LPAMin09-09-92MARVIN MELTZER, CHAIRMAN AJMAL J SST. CITY PLANN EF
. CHAIRMAN CATHY RICE, AADMIN. SECRETARY
YSEMORYN~
ALAN HAMMOCK
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Chairman
Meltzer.
2. e Chairman Eimpsov made the m approve the m
of the rAUgust 12, 1 eeting and this m ron was seconded btmr.
Emory. A unanimous vorce vote was given.
3. AMENDMENT ORDINANCE TO SECTION 404.2A and 404.28
Chairman Meltzer asked Mr. Jams to brief the Boartl on this request
that it takes for smaller s e plans to qo through L and City
Commission. advisedt that the i of the c code
allow these building projects whichea w being proposed
but s mehow the verbiage w changed. M advised that, with
the amendment, if the City Administrator i omfortable with
the proposal o i£ these i sal project o any other
problem with these pro jectss (undertl sF') they would then have
e before the City Commission. M aid that there w
quest~ovs r sed by people as to whethe rJthe staff could deny the
plan a long the applicant the code
requirements and the a tM1at i ould n robe denied.
Meltzer que stioned nagai that as long a tthe s e plan m t the
requirements it had to be OK'd and Mr. J aid eyes".
niSami red that presently the applicant needsat and
qo throughtapreliminary site plan and address the c rwhich
have been submitted by the v sign and members s
that by the t the projec acheseL andvCittCOmmi ssion m
o£ the c s have been addressed. M aid the slow approval
method w ing s of the smallerJdeveloper e financial
problems ai cthat payments c ued while the project r ned i
pre-approval, approval and development s wally sixrm nths
( a nth and a hal£ t three m nths in-house) t a year. Whereas
ithm the proposed amendment approval t e for these smaller srte
plans could be reduced to as little as rf if teen tlays.
Chairman Meltzer asked if the proposed a endment addressed the
possibility of the developer c ing mthe DFB, L and CC by
developing in 9,500 Se i and M aid that it didn't
but that they would still pay at $F,oo0 appli arson fee each time.
9/09/92
this point M ory s tetl that he would like s input
the requested a endment and made a tabl envoi
Simpson also requested that atlditional information be provided and
seconded the motion. motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mr. Simpson asked the origin of the i sP threshold and why
this specific umber. ock asked how many 19,000 sF
projects had been built i Mthe City, how many below and above this
the last few yea aid that t clarify he
believed that the 1 000 SF figure w entletl for the building
Chairman Meltzer also saitl thatr he would like t
n per s of lot so that a developer wouldo note be
allowedtto keep adding on.
Chairman Meltzer ragas tad that M i provide <ompar s from
other gov tai organizations (seminole nty, Lake Mary,
Casselberry e c.) if they have a ordinanceosuch a s being
requested s that the L A has s ethi ng t ompare thisi request
ith, prior t the n ing a which this amendment would be on
the agenda for revrew tby eLPA again.
EUSINE55 CENTER SITE a ENSIGN Applicant:
asque~n vDelopment, Inc. Owner: Tasque development, Inc.
Engineers arbco Engineering / Architecture, I
Highline D cal 2 ing: I-2 ingau
roposedaU Offices2/nW rehouse Property s
3 Acres rehouse Area: 43,625 SF a Request: Extend Site~Plan
Permit for Another Year
Chairman Meltzer requested that M i give the Board s input
this request and M Jami tedJthat due to the economy they
had not been able to develop it.
ory asked if this w the first extension and M Jami said
thatEi the s and e , having originally been approved
n 199o wand firstc e nslon lgrantetl r Chairman Meltzer
inquired whether there w a limit on extensions and Mi. Jami
advised that there is not as
mory made to approve year
requested and Mr. simpso~nseconded this motion. Roll callnvote was
5. The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Cathy err , Admrnrstratrve Secretary