LPAMin06-24-921. The meeting was called to order at 7.03 by Chairman i~fel tzer.
Approval of M alley m ved that the m of the
May 27, 1992 meet.i.ngtbe~approvped and this was done by tunanrmous
by i.ongwood F Hab Bender, property o
Euqene Okun,n busine sseo e present t speak on behalfaof
this request. explained chat this request w required
due t e fact that aifi[ness c ither a permitted n
ondit iinal used for I- loge nteThes business w riginally
gra red s orbs t ope eaten and a additional s ontbs c n be
granted, thus this request a this t Okun sx red thatathey
hope to zemain at there present address and they arc also hoping
before [his final s nth period passes. ing of the Special
rides thexc ing and allowsa [Ris a ory
ques[ionedr whether therz ing no e property would h o be
changed and M explained that the property could b
to C-3 and then they would apply for a conditional use ocdthezCity
allow the facili ey as a conditional use. These would be reviewed
omprehensi ve Plan policies, i t be compatible with the
omp Plan guitlel.i nes. Meltzeri questionetl whether there had
been any problems wish t s business i the s orbs tl ing which
i[ had been operating and Mr. Sami stated that staff coim~ents
mory m this special Y
granted for ads additio nal ns orbs, b setl o toff c and
impson seconded thts motion. Moti n passed by unanimous ro 11
calls vote.
Page T
ing
6/24/92t
Meltzer addressed the Longwood M Replat and
explain this request em tetl that i
ju replat light atopssegns
impsonm requested tnat beach nge ba m oche parcel s ch
states 1,669 Acres to relict t. the correct sate of 1.669 Acres.
ith mat ory made the
reliminary fteplat o£ Longwood M sal Gardens be a ceptetl and M
ocy s onded t subject to staff comments. Mo iron
passed by unanrmous rollrcall vote.
Meltzer addressed the v Request by Marie S and
ofa II Church A This crequest w made dueh t
encroachment caused by van unpe rmitted sc reenetl sporch. Mr. Jamr
utnerland had partially e ted the parch before being i ued
top work o by t icy f inq work wi[nout a permit.
utherland applietl for then permitn but proceeded to have work
done Sbefore the permit aid that he
red t achme nt ai the cprocess of r ing the permie
application ande referretl it back t the City BuiltliWg Of f.ic i.al who
advised M uthe zl and t days after s e hatl made application.
utherland s tetl that en she w atlvised o this problem
she told the buildersn ork a sne had n t gotten
the permit but they s tetlt anyway[" urprise" her and because of
the hailstorm [hey w a Hurry t unload the t uck and get the
job done. She s tetl tnat she felt that the request should be
qra ted because i the back a She also
ook a poll of the neighborhood a solicitetlcsignatures of people
who had no objection to this encr acnment.
ory questioned wnether all R-2 houses have porches a ached
atnd M explained chat t option as Song a the
requirementsra e further explained that M Sutherland
uilt the tluplex, n vi ng t the 20' front setbacks which left
he[ only 15' i the back. me Emory asketl who imposed the ha rtlship
and M Jams aid that i imposed by the applicants themselves,
utherland and Sutherland C whose n
e permit w s pulled. utherland ss tetl of Hat dthe lots w
cry small antl M mory saitl that he felt that M erland w
of what w volved when she made plans to build a Chat
shern atl, in fat talc ted this hardship for h self. Ghe said that
she had no knowledgeeot all of the details but rjust w o build
n her lot which had s t foi years. Meltzer ed ted
that the hardship w ted by the applicant s sne [should
have inclutled t tl porch i riginal plancfor t o house
ither snaking tleehouse s ewhat esmaller t mmodate the
parch o applyi ny for the varr ante prior to canstruct.ion of the
noose.
Page
ing
v/CayeZt
chairman ftelezer inquired a anyone
present to speak for or a9ains[sth~ wr equese Mre. Sut hertantl
(SUtherlantl Constructr on) antl he had pul.tad the permit Eor her but
whan asked what of the porch
Suthe eland advised sthat the slab tis po [ed, the loot is on rantlMall
ail ey made the m that this request be granted and Mr.
impsDOn s ondea the m Dailey s tetl that s
the neighbors did n and s she w able to develop hei
property he had no problem with then requests fir. Meltzer stated
(Sutherland Constructron's) permits".
Motron passed 3-2 with chairman Meltzer ana Mr. Emory voting "no .
Maeciny was aaioeraea at ~r:36 e.f~.
Respectfully submitted,
atRy e
Administrative Secretary