LPAMin09-09-87LAND PLANNING AGENCY
LONGWOOD, FLOR IDR
September 9, 198]
Present: Robert Hammond Lha rl es Hassler, F. iiblier,
Ri herd Rull ing ton D. Krzeminski -Grant St.
William Thompsen
Sandra Smith, Planning Assistant Pump Station
Harry Reynolds, i. Roth -
Geri Zamb ri, Deputy City L1 ark Nanak Landscaping
Absent: Berne rtl Linton (excused) ql Land - Pool lYa ter Products
G. Gackenback, L. Cushman,
Herbert Haynie (excused) B. Shoemaker, fri end1y ice
Cream
1. The meeting was celled to order by Mr. Hammond at I:02 P.P1.
2. Approval of Minutes of August 26, 19II]: nlr. Bull inton asked that
the Mlnu tes be cq rected under [rem 6, para9ra ph 2 as follows: "Motion by Mr.
Naimlo nd, secontle0rby Mr. Haynie" antl that paragraph 4 be co rected as follows:
"41r. Hai~ond amentletl his motion and Mr. 1laynie unendeU his second".
Motion by Mr. Bul lington, s condetl by M1lr. Thompson that the minutes of August 26,
19b] be approved with the co rections as stated by t?r. Bul li ng ton. Motion
carded by a unanimous roll call vote.
3. Site Plan Approval - Grant St. Pump Station. Rppl icant: Li ty of Longwood.
Location: Grant SC./A. R. Plates and Bounds: Parcel 2A. Zoning R-1.
P15. Smith stated that the Board of Adjustment had granted e Special Except ton tq
the City on August l0, 79B] to allow the construction oP the pump station. fie
further stated that minor changes had been requested and these changes ha
been made by the City. Mr. Bul ling ton question etl wh eT her any time frame had
been mentioned raga rtli ng the ins taltation of the Fence. Ms. Smith said she did
not believe any specific t e M1ad been mentioned. There was di scuszion regarding
when the fence should be installed.
the Grant St. Pump Station site plan subject to compliance with all staff
menu as stated in Mr. Ti bli er's me o of August 2I, 198] to DRB wi [M1 the
landscape sprinkler system to be ins tell ed wl~thin 30 days of completion of
the pump station and that fencing be installed within Two weeks after sta rc-up
of the pump station. P1o [ion ca rrietl by a un and moos roll call vote.
4. Site P1 an - Nanak Landscaping. Applicant: Nanak Landscaping. Location:
Lot 30 (portion qF) Florida Central Lmnmerce Park. Toning 1-2
115. Sm 1th stated Mr. Nagle wa requiring the developer to complete ste ndard
ai ntenance and se r agreements. Mr. P.eynol tls acknowledged. Mr. Bul l ington
asked that sheet SPl be co rected to indicate City of Longwood in lieu of OUL.
Mr. Roth agreed. Mr. Thompsen questioned the note regard ing the gas tanks.
Nr. Rath stated the tanks have been el inti oared as requested by the Li ty due Co
the problem with percolation into the wa table. He s red i{ they requested
to install at a later date, they would bee ins Cal led eboveagronnd.
Land Planning Agency -2- September 9, 198]
Motion by Mr. Bulling ton, s tootled by Mr. ihompsen, to re mnend approval of
the flanak landscaping site plan to the Li ty Lommi ss ion subject to coripli ante
with all staff comments. Motion carried by a unani moos roll call vote.
5. Site Plan Approval - Pool Water Produc LS. Appl ica n C: Rory Manley.
Location: Lot 12, Florida Central Lomnerce Park. Loni n9 1-2.
Ms. Smith stated that the St. John's River Water Management District permit had
been re ved. She further sta [ed Lhat the standard agreements a5 required in
Mr. Na91 ens August 19, 1981 letter would be required prior to City Commission.
M5, Smith stated Mr. Nagle wa requesti nq CPA's re me ndaT ion on nwnber of
adtli tional t e for proposed treesmunder the Arbor Ordinance.
Mr. Bull ing toneyuesti oned~pha sing of the project. tlr. Land stated right no
they ar nsid eri ng two phases but ar not certain, at this time, [hat they
will build the second phase. Mr. Landeal so s ated that the site as engineered
for retention would not change if the second building wa not built.
Mr. Bull ington asked Mr. Land is he had any conmen is regarding question of trees
Mr. Land stated he believed Mr. Nagle vas co rued due to the fact that they
would be re vi ng the Oines on the site but that they M1ad complied with the
l andsca pi ngm~ode of the City.
Flotion by Mr. Thomps en, s onded by Flr. Bull ing ton, to r end approval of
the Pool Water Products sate plan to Li ty Commf ssion subj ectmtw the ouTStandi ng
menu of Lbe City Planner being resolved prior to City Lormission. Motion
carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
6. Site Plan - Friendly Ice Cream. Applicant: friendly Ice Lreanr Corporation.
Location: Shoppes of Island Lake outparcel, Slade Dr, and Rangel ine Road.
Zoning: C-3.
11s. Smith sta tetl that Friendly was developing the outparcel located on the
Shoppes of Island Lake. She further stated that a few agreements from the or
of the Shoppes would be required. Mr. Thornpsen stated he had a mnent rega rtli ng
Mr. Na91e's Auyust 31 m item 4. rega rtli nq signal co sC participation end
stated he would prefer to se right turn decal lane, east bound, rather than
a traffic signal Ms. Gackenback of DRn1P stated they we not aw e of Mr.
Nagl e's co ments. Flr. Cushman of ORMP stated he believed these items should be
nsitleredmas part of the Shoppes of Island Leke development. He asked i4 the
LPA was considering tying these additional requirements tw Friendly or Shoppes of
Island Lake. He stated he did not believe they should be tied to the Friendly
plan and that Friendly had no control o r changing the entrances. Mr. Cushman
explained how the en and exists to the Friendly site were not directly
on the SR 434, but ontonthe ma'n driveway into the Shoppes. Ms. Smith explai netl
that the request far si 9nal cost pa rticf potion was only in the event DDi and the
City would require a signal. Hr. Thomps en asked Mr. Sheema ker, a r of
the Shoppes, if signal iza ti on M1ad been Ol scu s sad. r. Shoemaker statedeNr. Nagle
had c nsud tad with DOT and poi did not re tmrend a traffic signal due to the
fact that they have a 1/4 mile limit requirement between traffic signals.
Mention was also made of a traffic signal at the Harbour Isle subtlivi si on being
ork ed o F1r. Cushman ask etl if anyone Fad ever considered a right turn lane
into thenproj act, fir. Shoemaker said no..
Land Planning Agency -3- SeOtember 9, 798]
Motion by Mr. 6ul lington, s conded by llr. Thompsen, to re mnend apVroval
of the Friendly S<e Cream Sete plan subject to all stafFCOOmnients, including
resolving the ISR question. Motion carried by a unan tm0us roll call vote.
]. Additional comments. There were n0 adtl iti0 nal comments.
8. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M
Gerf Zambri, Deputy City Clerk
cf ty of Longwood, Florida