LPAMin07-30-86LANG PLANNING AGENCY
Longwood, flori da
July 30, 1986
Present: Bernard Linton, Chairman Victor Lyal and Robert J. Fritz,
Robert Hammond Repl at of Sleepy Hot lov
Herbert Naynfe Brian Pi nk ney, Robison Request
Robert Loch rane Rodney Weaver, Weaver (Energy
Uavid Wickham Conservation) Request
Christian Nagle, Li ty Planner Kendall Allen, Allen/Miller Request
Geri Zambri, Uep. City Ll erk Ua ve Schulte, Bradt ck Request
Walter E. Judge, Judge Request
Elaine M. Keller and b'a rba ra
Wilkins, Keller Request
1, t1r. Linton called the meeting to order at ]:00 P. M.
2. Approval of fti notes of July 23, 1986: Pir. Linton stated the approval of the
Minutes of July 23, 1986 would be deferred until the next requl arty scheduled mee ti nq.
3. Lon ti nuati on - Re pl at of Sleepy Hollow first Addition, Lot 2. Applicant: Victor
Eyal c/o Robert J. Fritz. Location: Garden Lane, Sleepy Hollow 3ubtlivi son. Zoning:
R-1 A. (SU-03-86)
tlotion by Mr. Wickham, s co nded by M1lr. Haynie. to re ve the request far a Repl at of
S1 eeDY moll ow, First Addition, Lot 2, from the tabl eno Motion carried by a unanimous
roll call vote.
Mr. Nagle stated he had re ved a legal opinion From the Li ty Attorney, dated July 24,
198fi, which stated that thet Li ty cannot consider deed restrictions when considering
a plat for approval and if the developer/landowner has met all the legal requirements
for platting land as stipulated in Florida Statute 1]].091 the law would appear [o
require a cipali ty [q approve such plat. Mr. Nagle further stated that it w
possible tha tta fire hydrant nmy be required as the nearest hydrant is 600 feet from
the proposed lot.
Motion by Mr. 4li rkhem, seconded by Mr. Haynie, that in light of legal opinion ol,
da tetl ]-24-86 and City Planner's co tents tonight, to re tend approval to City
Loudssion of tha Repl at of Lot 2, Sleepy Hollow 1st Addition and that the prelim-
nary plans be co rected and submitted back to the Land Planning Agency accordi nq
to staff and Li tyrPl anner's co with the exclusion of the re mnenda ti on as
stated in the City Planner's lettersof July 21, 1986 and further Chat the Lantl
Planning Agency takes no position on the potential deed restriction problem that
the owner may encounter. t~to ti on carried by a unanl moos roll call vote.
Pir. Fyal and Mr. Fritz w e both given a copy of Legal Opinion No. 1 and Plr. Fritz
recet ved a copy of the City Planner's comnentr dated July 21, 19N6.
4. Pvbl is Nearing - Annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning - ApPl icant:
Richard Robison, Trustee. Location: Lot 14 and W 100' of Lot 13, Longwood Hills.
Request to mend the Comprehensive Plan to Low Oensf ty Residential and rezone
from Coun tyaA9 ri col to ral to City R-1 (Residential, Si ngle Family). CPR-O3-B6)
PH 11-1]-86 and 12,1-86.
Mr. Linton opened the public hearing and displ ayetl proof of publication and stated
there would be tw atldi Ci onal public hearings held by the Li ty Lommi ssi on pn Nov~ib er
1], 1986 and December 1, 1986.
Land Plann in9 Agency -2- July 30, 1986
11r. Nagle stated the applicant originally requested Low pensi ty Residential and A-1
ni n9, however, hfr. Nagle sug 9es ted that hledi um pensi ty Residential land u
be assigned and R-3 zoning as this !antl would become part of an existing PUO with
the land use designation of MpR antl zoni n9 of R-3.
Mr. Brian Pi nk ney, representative for the request, stated he wa n agreement with
Mr. Nagl e's suggestion. No one else spoke for or against the request.
Motion by hlr. Wtc kham, seconded by Mr. Hanungnd, Co c1 ose the public hearing. tM tion
carried by a unan tmous roll call vote.
Motion by htr. Vli [kham, seconded by Mr. Haynie, to re ci nd the previous re nendati on
of December I1, 1965 re9ardi n9 the request. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call
Motion by Mr. Wickham, se onded by Mr. Haynie, to re mmend approval of acceptance
of the petition for annexation submitted by hlr. Robi n~qn. wi th the re vnenda tion
that the applicant/owner comply with subdivision regulations, I~lotionocarrietl by a
unapt moos roll call vote.
Notion by 11r. Vlickham, seconded by Mr. Ha~mnond, to re mmend that a Low pens i ty
Residential Land use designation be denied and re mnend that Medium Density Land
Use designation be assiq ned. Notion carried by ac unapt moos roll call vote-
Motion by Idr. Wickham, s ondetl by Mr. Hanmond that R-1 (Residential, Single Family)
ni n9 be dented and to re mnond that R-3 (Resi dentiel, Multi -Family) zoning be
assigned. !lotion carried by a unapt moos roll call vote.
5. Public Hearing - Lompreh ensi ve Plan Amendment Request - Applicant: Rodney E.
Weaver, (Energy Conservation Unlimited, Inc.) Location: N side of Georgia Avenue,
~tmediately east of Seaboard Coastline RR. Request to ale d Comprehensive Plan from
Low pens i ty Residential to Light Indus trf al. (CPA 04-86) (P!I 11-1]-86 an 12-1-86)
Mr. Linton opened the public hearing and displayed proof of publication and stated
there would be two adtli ti opal public hearings held by the Li ty cotmii ssi on on
November 1], 1986 and December 1, 1986.
Mr. 4leaver spoke in favor of the request and stated he would answer any questions.
No one else spoke for or against the request.
Flotion by Mr. Nayni e, s co ndetl by Mr, lli [kham, to close the public hea ri n9. Motion
carried by a una ntmous roll cull vote.
Motion by Mr. 4lic kham, s [onded by Mr. Hammond, to re lend approval of the request
submitted by Mr. Weaver to amend the Comp Plan from Low Oensi ty Residential land use
to Light Industrial !antl use. Motion carried by a una nt moos roll call vote.
6. Public flea ri ng - Annexation/Amen~ient to Comprehensive Plan/Rezoning. Applicant:
Kendall W. Allen/J. Wayne Hiller. Location: F side of Hwy. 1]-92 i med is tely north
of Longwood Lake East Shopping Center. Request to an mend LompmPl an from Lounty
Lomnie rc ial General to City Commercial-General and rezone from County C-2 to City C-3.
(A 01 -86) PH 11-1]-B6 and 12-1 -86)
1
Mr. Linton opened the public hearing and displayed Droof of pub! icatf on and stated
there would be two additional public hearings held by the City Lomrai scion on November 1],
1986 and December 1, 1986.
Land Pl anni n9 Agency -3- duly 30. 1986
Nr, ila9le stated the condition placed on the an exa Lion by flr. Jablonski had been
ovetl as flr. Alien and Mr. Miller had Ourcha setl the property from Plr. Jablonski.
Mrm Allen spoke in favor of the request and s[a tetl the request was co istent with
the contiguous parcels and stated he and 11r. Ifil ter were anxious tq become Dart of
the Li ty. Mr. Alien was given a copy of staff colmmen ts.
The LPA re ssed from ]:40 PM to ]:43 PII to afford Flr. Alien a few minutes to rev lew
the staff conments.
Mr. Allen sta tetl they fully intend to comply with the conditions autli netl in June 19,
1986 letter however, he stated, he did not believe they should be part of [his
meeting.
Motion by M1lr. 4li ckham, s ton ded by Mr. Haemond, to close the public hearing. kioti on
carried by a unan lraous roll call vote.
Mr. Nagle stated to Mr. Allen that he agreed that the conditions could be c red under
to plan re Mr. Nagle asked Mr. Ail en if he had any Drobl em with any of the
ments, flr~eAll en stated a setl site plan had been submitted based on the origi nal
DRB review comments and sta Cedrall of the co ments have been addressed in the re setl
site plan. Mr. Allen stated he did questionmi Lem 5 reg a rtli nq ins tal to Lion o£ drys
r lines. Hr. Nagle stated that is will be tli scus setl at the DAB meeting on the
setl plan. Mr. Allen stated he didsnot want to spend m ney i calling dry s
lines if he did not have to and would like to be treated as othersdevei opens haveer
been treated. Mr. Allen further stated he would not object to hooki n9 up to sewer
when it became avail obi e.
lloti on by Mr. Naynie, s onded by Mr. Lochrane to r end that the petition for
xa Lion submitted by Mr. Allen and Plr. Nil ler beaapproved. Motion carried by a
unan lmous roll call vote.
Motion by Mr. Wickham, s conded by t1r. Hammond, to re amend that a land use designation
of Lommerci al General beeas signed the subject property. Notion carried by a vna n~mous
roll call vote.
Notion by Plr. Ylickham, s condeU by Nr. Heemond, Co re send Lhat the zoning on the
subject Da reel be changed from County C-2 to City C-3comi^lotion carried by a uwni moos
roll call vote.
~. Public Nearing - Comprehens the Plan Pmendmen t. Applicant: Raymond R. Brad ick.
Location: N side of Longwood Hil is Road immediately east of Oay care Center. Request
to amend Comprehensive Pian from Low Oensi ty Residential to Office-LOrtnierc ial.
(cra oz-¢s) (rx n-n-es and iz-i-o6)
Mr. Linton opened the public hearing and displayed proof of publication and stated
there would be two additional public hearings held by the city Lomni ssi on on November 1I,
1986 and December 1, 1906.
Motion by Mr. Haynie, s conded by Mr. 4li ckham, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Nagle sta tetl [he comprehensive plan specifically addressed this ar and re mended
that as umsW Ores cha n9e and when cha roc ter of area had changed sufff ci ently
nough [o Ewa rrant, low intensity co cial could be compatible to the ar Mr.
Na97e Stated a Residential-Professional land us would be the most tlesi rable of the
ial categories, however, the City did not have an A-P category and [he 0-L
atmpresent was Che most compatible.
Land Pl an ni n9 Agency -4- July 30, 1986
Plotion by Mr. Nayn ie, seconded by Mr. Loch cane, to rec mmend that the land use
designation be changed from Low Oensi ty Residential to Office-LOnmerc ial on the
subject property. Motion carried by a unanl moos roll call vote.
8. Public Nearing - Lompreh en si ve Plan Amendment. Applicant: Raymond R. 6radick.
Location: N side of Longwood Hills Road, immledi ately west of pay Care Len ter.
Request to amend Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Office-Comnercia
(LPA p1 -85) (PH 11-1J-86 and 12-1 -86)
Nr. Limon opened the public hea ri n9 and displayed proof of publication and stated
there would be two additional public lieari n9s held by the City Commission on
fVDVmeber 1], 190fi and December 1, 1986.
Mr. Ua ve Schulte spoke in favor of the request Stating L-2 zoo in9 was chosen because
it was most suitable to the property. Mr. Schulte stated they supported the RP
category but the City does not have RP. Mr. flagle asked Mr. Schulte if the City
rea ted an RP category prior LD November would he be adverse [o considering RP for
his parcel. Mr. Schulte stated they would be conducive to tli scus Sion on the subject
Motion by Mr. Haynie, seconded by M11r. Loch cane to clasp tha public hea ri n9. M1loti on
carried by a unan naous roll call vote.
plo tion by Plr. Nayni e, s conded by Mr. Namraond to re mnend approval of the Brad ick
request that the land use designation be cha ngetl from Low Oensi ty Residential to Office
Conm~prc ial. M1le tt on carried by a una of moos roll cell vote.
9. Public Hearing - Annexation/Amendment to Corprehensive Plan/Rezonf ng. Applicant:
Walter E. Judge. Location: N side of Wit dmere gvenue, approx. 250 ft. W of U. S.
1]-92. Request to an and amend Comp P7 an from County Law Density to Li ty Commercial
General and rezone fromxcoun ty R-1 to City C-3. (A-03-86) (PH 11-t]-86 and 12-1-86)
Mr. Linton opened [he public hea ri n9 and displayed proof of publication and stated
there would be two adtli tional public hearings held by the City conmission on
November 1I, 19II6 and Uecember 1, 1986.
Mr. Judge stated there wa -confgrmi n9 mobile home park located on the property
~, property is tined R-1 on Aunty. hle stated the tenants had been notified
of the proposed change and were tint month to month lease status. Nr. Ron Haentl iquez
spoke for the request. No one spoke against the request.
Mr. Judge was given a copy of all staff conmen is and the LPA recessed from 0:10 PN
until 8:15 PM to afford Plr. Judge an opportunity to read the comments.
Mr. Judge stated he was rezoning the property now In the County from R-1 to C-2.
Motion by ftr. Haynie, seconded by P1r. Loch rang Lo close the public hearing. 1loti on
carried by una n~mous roll call vote.
Mr. Judge sta tetl regarding signal iza tion at llil dmere and 1]-92, that applicant RG
also impacted traffic at that c and if the Judge project w required to pay
toward signal iza tion, anyone involved in impacting traffic at Chat point should also
share in the cost, Mr. Loch ra ne stated he rfas co rued with the displacement of
si dents in the mobile home park. M1lr. Judge stated there w a total of 34 mobile
nits, 18 of which had already m ved, lII n w had m vetl in knowing they w
uDnth to month status. Flr. Nagle asked ifethe to ants would be assi sted ein relocating.
M1lr. Judge stated they would help them in finding location in pother Dark. llr. Judge
stated he would provide the tenants with a mobile home park listing. Mr. Judge
stated the tenants haU been notified of the proposed change in use and that [he County
Land Planning Ayency -5- July 30, 1966
had posted the property notifying own s of the pendi n9 rez ni ng. l~lr. Nagle stated
the City M1ad also posted notificat ioneon citizen bul Teti no board and had 1/4 page
advertisements placed in the newspaper regarding [he proposed change in land use.
Mr. Wickham asked if the County had commented on the proposed an exation, land us etc.
P1r, Na91e stated he had su bmi ttetl the proposed changes etc. tp tM1e County but ha Oenot
yet rec e~ved any cortments.
Flr. tlagle referenced poor condition of East Street and asked that the developer be
es ponsibte for paving from Wil tlmere Avenue to the north boundary tine of his project.
Owlie rship of East Street was discussed and Mr. Nagle stated M1e was un as to
whether ownership of East Street was in the Lounty or City or half anduhalf an asked
the developer to resolve the question. Ms. Zambri stated that if any of East Street
n the County, the Lounty would have to pets ti On the an exation of the street
to~the Li ty. Mr. Nagle stated the applicant has asked that the an exa Cion be contin-
gent upon site plan approval. Mr. Nagle stated Chat the Li ty ca nnotntechnical ly
approve a site plan until the an exation has been completed. Mr, Nagle stated
exation, land us and re ni ng could all be on the sa e agenda with an exation
benn9 done first. 11e forth erns to Led that he would as suremthat the Lonnis Sion was
e of the requested land us and zo nin9. lle further stated that Comni ssion could
each a n the land us and zoning prior to enacting the annextion. M1lr.
Nagle sta tetlehe ud itl no[ believe the Conmissign should commit to [he annexation
coots n9ent upon a 35,003 sq. ft. building being permitted on the site.
Motion by Flr. Cochrane, s conded by IAr. 4li ckham, tq re onend approval pf the an n
petition by Mr. Judge with the elimination of the contingency that the an exa tioneb et o
subject [ change and approval of C-3 z in9 and City approval of site Dl an tp be
submitted far 35, 011o S.E, retail center.n iio Lion carried by a uw ni moos roll call vote.
Motion by Mr. Loch rane, s conded by Mr. Vli ckham, to re mmend approval of the
requested land use cha ng eefrom County Low Density to City Comnerci al General and
also require that the City send letters by certified mail to each of the mobile home
tenants sta ti n9La nd Planning Agency re Benda Lions and the notification of the
upcomi n9 Public Hea rf ng s. Motion ca rriedn by a unanimous roll tall vote.
Motion by Nr. Loch rane to amend previous motion to include the following: that if
any of the certified letters a returned to the City a undeliverable that the Li ty
hand deliver the letters r rued to the tenants. Motion seco ntletl by 1-0r. Wic khain.
Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
19otion by 11r. Loch rane, s conded by Nr. Hammond to re mend approval of the regves Led
oni R9 change from Eoun LYeR-1 to City L-3 and also that the Ci Yy send letters by
certified mail to eacM1 of the mobile hone tenants stating Land Planning Agency
endations and a notification of the upcoming Public Hearings and also if any
o fcthe ertifi ed letters ar returned to the City as undeliverable, that the Li ty
hand deliver the returned letters to the tenants. M1lo Lion ca rri etl by a unan~mpus
roll call vote.
10. Public Ilea ring - Annexa [io n/Amendment to Comprehensive Plan/Rexoni ng - Ap0l fcan t:
Elaine M. Keller. Location: 5 side of Island Lake, N of Alberta Street. Request
to a mend Comp Plan from County Agricultural/Low Oensi ty Residentf al to City
Low pensi [y Residential and Rezone From County R1M to City A-1 A. (A-02-D6)
(PH 11-t]-86 and 12-1 -86)
Mr. Linton opened the public M1ea ri n9 and df spl ayetl proof of pu bt station and sta [ed
there would be two additional public heart n9s held by the City Cprmissi on on
Novenber 1]. 1986 and Decmnber 1. 1986
Land Pt anni n9 Agency - -6- July 30, 198G
hfs. Et ai ne Keller stated she had an 11 l/2 acre site she would like to an into
Longwood and needed se and water. Plr. Nagle stated to date he had no ved
any co menu from the Lou my regarding the request. hlr. Nagle stated the property
abu its Island Lake and about SOX is ns itlered flood prone. Ne further stated the
land above the flood level is Low Deno ity Residential but the portion below ft OOd
l evet is Preservation. Ns. Keller stated she has awned the property for 22 years
and the only time she had a water problem was when 4li nsor Ifanor was constructed but
ce then culverts had been placed antler SR 434 and it appeared to resolve the
problem. She further stated she was working with lots above the flood plain.
Ms. Nit ki ns stated she had Seminole County Meal th Oepa rtment out to the property
and they had stated there would be no probl enl using septic as long as the elevation
lines we rect and a site plan would have to be furnished the health department
prier eoriss~ance of septic perm; ts.
Plr. Nagle stated the County may reyui re road leadi n9 to the project be paved and
also stated that the Loun ty was Levi ng impact fees {or purposes of improvi n9 roa ds
and as the only access to this property is through un corporated roads, the C.i ty
would not have any ca ntrol o r what the County may require. Mr. hla gle stated
another area of concern was the distance the developer would have to extend water
lines to se ce the project plus the need for an lent from the owner of the
1Dt in Florida Central Commerce Park to hook into theewater.
Moti On by Mr. Namnpntl, s co ntled by Mr. Cochrane, to close the public hearing. Motion
carried by a una n~mous roll call vote.
Motion by Flr. Loch ra ne, s tootled by Plr. Hammond Co re mne nd approval of the Keller
exa ti on. Motion ca Tied by a four to on vote with Messrs. Wf ckham, Hammond,
Linton and Loch ra ne voting aye and Mr. Haynie voting nay.
Motion by Mr. Loch rane, s cOndetl by Mr. Hammond, to re mnentl approval of the Keller
request to amend the LompePl an from County Agricultural/low Density t0 City Low
Density Residential. Motion ca ri ed by a four to on vote with Messrs. hlamnpnd,
Linton, Loch ra ne and 4li ck ham vo tin9 aye and Mr. Ilaynie voting nay.
Motion by Ilr. Cochrane, s co ntled by Mr, Hammond Lo re mmend approval of the Keller
request to re ne the subject property from County R-1 AA zoning to City R-lA Zoning.
hloti on ca ri ed by a four to on vote with hies srs. Hammond, Linton, Cochrane and
Wickham voting aye and h1r. Haynie voting nay.
11. Addition Discussion Items. Mr. Linton distributed a copy of proposed Land Planning
0.9ency Rules and Procedures t0 each member of the LPA and asked for comments at
the next regularly scheduled meeting.
12, Meeting adjourned at 10:10 P.M