LPAMin05-14-86LANG PLANNING AGENCY
11AY 14, 1986
Present: Bernard Linton, Chai rnian Bob beaver, LOCK rane Eng r.
Robert Hammond Mr. MclJeeney and tqr. Shoemaker,
flerbe rt Haynie (arri vetl at ]:iJ OM) Construction Enterprises re
Robert Loch rane presenting SMOPPes of Island
Lhri sti an Nagle, Li ty Planner Lake
Geri Zamb ri, Oeputy City Clerk Robert Hopkins, Harley Davidson
Of Semf nOle LO., lnc.
Absent: Oavid IJl ckham Jay Naul t, Primary Prep Pre-
school
1. Mr. Linton called the meeting to order at ]:05 P. M.
2. Approval of Minutes of April 24, 1986. Motion by .fr. Lo<h rane to approve the
Mi nvies of the April 24, 1986 meeti nq with the fall Owi ng c0 recti ons: [tam 4,
4th paragraph be amended to state that a rii ni mum 100/200 gallon holding tank be
penni tied, and a7s0 that IAr. Wickham suggested the nio ti on but that Mr. Naynie
made the motion t0 amend his original motion. Motion seconded by Mr. Hanmond.
Motion ca ri etl by a unanf moos roll call vote. Mr. Haynie joined the meeting at
this timer
3. Site Plan - Sho of Island Lake. Oevel Oper: Construction Enterprt ses Of
F10 ri a, inc. Location. side o SR 434, inmiedi ately west of Let's Putt America.
Zoning G-3.
Mr. Cochrane sta tetl M1e would file a onfli ct Of interest and abstain from voting
due to the Fact that he was the enq ear Of record on the ShOpPes of Island Lake.
Nr. Nagle presented the site plan stati n9 the proposed plan was for a strip center
with two out parcels. Mr. Nagle ask etl that his c0 is dated t1ay 8, 1986 be made
a part Of the record. Mr. Nagle stated that by theml andscape code, 59 trees a e
required on site. Mr. Nagle stated 44 trees were being re Quad and that the r
developer was pl acf ng ]8 new trees o site. Mr. Nagle asked the LPA to consider
whether the addition of 19 trees, o and above what is required, mi tiga [ed the
1055 of the 44 large tr es being re Oved. Mr. Nagle stated the Arbor Ordinance
permits the City Comnissi on to require up Co a 2 to i rep1 acemen t. He asked th et
LPA make a re mnendati on to City Lommi ssi on On the replacement of the trees.
l1r, Haynie asked if the septic requirements had been met. Mr. Nagle sta tetl the
City has On file a letter from the COUn Ly approving the septic syst~i. Mr. Linton
asked that the Fire Oepa rtment reference date Of any prior letters regarding site
plans when they dO their co ant letters. Mr. Beaver was questioned as to whether
dry se er lines would be installed. Mr. Beaver stated se er lines would be
ns tolled when capacity became available and that they had a letter from Longwood
Gtil iii es penni tti ng Co ns tructi0n Enterprises t0 c ns tract the lines when capacity
vai labl e. Referencing Item 10 of Mr. Na91 e's letter, the aPPl icant sta tetl
theca rchi tectural plans would show the stOni~ater from roof tap and where it was
detained.
Flr. Nagle stated the LPA would have t0 r end a the City Cmnmi ssi On
if the w x myrtle trees w e pertni [tad incthat w myrtl es tdO not have a 6' clear
wood trunk, whl ch is requf red by Ordinance, Plr. aRi cha rd Gear stated they would
prefer the wax myrtles as they ar native of Florida and readily available and
have a wide spread foliage. Ina an d queS ti On re9ardi ng a traffic light,
Mr. Na91e stated OOT is wing thewsi t_opl an no and they will r vend
s [O whether a traffic leght is ranted. Mr. Na91e further stated that the
City Lommissi on mould make the requirement of a traffic light when tra £f is s0
Land Plannt ng Agency -2- Play 14, 1986
warrants as per OOT sta ntlards
Mpti on by Mr. Haynie, se on tled by hfr. Hammond to re mnend approval to the City
Commission of the site plan for Shopper of Island Lake subject to all staff
tents with co retied plans bet n9 res ubmi t{zd to staff prior to submittal to
City Comm ss ion, ra lso re lend that the 5' clear wood trunk be waived to allow
the crepe myrtle trees to be planted and also to ccept the 78 trees to be planted
as proposed by the tlevel ppe r. M1lotion ca Tied by a 3 to 0 vote, with Messrs.
Hanmond, Linton and Haynie voting aye and Mr. Loch ra ne ab stet ni nq due to conflict
of interest.
4. Conditional Use - Applicant: Harley Davidson of Seminole County, [nc. (CU 02-86)
iota tton. 490 ~R 48 Red quest operate a motorcycle sales/service business.
Mr. Nagle asked tFat his co tents dated May 8, 1986 be ma tle a part of tFe record.
Mr. Nagle reiterated his comments of Mey 8, 1986 and re mmended that if the LPA
ommended approval of the request that they limit theocondi tional u e to Parcel A
and the paved portion of Parcel D, al sp known as 490 W. 8R 434, whi chsis used today
s the dealership. Mr. Nagle also asked that if the us mnended for approval
that it be subject to all staff comnen ts. Mr. Haynie and t1rreli nton stated they
had no objection to the use provided all staff comnen is a e addressed. Mr. Linton
s u9ge stetl the dealership be penni tied to display on r two or three bikes out-
side of the building. Mr. Hopkins stated that during the day stx t0 ten bikes are
n the perking ar a while the repair shop is to operation buY that there bikes
are locked in thee repair shop at night.
Motion by Mr. Hammond, seconded by Mr, klaynie, to re mnend approval of the Con-
ditonal Ilse for sales and se a of motorcycles by Harley Davidson subject to
all staff comments also the trope to three motorcycles be penni tied in the parking
ea for display and also that the bikes being stored during repair process be
peemitied to be parked tluri ng the day on the parking a ea but be re oved at night
end stored in the building. Motion carried by a unan+mous roll call vote.
5. Special Exception. Applicant: tlav Naul t. Location: Vacant on re lying
art si tle of Rangel ine Road Tmmetliately south of Meadowri dqe Svb tlivi si on.
Request to construct a Day Care Center in an R-1 zoning district. (5P% p1 -86)
Mr. Nagle stated that the request needed to be evaluated against the Comp Plan.
Mr. Nagle mentioned three applicable policies in the Lmip Plan - 1) discourage
strip development along major thoroughfares 2) i re that streets in Longwood
not unduly impacted by traffic impacts generated by growth and 3) protect
esidenti al neighborhoods against comet cial fntrus ion. Mr. Nagle stated it
the LPA'S duty to evaluate the request against the Lomp Plan and the staff comments.
hlr. Naq le stated the Day Care Len ter would Foure approximately 98 children, whiih
ould generate approximately 225 trips per day wM1 ich was equivalent to 22 homes
on this on site. Traffic for the tenter would co e at peak Fours due to parents
dropping off and picking up be{ore and after business hours. Mr. Nagle stated
there could also be a impact upon tFe rest denti al a s abutting the Len ter, i e.,
es from playground ar a, lighting of the site. However, M1lr. Nagle stated
there were same positive points to consider in that a e/9 have subdivision Fad
been approved some years ago with a condo ry road ru ni ng parallel to Ra ngeti ne
Rpad. TM1is project however was abandoned. Mr. Naq lens toted that due to the
ons traf nts of the property it was ne sary to consi der re onable use of the land
subject to being compatible with the Comprehensive Plan andacompatibil ity to the
neighborhood. Itr. Naq le further stated that Rangel ine P.oad was unique in that it
e of the few collector streets in Longwood Chat does not have st riP develop-
ment.n 11r. Nagle stated that the Day Lare use Fatl sane merit in that it would
Land Planning Agency -3- May 14, 198fi
permit re Doable use of the property consistent with the rest tle nti al u e of the
property and could be considered a tradeoff between marginal a esi den ti ai
us the use of the land as potential m ci al and the vsespfathe lend as
ae Day Care Center could prevent it from go~grco tai and protect the residential
land values in the area. Mr. Nagle stated the buffers a indi catetl on the plan
do meet minimum standards of code but the setback of then proposed builtli ng from
Ra ngeli ne Road could be a problem in thak in the future, it is likely that Range-
line Road would need to be sri dened to four lanes - the widening of Rangeli ne
due to [he commercial deve lognent in Lake Mary.
F1r. Nagle r ended that unless the problems c n be r salved and the board pt
Adjustment can find the proposal i si stem with th eetomp Plan, the request
should be disaDDroved, however, ifsal lnc vents and is an be resolved it
cpuld perhaps be a suitable use for the land. Mr. Linton stated his fear was
that if this request was granted, it would seta precedent in the area For other
requests for re ni nqs and amendments to the Plan. Mr. Linton stated he believed
there wa abetter use for this property. Mr. Haynie and Mr. Hamaond stated their
ag reemeni with Mr. Linton. 11r. Na ult asked if anyone in the audience was in favor
of the pre-school. There wa ne present in the audience who was in favor of
the request. Mr. Nault as ketl that ail present keep an open mind to the project.
Nr. Na uit stated that if the school went out of business the land would re
back to residential o would have to re a pre school. Mr. Nagle sta tedethis
would be true only if the aDDroval w or stated. Nr. Loch rane asked how close
the ne rest residence was. He was advised that it was approximately 150 feet to
the ne rest house. Mr. Nault sta tetl they did a rvey within a I-3 mile radius
which projected a 64% growth in number of working women up to the year 1990.
Mr. tlault stated [hey were proposing buffers to the residences and would be happy
to add any addi ti onai bu{fe ri ng a required. Mr. Plauli stated that in er to
the proposed widening of Ra ngeli ne Road, tNe building could be set back nto
ommodate the widening and meet code. Mr. Nault stated that the addi ti onai
buffering, engi neeri n9 and building co could be easily dealt with and
and traffic could be addressed tocarcertain extent. Mrs. Barbara Wallace
s tdtetl she owned a pre school in Clearwater located adjacent tp condo complex
for retired persons. She stated the school M1ad been in operation {or three years
with n omptai nts about n Nr. Nauit asked Che Chairman shat u e he e iBned
on the property as Mr. Nagl es had stated it was not compatible For reside ntiai ~s
Mr. Nagle stated he meant single family residential. Mr. Nagle further stated that
if the 3/4 property owners adjacent to the subject property could qet toq ether,
esi dential subdivision could be planned. fir. Nault sta tetl in mnary that
they believed the pre-school would be an xcel lent vse for the site and it would
not detract from the neighborhood. Hr. Frank Shelton spoke against the proposed
FIS. Mary Spila spoke against tM1e request and presented a petition opposing
the request and asked Chat it be made a part of the record. The president of the
Woodgate Homeowners' Assoc, stated there w e 41 h~ieowners in Woodga to who objected
to the request. Mrs. Patricia Allen and Mrs. Sherry McCracken spoke against the
request. Mr. Jim Perry and Mr. Mark Rabi nowt tE spoke against the request. Mr.
Rabinowitz presented five letters From residents in the area and as ketl that they
be ~naae part of me record.
Flo ti on by Nr. Haynie, s cunded by 11r. Loch rane, to re mend Co the Board of
Adjustment that the request by Mr. Navlt to locate a Bay Care tenter be denied
to maintain the residential area as such. Motion carried by a unanf moos roll
call vote.
6. There were no additional discussion items
]. Meeting adjourned at 9:20 P. M.
Geri Zemb ri, Oeputy Li ty Clerk
fib) Tne m hick 1 abmm~e av er sv<e i as roll
-r4 fir.„ S o,,.<a.e„,p!<~.=.d ~~~c"r , ~L<nobra.h.~ 6.~~~w..o,~-L:~ 'G .<.,
r"'i°,,.a +e.~ .c;l < ~~~,,.. ,09 :;~ w ~...+ woo b<.,g bok2 0~
z,~~~c..
ar< i a sg ^-
I<a.<s« PnXr c ror io,~r~~emo. oo wn<„ am wn<rmo n<~ni.rorm.
VOTING CONFLICT OIGCIObUXE FOX bTATE OFfICEXB
[Requ4ed by Scmion 11E.31a3(2). Florida bu~~~es (SVpp. 19Ba).]
Eqp .om<Ip~ padrxyop :orraa
~onir: <~e re~n,,,me we
o a~u o~<r <oawr~ or narW~ma.~ erc> pobeaP~wm ~ Pan a neiow« nc~ ~isae,reran:rpm.~.o«ba ufom n
r. m<um : aMa orrur ora r~a~<e~<r. n<,my a~wo~e ~nae oo . w-.
coi i.p~ea o0 o q,<~«r am<n rrn«L o«l:
r-~~r<a,o~ p p or ny nom~em«,a,~<
b,Tn<m<a.„m~<wn~~l.<I<aaaa~n<~,~,~,e<rmy <~„~~n<ma=~rc,r~,r<II<~,.
aye FI<a b~gee~ore
lease ue PART C below or insirunions on wnrn and w ere ~o tle finis form.
FART C
FILING INSTXUCTIONb
en(IS)tlayslollowioytne me<iinedvnn6whlentnevoiingcvn
iv pa «Nemomvrentlvm ~n ~nemva ing minolu. ThUform<aasmt
vewonov. avotrnou iv snuxr. xsrxiHnrvv, oxncivi<vsnnirv norroexc[aossm.
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
l,CtiuPA+~E Ro BF*L'rE5 x~cx ssa.s s.un~. o., oa ,vr ~o+,r, on mMMnreF
x~•~~5lecsss FVnUew ~wz rte' Dcooa,. oonvn racu.,cc.cr osrs.c
C1~.o„ poca Flr. Se.~ r,ole „EO.pollT~~.l.nao~r~a~onaxa..,E.oE.cr
o.T~n x~c14~, l Hbxxo
.a,i~n o°ai,,.iA~;an.i~lu~n
wH0 Mu6T FILE FONM a '...
ibis farm is for us< by any person revving on either an appoinud or ele~ea boars, council, ao
n1Prrrr. .e or mwl.axe pp a r membea oraar r aaoa aar~ r mca wno.~.r a~aaWi M1OaxVO`^rga o~nm or I
rhrx•wbcr orcirwsam~e laalleramrcer o-ommeoegnnex,emrma~a~e orawr:,~nirmrm isammm
boartls (munlalpal, couviy, spevlai pax alnrlms, ne.). while PART B Is
cubed lor~alPl o her boards ui5e.. those at the s~a~e level.
ART C of [Fe form con~ainr ins«~ctions as to when and where rhir Corm must be fletl.
1
VOTING CONFLICT DISDLOSURETFOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Requirrtl by 9enion I I2.JIa3(I), Flanda S~ew~es (SUpp 198F~.]
csfor Nblic Oflcers antl Employees PROHIBITS each mnnletpol.ronn,y. and ocher txnlpubl/r ours, FROM
awl arfittr eko is pronibikd from '..
ga o YP pal (ocher thana8overnmeni '~,.
n Ya~cnc ass a~ii SecPronn<I Ohwrgmu~~tlitlclm'e the conEwnom heeia rttaencaeeia
1(a~xn TAKE yp y g Measse ly ih<na~orc ofhisimesenin one ma~ieron which he is
absia g om.ot~g and `O
(b) w1THIN iS OAYS AFTE0. THE VOTE OCCURS by de~nihing she nature orhiz imeren azapnb~ic rccortl in rns pan nelow. '...
c~s(SUpp519g4). oar orfcersorlndepenaemsp e~al uxdistncu acted onaonesacre.one--vo~~ebabsartnm prohibilctl3(rom
&inme aaaeaendl«apbor orrnarwneeebrdasrrl~. mar on °ar,mo-~1rj .Ip81
ra, ~ an.~a.ncd rrom rmlag xn a ma,~er which rannag on~,
/innred~n,e,~ g ngaCo~b+(~7-~.FM~.g,.rc~ Gt~il,~.brwnomiamre~amra,