Loading...
LPAMin08-27-85LANG PLRNNI NG RGENCY Longwood, Florida August 2), 1985 The Land Pl anni n9 Agency held its regularly scheduled meeting at ]: DO P. M. on August 2], 1965 in the Longwood City Commission Chambers: Present: Robert Hammond, Bernard Linton Ed Mul ca rs ky, 5 & V! Kitchen Pedro Cruz, S & VI Kitchen Fmery Me ineke David 4li ckham Joe Stec nbe ke, S & W Kitchen Jim Zer kel, Plaza gel Sol Christian Nayle, City Planner Geri Zambri, pep. C.i ty Clerk Jack Reynolds, Plaza Oel Sol Absent: .Herbert Haynie, Chairman 1. can to Drder. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 14, 1985: Motion by Mr. Linton to approve the Mi notes of the Au9vst 14, 19II5 meetf ng with on ec ti on, to show Mr. M neke present in the list of members present. Motion seconded by Mr. Me ine ke, eMO tion carried by a vnanlmo us vp ice vote. Mr. Linton stated it was his belief that the La ntl Pt anni ng Agency should not pass any site plan or any other type of request on to the City Lomni ss ion if the plan/ request w wnpl ete and wanted each of the appl icon is to unders is ntl that he would vo tesagaf nst plans/requests that were substantially inconple te. Mr. Me ineke, Mr. Hzmmond and Mr. 1lic kham were in a9ree'nent with Mr. Linton. 3. Site Pian - ASC Center -Developer/Owner: Alternative Structure corp. Location South side o Dog ac'; Road, 41 of Hwy. 1]-92. Zon inq C-3. Mr. Nagle asked that his comn~en ts, dated August 20, 1985, ORM&P comments dated Auqvst 22, 1905, and comnen is on en9i neeri ng check list be made a part of the record Mr. Nagie stated the plan was substantially incomplete, however, at the request of the applicant the plan was presented to the LPA. Mr. IJic kham noted that the plan had not been signed and sealed by either an Architect, an Engineer, a Landscape Architect, or Surveyor registered in the State of Florida. as required by Ord. 495. Motion by Mr. Linton, s tootled by Mr. Wickham to re pmnend di sapprovai of the ASL C.en ter site plan to theeLi ty Loomis si on. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 4. Site Pian - S & W Buil din -Developer: 5 8 I1 Kitchens. Location: North side of 5 3 of Grant treet ots 060, A61, 862, ft63, 865 and 86Z, Town of Longwood Zoning C-2. Mr. Nagle requested that his comments dated Au9vst 19, 1985, ORMFP comments da tetl August 9, 1985, City Engineer's co menu dated August 22, 1985 and Fire pepa rtment's menu dated August 2, 1985 be made a part of the record. Mr. Nagle explained the u e of the property sayi n9 it would be a low traffic generator which is co intent with the C-2 e ing, [hat the site would be retail sales of custom ca 6lne is ands appliances. Ilrn Na91e stated that FoOi has re mnend ed a e agreement for e shared entrance into both the 5&41 boil di nycand the exf sti nG Ha ttaway property to the west. Nagle stated that the Li ty Engineer will be c suited r ardi nq d the drainage ent far Pine Street. Sails on the property w e discussed and Pir. Steenbekeesta tetl they would try to s any trees as possible. It w s pointed out by Mr. Wickham that due to Che am vntvof fill required and the grade changes which would result, that it might be ~ery difficult to save the trees. Land Pt anni ng Agency -2- August 2], 1986 Motion by Mr. Wickham, seconded by Mr. Mei neke that the 5 & W 8u{id ing site plan be di saOProvetl as sudnf tted and that the revised plans be resubmitted to the LPA before being svbni tted tq the City cdnmission for final approval. Mo ti Pn carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 5. Variance Re uest - A licant: Donna R Ronald Pi att. Owner: Orlando and Gl adis Rodriquez. Variance requested to driveway w, t engt of parking space, and width of parking space. Location: Lot 39, less E 12,5', Town of Longwood (133 W. Bay Avenuel Zoning: Historical. Mr. Nagle explained that the Piq ott's we requesting the va Order to establish a bed and breakfast establishment on the property andndue to Ordinance req uiranents for parki n9. 5 e of parking spaces, and driveway width requirements, the variances were ne saryZ Ne stated the request would also be brought before the Historical Lomni ss ion for their re mnenda Lion regardi n9 the oho nge of us frwn a esidence/9 if[ shop to the bed and breakfast esta bl isVment. Mr. Nagl eeai so explained that the Pigott's preferred to leave the exi sti n9 porch on the rear of the property to later enclose as m addition. Mr. Nagle suggested that the oval of the existing porch wool drin e the backyard ar and this would make the project much more feasible antlrwould et imi na to the need for so e of the requested. Mr. Nagle also stated that the handicapped spacesmneed only ber l2nfeet wide, not 14 feet, and the extra footage in the handicapped spaces could be added to the regular spaces to create the required 9foot wide spaces. Nr. Lli ckham stated he did not believe both the insufficient drSVeway at sle and insufficient length of parking space would be a eo to bl e. Mr. Vlic kham also stated that he believed the vari antes would not to totly relieve the situation, even if granted. Motion by Mr. Linton, s contled by Mr. I~Iic kham to re ommend disapproval of the va requested by the Pig Pttes tq the Board of Adjustment. Motion carried by a omens moos roll call vote. Mr. Linton amended his motion to say that the La ntl Planning Agency reconenended approval of me bed and breakfast concept but due to the traffic flow, could not arunend approval of the va Amended motion seconded by Mr. Wickham. Carried by a una nsmovs roll callcvote. Nr. 4lic kham suggested that the Land Planning Agency make re amnenda bons to the Board of Adjustment as to what would be acceptable rather than a Straight denial. The fol lowi nq sug9 es do ns we a agreed to be acce0ta ble alternatives by a concens us of opinion of the Land Pl anni ng rA9ency: i. Due to taw voi tme of traffic volume anticipated, reduce the entrance driveway width to 12 feet wide, and also-.require a three foot wide landscape buffer along the driveway entrance on the east side of the property line, 2. Recmmend 22 foot wide dri vewaya i 5l e, 3. Recommend 20 foot long parking space. 4. Recommend that handicapped space be 12 feet wide a required not 14 feet wide wM1i ch will allow the extra two feet of space to besal iota tea to the standard parking spaces. 5. Recmmend that alt parking spaces, except ha ndi ca peed, not be paved Land Planning A9 ency -3- August 27, 1985 6. Site Plan - Plaza Oel Sal Retail Stores - Oevel open: Schrims her Ma na9ement, Snc. Location: vrt s, a of SR 3 ,east o arbour Isle Way. 2oni ng L-3. Mr. Nagle requested that his commen is dated August 20, 1965 and DRM&P comments da tetl August B, 1985 be made a part of the record. Mr. Nagle requested that FOER permits, i stonnwa ter, water line extension and dredge and fill permits be sudni tted. et1r. Na91e stated a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer is required by ordinance where a ci al entity abu tts a esidentia7 district. In order to protect Island Lake, Mrr Nagle requested tha trthe developer clear the site in phases as this will curtail e n of the land. Mr. Nagle questioned [he use of Island Lake as open space ar ~s Mr. Zi rkel stated the developer intended that the retai ni v9 wall w re pro te<ti ve buffer than the 10 foot wf de landscape buffer for the residential oneighbprs. Alr. Nagle regves ted that the 100 year flood elevation be shown on the pia n. Mr. 2irkel also stated that the retai ni n9 wall s si ty due to the difference in grade by the lake and that without the wall athere could not be re ss to the building. Mr. Wickham suggested that the question of the re tai ningawall being acceptable will be dependent uDOn whether it is located in DEP's jurisdictional territory and need not be addressed until t~tfact is determined. Mr. Na91e sta tea that existing and proposed contours should be shown on the p1 an. Mr. Na91e stated if OER dredge and fill permit is needed, he could re mmed di sa Dproval to the Li ty Commission. Mr. Nagle also requested that the apPl leant check with the FOOT as to whether any improvanent projects are planned for SR 934, pa rticnl arty any widen in9 proposed far 5R 434. Mr. Na91e sugges led that the retai ni n9 wall be left on the plan for City Commission to decide if it should Mr. 2irkel stated they were of the opinion that they were exceeding the requ iranen is in providing a wall and they were not trying to eliminate the la nd scap inq requirenen ts. Mr. liic kham stated that the landscaping does not meet code. Mr, "1 ti rkel stated they were planning on extensive landscap inq but the plans were not ompl ete at this time. Mr. Nagle stated i was nee es ary to submit the landscape plans as a part of the Site plan review. Notion by 11r. Wickham, s cgnded by Mr. Linton, to re mend disapproval of the Plaza Oel Sol sf to plan to theeLi ty Lmmission due to all staff and LPA cmvnents and nmend that the re sed plans be resubni tted to the Land Planning Agency. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Nagle stated that if the developer could resu Mtit their re ised Dl ans by September 3, 1985, he would schedule the LPA review for September il, 1985.v ]. Oi seas si on: Suggested amendment to Ord. 495, Section 402.2.0. Section 402.2.0 of Ortl. 495 was discussed and it was the opinion of the ma'nbers of the Land Pi anni ng A9 ency that the 30 day and 15 day submi Ctal deadlines should be increased to allow staff sufficient time to review plans/applications. Motion by Mr. Linton, s and ed by Mr ref ne ke Co amend Section 402.2.0 to read ec no later than forty-five (45) calendar days .. "~uP to twenty (20) calendar a.... cat entlar~' ays...." and ".... to the final twenty (20) day application period." Motion carried by a una nimovs roll call vote. 8. Discussion: Policy recomnenda tion for open space regal ranents. It was the concensus of opinion of the Land Pl anni n9 Agency to continue Item 8 .~ to the Avg ust 28, 1985 meeting. _ Mr. 4lic kham furnished each LP0. member with*a preliminary copy of the tlenogra phics s tutly he has been preparing far u n the Comprehensive Plan uptla te. 9. Meeti n9 adjourned at approx. 10:15 PM.