LPAMin04-12-95LANG P
ongwood, Florida
L April ]2, 1995
RESENT: STAFF:
Meltzer JoRn B ock, D
Phoebe Hopewell Terri Moran, Secretary
Sohn A. Lrns
AesENT: Efts:
ichazd Bullington MikeENattaway
Barry Revels
The m ing w calletl t order a by Chairman
Meltzer. Meltzer, n behalf of the Lantl Planning Agency,
welcomed MrM Carl Gosline as the new City Planner.
2. PROVAL O TES: A m made by M approve
the m of M Inch 22, 19g5otiMS. Hopewell seconded the motran.
The vorce vote was unanimous.
3. OUR eOUxI¢Ve SITE PLAN, 250 W. CHURCH AVENUE.
of Milwee and CRUrch Avenues. He £uxther stated that it has
beenebefore the D and the H cal C also n ted
that this will be the first i theoH that will Rave
combined u retail downstairs andtlivingr quarters and offices
upstarrs. The staff recommends approval.
Meltzer asked the applicant, Jacqueline Cason of 2449 G1 e:unoo re
Apopka, if she had read the staff [epoit of April 6, 1995,
andvthe architect replied that they had read the report and had no
Mr. L made a n to appio the O tique Site Plan at 250
. CRUrch A subject t taf£ c uof April s, 1955. Ms.
Hopewell seconded the motion. sThe vorce vote was unanrmous.
4. ION PURPOSE -- RANGELINE ROAD COMPREHENNIVE
Block began by expl ai ninq that after public
volvement s the City Commission agreed t end the
omprehensive Planot eliminate the three-laning and four-l aning of
angeline Road from othe Plan. The document under discussion this
ing the first draft o£ the repot which i required to justify
this proposed plan endment. St t organized to omply rth
specific guidelines amfor the preparation of plan amendment
submittals found in the administrative rules.
and Planning Agency
April 12, 1995
Page z
He identified v s portions of the document t which Re thought
the membeisioshould pay particular attention. Among trte
identified sectrons were the following:
1. Page Element analysis background, s ovd s third
paragraph - The city Commission limited the project to drainage
improvements, n laves, 15 foot metlian antl certain pedestrian
improvements. Any improvements must take place wrthin the
existing ri ght ~of way..."
2. Page 3, last paragraph, last s .This analysis
showed that traffic o angeline Road w e projected to i 1.0
per t per year £orn the No Build Condition and 2.2 percent per
yearefor the Builtl Condit tort..."
Page 4, bottom paragrapR - ary, the o sign
ra££ic nalysis of tRe Report has shown that the uild
ondition will n t decrease the e ing level-of-service NS andard
be£o [e the Y r 2005. It does forecast the LOS standard being
exceeded in approximately the Year 2010..."
4. Page 9, £itth paragraph - .. It is the City's position
that widening the Road c a greater incept ve for development
requests which isten i.th these ipolicie s..." This
refers at es Land u Element policies v-e and V-c
wRichmconcern the neetl ito for neighborhootl protection.
Page 9, last s ..In order t pal
ncy a ong the Planes Elements, the programmed wideningemust
bendeleted from the Plan..."
Page 1 first s - .The City C n has
weighed the vidence provided i s public om ings and
hearings regarding this matter andum nobalance determined the
eighborhood protection policies a important for the healtR,
safety and welfaze of zens zn this case than rs tRe
programmed widening project, citi
Page 11, ti£th paragrapR, first .The
vidence provided i the Report shows the proposed widening project
will r salt i si gni£icant alteration o£ tRe floodplain because
there will bennn increase .tn the stormwater runo£t .. ."
Page xth paragraph .The project not
itR c ertt FEMA regulations. FEMA's c t policy i
oidn developme n the floodplain unless thereat other
feasible alternative. The precetling discussion showed the No Build
Condition as a feasible alternative..."
Page 1 last paragraph. The Plan i ordinance o£ t
ity. 9Since the lprevious discussion snowed the proposed project i
not c ith s zal parts o£ the ordinance, n be
concluded the project is not consistent witR City regulations.
Land Planning Agency
April 1 , 1995
Page 3
10. Page 1 , fourth paragraph; any of the build Condition
scenarios would result in wetland impacts.
Page 13, s xth paragraph, Last s - this
angeli ne Road rs no longer part oft the regional road
network..."
12. Page i third paragraph, last s identifies a
policy to be added t the Plan as follow: e eThe City staff shall
be directed t vely cooperate with the staffs of adjacent
jurisdictions,othe M tote agencies and federal agencies to find
land other ways [ mmodate the projected t nspo rtation needs
without sacrifi cl ngathe City's residential character..."
13. Page 1 , last paragraph - sed o the data i the
Report and the t ony r ved throughout the process, both the
LPA and the city Commission c ncludetl the Plan should be amended t
delete the proposetl widening project. The participants also
ncl uded t types of improvements should be matle for
safety, appearance taand s mi.lar r it w agreed that any,
and all, improvements must be madea within rhea existing right-of-
way..."
14. Page 1 the single m important statement of
the whole documentcor.e. a new Policy P as follows:
angeline R between SR 436 and Longwood Hills
oadR hail be c rained t of
Taff ics and the only permitted improvement shall be
limited [hose raing safety, ections,
vagem appea pedestrian and/or
bicycletfacil itles which c ithin the right-of-
way a fisting at the date of adoption of elan Amendment
95-01 %.."
Page 22, fifth paragraph, last two s .The
preceding discussion has provided ample justification for the
deletion of the proposetl widening of ftangel fine Road from the City's
budget. The widening project will be deleted for the planed
capital improvements in the City Budget..."
ock explained the plan amendment process in general t
aid that hopefully the LPA should establish a public hearing
date to begin the formal process. The city c also
ho Ld a public hearing t e proposed amendment t A for
their r and c mthetoCA c s have been r ved,
espon ea document will be cprepared and the City C will
hold a ther public hearing t adopt the a endment.oThesamendment
becomes effective 21 days after adoption unless it rs contested.
The whole pro s from the City C tai decision
to the effective date of the amendmentstakes a mrnrmum of 24E days.
and Planning Agency
April 1 1995
Page 4 2
Chairman Meliter suggested that after the L s happy with the
report, a copy should be s the C my for their r and
ent. Mr. Gosline pointedno othat all the c s in thei County
have a interloc al agreement with the county to tnotify each other
of such projects.
ock said w e putting {Drib the best arguments w n for
thi sxpro je<t. while w ant t Doper ith o eighborsct the
t possibleW i obligation to advocate the City
Commissions snpolicy in this mattes to the best of our ability.
ock explained that the Plan may only be amended by a formal
planxamendment process. Therefore, if the amendment goes through a
the only way i n be changed is to go through this
esprocessn f nary t sallow s e flexibility for safety
improvements, tlrainagecimprovements, e otherwise nothing could be
done to a mmodate these c It i also very c cal t
member tRat the proposed amendment language on page 15 limits the
improvements to Two TxR000x i.ANeS within the existing right-of-way
of the Road.
The discussed of the echnical aspects of the
nsportation planning efforts that Rave taken place. Mr. Brock
aid that the document won ltl be sed prior the public
hearing. The document will be modified, appropriate, ach
tep of the process. M Hopewell expressed the idea that to
rchange o i-4 i other potential solution t the traffic
eetls in the a Mrs Brock said the PEC report is in our office
£or anyone to review.
. Linn expre sed s n about how the decision w made t
Mr s ome concer as o
delete the programmed widening. M online explained that the PEC
tudy gave tRe city Commission the Odata t show the improvement
ary a this time. The L t balance {acts and Plan
policiesctosdetermine its position in this, or any issue.
After sitlerable discussion, Hopewell made
tabu sh a public hea ing for this plan a endment foro May
1995. M[. Linn seconded the motion. The voice vote was unanimous.
Additional Discuss tov
Respectf ally Submitted,
Terri Moran, secretary