa: The Plarmiug Division ofthe Community Services Depwmevt reeommeMs chat the Land Plamting Agevcy recommutd to the Cily Commission that a portion of the KatFayn Park Plal end a portion ofthc right-ol' way known a9 K-9 Drive be vacated and abandoned in Izvor of Sanford Orlando Kennel Club and Jack Collins and accept a portion of property for right-of- weyfrrthe proper alignment of North Street and CR 42] (eaet side). EsplanatioaBaekgrou vd: The owvers. Sanfiied Orlando Kennel Club and lack Collins. have reyuested the Plnt kno.vn as Kathryn Park 131ocks 5 and b (including all ofthe lots in both blocks) and the unimproved rightroC--ways known as I" Ave, 9'" Street and a portion of K~9 Drive_ excluding the western mos[ portion as described in Attachment B, to be abandoned. l'he property being requested to be abandoned is partially underlying the Kennel Club vack thdlltles and iv also unimproved rightof--ways. The owners have agreed to dedicate to the City a porion ofpropeny adjacent to County Ruud 42] so that proper alignment with North Street can be achieved for a proposed davelopmemon the east side ofCR 427 (AttucMSent C} Tho utiliry eompen es Mee been notified and have responded with no objection However, Florida Power Coryorat on has requested that the o er provide a ver the locmions that serve the facilities. 'This wig be a easement between those two purees. The DRB, at its regular scheduled meeting of May 4 2000. unanimously approvN to end that the LPA recommend to fie City Commission approve the vacation end ahandonment as requested and accept the dedication for rigMof--way adjacent to CR 42'J. Mr. Sargevt gave the stalFreview. Following the steRrepon there was a brie[discussion. Ms. 6ullisgtou asked if there was anyone else who wiehcd to sceak in favor or opposition of the vacate reque t. With fro further discussion she entertaiced a motion. Mb. Schrieber made a morfarc ra aPProve VAC-02-00. Sanjord Orlando Kennel Club, and mend ayprova] ra the Clry Cammisnoners. Mr. Emery sacofed the motion. The motron was umm~mouslY aPProveti (i-OJ. Thirce was no further discussion. B. 9P-Ob-00 Sitc Plan South Seminole Hospital Cardiac Unlt 555 W. S.R. 434 .IOhv Frith, Frill ~ Associates Nation/Ream mendatlon: lire Planning Division of the community Services Dcpanmevt recommends that the Land Planning Agency recommend to the Ciry Commission that they approve a site plan (SP-0600) lore 5,000 sqR. rardiae cash lab addition and a 3.9"R sq.lt. central energy plant edditiov for Sovdt Seminole tlospitnl. EsplavatiONRaclcgrou nd: The applicant. Mr. lobo Path, fus requested site plan approval m build two additions to the hospital at 555 W. SR 434_ The first addition is a 5.000 sq.(1. cardiac oath lab. The sewnd edditiov is a 3.9'12-sq.fi central energy plant. The DRB has found the site plan in compliance with applicable City Codes at ite Mny q 2000 ma _with the Following exceptions and wmments. Com • F,ztn care.shall M: taken to protect existing trees on the lot (LDC Sec. 24-55.03 ). Nov es fiom the Ciry Code. requested for this project, all none are assumed. Stnffa c es the right to additional enmmente during consuuctton and prior to completion Implementation: Upon fret vpproval of the Ciry Commission. Site plena cxpete l80 days after final action. Mr. Sagent gave the staff'review. Followme the steffreporl there wnsa briefdiscussion. Mr. Drury_Architect, spoke on behalf ofthe Applicant. With no further questions or cortmtents. Ms. Bullington entenaived a motion. ,Nr. Emory made a murion ayproval ofSPL6-00. Ms. L'hllders seconded eHe merlon. The mortun rtes unutrtmausly approved (5-O). 6. NF.w BUSINESS: Thee was no new business. Mr. Sargent reminded rite Board ofe special meeting tar review on the EARa, and the books .would be distributed prior to that meeting. 7. OLD DUSINFSS: '[here wxs no old business. e. DISCUSSION AND 9CHF,DULIi FOR FUTURE ACF.NUA ITEMS: Nc+r ng~lac scAied::led meering:luly 12, 2000. 9. ADJOUIL'VMENT: Ms. Helrher made a notion ro ad~'ovrir the maering. Mr. Emory saconded the marian- The malion uas ~manimous[y approved (5-0i.