LPAMin06-10-87LAND PLANIJING AGENCY
Longwood, Florida
June 10, 198]
Present: Bernard Linton, Lha i rman Consolidated Label - Joel
Uavitl Wickham Ca rma ny, Jay Adki nson,
Robert Hammond and ferry Wolters
Herbert Haynie Storage USA - Philip is tich
Robert Lochra ne and idark Holder
Christian Na91 e, City Planner
Geri Zambri, Oep. City Ci ark
1, the meet in9 was called to order at J:OJ P.hl. by Mr. Linton.
2. Approval of Minutes: Mr. Wickham asked that Item 3, paragraph 2, Nay 2],
198J be corrected to say Mr. Wickham stated that his fi nn Uavid Wi ckhanl
Associates was the Landscape Architect of record ........farm,
Motf on by Dlr. Haynf e, s conded by Mr. Hammond, to approve the Ili notes of May 2J
1981 with the co recd on as stated by Mr. 4lic khain. Motion carried by a unanimous
roil call vote. r
3. Site Plan - Consolidated Label - ApPl ica nt: Southern Ues ign L Construction.
Owner: Consolidated Label. Location: Lot 28, Florida Central Commerce Park.
Zoning [-2.
Mr. Nagle stated the re on Mr. Ti bl tar's letter still mentioned items to be
solved w s due to [heafact that the applicant desired to be r wed by [he'
LPA in order to get the project done quickly. Mr. Nagle furtherv s to tad that
mi ng Mr. Ti bl tar's co menu ar esol ved, the project will be forwarded
S the City Coimnission fon their r Dlr. Linton questioned the corporate
seal on the electrical layout pl aneV 1Mr. Wolters stated under Florida Statutes
n el ectri cf an is able to desf gn the ei ectrical plan himself. Mr. Wickham
stated he believed the City Attorney should be consulted on this point. Dtr.
Nagle commented that a note needs to be put on the plan giving the impervious
urface ratio. Mr. Wickham stated the landscape plan does not conform to the
layout plan. M1lr. Wolters stated the landscape layout plan was done prior to
Mr. Nagle stated that wonld need to be resol vad. tir. Haynie asked
ifva stree count had been submitted. Mr. Nagle stated they had only given a
ount of the oak trees and the lot is heavily wooded and the applicant has not
shown what trees are got nq to be removed. hr. Wickham stated the LPA could not
make a fair ruling on the Arbor ordinance wi ihout this information. Mr. Wolters
stated he had counted the trees and there were 82 trees on Parcel A and 4J
will be re Quad - 35 saved. Lack of a tree survey was discussed and Mr. Wickham
tated it was difficult Lo app1Y the Arbor ord inane without knowing where
trees were located and what was being removed. The aDpl icant stated they
believed they had met or ceeded the policy for replacement of trees. Dlr.
IVag le stated there ar xs eparate is s, the Arbor ordinance and the landscape
ordinance, however, 40 ne re being planted. Mr. Linton suggested that
ce the land is ci ea red, wifr itsappea rs there ar nsuffic ie nt trees, that a
oepla cement will be ivde with a definite figu re.e Mr. Wickham asked who would
make that determination. Mr. Linton sug9e sted the City Engineer. .Lochra ne
tad the LPA has c si dared in the pas[ how big the site i and how many
trees a on the si nand how many are being replaced. 11r. Lochra ne stated
the apps eca nt shoal daprovi de plans showing the location of the trees to be
saved. Mr. Wolters asked if the plan showing location needed to be sealed.
land Planning Agency -L- June 10, 198]
Mr. Nagle stated it did not have to be sealed. There w s tli scussi on regarding
the requirement for a hydrant at the north <o r of the entrance into the
driveway. It was suggested that this be discussed rli th the Fire Marshal.
Ther s discussion regarding the ingress/egress a and i noted
tllatethe ingress/egress ea ment agreement did not ful lyncover all the tlri veways
that would be used jo intl yse
Motion by t1r. Cochrane, s co nded by Mr. Wickham, to re mend approval of the
Consolidated Label site plan wi tFr the following stipulations: 1. Prior to
ew by City Commission, the applicant shall Prepare a tree plan and r
with the City Engineer for his a cepta nce and reyard ing the Arbor OrdinanceeW
that the City Engineer a infmwn, be required to stipulate the total number
of trees be lim{ted to what ri isti ng n up to 82, but not below [het,
2. that the applicant resolve the location of the fire hydrant with our Fire
Chief, 3. that the Li ty Planner review the requirements regarding electrical
plans being sealed, 4. regarding the ea nrent, would like the Li ty Attorney
to re w the ne sary ingress /e9res5 easement agreement to ac mmodate
vie
Parcel A prior tonbei ng submi ttetl to next City Commission meet ing. Also to
ncl utle all staff comments being resolved prior to being submitted to City
Commission. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
there was a ten nn note recess from 9:25 PM to 8:35 PM1I.
4. Site Plan - Storage USFl. ApPi ica n t: Marc Holder, Engineer, Owner: Storage
USA. Location: Lots 1 and 2, Flori tla Central Commerce Park. Zoning C-3.
Mr. Wickham stated hfs firm had co sul ted with Marc Nol der rega rtli ng Storage USA
fora few hours but has not co sul ted any further. Ne sia ted this oc rretl
when Storage USA first care tonthe LPA fior their Londi tonal Use request. Mr.
Wickham asked the LPA if he should again file a Confl icC of [nteresC and perhaps
join in discussion but not vote. It was the concensus of the LPq that Mr.
Vlic kham should file the necessary Conflict of Interest form and should not join
m the efscuss ion.
Mr. Nagle informed Lhe Board Chat in their packets w staff c ents and DRB
ent s, subject to City Commission conditional a estricti ons~ Mr. Nagle
asked that the LPA, fn their motion, make referenceeto those c en [s as the
applicant is required to comply with the conditional u rictions. Mr.
Nagle s[a led he did not have any eddi tional comments otherothan those in the
packets.
Mr. Tatich stated he represented Storage USA and Pla rc 1lo lder was the enq ineer
on the project. Mr. Nayn ie asked Mr. iati ch if he had re ewed Mr. Nagl e's
unents. Mr. Tatich said he had and they had provi detl the landscape nrai ntena nce
aontl the ea t for the fire hydrant to Mr. Nagle this m ing. Ne stated
Item 4 of Mrs. eNa91 e's April 24, 198] letter had been to kenrca e of and ehey
ould be expecting letters from the companies. Mr. Nagle stated Lhat asphalt
shingle will not be permi ttetl. Mr. Nol der stated the plan needed to be c ec tetl.
Mr. Tatich stated the or are that construction will be in conformance
with ail eppliwble fi rencodess a
Mr. Linton passed [he gavel to Mr. Wickham and made a motion to re nend
approval of the Storage USA site plan as submitted subsequent to ne sary
changes to be made. Motion c ietl by a Four t wf ih Mr. tLi n[on,
Mr. Hammond, Mr. Naynie and Mr.~rLOCfrra ne voting aye and tM1ir. Wickham abstaining.
Land Planning Agency -B- June 10, 198]
5. Proposed Ordinance No. 632, amending Ordinance tlo. 495, Section 618,
Parking of conmerc ial veM1 icl es, boats, buses, trailers and trucks in
residential areas.
Mr. Nagle asked that the LPA nla ke suggestions re9ardi ng proposed Ortli na nce No.
832. Mr. Hammond and Haynie agreed ed that boats and ca es that 4it within
the limits of the structure should be all owN to be stored in carports. Mr.
Wickham also agreed but added if they are stored outside they must be beM1i nd
the front setback and screened.
Plo tion by Ptr. Wickham, s conded by Mr. Loc hrane, that except for the comments
here, could make a general r mendati on that the Ordinance go forward to the
City Comni ssi on as submi ttedebymHr. Na91 e. Mr. Haynie stated del ate boats
sitting in front yards. Mr. Wickham suggested any modifications from the
discussion tonight. Motion by Mr. Wickham, s conded by Ffr. flalmnond, to
make an amendment to the prevf ous motion, that any rowboat or e stored
within a carport be excluded from sc ni n9 but if stored on then~ide, should
be behind Lhe front building line. Notion and amendment [v motion carried by
a una nimvus roll call vote.
6. Adtli tivnal Oi scus lion Items
Mr. Nagle stated [he applicant for Che s to plan far Pee Wee Ranch had requested
a special meeting for re ew by the LPA due to their losing their lease and
needi nq occupancy of Lheir new building by September 1.
Motion by Flr. I{ayni e, s conded by Mr. 4lammond that a special meeti n9 be called
for Pee Nee Ranch at I: DO P.F1. n June tZ, 1981. Flotion c ietl by a four to
vote with Mr. Lochs ne, Flr. oHaynie, Mr. Linton and Mr.aHammond voti n9 aye
and M1lr. Wic kbam abstaining.
F1r. Nic khem ste tetl he was officially resi qni ng from the LPA and would submit
his letter of r signs tion. Mr. Wickham stated this meeting of June 10, 1982
would be his last official meeting.
Z. Fleeting adjourned at 9:25 PM
Geri Zambri, Dep. City Clerk
City of Longwood, Florida