Loading...
LPAMin01-09-911. The meeting was called to order at ].00 P.M. by Chairman Emory. APPROVAL OF MI N[TTES. Motion w made by Mr. Meltzer seconded by Mr. Simpson to approve minutes of December 19, 1990 letter to the LPA asked iL the applicant had rob lem with the 5' landscape.n Mr. Eaton eplied that he hadnn roblem. Mr. Nagle <ed that the Sandscape ordinance r P15' buf Eer but the pplicant redesigned the parking Sider ex42] widening and they had inoluded a small lands capeobuffar. asked Mr agle i£ the erty Ould do eth ingso ith the wa11N Mr. Nagle replPed thatna driveway could be c sidered iF a wall is pvt vp. ahe pplicant stated that this would be feasible. Motion made by Mr. Simpson onded by Mr. Meltzer to endaa val of the subs ect to staff comment letterodated DecembervZ'ia1990PeaMOtion carried unanimous tated that he not clear about the t o landscape isiana ~ referreaeto in staff rOmment wl] in letter dated De. cembermd~ts1990. After discussion eed by LPA, toff and applicant that arking ould abe deleted to ss eve one tree and one landscape isl andcwovld be regvrred. Motion made by Meltzer onded by Mr. Dailey t enders val of Mr plan svbiect t staff c ents letter datedpDe cembex ZBite1990. Motion carried unanimous roll call vote. Yuacxe - renensi~e Plan Amendment est t onange lane ~eReesignaeio~ from maainm aenaity r siaential t office c ial land Applicant: Gary Hunte Location E. 1/2 oLOt c10, art uof Lots 11 & 12, Fairy Lake Manor Subdivision. (900 E. Wil dmere Avenue) Chairman Emory opened the public hearing. Mr. Hunts ted that he i es tins C-2/office ial ng/landa after beingnodenied his t for c~0/general ial z ng/land u Hunt furthers ted that he did ~efeel thatrr ing the p ould n vely i the abutting p tedwthat hegdoes tmfeel the eed to s roffsc ialnt ang and that he doeson agree ith Mr. Nagle's letterewhi ch included traffic c oMr. H ted that the last City Commission the City C.ommiss.ion ested lesser uchea -2/office ial andug ted that the n arbynABC Liquor Store does n make the table for r sidential ted that thereais glittering and loitering on nearby vacant property. Mrs. Piloian stated that she has lived on Wildmere Avenue for 24 and they have been e ached n by c ial and there i a dangerous c n Wilamerevwhi ch wool debe affected by e traffic. Piloian s tad that she i ned about the lake and dralinage. Mr. Piloian also stated thatnuif property ned o ial 4 or 5 years down the road something less desirable aouldo coma in. Mr. Yil Dian read the p xmitted u far C-2 and s ted that the sidential ewhen pvrchasednrand he would like to see s.t. stay residential. Mr. William tsh ted that he sed o live the end m vad downathe street dueuto the oommercialtbusiness com>ng an the area. . Hunt s ted that the u should n t be predicated by the p andtgthat there and the update of the zon g ordinance might keep the perm>tted uses limited. Mr. Meltzer aaxea wnat nr aiaerea m - nr. Hunt replied that the u ovl dnbe subiectrto economy, etc, and that they did not have asplan right now. Mr. Meltzer made m onded by Mr. ailay t close the public hearing. Motionncarried unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle s fed that he would like the packets and the Evtuie land u e list to be p of the r ord and that the applicant did changes his est from the San ied C-3 Nagle further fed that Wilamere qudesignated s idential is the Comprehensive Plan to p sthe of theet sidential a and he does n lathe a being changed ything but r sidential although there r ial on both sends of the s eat. Mr. Nagle further s fed that this application i with the Comprehensive tPl an and the p antial i si£xoto ial u of the arty i gatSve.ot This p colt nstdered during the Compxehens ive Plan changes and i swdecided o be Lett alone. Mr. Nagle stated that the City can only restrict the use of the property by zon g ordinance. The applicant submitted a the City i which the p andatbeagtormeriCity Attornets t©d they r ould n supportnbecause i y be c ued a ingaand endationtby C s for o vest to come back for re-review by LPAtandCtheiCitynCOmmission. Mr. Nagle st fed that the AHC Liquor s a problem Eor this property and suggested fencing, wall, etc. ogle s fed that traffic c n 1]/92 could the need foralight on Wilamere Avenue abut 1t needs warrant study and 'approval by FDOT. Mr. Nagle further fed that the site i and heavily eed and he Eee1s that multi family u noble of the p arty and lake. Mr. Nagle s tad ithatrheshad talkede Mr. xvnt and had informed him of th isa nr. Nagle stated that he stands by his aanuary 9, 1991 memo. Mr. Emory passed the gavel to Mr. Meltzer. made by M ondad by Mr. Dailey t denial oEJ the regves t. notion carried unanimous roll ~allcvota. AEZONSNG - Request t mange property z g from R-3 Multi amily R sidential to C-2 Office C ial oZ ppl icant Gary Hunt. Location: E 1/2 Lot 10, part of Lotsgll &A12, Fair Lake Manor Subdivision. Motion made by Mr. Simpson onded by pail ey t endadenial of the zon g requesteC Motion carried unanimov rollmcall vote. . Meltzer s ted that he would s est finding o what im ouldahave o the schoolsuggMr. Nagle agreed and saidahe wovia~oentant ina senopla. Meeting adi ourned at B:p"f P.M.