Loading...
LPAMin05-23-89E% -T B -- —__ � �rvorrn crt,=; o orf �e r I -� upaeveiopea Tract Set ,15f tle For tow Oensi ty �� e \ Resi tlenti ai Oevel opmenY �� � LIKE II i OUT I 1 I S , z 77 L-e ...... .. . .. % .' R. nd U �i ZRO MtMlll eA,, e ,1Pel IrL,.l F" d— wavor Darla enter R pril 13, 1988 Page 2 Also, there is about the difficulty of extending public streets Is the large u...le l opedCeI roc t in the City of Casselberry located between Lake Griffin and Trout Lake. At present, where North Griffin Drive dead ends o the east side of the proposed annexation site, there is a n unimproved 25 foot wide right-of-way Well extends to the large a ntlere lopedtract. This is the only public right-of-way which leads to the large uncle vet op etl tract and it i not wide e ough to meet public street standards (i. e., s 50 foot ri Sht-of-way width). It¢ i ,ague s led that the o of the propo s xd a site provide the mall additional sY retch of rivyh C sof-way eeded isfy npu bl is -eel tandelds. This would help make it possible her low dens itts residential development to occur el this large undeveloped tract. Further, there i nc about the impacts from development of the proposed xstion site on TroutLake, the e isting residential development along the uth side o the lake, and - sidentisl developmentn expected ¢ the east sirle le, de of the It i requested ,that development of the proposed a xation r ,its be teen i s manner whi cM1 will preserve the environmental and aesthetic values oftrout Lake. Finally, there i about the a - of property whic'n is located within what the Ci tys of nC as s1111-y has forx ail long time c nsidered to be its planning The proposed a has a no boundary with the City of Casselberry w ich ss longef than�its c n cbo u�dary w - any o.M1er City. the City of Casselberry has w and s r dines n r the I ire III, a led earlier, a ich c acts to eNthe site. ez It 1 hoped that athe meCity of Longwood s t the City of oCasselberry c future understanding regarding the .limits of annexations wherea.Durum bed,deries ar_ near each other. Please c .side. these c melts i a positive light. They a not intended to harm a good relationship mbet'els, Ill two cities, but rather t rang then the relationship through a understanding uof the needs and objectives o eigh'e - inq City and to a<hi even a mutual goal and growth m nagemen to sn Perhaps our steff's can get together to tli scu ss these ma tt errs further. (ssii.... el\y,, 0 �ppard, Mayor �iin u£ (4asselherrq April 13, 1988 is psi es. ss s� Mayor David Gunter "1 Warren Avenue Longwood, F7 on tla 32150 RE: Hardy Annexation Dear Mayor Gunter: 1t iser my understanding that the City of Longwood ongd has rPived a petition from Mr, and Mrs. Henry Hardy, Jr. raquesting that the shaded a o of the a tached naps (Exhibit A) be a axed into the City and tM1Pao at Itbezof the 1-2 (General Indust "al) iai). As you may be a the property to the east end south of the proposennd a exation site s within the City limits of Casselberry and classfffed LowDensity (Residential) by the ComoreM1ensiv= plan. The predominant Sell ng category assigned t ea by portions of Cassalberry s R-lA IS Dwelling). However, a portion of the adjacent property to Cassalberry is zoned R-2 (one- and Two -Fatuity oweIIIng ). Although the land u sclassifications for e proposed —ion site may not be tle termf'do at the time o xation, the City of Cassalberry would like t express its c about in. potential oen r geral industrial development lain, located on the oslte. It appears that the i-2 (General Industrial) z ni ng category allows a wide range of industrial a many of which mf ght adversely impact e i$tiog and future low density reside It Pdevelopment in the City of Cassel - berry. xRather than ing general industrial classification for the site, woultl s m preferable to u a low density or pes si"y a medium I ..its residen- tial Classification - t least for the portions closest to Cassalberry. Those parts of the site closest to County Road 42 might have a esi den ti al 11—ifi- cation less intensive i nature then the 1-2 category. nResidential development, of course, should be sul ably buffered fro. any non-residential land uses. In addition, the City of Cassel berry i rued about a ns iderations. As indi Sao, L . the attached maps North s Griffin Drive des,i ends o on the e side of the site proposed £ xation. The City of C.... lberry i rued about the passibility raffic from si den [i al tlev el opme nt s transi ti nq North Griffin Drive and If r aidential n�treets this part of the City If Ca ssel be rry a r.. to to U.S. Highway 37-92. This r will become .... tempting for - si risen ti al drivers when these streets op av ed during the or t year. The Cityr of Casselberry believes such a of the seP routes woultl adversely impact the n,ighblrhlld and requests that vehicular a s to any n esi tlen Ci al develop- n the proposed a r than s emergency voehicles, be prohibited from using North Griffin norive oor sa�ny extension of North Griffin Drive.