LPAMin04-22-87LAND PLANK ItiG AGENCY
Lc ngwood, Florida
APrii 22, 1982
Present: Berna rtl Li ntcn Per E. Lindholm, Lindholm Uevelop-
David Wickham
Robert Hammond lent Group
Lol in 6u r9 ess and M1lichael Allen -
Nerbert Haynie Ai Ten/Burgess Variance
Christian Nagle, City Planner
Buford Nei ms, 6uil di ng Official
Geri Zambri, Gep. Li ty Clerk
Absent: Robert Cochrane
1. The mee ti nq was called to order at ]:OO PFI.
2. Approval of blinu tes: Me Ci on by tAr. Wickham, s onded by Mr. Haynie, to
approve the Flinutes of March 25, 198] as written. eMC ti on carried by a unanimous
roll call vote.
Motion by F1r. Harmond, seconded by Flr. Haynie, tp approve the Ili notes of April 6,
1981 as written. Floti on carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
3. Variance requested by Lindholm Development Group to permit a front setback of
1].3' rn lieu of the required 20' setback on esi den tial dwell in9. Location:
E. Long Creek Love, Repi at-Amended Piat of Longwood Green. Zoni n9: R-I.
The LPA questioned when the permit was is uetl did the Vi an indicate a 20' setback
and they w advised that it tli d. LPA questioned if [he addition w s part of
the on 9i na lope rmit and Tlr. Helms stated the addf ti on ca le later. LPA questioned
when the en oachment was noticed and Mr, liel ms stated he believed it was duri nq
the frami ngcof the building and Mr. Lindholm was advised to apply for a
Flr. Lindholm stated he was delinquent about fil inq the va e applicationr bate
he ditl irraedi ately came to City hall for the proper apVl ica tnon forms. There
as discussion rega rd inq the time span between when the er not{ cetl and
when the application for a as filed and also therfacta that Mr. Lindholm
did not cease construe ti on. vallranLindholm stated he believed it was important
to complete certain portions of co ns true Ciq n. He stated in his opinion, he
could not leave the building in the stage it was in when the error ~~~as noticed.
There was also discussion regard{ n9 the fact that Mr. Li ndho im was boil tli ng o
ne tot plus a portion of another lot. Nr. Nayle stated he would consul[ then
City Attorney regard{ n9 the possibility of re pl atti nq the subdivision. Ne also
ste ted, the Li ty would, at this t1me, require Mr. Li ndhc im to show proof of
ership of lots so that he does not encroach on a let that he does not own
nent. F1r. Na91e also stated he did not want the board of Adjust-
tvto la terabe put in the position of ha vi nq tp rule o substandard lot
e due to the developer c in9 his o n hardship byau ing po rTiuns of
lotsat e the s of s eal ots, ttr. wLi ndhc lm stated she would shcw proof
of ownershi peon all lotrea nd proof that the property was conveyed properly.
Flr. Linton ita tetl they was a time lapse of se weeks from when the er
discovered to when the va applied form nd he was disturbed tha trtl~ras
Lindholm had waited so Tonga toeappiy and also that he had cent{ nued with the
onstru<ti on of the house. tlr. Hannlond stated the co ruction should have
stopped i~~etli ately when Me e s discovered. Nrs t4lic kham stated that
within [he setbacks there was enough a room for the building the way it is
Land Pl ann 1ng Agency -2- April 22, 198]
with the six foot addition and stated it was upsetting that when the
addition was added that it was added to the front and not contained within the
setbacks.
Motion by 19r. Haynie to re ,end approval of the va reques tetl with the
stipulation that before any more permits a sued thenbvilder will provide
proof of ownership of all land and that everythi nq will be taken ca e of with
staff prior to being sent to the Building Department. Motion died for the
lack of a second.
V1r. Nagle sugges ted that a foundation survey should be submitted prior to the
Building peparLnent approving any additional slab inspections.
Itotion by Mr, lit ckham, seconded by Ilr. Hanmiond, that due to the difference in
time between the er or being discovered and va e application subini ttal and
the fact that thererwas utleq uate ro on the totafor the house to be set
properly, that a me ntlation forodeni al of the va requested by Mr.
Lindholm be forwa rdedmto the Board of Adj vs tment. Motion failed by a two
to two vote, wi tM1 Messrs. Linton, and Haynie voting nay and Messrs. Hammond
and lli ckham voting aye.
4. Variance requested by M; chael At ten (owner: cpl;n Burgess) to allow a
building to be constructrd on a lot wiM e 62.5 foot tlepM in lieu of Me
required 100 foot depth, also to allow a 0' r setback in lieu of the required
25 foot setback. Location: east side of 5. Vla'lma Street. Zoning I-2. Land
Use: Lonmerci al -General.
Mr. Nagle stated he did not evaluate the site plan submitted but only made
on the va requested. Mr. Haynie asked Mr. Burgess how to n9 he
had now ned the propertYCeSMr. Burgess stated he owned Che property si ce 19 ]].
Mr. Lf nton asked if Mr. Burgess owned any abutting property. Mr. Burgess stated
he owned property to the south. Mr. Burgess stated Mr. Allen is the prospective
buyer of the property. Mr. Ilagie stated the City had recently placed a paving
ment on ~e property in question and [he pw could have just cause Lo
appeal the paving as nent if he could not havenre Doable use of his property.
M1lr. Burgess stated tM1esproperty irenedi ately to the east of his property is
landlocked and he tried to negotiate with the ow er M1ir. Vwore, through Pir. Bi nford,
trustee on the property, but they could not reach an equitable solution. M1lr.
Burgess stated thdt Mr. Ploore had stated that the land will lay fallow.
M1totlon by Mr. Hammond, s conded by M1ir. Vli ckham, Co re mend to Che Boe rd of
Adjustment that the va requested by M1ir. Allen be re ,ended for approval.
A9oti on ca r1ed by a roll call vote. Ilr. Allen wa sa advi sad that the
nanimo us
Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Mey I1, 198] aC ]:3p P.M. and
that he would be notified of the meeting.
5. Additional Oi seas lion Items. Mr. Linton referenced M1ir. Nagl e's memo of
March 24, 198] raga rtling suggestions for possible re s to the xis[oric
pi strict zoning regal ati ons and stated he was in favors ofnM1ir. Na91 e's recom
mentions. Mr. Vl is kham stated he agreed.
Motion by M11r. IJi ckham, seconded by Mr. Haynie, that the LPA support Mr. Hagl e's
s of March 24, 198J and forward Yo the 4lis torn Gonmfi ssi on and Che
City Comm, ssr on far their approval. Motion carried by a unanimv us roll call vote.
Land Planning Agency -3- April 22, 19d]
Mr. Nagle an need that a Comprehensive Plan Uptla to workshop is sch etlul ed for
May 6, 198] inulieu of April 29, 19&J as previously stated. He stated the
s ul toots needed the extra week to complete so e of the materi ai needed.
Mr~ Na91e further stated that he fntended to re mend to the Gi ty Conmissi on
that at the hlay 4, 19F] Commission Meeting thatcamComp Pl en Committee be
fornmily no na ted. He further stated that he would like at least on member
of the LPA to be a part of the working co mii ttee. Ne stated that even though
the LPA would be re wing the en re plan tFat it aided in their review when
one of the members iseal so a pa rttof the working committee.
M1lr. Yli ckh am stated he wwul dn't mind being on the advisory cvmni ttee for the
Plan, however, he wwuid soon have to resign his seat on the LPA as he was
building a house outside of tFe Li ty liei is and expected to occupy the house
around the first of June.
Mr. Linton stated he would be taking a aca tion the later part of M1lay.and expected
to be away approximately four weeks hu tvex pec tetl he would only mi s one meeting.
M1lr, Naynie stated he was schetlvl etl for vacation the end wF dune, 5
6. Neeti ng adjourned at approximately 8:10 P.M
Geri Zambri, Geputy City Clerk
City of Longwood, Florida