LPAMin01-25-95PRESENT: STAFF:
Meltzer, Chairman John B ock, Director
BarrynR vels Ajmal C City Planner
Richard Eul Sington Terri. Moran, ecretary
RRB:
wthorne
Mike Cash
Carl Becht
Al sand
1. The meeting was called to order at "I.OOp.m. by Chairman Meltzer.
INOTEE: made by M ftullington and
secondedNbyAMr. uevels to approve the mvnutes of January 4, 995.
3. Thomas Varvavice, 890 E. Nwy. 634.
. Jami s ted that because r already a onPOrming s
the v addition t already n - onformities thatte ist o
the buildings aThere a thatna e being request ed~Ac
side s ack and the £rontw setback ce The first request is for 5.8 ofeet
achment i the requiretl 25 £eet c sitle setback, whlch i
addition t ing 8.32 feet e ac hment c mulatively, r
10.1 feet andtif the v s granted thecpioposed setback would
be .10.88 feet and the and front etback
requirements. The building already ea roache sv aboutt> 3 feet, request
s For 2 a Feet Further e achment nc In the letter submittetl t the
artl is a ta££ valua[ion of the v Trance request and the oCOde
requirement i.n that especific situatvon.
wthorne, rebi.tect for Etl Thomas I Age n<y,
i~ai ated that he had yone o the evaluation that cw a letter
dated S uary 19, 1995 by M ted that he badsa rebuttal t
ofn the r endations and preceded t Bad t the e and a
payeerebuttal dated January 29, 1995 on evaluations A, E, and F thatihe
had handed out to the Board.
wthorne s ted that they w requesting the v that they
oulda bring their building ompliance witha thencnisabled Code
requirements by a ing a handicap ramp and also enhance t appearance
of [heir buildinydwith the alterations they were planninghto do.
ail Thomas, wife of the o of subject property, c tetl to the
and that they w ted t improve the appearance o£ the buJi lding and t
amply with the Disabled Code. She further s ted that because the
State had t e previously taken land from themtfor the widening o£ SR
she appealed t the B and to grant t of the co
ould i if they had t reduce theh srze of the builtliny in order
to comply with the nrsabled Code.
Land Planning Agency
vary 25, 1995
Page 2
The H a[d agreetl that the design of the building would improve the
appea ~ance of the area.
After additional discussion, made by M vels and
onded by M Hullingto end approval o£ the Thomas v
E90 E. Hwy. 434. Mel tzez suggested that w end a letter t athenB
stating that w ended approval and the er antl also that he
ould attend them s ng t any questions about their decision.
The voice vote was una nvmous. smhe motion carried.
4. Miller School Supply Svte Plan, Lots 3 S 4 eaywooa Industrial Palk,
Pvrst Additiov.
. Sami stated that this i imple office w rehouse combination site
plan. After the 0 i.ng when the plans w red and submitted
o Planning bepartment,e the majority of the c ents were saris{red.
The staff recommends approval of this site plan
Mike Cash, agent for the o and applicant Wayne Miller, stated
that he representing the o Meltzer asked Mr. Cash if he had
ead the staff letter of J vary 18, 1995 and he Sndicated that he did
t have a copy of that letter, he w s given a copy to i Mr. Cash
read the letter and stated that he did no[ have any problems with it.
made by M Bullington antl s onded by m eels t
end approval of the Millet School Supply S Plan L s 3 6 4,
0aywoood Industrial Yaik, F Addition subject t toff c
letter dated J vary 18, 1995. The voice vote was unanimous. iThe
motion carried an
5. Huvt Industrial Park Svte Plav.
ted that this a proposal Eor platti nq the e ing Hunt
property and w ith the property o representative at and
discussed all these that Planning esta£f had a that poi ntAH Mr.
Jami ted that m eo£s the c the r setl plan has been
satisfied and a lot of the c e deferred a til the final plans
and plat w submitted. ted [hat s this is just a
peel iminary plan at this point ~thet staff recommends that this be
plat and plan revr ew time
Mx. Carl Pecht was at the meeting representing Pecht-Evans engineering
Hulli ngton asked Mr. if i up t ask fsr a Soils
Report? aid thatmi required by thet Code that a oils
Report b submitted, but s this is a preliminary plat it vs not
required euntil the final platcand plan are submitted.
Land Planning Agency
uary 25, 1995
Page 3
Bullington asked M if the s s going to be dedicated t
the city or private. indicated that the i s discussed a
and because there a ing cul-de-sacs o the wproper[y and w
don't Rave any detailst on how they w ted and if they w
uct ed to City s andards o not. The a gineer will have to provide
nstruction detailst t the Engineering Dept. and will have o be
eviewed determine oif vt vs feasible for City to accept the
A m made by Bullington and onded by Revels
end approval of the preliminary s e plant £or x industrial Park
subject t toff c n letter dated Sanuary 18, 1995. The vovice
vote was unanvmous. ~Thesmotvon carried.
6. 611 Building Site el , 611 E. Highway 434.
Mr. J ted that the conditional u s previously approved for the
automobile sales. The staff recommentls that the svte plan be approved.
Al Lantl, Land Engineering, Inc. repiese nting Mike H way, the
ted that he Rad o e problem and tRat w ith Sgttt Jackson's
Sabo ut the lighting. n ted that Bgt. Jackson w tetl lighting
the e where theyH preferred to Rave the lighting o the
builtling t ri lluminate the parking lot. The reason for this is so the
light is off the right-of-way.
ock asked if they wouldn't mind putting a light i oth places.
and s tetl that they would prefer n o have lighting in both
plat because you really don't eed r places. Brock
further asketl if tRey minded if they c vSgtW Jackson and emake s
that i all right witR him? andts ted that he tlitln't mind and
commertteds that he hatl tried to contact Sgta Jackson.
Revels inquiretl if there w any other 5 lighting i that
red that these lights on the North side and
probab lyMat vntervalswand on the corners.
made by M Bullington antl s onded by M eels t
entl s e plan for the 6 wilding at 611 E Hwy. 4 subject t
toff c a letter dated J ary 1 ith the understanding
that Sgt~Jackson~s request for aal fight a the 9e the property
will be discussed with Sgt. S and Ss subject ton cRange. The vovice
vote was unanvmous. The motvon carried.
]. Lavd Development Code.
ock s ted that the Chairman a sed this prior t
eting a tthey agreed tlel ay it untilh then next meeting, which owill
February e, 995.
Rlanni ng Agency
aarY 25, 1955
cage 4
After additional discussion, i agreed t a workshop to work on
the Land Development Code, on February e, 19 g5 et
e. Aaaitlnnal o,aouaaion:
. Bullington inquired of M ock about the drainage problem behind
Dogwood Executive uildingr ock red that he had
material regarding the issue. He stat eda that they reseaiclted sthe
Adj ou made by M Bullington and s ontletl by M .
Revels to ad journmtheomeeting. The meeting was adjournedcat 8:0>pm.r
Respectfully Submitted,
Terci Moran, Secretary