LPAMin05-23-89E% -T B
-- —__
� �rvorrn crt,=; o orf �e
r I
-� upaeveiopea Tract
Set ,15f tle For tow Oensi ty �� e
\ Resi tlenti ai Oevel opmenY �� �
LIKE
II
i OUT I
1 I S
,
z
77
L-e ...... .. . ..
% .' R. nd U
�i ZRO MtMlll eA,, e ,1Pel IrL,.l F"
d—
wavor Darla enter
R pril 13, 1988
Page 2
Also, there is about the difficulty of extending public streets
Is
the large u...le l opedCeI roc t in the City of Casselberry located between Lake
Griffin and Trout Lake. At present, where North Griffin Drive dead ends o
the east side of the proposed annexation site, there is a n unimproved 25 foot
wide right-of-way Well extends to the large a ntlere lopedtract. This is the
only public right-of-way which leads to the large uncle vet op etl tract and it i
not wide e ough to meet public street standards (i. e., s 50 foot ri Sht-of-way
width). It¢ i ,ague s led that the o of the propo s xd a site provide
the mall additional sY retch of rivyh C sof-way eeded isfy npu bl is -eel
tandelds. This would help make it possible her low dens itts residential development
to occur el this large undeveloped tract.
Further, there i nc about the impacts from development of the proposed
xstion site on TroutLake, the e isting residential development along the
uth side o the lake, and - sidentisl developmentn
expected ¢ the east
sirle le, de of the It i requested ,that development of the proposed a xation
r
,its be teen
i s manner whi cM1 will preserve the environmental and aesthetic
values oftrout Lake.
Finally, there i about the a - of property whic'n is located
within what the Ci tys of nC as s1111-y has forx ail long time c nsidered to be its
planning The proposed a has a no boundary with the
City of Casselberry w ich ss longef than�its c n cbo u�dary w - any o.M1er
City. the City of Casselberry has w and s r dines n r the
I ire III, a led earlier, a ich c acts to eNthe
site. ez It 1
hoped that athe meCity of Longwood s t the City of oCasselberry c
future understanding regarding the .limits of annexations wherea.Durum bed,deries
ar_ near each other.
Please c .side. these c melts i a positive light. They a not intended
to harm a good relationship mbet'els, Ill two cities, but rather t rang then
the relationship through a understanding uof the needs and objectives o eigh'e -
inq City and to a<hi even a mutual goal and growth m nagemen to sn Perhaps
our steff's can get together to tli scu ss these ma tt errs further.
(ssii.... el\y,,
0 �ppard,
Mayor
�iin u£ (4asselherrq
April 13, 1988 is psi es. ss s�
Mayor David Gunter
"1 Warren Avenue
Longwood, F7 on tla 32150
RE: Hardy Annexation
Dear Mayor Gunter:
1t iser my understanding that the City of Longwood
ongd has rPived a petition
from Mr, and Mrs. Henry Hardy, Jr. raquesting that the shaded a o of
the a tached naps (Exhibit A) be a axed into the City and tM1Pao
at Itbezof
the
1-2 (General Indust "al)
iai). As you may be a the property to the
east end south of the proposennd a exation site s within the City limits of
Casselberry and classfffed LowDensity (Residential) by the ComoreM1ensiv=
plan. The predominant Sell ng category assigned t ea by portions of Cassalberry
s R-lA IS
Dwelling). However, a portion of the adjacent property
to Cassalberry is zoned R-2 (one- and Two -Fatuity oweIIIng ).
Although the land u sclassifications for e proposed —ion site
may not be tle termf'do at the time o xation, the City of Cassalberry would
like t express its c about in. potential oen r geral industrial development
lain, located on the oslte. It appears that the i-2 (General Industrial) z ni ng
category allows a wide range of industrial a many of which mf ght adversely
impact e i$tiog and future low density reside It Pdevelopment in the City of Cassel -
berry. xRather than ing general industrial classification for the site,
woultl s m preferable to u a low density or pes si"y a medium I ..its residen-
tial Classification - t least for the portions closest to Cassalberry. Those
parts of the site closest to County Road 42 might have a esi den ti al 11—ifi-
cation less intensive i nature then the 1-2 category. nResidential development,
of course, should be sul ably buffered fro. any non-residential land uses.
In addition, the City of Cassel berry i rued about a ns iderations.
As indi Sao,
L . the attached maps North s Griffin Drive des,i ends o on the e
side of the site proposed £ xation. The City of C.... lberry i rued
about the passibility raffic from si den [i al tlev el opme nt s transi ti nq
North Griffin Drive and If r aidential n�treets this part of the City If
Ca ssel be rry a r.. to to U.S. Highway 37-92. This r will become .... tempting
for - si risen ti al drivers when these streets op av ed during the or t year.
The Cityr of Casselberry believes such a of the seP routes woultl adversely impact
the n,ighblrhlld and requests that vehicular a s to any n esi tlen Ci al develop-
n the proposed a r than s emergency voehicles, be prohibited
from using North Griffin norive oor sa�ny extension of North Griffin Drive.