LPAMin07-12-00CITY OP LONG WOOD
LAND PLANNING AGENCY
Minutrs, July 12, E000
ATTENDANCE:
BoaN: slam:
Bobbi Bulington, Chairperson Jay Sargen4 Planning Division Manager
Nancy Childers. Vice Chairperson BeverlyMjors Planning Divisiov Seuemry
Al Schreiber
Absent
Joyce Helchu
Denny Emory
I. CALL TO ORDER:
Ma. Bolling~on called the meeting to order at'/:15 P.M.
2. APPROVAL OF Janc I4, 2000, MINUTES
Mr. Schreiber mode a mntlnn ro approve the Jnne ]A. 2000, mi,mt~es nr Presemted Mv.
Bullingron.seconded /he morlon. The mortar, nw' iinnnlrno~rsly approv¢d (3-0).
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
There was no public comment.
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
Ms. Bullington opened public hearing on SPA-01-00 and RZ-OI-00.
A.1 SPA-01-00 Sma113eale Plan Amendment
TT of Longwood, lac (D33A hairbanks Mazda)
4W N. Highway 1]I4Z
Susan B. Spradley, ESq.
2. RZ01-00 Rezoning
TT of Longwood, Ina. [DRA Fairbanks Mxrda)
400 N. Highway 1]/92
Susan B. Spradley, Esy.
Mr. Sargem showed proof of advertising for the public hearings. It was necessary to rehear these
ms because ofan ertor in advertising for June 14. 2000_ With Ms. l3ullington's approval, Mr.
Sazgent gave a summary report with his menwrandum of June 26. 2000 on SPA-Ol-00 and RZ-
01-00.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Land Pluming Agency DALE: June 26.2000
MEFTMG: July 12. 2000
FROM: F. Jay Sargant. Plamting Dlvisvon Mareger
SUDIEC'1': Final StaffRccommmdations -Mazda (SPA 01-00 and RZ 01-00)
The following are the conditions as agreed uDOn at the Lend Planning Agenry meetwg of June 14.
2000 with the understanding vgreemont with the Applicant (Eoirbarilrs Mazda). the residents and
the CiD, end Lire FINAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE Land Plnmin5 Agurey and
Gty Convntssion.
The properly wea[ of the AT&T easemem (190« feet) shell be revtricted to the following uses;
entioNdetention, drainage, landscaping and or buffering, it will have pemim
os that will ru with the Ivrd that will limi as descnbcd, and the o er shall have
mitts ute
aedevelopers egrectrentlhnd restriction approved d agreed upon by the City. and recorded
against the property with Semitwle County. This parcel will not have any building structures of
any kind on it nor will the parcel be able to be milized for vehiole storage at any time.
TNs parcel wen ofthu AT&f easemem during the site play will be designed with the reaentian
pond located center most of the property end Drovide a meandering riatursl buffer eC3S-+/-,
ext ring rt es and required pond size will dictate the meandering points
'fhe existing masonry wall, adjacent to lot 19 (DattZ's residence), somh property line and east of
the ATffiT easement- will be increased to a height of fi (su) kat and extended wen and on [he
Both properly line along lot 18 (Small's residence) end to Lake Gem. (Exact location of the wall
will be deermined daring the site plan process).
The property 1'me to the west and north wll have a chain link type fence (minimum six f tin
height) to secure the area The masonry wall along Orange Avenue wll be extended to the
western portion ofthc AT&T easement (with permission Ham AT&T. or Wood Screen).
Thc screening to be utilized along the eastern property line will be determined et time ofsite plan
process, however [he screening will assure that visibility ofthe vehicle activnyon the car lot will
be a minmum to the wrrounding properties.
During the s to plan proc s the City will require the e to be evaluated as to the applicable
City cedes, (i.e.; landscaping, drahmge, pazking, delivery access. etc.).
The owns to asmre that the masonry wall will not permit the visi6iity oPthe car lot vehiole
ivity vehicles Hom ndjacunt properties evGt ifthe height has to be increased to'1 (seven) or R
(eight) kw in heiglu and also meet dte qty i buffering regairemevc
Following Mr. Sargeofs prcsen[mtion. Ms. Susan Sprndlcy spoke on behalfof her client, Fairbanks
Mania. She agreed with Nr. Sargenfs swrmary ofwhat occurred at the lone i4'" review ofthe
Small Scale Plan Arncndment applications and the owner and applicant Corey Fairbanks. still
agrees with ell the conditions at that meeting. TheF gineer. Mr. Dowsr is om of[owrt and
vailable for this hearing. She asked that the rttinutes anU tape of June 14, 2000, testimony by
the Applicant end Mr. Dowsr. documents and staff report Yz made e part of this hearing. She
asked (hat the Board do recommend approval Ofthe Small Scale Plan Amendmem and the
Rezoning.
Ms Bullmgton asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in fivor or in opposition of [he
s. Residems of Fairbanks Mazda were present, but did not wish to speak.
Msn6ullington then asked the Ooard if duy had any questions. There was a short dixussion
with Board Members. With no f tither discussion, Ms Bullington asked for a motion to clou
the Public i tearing on SPA-OI-00 and RZ-OI-00.
.LL'. Schreiber made a rnoriwr ro elwe publle Hear(rcR nn SPA-01-00 and RZ-OIAO_ Mx
CHlldars szcorcded the motion_ The rrrmian was urcanimnusiy rpproved (3-0J.
Ms. Bultington then entertained a motion for Items SPA-Ol-00 and RZOI-00 individaally.
Mr. Schreiber mode n mOrlun for opprova! and recomm¢ndarlon ro rha Ciy COnrminion,
SPA-Of-00 in accordance trlrh Ircjormar(on presented Srp(fReporr and fommenrs ofrhis
etinR and the June ]{ 2000 meeting. Ms. ChiWos seconded the nrorlon. The nrorlon w¢v
unanimously approved (3-0).
Ms. Brdlington made a morlonjor apprOrn! and recmrnrrendarinn ro the CYry Commiss~ion.
RL-01-0Oln ocem~danee uJrh lnforrnatian presenrerl SraRReport and CnmmenU~ofrhis
eering and the June Il. ?000 meering..Hh Schreiber seconded the nrorlon. 1'he morimr
tu~.t unanmrouriy approveA(3-0).
Mr. Saze r advised the Board and thou present that these Hems acrd the Venete.vould be
going befitre Ciry Commission on ]uly 1], 2000.
Ms. Buliing[on opened the Public flexring on SPA-02-00 and ItZ-02-00 6r A B Design
Group.
B.I SPA-02-00 Small Seale flan Amendment
A R Design Group
IJJI/IJJS CR J2'/ North
Applicant: Albert 6ttahinr
B.2 RL112-UO Rezoning
A B Design Group
1441/1413 CN 427 Narth
Applicant: Albers Buehler and 13ob (lodges
MOTION/REt=OMMCNDATION:
The Planning Division oftie Convnunity Services Department recoimtends that the LaM
Placating Agency recommend to the Chy Conutiselon approval ol'a small scale Lurid Use
Amendment (SPA-02-00) and R¢oniny (RZ-02-00) per the etteclted state report and
recommendation, for AB Dusign Group.
EXPLANATIONBACKGROIIND~
Ttk applicant has requested to change the land use and zonuty on the'v pweel IocatN at
1441 and 1445 CR 42] so that it will M more compatible with and provide additional
transuoo betweco the ew tiny land uxs to the nosh and to the south.
REQUEST (.and Ilse /Revon'n
Future Land Use Rai
FROM: City LDR (LOW Deneiry Residential R-I (Res Single Family)
TO: City RP(Residential Vrofessional)RP (Res. ProfessionaR
SUMMARY
OWNER: Albert Buehler and Robett Hodges
1441 and 1445 N. C IZ 42'1
Longwood. FL 32'/50
AFRLICANT: AI3 Design Gro:tp
Albert Buehler
1441 N. C.R.42]
Longwood. Pl-32750
PARCEL ID NUMDER(s): 29-20-30-300-02200000, 29-20.30.300-022&0000
LOCATION: 1441 N. CA 42] and 1445 N. CR 42]
TRACT SIZE:3. t] +/- Acres or 138.065 sy.H.
2XIS'RNG USE: Two residential homes
PROPOSED DEVELOPMP:NT:
The applicants DroDOSe to utili~z their property to allow those uses as allowed in the
residential prof sional distriot. Theapplicant leeLa that the pmDosed change lsa
logical buRer from the Ciry residentual (Lake Ruth Suhdivision) wtd Semimle
County's Fltwre Land Use Designation of OBico.
~ A-IAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DGVEI..OPMENi:
Curtent ft~ 1: 3.1 ]+/. acres x 59 uniVacre= l9 dwellme units
Proposed RP: F.AR 0.25 x t38.p85 sq. R lot area =34,521 sq. !1. odce
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
The improvement of CR 42] and the Future Land Uses of the City and County.
Residential Professiorwl office provides a prefured buffer from the existing city
residential uses and the Future County Use. The applicwt proposes professional
office use ms permitted in the RP zoning clazsitication. However, the property owner
conW utilize some residential uses as allowed per code.
REG~MM~NDED ACI'ION~
The Development Review Board @RB) recmnmemds approval of the following action
1. Fu[we Lend Uae Designation 6om Gin LDR a City RP .
2. Zoning Distrim Clavsifcation from Cali-I o Cirv Rp .
The Future Lmtd Use Desigretion m>d Zovimg District Clas'silication are compatible whh
he surtounding area.
Additional Comment:
The statfapproval H based on the Following Land Use/Zoning Repora
~ LAND USE. /ZONING REPORT
1. RIiLATIONSIIIP TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
DIRECTION LAND USE ZONING PRESENT USF.
North (Cowry) ODice A-1 Single Family Hames
South (Clry) Low Detuity IZ-1 Single Family llOmC9
Residential
Eest (County) Low Density A-1 Lake Ruth
Residential
West (City) OfSee Commucial C-2 Cmmntncial and CR 42]
II. ANALYSIS
Wekiva River Protection Aren: No
Area of Critical State Concern: No
DRI: Np
r Interlmcal Agreememt (Seminole Countyl: No
Housine Needs:
The RP wning would allow additional residential densities The RP dciuiry is
trolled by FAR. ISR and trvnimum dwelling azw. Aeidentified above the
R-I zonivg on this pazcel avonld allow a maximum of 19 units. FiP zoning would resuh
in (34.121 sq.ft. of office or 43 dwelling units at 800-sq. R. (min.) or a combiwtion of
both.
Ana seof the mlatioasbi of the amendment to thn o aleti
The amendment could increase thepopulatio in the area. Using the possible housing
increase analysis tho population projeetiov is as follows:
I9 units x 28 (average persons per household) = 53 persons
43 units x 2.8 (average persons per household) - 120 persons
Flab'tat for es liste0 ae endeaeered, threatened or ofsoecial concerv:
No evvaonmentai issues have been noted on this properly.
Traffe Circulation AnaNsis
L Roadways serving the site:
Araw Functional Existing tAS
Roadways Type Classification LOS Standard
~' CR42'/ SuburMn County Minor Arterial E• E
LOS will improve as road widevivg is iv process.
2. Projected 2005 LOS under the existing designation (e.g. Nase condition):
Roadway(s) Projected LO6 Trips per Day (Estimated)
CR 42] F. Residence 2 du =20 ADT presevt
19 du ~ 190 ADT allowed
# Land Use 210 (Single Parnlly Residential)
3. Projected 2005 LOS under proposed designation:
Roadwa s Projected LOS Tri s er Oav Esti tad
CR 42] E Residence 43 du=430 AST; or
Prof Otiice 34.50') sqR. /1,000 x 19.E trips per
1.000 ° 680 AD'C
N Land Use 710 (Ocveral Offiu Building)
Not .
'fM parcel(s) is expected to generate e maomum of 680 trips per day. h should be ~roted
dmt the above trip geneation will result in a net Increase of990 vips per day fiom the
exr tang land use designs ion to the Dmposed Innd use designation
N These calculation arc battd on the TRIP GENERATION, Fiffh Edition
4, Roadway Imnror~emems:
Seminole County is currently improving CR 427 roadway.
Santterv Sewer Aaahsis
I. Residential (F'.xieting)
a. Facilities serving the sire: Cty ol'Longwoad
I.OS standard: Residential 300 gpNd.u.
h Projected total demand under existing designation
19 du (Ida x 300gpd)=5.200 gpd.
c. Available capacity. Yes
2. Residential Yro@saional (Proposed)
~ a. Pacilities serving the site: City of Longwood
LOS standard: Residential: 300 gpd/du
LO8 standard: Ruail l Comm: 225 gpd/1,000 mA.
h Projected total dettand trader proposed designation:
Depending on how the property is developed the following mould
salt:
Residential= 43 du (I dux 300 gpd) a 12900 gpd; or
Professiora1 O15ce= 34521 sq.ft. (225 gpd11.000 sq.R.) _],'16"1 gpd
c. Avalablc cepeoity: Ves
d. Improvement/expansions already programmed or needed es n result of
proposed amendment: Additional improvements/expvtsion will be
addressed at time oPeite plan review but should rot be needed.
Potable Waver Anahsis
1. Residential (Existing)
a. FSCiliries serving the site: City oflongwood
LOB standard: Residential: 310 gPd/1.000 sq.ft.
r
r b. Projecfed total damanJ undorexisfing designation:
IG du (Ldn x 330 gpd}--5,280 gpd
c. Available capaciry: Ves
2. Residential Professional (Proposed)
a. Facilities mrving the site: City of LUngwood
LOS stanJard: Retail/Com: 2S0 gpd/1000 sq.ft.
Residential: 330 ppd/1,000 sqA.
b. Projected Total JemanJ under exixting Designation:
Depending on how the progeny is developed the following could resuh
Residenial= 43 du (Idu x330 gpdp 14190 gpd; or
Professional Ottlce=34521 sq.ft. (250 gpd/1 000 sq.R)- 8,630 gpd
c. Available capacity: Yes
d. Improvemenflexpansions already progremmed or needal es a
esalf of proposed amendment: No improvemems arc uheduled due
ro lhis developnrent. Atlditional improvemenie/exparaion will he
addressed at tune of silo glen review Ifneedal.
Dra ge AaslVfiS
I. Facilities se ing the site: Natural
Z. Projected LOS under exlstingdesignatiov:
Residemial-none required until subdivision occurs.
J. Projected LOS under proposal designvtion: Cotxaisrent wiJr St lolui s
River Water Management District (SIRWMD) and Florida Department of
F.nv naI Prot on Rules. Designed ponds t modete noff
fron'irthe u year, b hourswrm plus the (irxt one-inch ocf~ainGll ov-site.
i. Improvement/espanslon required upon development. Onsite
retcmion/dmvnttov ppnd in aieordence with No. 3 nbnve.
Solid 3Vaatc
I. Fvcilities serving the site: City oPLongwood-covaect services
LOS stnndarJ: Residential: SlbsJdvyld.n.
Non Rcsidemial:3.2S Ibs ldayll 000 sy.ll.
2. ProJeeiW LOS ander existing dasignatioa:
I9 du (dux 51M./day) =95 Ibs /day
3. Projected LOS under propnmd dcsignarion:
Depending on how the progeny is developed the following could result
Residential= 4J du (S lbs.lday/du)=215 gpd; or
Nrofessional Ol6cn=34.5?I sq.ft. (325Ibs/day/I.000 sq.RJ= 112 gpd
~. I+nprovemen[lexpansionsglready programmed nr needed as a result e(
proposed amendment: Seminole County has adequate facilities n~ ins Osceola
Lnnd611 site N the nonheaxt portion of the County.
Recreation and Opev Space
I. Facilities sen~ing the Hite City of Longxvuod
LOS e[andertl: 0.20 Acres/1.000 Pop.
2. Projected LOS under existing designntipn: Negligible umil and ifsubdivided
3. ProjecteJ LOS ander proposed Ucsignation: Negligible until and if
subdivided.
Mr. Smgen~ presented Ure above Stag Report wi6t a video presemo+ion. Following the Siaff
Report. Ms. Bullington asked the applicam to speak. Mr. Buehler. owner ofthe progeny
~roducetl himself. There was distuseion regarding the rezoning end buffering oC~he
properly.
Ms Dullington asked if anyone wished to speak N favor afihe items. No one wished to
speak Ms. Bullingtonthen asked ifanyonewished +o speak iv opposition. There was no one
present to speak in oppoaition There was no further discussion.
Ms. eullington entertained a motion ~o Blare public hearing on SPA-02-00 and RZal2-00.
Mr_SchrelAn ruudeamu+lonto clove public )rwrirrg an SPA~dS-00 and RI-02-00_ M.c
Chi[ders aeeonded the nominarla». The motion wax+manlmauxly apprvva/ (3-0).
Ms. Dullington then entertained a motion on SPA~02-00.
Tor. Schrel6er made a motion to appruxa SVA-01-00 wtth recommenJa+ivu+o +he Ciry
Commixi+on Ms. eultinuron seconAed the motion tha n+mlvn vox trebled (2-t), +~~irh Mr.
Childers voting na.
Public hearing on SPAal2-00 end RL-02-00 was closed and item is +abled until the regular
scheduled meeting in August
1. C. EAR
Mr. Sargent azked if Item 4 C ov EAR could Ibllow Item S.B- ff there waz no one
preuot to disenss this item. Ms. Bullmgton asked the public if anyone wes present to
hear [his item. Yo one prevemt was heerc f'or this hearing. Ms. Bullington entertained
e nrotion to move Item C. EA2
Mr. Schreiber made a motion ro rnova hem 4C. EARjor public hearingfoho>,~ing
Reru SB. Mr. C1tl[dars seconded the mo[Imr. The motion t~ve unanhnouslyapproved
[3-O).
5. A. SP-O%-00 Site Plan
Mona Lisa Ristoravre
135 W. Jessup Ave.
Appllcanr Roger NeL.nv
MOTION/RCCOMMENDAT[ON~
The Planning Division of the Community Services Dcpanmem recomnxnds that the Land
Plmwng Agency recommend to [he City Commission approval of the site plnn (SP-08-00 F[D)
m 1351essup Avenue to ostabliah Mona Lisa restauant within the Downtown Fliatoeie District.
EXPLANATION/BACKGROUND:
Franco Bovaduce the propetty owner and proprietorof Mona Lisa Restaurant would like to
stablish his restaurant in the Downtown Historic District at 135 Jessup Avenue. The property
had previously beev used as an offcc. The restaurant will have sensing for 52 patrons.
The DRB Fowd the site plan in compliance with applicable Ciry Codes a[ its lone I, 2000 meeting.
wmh the following exceptions and wmmevta
Exceptio
The FIPB needed to wo parking spat s; however- there is area shown for this
perking at a future da aif needed.
Cnmmevte:
Exira care shall be taken to protect existing trees on the bt.
Nov es fiom the City Code w requested for this project oral none are assurred.
Steffnre s the right to additional commeaits during construetiou and prior to
completion.
The Wistoric Prerervation Hoard at its regular meeting on June 20.2000 reviewed the sire
plan and unavunously cevommends that Ne City (um n approve the plvn with stall
s. The FIPB also included wood-Igec neatmentato the woler, relocation ofthe
dumpster to the west and internal pnrking lot signage to asviat patrons exiting the site
STAFh' ANALYSIS:
The change afore w01 have little mtpaw ov the struc[ore. The addition ofan orderly parldve lot
and landscapink will be the n>ain change to the site.
At Ms. Bullington's request Mr. Sargent presented the Staff Report. pollowine the Stall'
Report. Ms Bvllington invited Ivh. Bavaduce_ the ovnter of Mone Lisa to speak.
There wasa short discusswn. Following discuss nMS. Bollington entenamedamotton.
d1r_ Schreiber mode a mat(on ra appears SP-0R-pOjor Mono Llxn Restaurant of 735 W
Jexsup Avemte. as presented with st jlrecomm¢ndaaorvs and approval. M.v Childers
reconded the motion. The motion eras taranimattsly approved (3-O).
B. SD-02-00 LotSplif
Bradley's Addition to Lovgwood
South 200 f~. of [he Nortb 4U0 [t. of Lot 3
Applicant: Anthony fadinho
Mr. Sargent gave the Staff Report.
'fhe Plannivg Divixion of the Community Services Depaamem reconmretWs that the Land
Plarvting Agency recomtmitd to the Clty Commission w approve e Lot Split (SD 02-00) on Fvst
Place. in artler [o establish two (2) conformmk lots within the Rl-A zonivg district.
FXPLANACIONBACKGROUND:
Anthony God'Wro, the property owner, would like to split his Property into two (2) equal
pemels. per the Land Developmevt Code Section 24-95.1 I. a0owing the split of a lot of
record that existed prior to Mazch 21, 1981.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
The DR6 fount the Io[ split in compliatrce with applicable Ci[y Codes at its June 1. 2000 mewing
with dte following wttunents:
Comma Dedicate additional rikh[oP--way as required for Firxt Piece.
AU citations of regulatioivs refer [o Chapter 24 o[the City Code, artless staled othenvixe.
Referen o the Play, or Comprehens ve Plvn m the Comprehensive Plan ofthe Ciry
edoptedcby Ordinance 1019, adopted July 20, 1992.
oplicant Reaueat
My wmment are boxed on the property xurvey submitted February 25, 2000. The applicant.
Avthony GodWto has requested to split hix va~nnt lot on Firrt Place.
Staf[Anaivsis
I. Lots of record may be tlivided Into two parcels.
Mr. Godinho's lot did exist prior to March 21. 1981 per section 2495.11 of
LDC.
2. The proposetl lot eplite does not create any non-conformlries.
The split will creme two legal R-IA loll (minimum 12.000 sq.fl.).
The new strvetuma on the lots shall be tequ'ved to meet applicable regulations
and codes.
3. Adeyuate public facilities are available.
• The Utility Division shallwmrtmtn to avnilablity ofwater and wastewater
The roadway seri<ing thes nadequate. Dedication oftwenty-five
• (2i) feet ie requ'ved to complete the fight of way.
Plannine Division Recommendation
The Palming Division recommends approval of SD-02-00.
I. All ne nehallm tthe mquir is for the R-IA caning disarict.
Z The applicant .vill be requited to dedicate necessary right-of-way as rzqulrW
ny code.
Following the Staff Reponthere wasa bref discussion 6om the Board. Ms. Bnllington asked
Mr. GodWto to speak. Following questions from dm Board, Ms. Rullmeton asked if (here
anyon who wished to speak in favor of the lot split There was no otre present to speak
n favor.
Ms. Bullington then slated that there ware two requenvs to epeek in opposition. Those being
Don Leighton. 1000 First Place and Mr. Jerry Palmer, 970 First Place.
Bath Mr. Palmer and Mr. Leighton said they Iwd been misinfomsd end had no objection to
the proposed lot sp0[.
Mr. ScRreiber mode a mutton to recommend.SU-02-0U ro rHe City C'ommixrinn_ Ms.
Bulltngion secmrded lire marlon !'Na mutton was urcar~lmottsly approved (I-0).
M. 6ullingron opened Public }learin6 on the rollowing:
G kAR Comprehensive Plan
Evaluation and Appraisal
Mr_ Sargent showed proofof publication and presented a brief synopsis on the background of
the EAR.
lltere was a general discussion on the Comprehensive Plan E~alua~ion end Apprn'ual.
following discussing Ms. 6ullingron wt~ertained a motion to close the public hearing.
Mr. Sdrreiber nrada a nrntlon to close p~rblle hearinu an EAR. Mr. Bullhigron seeoaded the
mur~nn The motion vns irnm>imoasly approved /3-0).
Ms. 6ullingron ~hcn entertained a motion on f,AR.
Mr_ $c)neiber made a nrnrion ro approve EAH nud rac~omm¢nd it to Jre Ciry~Conrnii,sslorr.
M.s. Bullingmn secotuled the merino. The motion wa.s unarcimoeuly approved l3-0].
6 NEW BUSINESS:
Thera was no new business.
]. OLD 6USfNESS:
There was no old business ~o dixvss.
8. DISCUSSION AND SCHEUIILE FOR FUTURE AGENIIA ITEMS:
Next reeular scheduled meeting: August 9, 2000.
The tabled Small Scale Pleo Amendment (SPA-02-00) and Rezoning (RZ-02-00) f r A B
Uesign Group will be on the Agenda for August 9.2(IOO.
Mr. Sargent also an icipares a Site Plan m home before she Board in August
Mx 6ullingron commented on the decorum of the Board and thanked hec fellow board
Members- Formaliry ofrhe Board was discussed.
9. ADJOIRNMENT:
Mr_ Schreiber mode a rnorion ro adjairrn the rneerinR. Ms. Childers seconded she r~~orlorc.
The morran r~u~s urmutm irsly approred 13-0).