Loading...
LPAMin01-04-95RESENT: STAFF: n Mettzei, Chairman Sohn Brock, D rry R vets Ajmal J CitycPiannei Richarde6ullington Terry Moran, ecreta ry VESxS: SohnNBimpson Holtler, Holder engineering, t c. wil Liam Bentley n 1. The meeting was calletl to order at ].00 p.m. by Chairman Mett'te i. 2. PPROVAL OF MINUTES: matle by M Bullington and onded by M vets t approved theam of O tuber 12, vember 9 ded and December 14, 1994. The motron car rr etl by a anonymous vor<e vote. Mr. Meltzer w ted t ish e eryone a happy n w year from the members of the Board andathe City staf tv and hopetl everyone have a prosperous 1995. Jami s ted that the e e plan w s previously approved r but tlue t e lapse echey have t e back before L and o go through the s appzoval process i ordez c the i=lsi addition. r. Soma stated that the staff ozecommentls approvalPOfsthe syte pia n.M Holder, Holtler Engineering, s ted that hew ted c whatMM aid about the pro jectt being approved ni 198] eantl zw built with Phase 1 and [he project n e 2, ratty c plan w s fox Phase 1 0£ a Osf buildingPw additionat 2 OsP addition to be built a a late t which w s going to be Phase42 ted that they a e proposing a 6,000 sf addition t that i eatl of thisr The drainage system whi ch ow approved and constructetl in 190"1 was constructetl and sized Ear the ultimate build-out Meltze[ asked M Holder if he r vetl staff letter tlated D ember 1994. Holder stated that F.e ehad and that he didn't have any Bullington asked if t inq drainage w ing adequately, especially with the r yarns. Mr. Holtler answered that the drainage system wa., work.i.ng well nt A m made by M eels t approve the plan subject t toff of cember 29,Re 1994. o The ton was seconded by Mr. eoiliagcon. me +,orce vote was nnanrmons. and Planning Agency uary 4, 1995 Page 2 ongwood E wilding, 665 W to construct at 29e249sf office building Mr. J ted that this i onditional u Bequest t uct a 29,249sf general office building 1{e also stated that the applicant i of traffic impacts this project will have on the road. The ref ores the applicant i They a e proposing improvements t The staff discussetls the design of the improvements proposed to Athe uroad. Mr. Meltzer s ted that he would like the plans t reflect where the ity lighting will be placed and what part of warren Avenue will be lighted. The applicant, 9i11 Bentley, Bentley Architects and Engineers, stated that they had a ing witR the Police Sergeant about a nth ago and aid they discussed the lighting and that he did n requi zeo them to put any lighting o n Avenue since they were olighting all of the parking lot andndriveway areas. In a Mel tz er•s question about the sign, M Bentley stated thatthey woultl like the Board to c sider letting them have at least 3osf of signage a um because nthey w t to have s e leeway o leasing signage for other A£te an discussion, tlecided t approve the 30sf for the m sigtand if they neetl m signage then they could apply for a variance for the additional amount. Mr. eels w ted t onfirm that the applicant wanted to defer the impro s to w til the building o cupancy w per and the applicant nconf rimed and stated that rt was sfrom 5a financial standpoint. ing the width o£ the through lane and the t ing lane o and what the effect would be to the exrsti ng trees and wlight polese Sharon Palmiia, 115 Ho£fa Way, expressed about the drainage from the property and how the applicant w tgoing t tify the problem. She s ted that t sides of the subject property borders n her property and ashe expressetl i n how they w e going t keep the subject property separate from sthei rs; fence? wall? Who r going t maintain the drainage, what about the trees that bortler the fence? o Jami ted that i the City regulation that anytime a ials development rs rbuilt the City o£ Longwootl against a sidential development, they haven to provide and maintain a buffer yard. siaenhs c inq the ae~elopmeat, Mr. aenaley ana Mr. aami brief ed rthem on the nsrte plan. Mr. Flowers expressetl his concerns about people using i{offa Way as a done. Flowers w also c ned about the c -through being used o qo t the subject prope~ty after 1 ompletetl. 'Lhe Board sugge st etl that he talk to Shelton Smltht the cCity Administrator to resolve his concerns. After a engthy discussion, a made by M Hullington that the onditional U e be approved subject st the oad improvements being omplec ed at 51 per ent or gre cupancy and compliance with the othee staff c cthat w e directed here [ night and of the tetteradat echo cemberm29ts 1994. The motvon was seconded by Mr. Revels. The voice voce was unanimous. Longwood Executvve Building Site P1 an, 665 W. warren Avenue reduction; they a asking for 4 4 parking spaces per 1 Osf when t City C calls for £ive parkiny spaces per 1,000 sf; (2) Elimination of o landscape islands along W and E uth parking a (3) Elimination o£ 30 shrubs per 100 lineal £eet along East rpzope rty l.i ne; (i) Staff recomentltls that the parking reduction is okay at this point, (2) taf£ doesn't believe that this i the s already heavily wooded artd the islandsrvwo uldn'btc make mucbv of ra (3) 0 ing landscape r, ergs along the G n portion of the grope rtyt owhichtis proposed t ral, theseight foot wall and ooden fence wi.11 buffer suffice enely afrom the adjacent zesitlential properties. ntley confirmed that he had reatl the staff's co questions concernr n9 them. ana Planning Agency Sanuary a, 1955 Page 4 Meltzer t red t e the a entling r silents that the City would look into their concerns about the drainage p[oblem. Bul lingto ted the drainage ditch and the problems ing for theca silents and thought that the staff should look ~nto rget ing the ditch cleaned out. Mr. Drock said that he would get it taken care o{, made by M Bullington t end approval of the s plant subject to staff comments of De ember 2 , 1994. The motion was ext m ing o the 25th. Mi. Block n tified the 8oaid of the agenda that a enplanned (Thomas Valiance, Miller School Supply-SP, Hunt Industial-SP 611 Building-BP and Land Use Amendment). Adjourn: made by M Bullington t adjourn the ing. The m was seconded by Mr. Revels. The meeting was adjourned at 8.3opmn Respectfully Submitted, 2errr Mar ecretary