Loading...
LPAMin10-09-85LANG PLANN IIIG AGENCY Longwood, Florida October 9, 1985 Present: Herbert Haynie Kenneth Martin, Florida Central Robert Hartmond Commerce Point Bernard Linton pf ck Tic kel, Charles Jordan and Emery Mei neke Edward Moore, Vi tic Snvestmen is David Wickham Kingsley Grant and Mike Leonard, Christian Nag1 e, City Planner Kingsley Grant Warehouse Geri Zambri, Deputy City L1 ark Bob Jones, bob Porter, Parkway University 1. The meeting was called to order by J:30 P.M. by Mr. Haynie. 2. Approval of Minutes: [t was the co s of opinion of the La ntl Planning Agency to delay the approval of the Septcmbernl 1, 1985 Minutes until the Attorney's opinion on Item 5. has been received and resolved. Motion by Mr. Hammond, s conded by Mr. Mai nuke, to approve the Minutes o£ September 23, 1985. Motion carried by a unanimovs roll call vote. Motion by Mr. flat ne ke, s conded by Mr. Hammond, tq approve the Ni nu tes of the Septen bar 25, 1985 Meeti nq, Motion carried by a unanimous roll ca 11 vote. 3. Site Plan - Florida Central Camnerce Point. A condanim i am. Developer: Ken ,` arts n, ons true tson, Snc. Location: ots lfi, 1I and 18, Florida Central Ccrtunerce Park. Zonf nn [-2. Mr. Nagle asked that his camnen is dated October 3, 1985 be made a Part of the cord. Mr. Nagle stated that Mr. Martin and his engineer had done a good ,job nq the plan. Mr. PIa91e suggested approving the site plan subject to hi src en is of pctober 3, 1985. Mr. IJa91e also stated that by ordinance, one addit anal otf street loedi ng space is required. Motion by Mr. Linton, that unless sane additional c en is can be made regardi nq this plan, the approval be recommended. Motion died for the lack of a second. Mr. Ken Martin re es tad that the Land Pl anni nq A9 ency re amnend to City Lomni scion qU that al} three of the of4 street loath nn sn ces be waived. lie stated that two 10'%50' loath n9 spaces were shown on the pl anain lieu of three 12'%30' laa tli nq spaces. He further explained that the ~uni is would be individually owned condo- and did not anticipate the need for the three loading spaces due to the type of project being anticipated 1200 to 24pO sq. ft. units being utilized for semi professional, light business, rather than manufacturing. Motion by P1r, Linton, s conded by Mr. Hammond to re dmnend approval to the City Commission of the Florida Central Commerce Point site plan and re arunend that the three off street loading spaces be waived and that all r ni ng comnen is be c ec tad at CNe City staff lovel prior t0 bet n9 sudni [tad to City Canmi scion for ff nal approval. 1 Mr. I~lic kham stated he would prefer tP re mend wa vi n9 only one of the off street l oatli n9 spaces, and rata i nin9 the two asc shown on the plan. Mr, Wickham questioned vtiliza ti on of adjacent lot for septic drat nfi eld. Mr. Naq le stated a letter of permission was on record.antl that a hold harmless agreement would be required also. Land Planning R9ency 2 October 9, 1985 Mr. Linton sta tetl, in re9a rd to his motion, he felt that 619.2.1. f Ordinance N0. 495, exPl ai neA his motion. Mr. Wickham questioned if the ref oca tad plant material on the sc to wi 11 s11 be moved. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 4. Re oast for Rezonin antl Amendment to Lantl Use Plan - A pli ca nt: Vi tic Invest- ments. har es dor an and Edward o eq oast to re to C-2 ntl-Lant~USe an from Low ensi ty e en tial to Office Cgmnerc iai. Location: south of SR 434, west side of Oxford Streets Mr. lla9le asked that his camnents dated September 25, 1985 be made a part of the cord. Mr. Nagle further stated that he is oPPO S ed to the re ni n9 primarily because of in si stency with the Comprehensive Plan which opposes intr~sion of com ci al esidential a Mr. Nagle also stated that the rezoning does have so ri trhowever but stated the ma,ior problem is where do you stop cpmn cial intrusion into residential a He further stated that he is rued with what is built and not with the re ning per se and the impacts the ne ni n9 would have on the adjacent properti ez~o He stated that if adequate buffers n9za ntl la ntl scapi n9 could be imposed, a well a a 50 foot setback, control of hei9 ht of bus ldi n9, he would be less inclined to oppose the re ning. He stated the re n the re ni n9 is being requested, is that Mr. Moore and Mr. Jordan are both trying to protect their property valves due [o the fact that Vi tic is develops n9 directly north of their properties which is C-2 zoning. Mr. Nagle stated one of the options open to the LPA would be to re ommend the C-2 zonf ng be granted, however the effective date o£ the re ni n9 would not take effect until the site plan is approved. He stated the City Attorney stated this would be a legal way of con trol ing what was built on the site. The other option Mr. Nagle suggested would be to recognize that this property is ui table to re ni n9 but duri n9 the upcoming mora torf um, to institute a ning category, such a~ an R-P type of district, limited fo two story cmun cial e0rojec is that look like residential houses which would still allow conmercial development but with a lesser impact than the C-2 zoning would perms Y. Mr. Nagle stio tad that this not an sol ated incident, and that many residential properties fn the City abut Ls2 zoos ng~ Mr. Linton suggested that Oerhe ps no action should be taken until the LPA went out to look at the site, Mr. Tic kel of Vi tic, i a letter to the City A dml ni stra tor, stated that he has two proposed projects, o ,predominately three story building on lots 1, 2 and 3, and on the Jordan/Mggrenprqper ty, primarily the parking, landscaping buffer, wall or fence along Oxford and at so a 54' buffer along lake., Nis alternative plan would be a x of two and three story buildings rather than one large building, s miler Yo Crownl0e ks. Mr. Na91e stated ha would love to a Crown Oaks concept and if City could a re that type of dev el opnent he would wholeheartedly be in favor of the re ning. aNOwever, he stated, the letter frgn Mr. Ti ckel is not legally bi ndi nq and is known as contract Toning. Motion by Mr. Linton, s onded by Mr. Mein a ke t antl approval to the City Commission of the re ning and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to be effected at the time of site plan dpprgval. Motion carried by a una nimqus roll call vote. 5. Sf to Plan - Kin sle Grant lia rehouse - Oevelq er Ki nosl ey E. Grant. Location: Lots OA, 08, lOC and 35 of Lots 10 antl on9dale In us trsa ark. Zoning [-1. Mr. Nagle asked that his comments da tetl October 3, 1965 and ORM&P corvnents dated October 3, 1985 be made a part of the record. Mr. Nagle stated that the starred items on his comments denote major cmmen ts. Mr. Nagle stated that his convent regarding Lhe appl scant rates of n9 First inch of r infall i e<t and that s long as he has a um of Z2% impervious land on the si tat he rhos met the requi remen tt, ai permthemmas ter drainage plan for Longdai e. Mr. Nagle re mended approval of the plan, subject to his comment and the co en is of ORMEP, to exclude the comments re9a rdi n9 the rates ni n9 of the First inch of rainfall and that the Land Planning Agency -3- October 9, 1985 plan be remanded back to staff prior to bet n9 submitted to the Li ty Lommi scion for approval. Mr. Wickham svg9es led that the Tobi ra species of pi ttosporum be used for Lhe proposed hedges. Mr. Naynie suyyes tetl that the elevation of the buildi nq be ai setl. Mr. Linton agreed. Mr. Wickham questioned the 100 year flood elevation. Mr. Wickham sta tetl that parking spaces fl10 thru 14 do not meet code. Motion by Mr. Vlic kham, s tootled by Mr. Harmond, Lo re ammend approval to the Li ty Commission of the Kingsley Grant site plan subject tocall changes re ommentled by [he CPA, Mr. Nagl e's carmen ts, ORMBP co menu, to include locating 100 year flood elevation on plan and as ri n9 that building is above that elevation, to include ewnpensa tory storage ff necessary, any parking problems, and that the plan be is ntletl back to staff prior to be in9 svbmi tted tq the City Lanmi ssfon. Motion carried by a unanfmovs roll call vote. 6. Parkway University. Oevel opera Robert Porter Parkway University Lorp. Location: Lot T3, P or1 a Central Commerce Park, Zoni nq I-~ Mr. Na91e stated that at approximately 5 PM, qn October ], a setl site plan wa submitted, but that no rnments we corm tried for this re sedvpl an due to shorts unt of time.prior tot the mee ti nqe Mr. Nagle stated thevrequi rement is that the plans be submitted 20 days prior to the meeting. Mr. Nagle stated ft appeared that most of the carmen is on the prior plan had been addressed on the re setl plan, however, the open space is e still needs to be resolved. Also need tq resolve the requi repents of the Arbor ordinance. Mr. Nagle cited Itmis 3, 4, and 9 in his letter dated October 3, 1985. Mr. Bob Porter stated they would upgrade the new trees to 12' hi9 h. Applicant stated that Florida Power stated they would give an approval letter to utilize the easement once site plan approval had been granted Frwn the City. Motion by Mr. Li ntgn, seconded by Mr. Wickham that the applicant and Chris Nagle try to resolve the is s of the open space to include DRMP,P, Mr. Nagl e, and City Attorney's concurrence. Motion carried by a unani movs roll call vote. ]. Di sc us lion Itcvn. Special meetings to work on Comprehensive Plan, Motion by Mr. Wickham, seconded by Mr. Linton, that the LPA meet every Wednesday night at ]:30 P. F1, to work on Comprehensive Plan changes and updates and then continue on with the Codes and Ordinances. Motion carried by a vnan lmous roll call vote. Motion by Mr, Vli ck ham, s tootled by Mr. Linton, that each mer~ber be prepared to hand in 50% completed, his portion of the Comprhensive Plan, that was del e9ated for eva7 ua tion and apPrai sa 1, by next Vednesday, October 16, 1985. Motion carried by a voice vote. 8. Meeting adj ovrned at 9:30 P.M. Geri Zambri, Oeputy City C1 erk Li ty of Longwood, Florida