LPAMin09-23-87LAND PLANNING AG ENLY
Longwood, Florida
September 23, 19A]
Present: Herbert Haynie, Vice Chairman
Robert Ilammond
IJil Liam chomps en
Lh ri stun Nagle, City Planner
Geri Zambri, Dep. City Clerk
Absent: Bernard Linton, Lha i rman (excused;
Jimmy Bryan [suzu - Lhris
Brown, Lorhrane En9i Weer ing
St. Stephens Orthodox Church
Stephen Gidus
Saunders Variance - James
sannaers
1. The meeting was cal led Lo order by Mr. Haynie at ]:OU P.M.
2. Approval of Minutes of September 9, 1981: Motion by i-0r. Hammond, s conded
by Mr. Thomps en, to approve the Minutes of September 9, 19IIZ as submitted. Motion
carr;ea by a unan,mous ron roll vote.
3. Site Vlan - Jinmy Bryan [suzu. APPiicant: James Bryan. Location: Lots 8,
13, 14, 15 cal mo S/D Repl at, Block A and the north 1/2 of LoY ], Talmo S/U Reple t,
61 ock A. Zoning C-3.
Mr. Nagle presented the plan stating [he Lo ndi ti onal Use would be revf awed py the
City Commission on Mpntlay and the site plan was being presented for Land Planning
Agency at this t1 me. Mr. Nagle stated his co rents dated Septe'nb er 2l, 198] ar
des pi to the number, m He stated the applicant w agreement with most e
ants and they c n~berr solved prior t0 Li [y Lommi scion r Ne further
stated that so e ofah is co rents we e optional and were far LPAeconsi deration.
Mr. Haynie asked Mr. Brownmif he had a copy of Mr. Nag1 e's comnen is and Mr.
Brown replied he did. Mr. Th Dmps en questioned the landscape notes regardi ng
a intenance with Burger King. Mr. Nagle stated he had spoken with Mr. Beev er of
Loch re ne and Burger King has agreed to allow Jimnly Bryan to pl nce edtli tional
Yrees in the landscape strip and a three party agreemenC w111 be drawn up. He
further stated that Jimmy Bryan would be responsible for the trees being planted
and the Li ty would be involved i se they we not maintained. He further
stated that Mr. Beaver i working with Burger Kinq and Jimmy Bryan on the agreement
Mr. 4laynie questioned Ridge Road and MR. Nagle stated Ridge Road will be discussed
at Conditional Dse request. Mr. Nagle stated the applicant has dhosen to c ns tru ct
a ti' high block wa71, provide and grass strip, and stated he had requested
a hedge strip also. Mr. Thomps en qu es tf on ed the re entrance and Hr. Nagle stated
the entrance would be co cted but chained cl osedra nd the Lity Commission would
nla ke the tleci Sion o thenpa vi ng of Ridge Road. Mr. Haynie questioned if the n
landscape ord ina ncenbei nq proposed would have a effect on Jimmy Bryan site plan
and M1lr. Nagle stated iC could if iY passed on Monday prior to Jimmy Bryan`s sf to
plan bei nq approved. Mr. Thanlpsen questioned if the DOT would require additional
right of way Dn 1]-92. Mr. Brown stated they spoke with DOT and they were no
at this time if additional right o4 way would be needed. Mr. Brown as ketl
that c s 3, 4 and 9 of Mr. Nagl e's letter be c Bid Bred r endations not
requirements and that item 9, be contingent upon DOTnal lowi nq thema ppl i<ant to
landscape the right of way.
MDtion by Nr, ihompsen, s onded by 11r. Hananontl, to r end approval of the Jimnly
Bryan site plan subject t0 call outstanding staff co ~s being me and that the
regarding the right turn lane also be co nsidered, also partial landscaping
ofsi Bland assuming DOT`s approval, Motion carried by a unanl moos roll call vote.
Lana Pl ann; ng Agancv -2- septemner z3, ty3l
The land Planning Agency recessed from ]:22 PM to ]:2] PPi
4. Conditional Use Request - Applicant: St. Stephens Orthodox Lhurc h. Request:
ChurcM1 use. Lola ti on: Section 31, Township 205, Range 30E, Parcel 26A. Zoning R-1.
Mr. Nagle stated the request does have so aril in EhaC the primary lmpa ct,
Craffic especially, would be on a Sunday.meNe ste tad Ra ngel ine Road is fu ncttoni ng
at a very poor level of se e, Level E. He further stated the peak flow
rmaily occurs from the hours of ]-9 AM and 4-6PN1. He further sta tetl rho
a pPl scant su ppli etl traffic data based o is['i nq church in Nevary which
generally agrees with the ITE data as shown in lent letter of 9-21 -8J. Mr.
Thgmps en questioned the access to the abutting properties. fir. Nagle stated
property to the east w subtli videtl and it appears there i orded e ant
to Chase properties. 11r. Stepn en Gidus stated he belt eveds thereewas a corded
mans On the south side made to Nica rry by Janes, Mr. Nagle stated the easement
maYenot conform to su btli vl sion codas as it is only 26 feet wide.
Mr. Haynie asked the applicant if both bu it dings, the church and the accessory
building, would be used at the same time. Pastor Et of stated to ey would not be
used s mul to neousl y. Mr. Nagle stated the square footage of each but ids nq is
3600 and the estimated traffic generation could be decreased by half if both
build inq w not used at Lhe s time. Mr. Nagle stated that he compared the
traffic tlataeof a rch v single family development and estimated that ev n if
],200 sq. FC, of church/Fall w e utilized at the same time, it would generate
the sa or less than a ty pi cal rs ~x house subdivision, however, o a Su ntlay, the
traffic impact would be w than from a x house subtli vi sion. nMr. Haynie
qu est toned the growth projection of the church. Pastor Elot stated they w not
re but they would build again rather than in se the church. hir. flagle asked
if the church could be reduced in The applicant stated that approx. 25 feet
n the front (alter area) and 15 feet in the re r (vestibule a ea) a not used
for s ing and if the building w reduced i e they would rn t Fave adequate
eats ngt Mr. Nagle stated the buildings w endesigned to hold 126 paopl e. Mr.
Hammond questioned how many s oul the held. Pastor El of stated by their
Church doctrine, they a Oni yrpermi tted to hold o e but roar Chey did
hold additional s rv icesed uri ng the week. lir. Hayni es s to led with only one
boil d inq occu pi ed oat a time limited to 125 people, in his opinion, v+o aid be
de Si rable as he did noY believe anyone would develop the property for siz ro siden t cal
nits. Mr. Thoinps en stated from an traffic standpoint, the church use ~s probably
the most desirable.
Mrs. Adrienne Perry asked t speak. Mr. Nagle stated Mrs. Perry w [he resf dent sal
neighbor to the south of the proposed project. Mrs. Perry stated prior to building
she was as ured by Lf Cy Hall that the zoning would remain residential. She stated
her property and other residential lots will be us el ass if the church was to be
built. Mrs. Perry stated she did not know what was going to happen on Rang el ine
Road and questioned what the City's long range plans for Rangeline Road would be
and who would she expect her neighbors to be. Mr. Nagle stated if the church wa
bait t, the Perry property would be isolated a ould the r sidential lots t tF eS
Flr. Nagle stated that 1f the LPA Uoes swi~sfi to recommend approval they may
want to refer back to staff for re menda tions regarding conditions or es tr'icti ons
the property. Mr. Thompsen stated he w ned about the passibility of
lands ocki ng the parcels to the east. Mr. Nay lens to red he would contact the ow
to see if they have a legal a Mrs. perry queS ti oned whether the whole black
on Rnngeli ne could be re onedCCePlr. Nagle staked that so far the Ci Yy Commission
has refused c tai i onto Ranqeli ne but if the church w approved, he
Quid reconanend that then Perry property, at least, he zoning R-P. Mrs. Perry sta teJ
that alt the residentially zoned property on Reng el ine Road has the potential of
being developed into n beautiful subdivision but the owners have been unable to
get to9eth er.
Land Pl anninq Agency -3- September 2I, 198]
Fir. Haynie questioned septic tank. Mr. 6i dus stated the Boll had been tes tetl
and was adequate for septic tanks antl that soil reports we n the application
packet. Mr. klaynie stated Senri note County would make the final determi na [ion.
Motion lty Mr. Hammond, s tootled by Mr. Tbonips an, to re lend to the Ci Cy Commission
that the condi tonal u requested by St. Stephens Orthodox church be denied. Motion
ca rri etl by a unanrmous roll call vote.
5. Variance Request - Applicant: James p. & Ca ntlace Saunders. Location: Lot 3,
Repl at of Tract ]5, sa nl ando Springs, PB I, PG 2. Request: 1. Roadway to be 18'.
2. 0.educe required Da rki ng spaces. Zoning I-2.
Mr. Nagle stated he did not re ew the preliminary plan to see if there were any
other va needed. Xe stated the applicant i requesting two va
to coot inuentosuse the 18' driveway existing rather than the requ iredr28ncdri veway
required by code. Mr. Nagle stated the applicant is plann inq an addition Co
leis exi sti ny building. He further stated the atltli ti on would be usetl for storage
only. 11r. Nayle stated the second va request is to waive the 1 space per
thousand + five atltli ti onal yr si for spacescas required by code for storage areas.
Mr. Saunders stated he was the owner/applicant and he hatl pu rchas etl the property
n 1983 as it no xi sts. He stated the driveway as paved is adequate and they
have had no problems or accidents.
Motion by Mr, Hammond, s conded by Mr. Thompsen, to re mmend approval to Che
Board of Atlj us tment of the va requested to use the 18' wide driveway.
Motion carried by a unanrmous moll ecall vote.
Motion by Mr. Thompsen, s conded by Mr. Hammond, to re mend to the Board of
Adjustment that the va requested to not construct the required parking for
the 19, 2p0 sq. ft. atltli tionebe granted, with the sti PUla t'ion that the building
be reduced in order to assure that the impervious surface ratio does not exceed
]SY, also subject to the additional 12 parking spaces being provided for the
inq building as proposed on preliminary plan. Motion carried by a unanrmous
rol ltcalt vote.
6. There were no additional discussion items.
%. Meeting adjourned at 9:16 PM.
Geri Zamb ri, pep. City L1 erk
Li ty of Longwood, Florida