LPAMin04-21-00CITY of LoncwooD
LAND PLANNING AGENCY
Minutes, April 12, 2000
AT'fENDANCF.:
Board: Stag:
Bobbi 6ollingtoq Chnuperson ]ay Sargent, Plarming Division Maregcr
Nancy Cltiders-Vice Chairperson Beverly Majors Plavviov Division Secretary
]nyee Itelener
nd senreiber
Detmy Emory
Absev
L CALL TO ORDER:
Bobbi Bullingtoq Chahpersoq called the mee~ing ~o order.
Z. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR March A,2000
Ms. fleleha made n motion ro approve the MareH R 2000. minutes oa prosexrad. Mr.
Chllderr seconded the rnarian The motion uns yproved (4-0). with Mr. Emory a6sralning.
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
4. S1TE PLANS:
A. SP-OS-00 Mc0onalds Restaurant
900 S.R. 434
06-31-]0-300-02I K-0000
Applicant: Rob Lancaster
PWnnine Division Stag Reoorl - dnhn Groenendael
~gi orJRew tendon
The Plarmmg Diva nofMe Commnnily Services Department recommends lhal the land
Planing Ager¢y recommend to the City Commission that the Commission approve SP-OS-
00, asite plan 1'or a 4,893 sq.fi. fast food restaurant including The existing inside
playgrowd which is not being replaced.
Exvlanai oNBackg ound~
The applicant, Nu. Roberc Lancaster has requested sire plat approval to rebwld a ~ food
restaurant at 900 W. SR 434. The restaurant is 4,893 sq.fl. and will seat I08 persons.
The DR6 has t and the site plan m compliance with applicable City Codes at its March 2.
2000, me ring with the following exceptions and comments.
Catrun
• Extr a shall be taken to protect existing trees on the lot. (LDC Sec. 24-55.03)
• No vart'ettces fiom the City Code were requested for this project and no
rated. Staffre~rves the right to additional wmnents during construction and prior
ompleti
Molementat'ov.
IJponfiml approval oftho Ciry Commission. Site plans exp've l80 days nfiarf 1
Mr. Sargent prerented the Staff Report. He advised the Board drat the DRB
twusly recomnrended to the LPA approval of SP-OS-00, with all comments and
questions addressed on the resubnuttaL including the landscaping plan and tree
praection plan.
There was a discussion and it was asked why demolition and rebuild versus remodeling.
Mr. Mdrew Hawkhrs. Real Bstate Represemative for McDottalds spoke on behalf of
his client He explained the econonucal reasons for demohshin6 and rebuilding. He
s xlw asked about the time period, and he replied that demolition would take 5 to ]
days, atM rebuild 58 ro 60 days.
With no more discussion, Ms. BulWtgton entertehtedamotion. Mr. Emory madeo
mr mend approval oJSP-OS-00 ro the Ciry Commission. My Helcher
svcanded the motion. Zhe motion Kos unanimously approved (5-0).
5. NEW BUSINESS:
Ms. BuOmg[oo opened Public Hearing and declared that there was no public is ettendanea,
those present were the Board Members, Mr. Sargent and the 6oazd Secretary.
A. CPA-01-00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Section IX Capital Improvement Elemeut
Mr. Sargent presented the StaRReport and advised the Board ofthe proof oC
publication, and that the DRB had rewnuranded approval to the LPA.
Plennin¢Division Stag Report-John Groeneadaal
MoioNRec endai
Itre Plamuug Division ofthe Community Services Depmtment recommends that the Land
Plarming Agency re rnmend that the City Commission approve CPA-01 -00. e
Comprehensive Plvt Amendment to Section IX, Capital Improvement Elemeut, Objective
1, Policy B, C, and IJ.
Explarai oNRackmound~
The City Commission has requested that staff review aM make eecommeMatiun to modify
policies in relation to the budget approval procesv. The language in the Capital
Improvement Elw»ent, Objective I,Yolicy B, C, mtd D as found in the Comprehereive Plan
(Goals, Objectives, and Policies) was wed, and the Smlf reeommended the policios
be replaced with sltemative language. Theelanguage must h in compliv~ce with 9J-5.016
of the Florida Administrative Code
Imolememation:
Upon final approval of the City Commission.
Section I%Capimi Impro emcnt Element Amendments:
Obieetive i. By 1992, The City of Longwood shall review its capital improvement
programming procedures to provide for amual review atM evaluation of the Ca°ital
Immovementa FJements fCIE} Oaough uoordinadon oftbe annpai review of the ~~
Imorovem ms E~rt nt and Ne Cao'mI imnrovemeo~s Proeram Beet (C[P) [9]-5.016
C3) (b) ILe
Poliev A. City of Longwood fiscal policies shall be used to dyed capital experd'aures
f r pubfic facJity improvements that are reflected in other pWn elements. [Ch. 955.016(3)
(c) 9]
Policy B. am~ttee
~~.,,mming
The City o(LOngwood shail'vnplemwrt a process wiwreby a capita budgeVpublic feclities
and mil&ies capital improvement program is adopted as a pan of the amsuai budgeting
process. This process will include. individual depattmem preparation of a dcefl armuut
budget. including the atieded depazimeots suggested input to the updated five-year
capital improvement program; depanmental review with the Ciry Admutistmtor to
formulatethe"final draft" ofthe amual budget; workstmps held witlt the Cary Commission
v the proposed annvei budget. including the five-year capital unprovement
program; odoptio of the on uel budgd, including the five-year capital improvemeot
program, by the City Commission at properly advenLsed public hearings.[Ch.9T5.016(3)
(a) ~]
. ity'soa9bel~needs,-beaedexadepte9
~- w~~
Strikethrongh-Removed Text
Underline -Added Ten
Following Mr. Sargenfs prosevmtion ofthe Staff Repott and reawn why the request
there was a discussion.
When all discussion was concluded, Ms. Hullmgton entertahred a morion.
Mr. Emory made a morion fo recommend approval of CPA-0/-00 to she Clry
Cammisrinnere- M.v. Halch¢r seconded the nrotlan. THe morion u~an approved
({-/), wlrh A2c Childers voting no.
B. LDCA-01-00 Land Development Code Amendment
ArticM VIII, Section 2484 Codc Enforcement Doard
and Artiele X Code Compliance
Mr. Sargent Presented the SYaft'Reporc and advised the Board of the proofof
publication, and that the DRD had rewmmended approval w the LPA.
Plannine Division Stott Report-Jav Sareent
Mat or/Recommendation:
"the Plarming Division of the Communay Services Depanment recommends that the I,PA
mend to the City Commission the repeal ofArticle VIII, Section 24-84. Code
Enfornement Hoard, end Article X, Code C mpliance, ofthe Land Developrrent Code N
the'v entirety and for them to M placed N the City's General Code.
~planai onBazk¢round'
In aview of the LDC, it leas Men determined that the City's code en6rcemem structure
belongs in the general City Code. The code enforcement rtmcture Ms a d'vect corzelation
to the City at Imge and the enforce~mnt ofnll City codes. The orditunce fir the general
code will M rt ured to d'vectty reference the State Statues as n relates to Code
Enforcement and Is procedums.
~: NA
I I
Upon Adoption of Ord'vunce by the City Coumvssion
Mr. Sargent prerented the Stafl Report on LDCA-OI-00. Following the Report there
wes a briefdiscasion.
When discussion was concluded Ms. Hullington entertained a motion.
Mr. Pmary made a morlon to recommend approval ofLDCA-01-W to the Clry
Commiasloners. Mr. Schreiber seconded the minion. lRe motion rras apyrovvA
(41) wirh Ms. Childers voting no.
6. OI.D BUSINESS: There was no Old Business ~o discos.
7. D16CUSSION AND SCI{EDULC FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Next eegular scheduled meeting will be May 10, 2000.
Mr. Sargent advised the Board that new electronic equipment was going to be implemented
and that in future meetings video and visual repabliucs would be used.
Mr. Sargent advised the Board that there.vould mast likely be a meeting in May.
e. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Thcrc was no Public Commend.
9. ADJOURNMENT:
Mr. Emory made a motion ro nd~'a~vn tRe meeting, Ms. llelcher seconded the morlon. The
mouan teas unan~mavsty approv¢d (5-0)-