LPAMin07-22-92xne meeting was eallea co oraar at z:oz P.M. by enairman
Mel iz er.
Approval of made by M mory
onded by M Simpaone t approve therm o£ June , 992
meet.i ng. Motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Chairman Meltzer read tRe South Semi¢ole (Medical Office
wilding) application information and requested staff's input o
Sthis project. advised that this i a 25,000 SF proposed
and advisedM th [most oL' the comments have been satisfied by
the Engineer.
CRairman Meltzer asked if them n problem would be tia£f is related
and M aid yes. xhe proposed s will generated 600-700
ripsr per~aday which will eate ritical problem. when
questioned by Mr. Emory a ochow this problem could be addressed
. Jami s ted with a left t rage lane o ¢ Avenue and
a tra££iC signal at SA 939 (presently sub-standard)rat Wilma.
Chai rmav Meltzer asked if the major point of c rol w
and M Jami ted yes. When Chairman Meltzer asked rfor
taf fes r entlation aM advised that i oultl be to have
the left t rage lane o mory asked i£
the S e had any input o this proposetlV600e"!0 o[ntrips and M Jami
advisedt that the State w talkivg about closing the median o
and Milwee s that there coultl be no northbound traffic onto
Milwee at that point.
the audience, M We11 s, Planning E iequestetl that
a~k HardgrOVe be i rOduc ed s e he i the o who had analyzed
the M raf ti.c study for the City. Mrs Hardgrove s zed his
reportSby saying that there a o points of impact tnat~the M
should be accountable £or, stating that SA 434 rs beyond LOS E aOnd
this will c the s e pretlominant.
sed that people gordt e cis ecapacity, this
, because oEri Talignment from C
fable e through, allowing sb ospital~
4advised that the F stbound left. t rage lane ti cal,
ith right t n decel Pane also b ings r ended butt n
crrtrcal. Another recommendation is a signa~ wa[[ant study at sR
all of the traffic t milwee which already Ras a left
rage lane a sr le el of per ehe applicants planning
tudy st suggested t applicant pay for this stutly
which could cost betw¢en $3, 0000t to $5,000.
. Grimm, CEO of South Seminole Community Hospital w roduc ed
and advisetl tRat the applicant has no problem with any oftstaff's
entlations antl h advise t ity is tlone in-house
foropurpose o checking dtRe buildings and therparking lot, aid
e felt thatf a top light at Sft 434 and Milwee would be very
helpful a thai rs parking lot r oily being used a
through by everyone. advised that 1 of the proposed
building would ba takeg up by P antlP the r t by the
hospital r self. There would be a of tl0 employees and
possibly as few a aid chat the traffic generated woultl be
spread o f from ] and would n t be a
given t s would occur w th shift Pemployees, which would lessen
the impact.a
Chairman Meltzer asketl if M oultl a cept the ]/18/92 letter
of the c sultant (Mr. Naidgrove)m w wells, Planning D
tepped forward and introduced himself, stating that he rand tM
Jami had dealt with M Hardgro reference to the traffic study
and that the City is less i ted i t pl antl #2 of M
Hardgrove's letter if the applicant agreeso with Comments #3 5 4
impson made the m that this project be approved subject
taff c ardgrove•s 1 deleting c s #1
ands#2 as long as the applicant pays for ithe traffic lightestudy.
onded by M ammock. Motron passetl by 3 - 1 vote,
with Mr. emory voting "no .
Chairman Meltzer i roduc ed the Proposed C ncy M nagement
Regulations a ells took the floor t explain the C ncy
nagement program, wadvising that i requirement Band
that t System i m that m t the Plan work.
tablishes the L s Eor publicns and facilities that a
be a omplished. CThese L S qo £ - and a sed for traffic
sanitary sewer, potable wat drainage, parkseana recreacron and
tablished i the Comp Plan, Concsrrency Management iequi [es that
rt be mar ntarned.
ells b ief ly discussed the C ncy Plan, n ing t
Meltzer and impson had bee ncu embers of thet ncy
nagement Systems ard, going through the defi ni[ionsrrethe
regulations that a ing proposed for adoption, projects n
subject to Concurrencyb Management and those that will be. With
that each project cakes Fxom the inr txal review to project end
questions r sed a o how the figures w -e tletermi netl M Wells
ai.d that the fees could be re-vrsxted, sin response to Chairman
Meltzer•s quest ron.
Wells s ted that the request i endat ion t take the
first s the C ncy Plan a end i the City
Commxaaxon1 £or adoption as an ordinance and the last ttwo pages be
mory then made the m ted by M wells antl the
otion was seconded by Mr. Simpson.s Motr on passed by unanimous
with no further discussion the meeting was adjourned at 8:42 P.M.
Respectf ally submitted,
athy P
Administrative Secretary