LPAMin01-22-92PRESENT: GUESTS:
MARVIN FSLTZER. CHAIRMAN DAVID HENNON. STARLIGHT
WILLIAM DAILEY BAPTIST CHURCH
.IOHN SIMPSON JOHN REYNOLDS, ENG. DES.
MAATI KING, ST. GAURENT
STAFF:
MICHAEL FORD, ORLANDO
AJMAL JAMS, ASST. CITY PLANNER SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER
WILLIAM CULBERTSON, BLDG. OFFICIAL
LINDA ICF.OUGH, ADM. SECRETARY
ABSENT:
DENNY EMORY (excused)
ALAN HAMMOCX (excused)
The meeting as called to order at ]:OS p m. by Chai
val of made by Mr. Sim
ondedrby Mr. Daileyut rthe m of Tanuary e, 1992
meeting. Motion carried unanvnous roll callevota.
STARLZGHT BAPTIST CHURCH.
1J/92 WINN DIXIE PLAZA INW C of US SJ/92 and SR4341.
PROPERTY OWNER - NEW WEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN. 20NING C-3.
Mr. Jami tad that the ppl icant rate
church Sundaysafor four hoursques~ng Jami further
xplainadethat the applicant w already i this location and vas
unaware of the need for a conditional use.
Mr. Stazlight Baptist Church, stated that he had no
problemnwith the staff eonvnents.
Melize ked if the raffic rtable for this of
r Mr. Sam epl ied tfiat ould s robl emyberng
that th ytenant rs only in the boil dingcfor four hours.
Simpson asked about 119 of Mr. Nagle's c letter dated
December 3 1991 ing t making the building handicap
siDle ande ifai should be made a ailable by a
date~n stated it should be within 60 days upon pp Val
of the conditional use.
LPA MINDTES
JnNNARV 2z, 199z
PAGE 2
Motion was made by Mr. Dailey seconded by Mr. Simpson subiect to
sibility stated R9 being days from
onditional use app val.rn Motiont carried unanunous roll call
SITE PLAN. LOT 4 ORIDA CENTRAL C ICANT:
MARTI RING. GEORGE ST. LAU[iF3TT. 20NING I-2.APPGENIIEAL
INDUSTRIAL LAND USE.
Mr. Jami ted that he had roblem with the srt plan and
recomanendedaapproval with staff co~maenis.
Mr. Reynolds s ted that they have c a long w and asked if
the City feels i will need t othe c Mr. Jami
ted the City c shovldebe mple{ed byca mately
May. Mr. Jami furthers ted that ovl dpbeobased o
the approved CMS and he tdoes not knownatrthisytime if it will be
tested or not.
ynolds ted that t Sb of taff
letter dated January 16, 1992Seshenwovld likeet nclvdes the
s that ar the R of therlandscaping
Mr. Reynolds sta~ed thatanthis would meet the
requs.rements
ted that tr rots are based o all lot
Mr. Jami furthers tedethat i siblenfor the applicantnt
pply fox landscape v ands that the t the
lot but i the ROW andaheasuggests using the exsstr E reel to be
included in landscape.
Mr. Sim asked i£ the pplicant pvllod the t and
relocated them will ha have to still add more fors thet tree
Mr. R ynolds s tad i ould be an even swap and right now the
commerce pazk marntarns the trees.
LPA Conmittee s ted p rty o redit for tr e points
n the ROW a along as he p rthem.o If o sells the
property thissshould be inclvdedtinnthe covenants agreement.
There w s discussion o whether the word "shall" should
be sed i the t R1 of Mr letter dated
January 16~ 1992 referring to being subiectcto concurxency est.
it was decided to leave the word ' y rn.
Motion made by Mr. Sim onded by ailey t
endaa val of the site plan .subiect t taff
Letter dated January 16, 1992 and 91 tree points w/ROWetrees.
Motion carried unanvneus roll call vote.
5. VARIANCE. LICANT: LORERTA PEPREPPI. OWNER: PDI
ORLANDO ZI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. LOCATION: W. SR 434 SUITE
REQUEST TO REDUCE REOUZREMENT FO WNING36I GN TO ) 1/2 FEED
AEOVE GROUNO. ZONING C-3. LAND USE R GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
Mr. Jami rated that the v wed by Mr. Culbertson
the Building Official s rthee estris due oxk
order. Mr. Culbertson stated that hwius letter is due t rmit
being pulled and he had talked to the business o andninfoxmed
her to apply for order place the c sign.
Mr. cord stated thatVhe rhadeno problem w~th the comments.
impson stioned azagxaph !4 rating building code
of a height of sidewalk. Mr.
Sun ealso, askedvf there ar other a n the az a that
do poor meet code. Mr. Culbertson furthernsta{ed that it is the
only o this Culbertson red that this w
gpthat w s beingaplaced and that is why he became awaresthaf
itndid not meat code.
Meltzer asked if the code enforcement s following
evlbertson red that the City is trying to keep u
asked if the applicant had looked t
whatlg ovld c n to code and the pplicant said
there would not obe enoughmeroom t place the srg according to
code.
Mr. Culbertson a eed that for that location ould t be
itable t t the 9 code. Mr. Culbertson further stated that
ord needs o let his client know that there az other
ceded o be able to pull permit as stated in his
letteredated January 17, 1992.
Motion w made by Mr. Simpson s onaed by Mr. Dailey r ended
val of the v esteCSUbiect t taff c t Setter
dated January 1), 1992Ce Motron carried unansmous roll call vote.
6. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION.
Jam.i the list of the rehensive plan
endments submitted by Planning Department and tTe map shoving
these changes.
Meeting adiourned at 8:03 p.m.
Nespectfully submitted,
Linaa xeongh, naminietraci~a seerecazy