LPAMin08-14-91~wiSt~.
1. Meeting called to ordor at 7:00 P.H. by Chairman
2. APPROVAL OF MINOTES. Motion by Mr. Simp
Emory t approve m o£ Jvly 2 1991 m
Valutof Min Mr. Dailey se
motion. Motron carried unanvnouslyto
3. PUBLIC HEARING. ONING REQDEST FOA LOTS 135 &
AVENGE. APPLICANT: LYNN MILLER. OWNFR: FAED HOLT
made by Mr. S ended by Nr. Dailey
public heazing. Motion cavu'iedsunanamously.
oof of advertising w not a ailable. xr. Meltzer r ted
that the proof of advertising be available at the next meetvng.
Jamr xpl ained what the applicant's ra ted of.
Mr. Eaorye asked what ovld happen t the~dirt nroads.if Ue
perty s developed.w Ms. Miller stated that she has n plans
Eor the two lots 1135 & 13>) t the ocher Uan
arking Miller further stated thatt theebuilding ton
lots 131 &s1331 vovld be used at limited times of the day which
would create only limited use of the road.
. Sim asked i£ applicant would have t e back to the LPA
for oplan r if a arkin lot would be placed at this
locations Mr. J ted tM1at asglong a perty is being used
for the rthou a igo day lap o be
used Eor scoemmercial use and further statedrtthatyif thenpropertv
will have to come back to tha LPA for review
81491MIN/LPA
Mr. Simpson asked if r ted would applicant have io
e back to the LPA Eornx v forn a there
ial s that could be p tedsoandythe traffic o
they udirt oad,us arking and drainage roblems should be
sidered. Mr. Jami xplained that a - onEoxming u
ged and the City does try t pertyeo
bring athe business, etc. up to codes, nhoweyer,pr~f the p perty
does n change i e £or more than 180 days it would not have
to be rev>ewed bytiheeLPA.
Mr. Scot[ Lincoln s ted that he owned the p behind these
lots and asked if the road v ved would ~t have to eet an
andazds due t r problems. paMr. Jami epl led that it would
naye to meet atana~as.
Motion made by Mr. Em onded by Mr. Hammock to close public
heazing. Motron carried unanvmonsly.
Motion made by onded by Mr. Dailey. t onmend
sfor change from R-3 t C-3reCMOtion
received fouroyotes rnvfayor with Mx. Simpson voting no.
DISCUSSION ON CONCURAENCY MANAGII~N'.f SYSTRM POLICY ISSUES
PAPER.
Meltzer asked Eor xplanation of c
issues P Mr. Jami xplained what i onla ceMaiaou:sea
and soloed i order to vnplement iheenconcnrrency M
Systeme tated that he based his i
Seminole Covnty~intormation. Mr. Emory estioned hover
ogle xmal ly this ommittee based other
municipalities~o Mr. Jami replied probably about ]-10 people.
Jami xplained that this he
Mondensed 95-0. Mr. Fin askedeQE rwhen the Comprehensive Plan
azed w cY kept i ind. Mr. Jami replied that
okept ind and further xplained that
Concuxz'ency Management 1 eelement of the
Comprehensive Plan which i andatedpand due in April 1992.
Mr. Meltzer s ted that heswouldm like t
that a ailable, etc. when re cThexetw
furtherediscus Sion and drainagen~ be
solved through concurrency Mr~ Jami went over thesoutline for
Mr. Emory s ted
to be formeda
made by Mr. Sim onded by Nr. Fmory t nmrend
esfor ConcurrencypNanagement c svstrng of n>ne members.
Motiontcarried wanvnovs roll call vote.n
5. ADDITIONAL DISC[ISSIDN. Mt. Meltzer asked £or status on Land
Development Regulations. Mr. Jami s ted that Che P1aMing
Department orking c-1 vng district and it would be
available tovthe LPA members soon.
Respectfvlly submitted,
Linda Reough, Administrative Secretary