LPAMin11-27-85Larvp PLAMN1Ne nrervcv
Lonm,ood, Pl or;tla
November 2J, 1985
The Land Pla nni n9 A9 ency held its re9ul<
Lon9wootl City Crnmiscion Chambers:
Present: Herbert Haynie, Chairman
Robert Halmnond
Bernard Linton
Robert Cochrane
Oav itl I~lic khan
Christian Nagle, Ci Cy Planner
Geri Zambri, pep. City Clerk
rly scheduled meeti nn at ]:00 P.M. in the
Jones Rezone n Amendment to
Comprehensive Plan - Robert L.
Jones, [I.
Florida Residential Cpimiun1 ties
Howard Letkow;t=. Dave srnui to
i. Mr. lieynte celled the meeting to order at ]:DD P.M
2. AOProval of Minutes of November 6, 1985 O4eeti ng: Motion by Mr, lJickham,
conded by Mr. Hammond to approve the Minutes of the November 6, 1985 Hi nu tes as
su 6n'i tted, Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Approval of Minutes of November 13, 19II5 Ifeeting: Motion by Mr. Linton, s conded
by Mr. IJic khan that the approval of the November i3, 1985 "lino tes be delayed un tii
next rag ula r1y scheduled meeti nq. Motion carried by a unanimous ro11 call vote.
3. Cond itiona1 Ilse Request - 0 AP li a t: James A. Johnson/Dolly Durkhead.
P.equest f~ngre~ivno9 ac lTi y{Troup Aone~-Coca tlon. ~f3 6~eorgia ~
Avenue. Zoni n9: R-3.
Mr. Nagle stated the applicant had withdrawn his request as he had decided not to
purchase the house due to the fact that he was unable to be licensed for more than
Bevan peovl e.
4. Re zoni nq and Pmendment to Comprehensive Land Dse Plan - Owner/Rppl icant: Amos
L. J Lpca tion s side o A3 west of7 s il.
e~ques ~d ni n9: C-3 (N 140 feet only). Land Usa Designation: Cam. Requested
Land Use De~lg na ti nn: fl 140 fee C, General Commercial - rena~ni n9 south portion
of property, f, eneral Industrial.
Mr. Nagle stated that Yhis request would not mme to public hea rf ng until mfd 1986
due to the fact that it was an nendment to the Comprehensive Plan and that ne
leg tsl ature has dictated that the Comprehensive Plen ce only be amended tw1 cewin
any year. He stated the two dates for next year Fad not yet been set by the Li ty
Camni ssi on.
Mr. Hanle asked that his comments, <la tad Novanber 25, 198x, be made a part of the
cord. Mr. Na91e stated that the present zoni n9 is i-2, Industrial eral, but
that the future land use desi9nati on is L-3, feneral Lanmerc ial. He stated that
the applicant requested that the north 140' be re oned to C-3 as desi9 na tad Fy
the Comprehensive Plan, but the south 85' retain I-2zz and that the land u
ni nq
plan be amended to Heavy Idd us trial. Mr. Ma91e stated Chet Che objective of thee
Ccmprehens ive Plan was to di icourage industrial a al onq major thoroughfa res
i my for esthetic purposes, pa rki n9, etc. P5!ia91e stated he w ant
with the request to re ne tq C-3 on the front portion of the prgpertys but d?dog
not support the request to amend the plan to Heavy Industrial on the south 85' of
the property a industrial z ni ng in that area was in tent wi tF the Canpre-
hensive Pi an. Mr. ,Jones stated that M1e needed industrial sz ninq in order to
be permitted to use the property (iFe south 85') for assembly purposes.
Land Pia nni n9 Agency -2- November 2J, 7985
Mr. 11X4 ham questioned the c eni u n the s undi n9 a well as the proposed
land a Mr. Nagle rep! iedu that mos tscurrent us cial but that there
e still s industrial a ound ing the areawi neques tion, however, the future
war ome ses sort
land use plan tlesi9na tad Canmerc ial approxfma tely 600 Feet deep for the land su ound i n9
the area in question. Nr. liic kham asked Mr, Jones iF the a sembly portion of Che
business wa relation W co cial who lase! e. Hr. Jones replied ve Hr, lit ckham
stated there em condi ti onal muse for wholesale husi ness es in the C-3 zoning
district. M1fr. Jones was asked to explain in re detail the type of assembly that
would be part of [he business. Nr. Jones sta tetl the business would be retail and
wholesaling of pre£a bri ca tetl Fireplaces -display a n the front of the store
with the a enbly portion in the r of tM1e store andetM1at the ff rep! ace would be
shipped in ar tons, ready to assenbl e. Mr. fiagte asked that Mr. Jones prepare a
letter sta tiny the degree of assembly with a detailed explanation of the se
offered to see if the us an fit under wholesale outlets and distribution bvsi ness
of the C~ zoning. Mr. Nagle further stated that i9 it was determined that this
business did fit under G-3 the amendment to the land u e plan request could be with-
drawn as he did not believe the LPA vronld make a favorable recommendation to
City Commission of the request for industrial.
Motion by nit. Vlic kham, contl etl by tlr. Hammond to re end Yhat the entire parcei
within the request be designated as General Cormercial ofor future land a and C-3
(Cammerci al, (: eneral) z. ni nq and that Iir. ,loner be requested to provide infomati on
to the City explaining the type of business Yo be established on the land in
question, information to be kept confidential, i order to determine if a conditional
request would be appropriate for the C-3 district to get his business started.
Ploti on carri etl by a una nrmous roll call vote.
Mr. tVa91e stated that if the us s appropriate under the conditional u e portion
of the C-3 zoning category, tM1at the application could be processed in tie rch when
the morator i un was lifted.
6. Site Pl en - Pioneer Savi nqs Bank Addition
Mr. Nagle stated the developer had requested that the site plan taut ew be tabled until
the December 11, 1986 meeting.
L. Final Ptat - Oa nbury Hill, Units 2A and TB. Developer: Florida Residential
Communstr es. Loca ion. .,or th o4 existi nn 7)a nbury 1ritT-BEd vvsson, West si ~f
woad.
Mr. Ili ckham sta tetl he has been retained by Florida fte side ntial Communities on other
projects, and although he was not retained for this particular project, he f~rould file
conft ict of interest and would abstain frpn vo tiny but would take part in the
discussion. He stated he would file a conflict of interest on items 6, Z, and 8
of the IVOVemher 2J, 1985 agenda.
Mr. Nagle asked that his conwients dated November 25, 1885 be made a part of the
cord. Mr, ilagie sta teA he did meet with representatives from FRC and together revi ev d
the staff comments. He stated r red plans had been resuMni tted but there was
nadequa to time to net the comments completed and distributed to the LPA prior to
the meeting. Ne further stated that most if not alt of the copies of appropriate
DER and St. Johns permits we submitted and that, basically, FRC was wit li n9 to work
r wi tF the City Co resolve all ri Mr, !Nagle ro mended Yhat the Fi na1 Plats
for Units 2A and 28 be approveds su bj act to staff cmments and oRF1E,P comments and that
FR f, take steps to resolve comments of City Engineer. He also asked that the Plats
be approved condi tionai on placement of all n sary street signs and stop signs
and also speeA signs bai ng coordinated with theePOt ice Department. Mr. Schul to
Land Planning Agency 3- Novanber 2], 1985
stated he would Week with Mr. Hassler to resolve any questions he had and would
bri n9 the site plans intl ica ti nq the pha si n9 of the prp,i act. Ne further stated
he i uld coordinate ail si9 ns and placenent of si9 ns iai th the Police papa rtnent.
Mr. Schulte stated M1e would work out the questions regards ng the additional lo' of
anent requested ny the City Cnq i Weer and that all certifications and joinders
ons the plat will be provided prior to the Li ty Lamm scion meeting and recording.
flr. fla97e stated that UR11ftP had re awed the construction pl zns and comp! imentetl the
en9i nears on the good job. Mr. Ilic khan stated that Units 2A and 26 are pretty
cis tent with the existing portion of 9anbury Nill and said he tie! laved any
p~obl eas would be worked out with staff.
Motion by Mr. Linton, seconded I+y Mr. 4li ckham that the Final Plat for Oa nbury (till
Units 2A and 26 bo re amnentled to fi ty Cocmission upon completion o4 all changes
as recomnentled by City staff by the dev el oPer prior to suMfttal to City Comm ssi on.
Mr. Lef kowi tz stated the plans r:e a ail approves as part of the or nnl submittal
and asked that the plats be .approved based on the prior approval ofathe Final plans
and that anything questionable be worked out between staff and the developer. He
further stated that the plats were designed based pn the origi nai plan approval.
Motion withdrawn by Mr. Linton and second withdrawn by Mr. ilic kham.
Motion by Mr. Linton, seconded W' Mr. 4lic kham that the Danbury Mill Plat, Units 2A
and 26 be re aimendetl far approval predicated o or igi nai site plan with the
requirement that the va outstand i n9 items be am ca bly worked out between City
staff and the. manbers of~Fl orida Residential Comm nits es prior to be in9 forwarded
to the fi ty Conxnission. Motion ca ried by a four to nn vote with Messrs. Lochs ne,
Linton, Hammond and Haynie vp ti n9 aye and Plr. Wickham ebs tai ni ng.
]. Amendment to Comprehensive Land Ilse Plan - Owner: Florida Residential Lannluni ties.
Appl ica t: Ra and R. Brad ic-k Land lice ~esi9 nado-~i ty Residents a~
equestedR Land Use DesignaL~on: Office-C.wmnerc sal. Location: Vacant parcel on N
side of Longwood Ili! is Road, west of Oay Lare Center.
Mr. !Nagle stated that although itans ] and B were listed as separate requests, both
requests were the sa and were located within a few hundred feet of one another
and would be rev iewedeas one request.
B. Amendment to CamDrehensi ve Land Ilse Plan - Owner: Fi orida Residential Lammuni ti es.
pplicanA t: Raymond R, red ic§ k. Land-Use Uesiq na ti on: Low Oensi ty Residential.
Requested Lantl Use Oesi9 na tion: Office-Larmerci ai. Location: Vacant parcel located
on N side of Longwood fli ils Road, east of Day Lare Center.
Mr. Nagle stated the requests w e both amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. He
sta tetl the plan designated the property as Low Density Residential. Mr. Nagle asked
that his c ants dated Nov anber 25, 1985 be made a part of the r ord. Mr. Na91e
stated that he believed that residential land use designation was no longer appropriate
for the property in question. However, he further stated, he did not believe that
any of the c sal z in95 w appropriate either. Ne stated it ~r the deg re
of intensity ore type of c iai devel oprsent that needed to 6e c si dared. Ile
stated duri n9 the more tpr iumetha LPA and staff would be re :in9 the Conp Plan and
ma ki n9 r mendations for land use problems - e of the probl ens being cd:m ci al
backing residential. Ile staked there we a lac knof transi tlonal z ni ng between
iai and r si dential. Ne stated he agreed cept that limited office
in c
~seshould be considered for these parcels, however, n e of the ex fs ti n9 co ia1
ca te9ori es would do an adequate job of tryi nn to limit traffic and v ual impacts
n the ar Mr. Linton stated he believed the point was well taken but stated
sane action should be taken on the request.
Land Planni n9 Agency -4- Nov sober 2], 1985
Mr. Haynie stated the LPA should either approve or make recarvnenda ti ons
Mr. Lef kowi tz comPl imen tad Mr. Maple o ery professional and cgnprehensive report.
Mr. Let kowi tz expl ai netl the zoning background of the land, sta ti np i or i9f nal ly
cul 4rral, then B-1 (Business), Lhen he had an approved P,-1 subdivision pl annetl,
a9 ri
then the ne J Yo ex oa nd Che Longwood Utili Ci es se er plant required e Special
Fxcep do n, Which was granted, and the R-1 subdivision plan was not canpletetl, and
the City then passed Ord. 495 and the Future Land Use plan which desi9 na tad the
Proper tv R-1 A. Ne stated M1is intent no s to request C-T in order to develop a
lav intensity cawnercial -office comPl exW IMr. Lef kowi tz stated he co netl with
Mr. Na91c's cmmen is regardt nq height bet nq typical of two story houses, that the
devel op. ant should blend with -the su ou nd i nn u and that the dev el olnent should
Provide pond buffers to the residencesY Mr. Lef kowi tz stated the proposed Bevel o Pment
ronld add 450 Crins per day Co Che roads. ~e further sta tad the roads ar
expert anti n9 5,]25 trips per day but could ca rv 12,009 per day. He sta tedw that
the ordinance proposed by Mr. Nagle rnuld or could noY be adopted. P1r. Hit kham
stated if the request was re mended for approval, he believed alt of the R-tA
designated land should be re mended for C-2. Mr. Nagle stated the nu sery was
R-lA with a Special Fxceptf on for the day ca an ter. Mr. Linron stated he
n favor of a low intensity profes si onal roffice use for the property and in
If9 ht of the fact that Howard Le4P.owi tz would work al onp with the City, he stated
he was in favor of this particular use bet nn approved.
f1o tion by Mr. Linton, s conded by Mr. Ilic kham, to re mvnend approval of the Future
Land Use Uesig na tion pfe9ffice-COmnerc ial with the stipulation that no gas station
or ca nvenr ante store be permitted.
Mr. Ilic kham stated he an reed wf th Mr. Linton and that a low intensity one or two
store architecturally canpa ti ble professional office complex would be acceptable.
Mr. laic kham amended Lhe mq ti pn tp include that all parcels south of the sewage
plant be recommended for Office-Canmercial land us and C-T zo Amended motion
conded by Mr, Linton. Motion and Amended moti onecarried by acfour to on vote
with Iles sr s. Linton, Nammond, Haynie and Loc hre ne vo tl n9 aye and Mr. Yli ckham
abstai ni Aq.
9. Additional pi scu ssion Its'.ns. No addition di scu ssign items were addressed
19. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P,P1.
Geri Zembr i, Oepu ty Cl Yy Clerk
City of Lonqrrood, Florida
NG CONF410T OI£: ~.A'~SUf'"~~SN BtAYE OFFICEPo3
[ILO 9Wrod by Seo~ion 112:. ~ _.._.i . ~ai~ es (SAP
` -. ~ - _
~I [ ~ e -..
~ c ., Y. ._. .. _.i-......
i~ _ ....:_:. . ... ...:. IS. ... rart occurs...
i (e roiM Ono mat~e~wM1icF ek aoe)_
_~n~red wm~ it p~iva~e }gain', or
~ (b) TM1e museire on u~h'v:l~ I ~o~ca and the nniure of my in~emsi'~a Jic m~azom iF ns lollowx
VAHT C
f ING IHSTPUCTIONS
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
~a~
a.iap
4ii A ~ra
~n.,r
n.~~a~
m c.rnaaer oar.re
ongwo elox ide ge
rs o+xui ~ rrZ°roo 19 B5 wcov socinussueoinuarv oa mars.aexcr
City of Longwood
` Lon a~ooa Lana Flan ~r<.a
W HO MU6T FILE FOPM 1
is for use by any person serving on ei~ner an appoimetl or elenetl baartl, council, commission, a
~e or Ioca4 and i~ applies equally to members ofatlvisory one ooa~advisory bodies who em raced wl M1oa vyo(ng mnllln oc[
Army. orvniu mamr orrar al m.a dararoominer<ypir .:mr arvrrcar ma mrm
boama tmnrvmipai, coamr.,v~c~m ra: ag:~r~aa, e~~a, wnn~ Pnnr 6
pear e onne m,m eorv~an,r mr~ru«ma. a: ~o when am wne,e ~mr mrm mna~ be nee.
1
VOTING CONFLICT OIfiCLO6UPE FOP LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICEPfi
~Re9N.aa by se~wa I lz.J laJpi. Florlaa su~mes (snpp. i9ga~.7
e of ENics (or Public Officers one Emploram PROxI61TS earn municipal, roun~y, and ocher localpualir oJlcer FROM
VOTING in an orECial c (paci~y upon any measure which inures io his specia(vriva~e gain Each local officer also is pronibhed from
g o yp cipal(aher Nan agove~nmeni
whlcn loaves ~o one speela a
g y yde(ned in 6amion'IlE.l2(Z), FOMaStatutca)vby whom na is mmloed.
(a)o PRIOR TOTHE VOTE BEING TAKEN by pnbliclys aiins~o Neassambly the ne~oee ofhis inttmsrio Nemar~eron wnicM1 nail
abs~aining from voiiog; anA
(b) WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCUft66y desnibing iM1e na~um of hix in~eren asa public record is phis pan Mlow_
a of a Community Redevelopmem Agencyc~ea~etl ordesignaied pursuam ro fienion 161.J56or 6enion IbJ.lSr.
yes(SUpp. I9gd), or otfcrosbf independent special~axdistric~selened on a one-acre, one~vote basisamno~ prohibited (ram
o g(. the uoassesgnow'onr, one oa officer. nerebvda;sdose Na~onp ov T (9E5-:
rv)1 anstalned from vo~ing on a maser which (enecg one):
_~aarm,o,y p s ofsaa oxide rs siaemial c .bv nomlam retamm.
I