Loading...
LPAMin09-09-92MARVIN MELTZER, CHAIRMAN AJMAL J SST. CITY PLANN EF . CHAIRMAN CATHY RICE, AADMIN. SECRETARY YSEMORYN~ ALAN HAMMOCK The meeting was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Chairman Meltzer. 2. e Chairman Eimpsov made the m approve the m of the rAUgust 12, 1 eeting and this m ron was seconded btmr. Emory. A unanimous vorce vote was given. 3. AMENDMENT ORDINANCE TO SECTION 404.2A and 404.28 Chairman Meltzer asked Mr. Jams to brief the Boartl on this request that it takes for smaller s e plans to qo through L and City Commission. advisedt that the i of the c code allow these building projects whichea w being proposed but s mehow the verbiage w changed. M advised that, with the amendment, if the City Administrator i omfortable with the proposal o i£ these i sal project o any other problem with these pro jectss (undertl sF') they would then have e before the City Commission. M aid that there w quest~ovs r sed by people as to whethe rJthe staff could deny the plan a long the applicant the code requirements and the a tM1at i ould n robe denied. Meltzer que stioned nagai that as long a tthe s e plan m t the requirements it had to be OK'd and Mr. J aid eyes". niSami red that presently the applicant needsat and qo throughtapreliminary site plan and address the c rwhich have been submitted by the v sign and members s that by the t the projec acheseL andvCittCOmmi ssion m o£ the c s have been addressed. M aid the slow approval method w ing s of the smallerJdeveloper e financial problems ai cthat payments c ued while the project r ned i pre-approval, approval and development s wally sixrm nths ( a nth and a hal£ t three m nths in-house) t a year. Whereas ithm the proposed amendment approval t e for these smaller srte plans could be reduced to as little as rf if teen tlays. Chairman Meltzer asked if the proposed a endment addressed the possibility of the developer c ing mthe DFB, L and CC by developing in 9,500 Se i and M aid that it didn't but that they would still pay at $F,oo0 appli arson fee each time. 9/09/92 this point M ory s tetl that he would like s input the requested a endment and made a tabl envoi Simpson also requested that atlditional information be provided and seconded the motion. motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Mr. Simpson asked the origin of the i sP threshold and why this specific umber. ock asked how many 19,000 sF projects had been built i Mthe City, how many below and above this the last few yea aid that t clarify he believed that the 1 000 SF figure w entletl for the building Chairman Meltzer also saitl thatr he would like t n per s of lot so that a developer wouldo note be allowedtto keep adding on. Chairman Meltzer ragas tad that M i provide <ompar s from other gov tai organizations (seminole nty, Lake Mary, Casselberry e c.) if they have a ordinanceosuch a s being requested s that the L A has s ethi ng t ompare thisi request ith, prior t the n ing a which this amendment would be on the agenda for revrew tby eLPA again. EUSINE55 CENTER SITE a ENSIGN Applicant: asque~n vDelopment, Inc. Owner: Tasque development, Inc. Engineers arbco Engineering / Architecture, I Highline D cal 2 ing: I-2 ingau roposedaU Offices2/nW rehouse Property s 3 Acres rehouse Area: 43,625 SF a Request: Extend Site~Plan Permit for Another Year Chairman Meltzer requested that M i give the Board s input this request and M Jami tedJthat due to the economy they had not been able to develop it. ory asked if this w the first extension and M Jami said thatEi the s and e , having originally been approved n 199o wand firstc e nslon lgrantetl r Chairman Meltzer inquired whether there w a limit on extensions and Mi. Jami advised that there is not as mory made to approve year requested and Mr. simpso~nseconded this motion. Roll callnvote was 5. The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Cathy err , Admrnrstratrve Secretary