LPAMin06-09-99CITY OF LONC WOOD
LAND PLANNING AGENCY
Minutes done 9, 1999
ATTENDANCE:
Board: Starr:
Bobbi Bul~gtoq,Vice Chauperson Jay Sargent. Planning Division Manager
Nancy Childers John GroenendaaL Plnnner
Sal Orlando Beverly MaJorq Planrting Division Secretory
]oyce Helcher J. F. Yelvington, Public Safrty Department
Absent:
Barry ReveLS, Chairperwn (term expUed)
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at ]-00 P.M by Bobbl Bullingtoq Vlce Chairpereon. Berry
Revels [arm expired May 31. 1999
2. CON81Dt:RAT1ON OF May 12, 1999 MINUTES
rNr. Orlmtdo made n motion to npprnve the A1mch 10. [999 minnrer as presented Ms.
He[cher seconded the moon. The ntutlon wos in~ar~inroi~nty apyroved (f-0).
3. PUBLIC BF.ARINC.:
A. SPP~01-99 Applicant: Lou Mnsien
8'10 E. S.R. 434
BillbanrJ Sign
Plannine Department OmissionslConditions by Juhn Oroenendaal
!ill citetiom of regulatiorLS reFtr to Chaptu 24 of the City Code. uNess staled otherwise.
Refuences w [he Plan, or Comprehensive Plan, mean [he Comprehensive Ulan ofthe City
adopted by Ordinance IUl9, adopted July 20. 1992.
Applicant Request
The applicapc Mr LOU MUS Ca of Eller Media, is equestimg to esign agree with
the City oPl,ongwood es per section 24fi1 f r a new billboard signrto be located ontG SR
474. The aDPECam i9 requesting to exchange the billboard located et 865 S CR 427 (Lyman
High School) with several non-confortnmes (identified below) with e billMard meeting all
City Code wirh exception to mr cyclusionary zone outlined in Section 2460.1 I(k) (3). She
City Code does allow the City to toter this agreement upder the provisions orSectiom 24
60.11(k)
Staff Analysis
I. "Che e ting sign located on the Lyman High School si ently doe
meet the following code requir meets and is wneideredenon eon(otmingoo
24-60.I1(b) .. billboards slmll be o[ meal
sad a single pole in design... (Existing sign is a dual
wood pole, wood construction)
b. 24L0.11(el `.. The bottom of the sign shall be no
leas than tbhsy (30) fee[ aMve the crown ofthe road.-.-
(Exisliogsign is user the thvty (30) feet)
24-60.11(a) `.-. Billboards shell be permitted only
as designated as Activity Core. General Commercial, Light
I~nssrial or Industrial oo the I~ltture Land Use Mao-.:' (Existing
sign is in the Public Lend Use)
d- 2460.11(k) "...billboads shall be prohibited fiom
locating in any of the following areas... 2) The east side oECft 427
between the south side ofLylnan High School and mouth right ofway
line of East Maine Avc..:' (Existin6 sign is in the 'txclusiovary
mne")
_. 'Ihe proposed locadon is eWssified as General Commercial on the Future LaM
Ux Mao. The sito hasawning classification oCC-3 and is compatible with
the Compreheriaiva Plan. Billboard signs are permitted In areas designated
General Commercial.
3. The proposed location .viii be a monopolo and xltell meet ell of the City of
Longwood requirevxn[s and Standard 6nilding Codc requirements with
exception l0 24-60.11(k).
'...billboards shall be prohibited fiom locating N any of the f Ilowimg
3rihe sou[h side of SR 434 between the west right bf--way line of
East St. and the east right ofway line oCOleander St extended-_"
Section 24-60.I I (k) allows the Ci[y oP Longwood to exempt the exclusion
ne through the sign agreement. The City Alorncy has dGermined that both
etaffand the npplicanl are interprwing Secrion 24-60.11(A) conenty ro allow
the applicant and the Ciry to oonsider the sign agremricnt.
4. l'he City of Longwood wdl not violate hs billboard ca0 nY accepting thissign
agreement as it mplaees one sign wish the other.
5. The Comprcherulve Plan G.O.P. page III-28 outlinas gaidelives for outdoor
advenieing end st u graphics the LPA and svbsegvently the City
Con n should consider whether the applire reque s rhos
guide) ne oand whnt conditio essary to meet themsTheeapplicam
should he aware ofthue pal ties to assure compliance
6. The proposed sign will be 56 fat from the nearest rc+idential wncd pmcel.
Lots 5-9 on Lyns Drive em zoned R-? and is a progressive zonin6 Mtween
the C-3 and R-1A caning districts. The exclusion zones in Section 24-
60.I1(k) were designed to separate billbomds fiom residential areas.
Plannin¢ Division Recommendation
The City developed this sign agreement process w provide (or this type of request. The
applicnrrt does meet the uituia oCthie sign agreemem as oatiined in the LDC.
The Planning Division rewmmends that project #SPP-01-991x approved based on the tact
that then wbc nofthe sign willMm ompliance than rhea ring sign et Lyman
Hlgh School. Theredjaeent properly owners Input during the public hearing process should
M weighed heavily in whether the City should ensuing into this agreement and whet
conditions should M made due to the exclusionary zone and the bllMwd Ming within 100
Fet ol'residential zoned properties.
'Ilse appiievm upon true) vision will M required w prepare a sign agrccmut/development
vgrccmut auxptnble by the Cny Attorney In accordance with the City Commission Final
Action
Mr. Sargent identified that this m had been vdve ised properly and gave the stop
report. Mr. Orlando asked m goeo cord es being in favor of this type ofprogram by
n of past errors on the Codes. After a shoe discussion Chair entertained a
Mr Helcher made a motion that Item SPP-U]-99 6a vpp~oved vs prevanred Mr.
Orlando reronded the rnorion. The motion was nnanlnruusly approved (J~0).
R. VAC-01-99 Karev Kopec
ll] Raven Avenue
Esmte of Marion Person
Plannin De ar nt Omiss'onslConditiovsb John (: c.~~nendaal
Abandotnnent of the wut four (4) feet of the seven nn:. h: i ; 'h) Coot utility easemem
along the east side of ] I ]Raven Ave.
My eonvnents era based on the application d:'. .h "`. i' 99; All citations of
regulmi ref to Chapter 24 of the City Ci rther vz Refers
ces W
the Plan or Comprehensive Platy mean the Lomprmremwe Plan of the City adopted by
Ordinance 1019. adopted July 20. 1992.
The applieant. Ms. Karen Kopec, executor for the estate of Marion Perssoq has applied w
to the west four feet ofu utility easement of the uestun boundary of the properly. (See
attached) The rWuested area for vacating curtently is lying within the s~vinmting pool mtd
deck area. The family of the deceased world like to clear the cloud on the tide so a sale can
be processed.
Staff AOalvsis
1. Cons'stc w'th the Comprehensive Plan:
Thee tug use with We Comprehens ve Plau. By vacating the
utihry etasemeut, the applicant will not cause the use of the site ro change.
2. Effect on anv Public A¢enev:
Thev ting ofthe utility ea 11 no impact any of the City
depanments or local utilities currently. Thetapplicant has requested levers
oPapprovel or opposition from afiuted utility wmpantes. Cuaeutly,
Florida Power, Sprlnt,'Cime Warner, and Ciry of Longwood Utilities. have
0 objection to the vacating. No response has been received fiom Florida
Gas Company or People Gas.
3. Assessment of the Efect an Adjacent Procerffea:
The effu[ of vacating ofthe easemem should be minimal on neighboring
properties. The property will still have afoot-Poo[ utility easement on the
aide lot lines Kneaded The adjacent progeny owner to the west has no
objection end is the applicant. No response has been received born the
eastern neighbor.
5. Ad'aeent Land Uses Zonin and Site Develo m nt Criferia~
The adjacent properties w Skylark are all caned R-t and are designated
Low Density Residential.
~. ornennrormanon:
The applicant has also applied Por and received a vaziance, as the pool and
deck dou no[ mee[ setbaeka (VAR 114A9) The applicant hus pool decking
along the northern boundary, Ike the eastern boundary rhea is a revert and
a half-16ot utility easement. No request has been made to vacate that and
the applicant is warned that if e utility chooses to use that easement the
decking will be removed. However. tite pool G not N Immediate daveer-
Plann'o¢ R'vls'on Reoommendatiuns:
The Planning Division reconnnends the LPA reeotrmtevd the Ciry Commission approve
#VAGOI-99. to vacate the west four (4) foot of a seven eud a half (] 'h) fot utility
easements along the eastern side ofthe progeny Po the area of the decking only_
Ms. Kopec was not present. Mr. Groenendeal presented Staff Findings and Staff Approval.
Lett ved by Utiliry Companies. There a brief disc sston and Amendmem
w;n ~eaa e~e~ae=crivtron ofvaoate. emir emertav eaammton
Mr. Orando made a motion ra a-Prove ivcate ofeusement, VACJI(-99. according ro the
legal desolyrsmr_ the Was i ft. oJtha Eon 1-]RJG ojlhe North 30 fr_ ojLor 9. /i(oek K, Sky
Lmk Subdivision as recorded In PB II. Page 85 Public Reco>ds of Seminole County.
Florida Ms. Hatcher seconded the motion. The motion .vas nn<ntfmotrrly approved (A-0J.
C. Amendments to Artiele II, Artiele VIII, and Artiele I%. (Draft 3II]l99)
(Continuation Gum May 12 1999 Land Plarudng Agency Meeting)
This item was opened for discussion by Chair. Mr. Sargent and Mr. Yelvington
went through eacb artiele page by page.
ARTICLE II
5 f n20.22-Ear fitted Uses and Devel of Restrictions:
Mr. Yelvington explained the purpose ofthis Attecle to the Cbnmuttec. There was
a discussion and a full consensus ofapproval on 24-22.06. Duilding Occupancy
For all Uses and 2A-22.0>, Enforcement.
Section 24-230]-Inoperable Abandoned wrQ/gr Wrecked Veh'cles Mr.
Yelvington presented and explained the purpose ofthis article to the Board Mr.
Orlando w s opposed to the emptions. After discussion it was agreed that the
exemptions would be eemoved. With the removal of the exemptions there wasa
consensus ofapproval on this Article.
Sect on 2423 08 -Cam nereial Veh'ole_ There was e mnsenaus of approval as the
Article read.
Sec on 24-2) 09- Boa s Tw Iers @ Rec t oriel Veh'cles' llsere was a
consensus ofapproval as the Article read ~e
24-23 l l -Res'dent al Es a e~ This was a numariexl change on the Artiele ouly.
There was a consensus ofapproval.
20.23 I2- Enfomemen ~ This was a numerical change only. There was a
conae~snsoranprovar.
Section 24-24 Special Requirements For Accessorv Uses.
2424 02 - Genual Rem Isi arts: Consensus on items m-s
m. Itw sthe dec vofthc COmm1 ethat rial"
neededm eclan'fica a Staff weed to rork on this.aWith that
them was a conseosus ofapproval on m. _
p. Com i.. gav sofapproval on thisi
a. T~-_. ~ t ~~ ~ em «t rose mevea enm amm~er erne tma
_.. ...age Crom'q'to "r".
s. This was a ci ange from r to s .
2424 03 Development Standards Throe ~taa a coasevsua ofapproval un this and
also on Tuble 24-3.
24-25.05- Kennels: Ms. {{nlclrer raised wneern on the proposed Greyhound
Shaker. It was believed that the sheltw ould not be covaidered the e a
kewel. and Ms Helcber was going m have someone 1Mm We Greyhound as
Adoption Centro call Mr. Sargent.
24-25.08 - Sw'vnmme Fools There was a consensus ofapproval on this item.
24-25.09-Mobile kIome Parks Consensus of approval.
Alnohol'e Beveraees Vendors This Article E being removed from the
upment Code end put N the Cty Code book under Ordinances.
Section 24-27 Uow~ntow'n Historic
Tbis e organized and reformatted with no changes. The
Committee gav consensus ofapproval.
ARTICLE VIII
Seci on248t Developmer Review Board Consensus of Approval.
Section 24-B~,Land Plannme Aeencv~ Consensus of Approval.
Seci pp 24:85 Historic Pregeryation Board: Ms. Putz was present from the
Historic Preservation BOazd The Cnmiutttee gavea full Consensus of Approval
ARTICLE IX
Section 24-96 H'atorie D'sti a Pro ewe Thia includes 2h-96.01 t{vough2496.09.
The oNy ekange ism 24-9G.05(a.) This will be changed to read "Interior
modifications whioh do no esuh inachevge ofuu ofeny structure". With that
chvnge the Commiaee gave a conensus of approval.
hlr. Orlando made a morion to the Ciry Commission approval nfiNe 3/IJ/99 draJi
an Aniendmenis to Article ]I. Anicte VI7t, and Arzicle IX and modified with
corrections. page 2 oI237~enr d deletion o(Lhemprions:
1. page J of13. 2-f-2f 02 ra~rord afcominuous materlai:
3. -age]6of23.21-8/.01 DRR Mambership (b.)deleta"engineer"
and (f.) de/ute [upac~(onr Dlvivlon Manager and add Police
D P~
a~ PaFe 12 oJI3. 2a-96.05 the addvion f "do nor".
.Ns. Hefcher seconded the rno~ion. The motion wns tmarrimo~ivly approved (+O).
A. OLD ItUSINFSS: none
i. NEW BUSINESS: none
6. DISCUSSION AND SCHEDULE FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
A. Election for Chairperson
1. ADlOURNMENi:
~Nr. Orlando mode a morion ro adjman the meeting. Ms Helcher seconded the nioiiun. The
morion uas unanmrously approved (A-OJ.