Loading...
LPAMin10-08-97LAND PLANNING AGENCY Longwood, FL Ocmber 8, t99~ PRESENT: STAFF: Richard E. BWlingtoru CFm'uman Cazl Goslh~e, Plamdng Division Manager Batty C. Revels lobo Brack, Community Services O'vemor FemaM Tiblier JoM GroenerWaW, Plarming Aide Marvin Meltzer ABSENT: lobo Lim These minutes represent a summary of the actions which octmrrW.The Clry o(Longwood does nut provitle a verbatim record of LPA actions However, evtliotapea of ell LPA meetings ere einlained as part of the City reeoNs and are available fur listening during normal working hours. P, CALL TO ORDER 'ihe land Plerming Agency (LPA) meeting on Odabu g, 199'/ was called [o order m fi:30 P.M. by Mr. Metrzer. Mr. Mehzer asked to rnuider the minutes of the July 9, 199'/. Mr. Revels moved to approve the July 9, 199] minutes and the motion passed. Mr. Revels askeddmt the Mvy 14. 199'1 minutes to be considered as tlwy were tabled at the 1Wy 9,199"! rrating. Mr. BWtingtou ecrived and assumed fhe Che'v. Mr. Meltzer moved to approve the May 14, 199'1 mmmes and the motion passetl. The LPA presented Ftr. Meltzer a Certification of ApPretietion for his numerous yeare oP to the LPA arM m the City of Longwood. Photos were taken ofMr. Meltzer and the LPA. Mr. Mew thanked the LPA for the Certificate and commended the LPA and staff far all the work that bad been attomplished'm his teume. ~, NEW BIISINF.SS: ~ ~ 1 (OIDI Mr. GosW:e exph'u~ni ttwt the appkrem had requested to vacate seven and a half feet ofdmk~sge and utility easermnt abng the rear ofthe property at 1010 Huntington Ct. Mr. Gosbre added that Publk Works had requested that the vacation tint exterd into do dreimge and utiliq~ easements Wong tFre sides. The eppkcam had ~w objection to this request. hh. Brdl'vigton asked for any perwaz to sleek in favor of the vacation The applicant. Ns. Irene l:arasky, approached [he dins and stated she agreed with the staHreport. Ms. Kmasky explained flat the vacation was creed because a pool lad been built N the ens rat and that without a vacating, [he title company wouldn't insure the morcgage.e Mr. BuBhtgton ask d sany ofthe LPA member had any questions. Seeing none, he asked for a motion. Mr.7iblier moved to recommend approval of Project #VAC-OI- 9] at 1010 }luntinglon Ct, subject to the naFrecommendatinnsbnsed on findings of feet atM contlitions N the naR report datcrl September 22, 199]. Mr. Meltzer seconded and the motion was approved uwnimovsty. B. SmallSnle Phn Amendment aed Remnln¢-Proieet9 gRPA-R1-91&R~JIfi.9t Mr. Gosl'ure explained the rernainder ofagende i with the exception of4fwe all muhiple Projects. Mr. Gosline suggested [het the projeces could be discussed [ogether, but [het separate recommendations must be done for each project. Mr. (}ostine explained that the applicant, Welter Temple, wss reques4ing to change tha laml uce tlesipWation and m~dng to match the remaindu of his cliwt's land along CR 421. Mc Gosline indicated Wt the staR'recommends approval ofboth requests. Mr. BWlmglon asked for arose m fvor ofLe projects. Mr. Harlan Hanson introduced himselfend the applicant Mr. Welly Temple. Mr. fimaon presented the LPA with [he rent configuretion of the property and a conceptual she plan ofbuilding layout. Mr. Hmaon's sde plan proposes 26,500 sq.ft. ofoRu~e space N three buildings. The proposed site plan aL indicated a fifty-foot landscape buffer along the residential hnrders. Mr. Cmsline pointrnl out that on Mr. Hanwn's site plan Tullis Avenue u depicted az a Right of Way. He thought the road vacated, but these issues would he handled in the site plan process. Mr. BuII'utgton aked f r any other public convnem. Mr. Dermy Emory, oC 1005 OAoN Su,'vpuired to Ore traffic ~ on Wildmere Avmue and surrounding roads. Mr. Hanson did not lave any prepared data, but did speculate that the office w01 getarate 480 to 500 trips per day. Mr. Gaslire pointed to page four afthe smd report to the Cay's Sidings for trafic. Mr. Bullington asked for any other comment, mamg vone. }le closed the public hearing. Mr. Meltzer moved to recommend approval of Project #SPA-02-97, subject to the staff recommendaiiora based on findings of fact aM conditions N the staff report dated September 25, 199]. Mr. Tibiier seconded aM the rzwtiov was unanimously approved by voice vote Mr.Bullmynon openN the public hearing for the remning. Mu. Haraon asked that his presentation from the Plan AmeiMment be considered Por tbis case. Mr. Gosline sated that the saffrecommended approval for the rezoning atso. hU. Bullivgwn asked for any other person wislivg to speak. Seeing prone, the public hearng was closed. Mr.Tiblier nnved to cecommevd approval of Project #RZ-069], subject to the sniff cecanurrendations based on findings of feet and conditions in the seff report dated September 29, 199]. Mr. Revels seconded and the moron was approved unawmusly approved by voice vote. W Mr. Gosli're e~lained flat this parcel is an enclave ofthe City and the Comprehensive Phn bas tatgned the parcel far annexation Mr. Gosline explained thn[ three parcels will remain as an errchave as the} did not agree to annex into the City. Mr. Gosline explained that the applican reque ring to covtinve its tight industrul lend ux designetation aN wring. Mr.Goslhre saved that the Hoff rcrommended are approval of the atmexazion, plan amendment and rezoning. Mr. Bullington asked for tiwse wishing to speak by opedng the public hearing. Mr. Majid I(daghchi, the representative for applicant, explained the apPtivant's goal to develop four oftheacresfor oPnce/wareiwuse. The retndeing two acres along CR 427 ro br used az offices aM Imitaj warehouse use. lie also stated that the oNy point ofaccess was on C.R. 42]. Mr. Builk~gton asked for vwre public comment, seeing Done PIe cbttd the hearing. Mr. Revels moved to recommend approval of project dANX-01 -9]. subject to the staff recommeMatiorts based on findings of fict aM conditions N the saff report dated September 30. 199]. Mr. Tiblier seconded and tl~e motion was approved unanimously by voice vote Nu. Bu11iWy;ton vketl for comment for the Small Scale AmeMment. Mu. Gosline stated saff recommended appmvel of the Plan AmeMment and briefly discussed surmwd lard uses ra glumate cotgatibilhy. No other testimony was ot3eted end the public hearing was closed. Mr. Tiblier moved to recommend vpproval of Project flSPA-Ol-97, subject to the Half recommendations based on findings of fact atM mtdniotrs in du stag' report dated September 26, 199]. Mr. Meltzer seconded atM Ne moaon was approved unanun zesty by voice vote. Mr. Bugington nskal for commeN for the rezoning. Mr. Gosline stated staff mended approval oftbe reznrvng to be comistent with the Plan Mr. BWfington opined the public hearing, no one offered any comment and the public herring was closed. Mr. Meltzer moved ro recommend approval ofProject MRZ 07-97, subject o the sta1T rewmmendations based on fillings of fact and conditions N the staff report dated September 22, 1997. Nr. Revels seconded atM the motion was m,antmouvry by voce vote. U. Mr. Gosline explained that Ne subject property is adjuent to existing Medium Dwvsay Residential desigrm[ed land. He further explaiced that the applicant u N the ire plan process developing sixty-six dwelling units on Ns adjacent property. Mr. Goslloe stated Nat the applicant u requeni~ the change of land use to be pmritted to place a clublrouse and pool [o service the apartment reMtts and Nat Ne sNffrecomrtrends Ne approval o(small scale amendment and rewNng. Mr. Bullutgton asked for public wtmnent. Mr. Hugh Harihtg mu to speak as the applicant. He presemW the LPA with arorceptual plan and indicated that Ne subject parcel wi0 have aneight-foot wall to buffer the pool from [he single fatwy homes to the west Mr. Hwlit~v slated Iiw dm wall is ody requ'ved to be six feet ta0, but et the request ofthose residenoes his client has agreed to this make the wall eight foot N height. Ne also agreed m move the wall in three to five feet as requestM by Ne residence all to allow tanduvping on the outside of the wall. He stared that most of the trees on the site will be saved. Mr. Harting revleited the traffic issue discussed earlier. Bored on his reuazoh, the project will generete five nips per boor during Ne AM end PM Peak how. Mr. Gosline stated that the haffic issue really is germane to the site plan pincers not the ning and plan amertdntent. Mr. Mehzer asked how many trips per dny7 Mr. Hefling Placed the total at 460 triPS per day. w. nallhtgenn aakga r r wbhg comn,mt. Mr. emory mem;rna nrmglfand orated ne represerted tbe people to the west of[he project (Mrs. Maya, and Mr. Hevey). Mr. Emory stag be had disnssed tbe Project whh Nu. Marling and that the applicant will work with lbe neighbors. Mr. Emory stated [ha[ the apatments are zoned correctly, but he u still concerrred about tight pollutioq noise pollution and added traffic on Wildmere and surrouMing roeda Ere dated he has notked that tlresn recent projects (Wildrnere Subdivkioq Auto Zone etc.) have added to the tta$c an these roads. Mr. Emory conveyed that he felt the developer will do a quality job and will work whh the ueighbors. Mr. (ioslme paced into the rewrd a loner from Ms. Mayo stating her objection to the protect. Mr. Emory dated that be and Mr. Hoary (MS. Mayo son) agreed that the developer commitment's to the neighbors were acceptable and that he (Mr. Emory) rcsy speak on hk behalf Mr. BulWtgton asked for any more comment. Seeing none, he closed the public Ivanvg. Mr. Melzer rcntred to recormrard approval ofRoject HSPA-0}.9], subject a the staff rerommeMatiorts eased on finiings of fact and conditions m [he staff report dated September 26, 199]. Mr. Tb&r secoMed atM the motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. Mr. nWlingtov asked f r wmmeds on the rezonng. Mr. Gosling explained that the tdng request was to make the parcel consistent with the Plot. Mr. Bullington asi.M for further cotrarem seeing wee. fie closed the hearing. Mr. Revels moved to mmend approval of Project qR2-08-97, subject m the staff recommendations bawd on fudirgs of~ct and mMitwns N the stag report dated September 29, 199]. Mr. Meltzer seconded aM the motion was approved utwnimousty by voice vote. E. for annexed pyppertiea Anoi'mnt~ Aaroe (,orovi2 /O.IDI Mr. BWliugton eked foe staff wmments on the project Mr. Goslhre began by explouung to the LPA where the property was aM Nat it is desigmted in the Gty's Comprehensive Plan for being ideal for atmexatwn. Mr. Gosling stated the subject pmperry wrsut d ofsu kdividual parcek all designated Low Degsity Residential on the County's U ° M.,p. The axistiug uses in the azaa wue elm Low Ikmrty Residertial in rleture. Mr. Gosling coxluded by stating that staff recommetWs approval of[ne annexazion, play amendmem artd rezoning. Mr. Anton Gorovitz representing the property owners stated he was in agreemem with the sWfreport Duty asking that some typographic erzors be tturected where the subject properly is descriMd as a twenty-acre parcel. Mr. 6orovnz stated that the parcel is twenty-five acres in slu. Mr. Gomvitz askN for a chance to speak slier the public response time to answer questions. Mr. Burlington asked for any other who wished to speak on the issue. Mr. Ron Burkett of 1845 Lake Emma Rd, explainM that this is the record time diet the applicant has tried to change to rezone this property. He also asked wiry the whole is being represented as Low Density Residential when it H AgricWtuml. Nu. BmkGt felt that tlvs clove shoWd have the cnfve amexation request tluowo out. Mr. Gosline corrected Mr. Burkett. The County has the property as Low Uenaay Resideniai on the ~ ~reFFMm+and it is zonM A-i. The County uses A-1 ning as a holdingt zone in transitional areas. Mr. Gosime asked the LPA to remember thaz this discussion n an the armexanon. Mr. Burken steed that the first plan proposed to the County did not propose Low Density Residential. Mr. Burkett stated a concem to t~ drinking aster with ell the ew septic tanks this projem would bring. Mr. Goslme stated that the applicant will vmvdffiarily roamer to sewer and water et whatever expense. Mr. Burkett voiced a concem about naific Ms. Alioia Hokbury Idevtiped herself as represenemg 1851 Rartchlmid Tr. Ms. Holsbury had questiom regarding the devebprmnt abJrty ofthe parcel. She asked whet vegetation aM wildlife m the area. IfFish and Wildlife have been contacted for any pmoittvig? if envirommntW groups and govemmem agencies kmw abom sightings of gopher tortoises and bald eegks that have rzed in this a eo. She raluesud that ell these en mental issues be addressed prior to [he Cily annexing the property. She summarized chat if tbu property is undevelopable it is unfair to place a tax burden on the cifvens of Longwood. Mr, Goslkw slated that these are good quatbrq ell ofwh'sh will be addressed during subdivision procesx Mr. Gosline I/IVIIW ail interest citizens to atteM those meatmgs and review those staff reports aM documemation of emiromnemW impact at that Mr. Builingtov asked for Sharon Bishop ev speak next. Ms. Bishop wM also represents 1851 Ranchland Tr. did ask to speak. Ms. Bishop stated that a variety of endangered species live N this area aW thin developrrent and co n this are woWd be JIegW Ms. Hisinp asked tM LPA if they had considtted that they might be named as co-defendant with the developer N any Litigation. Nr. BuWetgtontook exceptbn to that type ofthreat but felt tnat if it does happen she should feel free to came the City. Mr. Goslim egam stated the[ thew are good questions and are good m have on the recoN. Ms. Bishop asks ifthe City has investigated the developer on his previous practices aM Ru B a goad corpoate <it'ven Ms. Bihop ako asked the LPA table finis project until a wmplete con analysis is done. Mr. Burlington caved Ms. Elfin PniWps. Ms. Ylilllips identified herselfand gave her address as 1851 Ramhland Tr. She ivquirN if the current Comprehensive Plan idemified tnis-arcel for annexation. Mr. Gosline raid it was. Ms. PlnLips eked the LPA decry the project as the ptopo dose was incouine with the surmundmg area. Ms. Phillips also felt tbat the wildlife needs protection and she was here to speak for tlrox wlro coWd mt. Ms Laurie YFtilfips who alu tepresepts 1851 Rnrwhlard Tt. asked if ratlces were sent out Wr three huMred fel. Mr. Gaslim stated that the City Cnde oNy requved ova hwdr d aM fifty fcet be ratified. In addition to mailings, the projects are posted and get two advertisements m dte Sanford Herald. Nv. Goslive conceded that the Sanford Herald is not the best way to give notice. Howevu, that paper is the ova the Chy Commission haz chosen for maiNy ecommic issues. Ms. Pnillips also had acomem wvntne env'vommntal issues. Mr. Gosline stated thm all these issues will be harMled by the subdivision plan. Ms. Phillips fIt that Ibis project will destroy the visual ambience otthe area. Mr. Tom Alderson of 33] Lary Acres Lam felt this project comes down to nwvey us the area's aesthetica 1{e feared more care d more tra07c. Tnat drainage problevss w1ll becorte wore on his property. The necessary Improvement 6r sewer will put cars on his yam as Lary Acres Rd. is torn up. The lake and horses W the area wW eUeact cnildren aM open property owners to liability. That Bartinglon was done re poorty that ne aid Trot want a repeat oftnat anbdiviainn. Mr. 1.T. Banton of232 Lazy Aoas Ln. askN fi,r the pmdme [r anvexing a parcel. Mr. Goslme explained that the City .sent notice to County and the surrounding property owmrs. Mr. Barron asked who owns the Wd. Mr. Gosline gave the names ofthe applicants. Mr. Barron asked iftheowmr were N favor of the annexation and gthey plan to live on the property. Mr. Gosline could oNy speculate, but bod on the fact that they signed the permit he assumed they were in favor of the annexation. Mr. Banton asked how many homes wi0 be in the subdivision. Mr. Gosline again could not answer, except that they woWd be albwed up to fve dwelling routs per re. Mr. Bamm~ asked ifthe property is still N County should not the notices go 3011 feet versus the 150 f t tM City sent ovt. Mr. Goslhe answered by saying that the City abide by its ordinance and that state statutes do not requ've Letters be sent. Mr. GosWe wWd not answer aM recommeMed he ask a lawyer. Mr. Banton asked the LPA find some solution. Ms. Florence Radun of 241 Lazy' Acres Lane asked why the City is pursuing this property Cor atmex. Mr. Buffington responded that the applicant asked to wme into the City. Iles hearing A the err re for both sides to disc m the u es of growth, traffic, etc. that this project will create. She fah the whole process isu'sneaky." Mr. Robert Nininger of 1839 RanchlarW Tr, asked what is N it for the City. Mr. BulWtgton stated the i sad tax base is tM primary goal. Mr. Nininger asked nbout the Comprehensive Plmpacing this whole area for atmexvtion without notifyug the property owners. Mr. Gosline stated tbet m 1991 whin the Plan was adapted the Plan was probably advertised W the Sanford Herald. Mr. Nininger asked the wisdom of using the Sant rd HeraM. The LPA agreed aM directed that he take [he issue up the City Comvueston. Mr. Michael Demur of 223 Lazy Acre Ln. stated that this area is agricultural that people own sevmW ammWS. lie afro had eorwcros about traffio end the City does trot memtawing ns neighborhoods (Barrington). Mr. Hugh Aleddyn of 310 Lary Aces La stated that from the Ciry's point ofview thk disc a trade oRbetween added tax base vm us additiotul expenditw He aim stated drat ties IoM forconsideration is a dog legsshape. Mr. Gosline agreed. Mr. Bleddyn stated why would dte city do that unless tbey are plaruvng m atuex more oftbe County In this area. He asked why tlx City want to take on addi[ioral erca for Police and Fve Drotectwn. Bad notes et~erierce, this is expensive and the City should Lave ilrose figure prior amtexing We patceL He asked that allmMaw nthe subdivu onbe w.n mto the rttoN. Hest ovgty ftlt if it isn't wriaen into the rsord it gets forgottenen Etc stated the lake b also a corteem and be asked that when tbe first child is hurt oc drowre tlmt it ba troted that at the meetin%tha CYtY was warred. He was ooncemed tlet tM water supply ofweLLc N de area be protected ifthe development causes them to fail He asked the City m place a perWrmance bond m to place to fix the problem Jit occurs. Mr. Rlaad}m i~uuted that the advertising for the project h done in Orlando Seminal am wrzeeay admessae number oraeres involved. He mrcner amrea that mere were oM' 154 subsmbers to the Herald in postal zorre 32]50. Mr. Goslme readdresxd ttre Senth~el issue by rtaling the City Attorney has provided an opinion tlul advertising m tha Sardord Herald meets the ra3uiremeots of Chapter 166.041(3H26),PS. Ms. Mary Boone of 1863 Ranchland Tr. wanted to state the property can be developed, but siM homes are too many. Ms. Ronne also had a concern regarding mde enforcerrcnt whh regard to fee. Barrington was requved to (once arowd the subdivision but Fences were taken Jowm for storage of boats and recreational vehicles. assn u tluowv ovu the fnae and We city does uothi~ about it. Ms. Phillips corclWedby stating roar this new development ofsixty plus homes will al do this uNess the City enforces its codes. Ms. Kelly 7'indale of 289 Lazy Acres Lane asked to speak. Ms. Tiridele felt this subdivL ould destroy the riatmN en ant of the area Nong wish added tmtfic. She fars more crone will also resultho~ Mr. Gorovitz waz asked to respond. Mr. Gorovitz stated simply rhat Ilre City of Longwood Comprehens ve Plan targets this area for annexation when possible. He mimed [o state rust tMse property owners (his ctiems) have met the requirements to do so. lbat mie project is exactly what the City Commission has been boking for to widen [xe City's tae base. He saved tM enviromrcntN isues wdI be eddrcss N, pointing om 11w letter addressed to Ray LLba~s with DCA along with oopies oftlart letter going to DOT. ECPRPC, STIRWMD, DEP, and Semi~wle County and [hat doing all the enviromnental tests prior to receiving me approval of rezoning and land uu desigrwion would be promatwe, The audience needs to trust Ihase agen s' will be watching for mesa oral issues. Longwood's Comprehemive'Plan identifies that Were is a deCtc'u orhousing N the City and this project works to reduce this deficit. Mr. Goro ated for the record tlat w e of the speakers (bat spoke ar of me a~yanrr. Bnllington r Img that e~erynne naa naa a enanae ro na minded me anaieae War the LPA is a recommenains boas ana that me city Commission wix make faW decision on mere issues. No motions made by the LPA are bi~Ming one way or another. Mr. Tiblier thought that possible solution would be to use vt ultra low drnsity residcmial znnir~g. Mr. Gosline stated that R-I A does still exist, but the applicant asked for R-1. Mr. Revels asked to close [be public hearing a~ the public hearing s closed. Mr. Iiblier moved to rccommsnd approval of Project MANX-02-97, ubjeot to the staffremmmerdations based on find'mgs oPfact and conditions N the staff report dated September 30, I99]. Mr. Mehzer seco~Wad the motion. Mr. AWlmgton seed he felt ine anrexstbn is appropriate, bm the denary and lots sizes are too greaz to be wrainent with tfie neighboring areas. Mr. Melt'rzr eked Mr. Gosline whether the an Bets the sm utory requimmevts. Mr. Gosline stated that in lvs opinioneit met the rcqu'vemems. He exptairiW Oat an mvexazion aecicion's legislative in venue and in subject to the fahly debamb@ Zest This means the decision must be based on a reasonable interpretion of the iWbrmation provided. Mr. Bullington asked for a roll call vote. Mr. Revels votes No. Mr. Menzer votes Yes Mr. Tiblier votes Yes Mr. Bullington votes Yes The motion recommeMing aPPmvel ofthe amrexatiov passed 3 to 1. Mr. BWlmgtonopenW the public hearing for the Plan ArrcWment. Mr. Meltzer askN ifOris plananrndmem is approvN the appliwvt mutt .still do a subdivision plan. Mr. Gosline indicated that was cortem. Mr. Bulnnynon asked for commems seeing none. He closed the public nearing. Mr. Tbfiu wanted to smte thaz the City doesn't have any estate bts aW that tM1is wawa ba an emellent nlanne ~r Ina cry to ao so. Mr. Gna~n rn tnat n w~ not possvme m clange me aenaty m ina Low nanairy xeaiaemiW yaw nee aeaisnetinn, but the LPA could adjust it with [be use of R-IA mrw~g. Mr. Meltzer nwved to rewmmeM approval ofProject #FPA-OI-9], subject [o the staff reconuneWations based on fuWings of feet and conditions m the stag repon dated September 29, 199'/. The nwtion died for a Zack ofa secoM. Mr. Bullington asked for a motion to recommend for denial of [he full scale plan amendmenn Mr. Revels rtaved to recomircnd denial of Project #FPA-019], subject to the LPA's findings az the October $ 199] meeting. Mr. Gosline asked that thou voting in fevorofOx nw on give fneb persotal mtio~ale far denial as no staffrepon will be on the rewrd for ihev fuMings. M1U. AWlington askM for a roll vote wrth mtiorale for denial. Mlr. Revels voted yes based on [he use compatible with the area. Mr. Meltze voted no nosed on the applicant having met the require Mr. Tiblier voted no based on a des've for the pmject to move forward. is Mr. Burlington voted yes based on the use being rnt compatble with the area The motion Niled on s tie vote. Since no other were oRered, the project will be forxarded [o Ne City Conmvssiov with a tie vote. Mr. Hullington opened the publk hearing f r the retuning. Seeing no comment the public hearing was closed. hn. Revels nnved to deny the m7ovmg. Mr.Tibner secoMed the motion. Mr. Gosline asked the board fo stare then retbrale Por denial wdh their vote. Mr. Aevels voted yes based on the wrwtg H not compatible to the area. Mr. Meluer voted no. Mr. Tibner voted yes based on hls delve to get a lower density residential elassfflcatton. Mr. Bullington voted yes based on the fact that the City does not have a land use designation that matches the surrounding area. The matron passed recommending to the City Commission w not approve the R-1 zoWng. The meeting was recessed for Chen minutes F Mr. Bullington opened discussion Por the LDC amendments. Mr. Goslirre explained tlat these amendmens are the most nrnded and more will come. Mr. Gosline minaaa hyaisenssing me pem>;rrm are matrix changes. Prm<ipaur G,nrehaa tp be coMdional uses in residential, car rzpair be permitted in C-3 ,and private uhools in RP. hn. Gosline nnved onto kxes. The LPA HnugM tnaz when replacing a fence it must be ofJjke materials. Tney also flt they would request the City simply get out oftna fnce permitting business. The LPA wanted to change dre Nrce-foot high fence I"vnimticn to Jm+t tha re idwGai areas. Mr. Goslitce covered charges in temporary use Permits and o<cupatwwl license. The LPA had no changes. Mr. Gosline <ovued Gearing of shorcnnw Mc Tiblier left the wording was not correct and Mr. Goslire said he would correct the wording [o match stae law. Mr. Tblier wanted the parking ofcars in the R.O.W. to be permitted unless sigtrei. Tha LPA agreed to delete (a) from 24-52 and scratch the wood `parking" Gom the n w(o). Mr. cnaune neM aia~n:sea me arbor panrvttmg regairemem:. Mr. rniier asked ~r protection ofspsurcnvees. The LPA agreed to do that. They eemoved 24-55.01(6) and added "except as above" to 20.~SS.Ot(a). Mr. Croslire wvered view sign regWatiotvs and rwfice requirements. The LPA hod no objections with those areas. Mr. Meltzer moved to accept the changes ofthe LUC. Mr. Revels seconded and the motionpasred unan~mousty. y ARJORNMF.NT The LPA edjomed at 10:00 P.M.