LPAMin08-14-85Land Planning Agency
Longwood, Flo[ida '~
Angust 19, 1985
Tne Land Planning Agency held its eeg ul acly scheduled meeting at 7:3o p.m.
on August 14, 1985 in the Longwood City Commission Chambers.
P[esent: e[be[t Haynie, Chairman oug H ard, Cnev[on USA
Robert H and pav id Schulte, FAC
avid Wickham Andrew Hutz, Architect fo[
¢e[na ed Linton quality Ovate[
Christian Nagle, City Planne[
Geri 2amb[i, Deputy City Cle [k
1. Chairman Nayn ie called the meeting to o[de[ at ]:30 p.m.
2. App[oval of Minutes: Motion by Mr. Linton, s onded by M[. Wickham t
app[ove the m nu tes of the .luly 24, 1985 meeting with c ec[ion a noted
Item 4, Y15, should state "M[. Linton" instead of Mr. Nagle. s Motion
ca[[ied by a unanvmous roll call vote.
3. @~.;X186-CEEYH4NSl3$_l1AXItl88T_SeBJ'Ib3H~kZ€CLQ€YE1sF£t: GhCYt4rt
4SH<_dRS. Location: NW co Cher of SR 434 and SS Lake Street (CR 42]).
Zoning C-3.
M[. Nagle p[esented the site plan stating the n onld be a £aiayr
e=aenaive vat ion of the site for a [vica staeio aa~a a aan.
stared tnat[his c dated August 65P1985, would be madeaa part of the
ord. Mr. Naglemst at ed that Item dl, FDOT pecmita, w n p[og[ess, a
pet [ne applicant and that Item Re, b[e ak-away bases forclig hts and signs
[egnested, had been c ect ed. Ne stated that -RM6P Lett e[ dated August
]s, 1985, approved the oplan contingent upon FD-T approval of
system and a[iance being geanted by the City Commission srega[d inq
proposed driveway location and also contingent upon a copy of the approved
driveway pe[m it from FDbP, howeve[, he s [ed i s his understanding that
the proposed driveway design w s thought to bet the best possible design a
pet -OT. M[. Nagle stated that the s e plan w s b[ougnt befo [e L
before, but the site had not changed substantially a cept fo[ the dPainage
which had to be changed when the City Commission adenied the proposed
abandonment of Pine Street. Mc. Nagle also questioned if the - a[f you pon
Holly would glow to the specified height of the ordinance requirements.
. Nagle [ ended that the Chevron Site Plan be approved subject to the
applicant omply ing with his lette[ dated August 6, 1985 and DRM6Y lettec
dated August ], 1985.
Naynie questioned the File Depa[tment's c ents. M[. Nagle stated he
ould request updated lettec E[om the F1[emmDepartment. Meineke
questioned the tank fo[ the cecycled water for the c ash artdMloca[ion of
the flame estors. ard Cated both wcaldw be shown the
ard awing s. ick Hams ted that the D arf Yaupononxolly
uldrstay low, nowevez, Mhe ned about the 6ucford Chinese New
iocaeea at ene eastern ent[ance onetne aontn siae as well as at ~.,e
Land Planning Agency - 2 - August 14, 1985
inte[section, it could c ual blockage. a[d stated they
ould confo[m tosthe landscapescodesof the City. MML Wickham s ted there
a discrepancy between pages C-2 and C-3 of the [ elevation.
Hawacd stated that ]6.1 would govern. Both Mr. Wickham and M Hammond
ned that the s nagement system would not pe[EOrm
expectedCe and [egaes[ed that DRM6P [ec heck [he calculations a submitteds
Nagle stated he would [equest that they recheck the calculations.
Haynie asked if the pert t s had been taken. Mr. Nagle stated the soils
[epo[ts had been submitted and approved by the Me alth Department.
Mc. Nagle requested that the Land Planning Agency end that the
ted plans be submitted back t taff rather thancback [o the LPA
pcio[cto being bought before the City commrssxon.
by M[. Wickham, and ed by Mc. inton that the and Planning
Agency end approvale of the Chevron Site Plan a submitted with the
and it ions that the applicant m s the c of n dated August ],
1985 and Mc. Nagle's c atdat ed Auqustt6, 1985sP that all r
thes onditions mandtsshall be submitted t taff pci vrbe ng
submitted to City Commission; also, that finished floo[ elevations a e to
be provided, that DRM6P c check drainage calculations and exfilt[ation
system to allay fears and c of [he LPA, also with the [ipul at ion
that all c made ducingothenc of this meeting a taken c of,
ali landscaping comments. Mot ron carried by a unanimous rollrecall
vote.
~ 4. YBRiAdGE_8E44EEm~L4R1De_BEESPE[~LieLS4MtllldITIE@.~HdERIPEYEL48E6.
LOCATION: Lot 109, Tibe[on Hills Phase III (Baicingt on). Vac ianee Erom
required ]' side setback to 5.3' side setback. Pn bl is Healing, eoa[d of
Adjustment, September 5, 1985.
Mc. Nagle explained Florida State Statutes Chapter 163.255, which states
legal grounds for a ae stated that a ing there [ way
possible to al te[ thea hous eato eliminate the ne eds£oc that
the ce i indeed a hardship, and that the v shouldabevg ca ted. Mr.
Dave Schulte stated the house w already undernc nst[uction in the framing
tage, and that the l.] foot a achment into the side setback w s for a
dining further statedxthae v e granted fo[ the la] foot
achment ould be c orded with the deeds order for the v to
becxpick ed upwwith a title search if the grope r[y was to be res oidncat a
later time.
Motion by Me. Linton, s onded by Fir. M neke, t end app[oval of [he
[equested byaFloc ida Residential Communitiesm Lot 109, Tiberon
HillsncPhase III of the 1.] foot a achment i o the side setback, To the
Board of Adjuat ment. Motion <a[[ied by a unanimous roll call vote.
5. 3STE1L8N-p48LITY~.'BTEBSY@TEtlS~FSCE~NQJ388E844EE -
Ownec/Develope[: Robert Floren. Location: Lot 14, Fl ocida Cent[al
Comme[ce Palk. Zoning 2-2
r Mc. Nagle ieques ted that his c ents dated August 9, 1985 be made a pa[t
of the xeco[d. Mx. Nagle stated that there has been insufficient p[ojec[
Land Planning Agency - 3 - August 14, 1985
time n the rev rs ed plans to xece rve comments from DRM6P and _ne
CityeEng ineer.o
Mr. Nagle stated the City required a copy of a signed agre ent between the
applicant and the o of the adjacent grope r[y regardingeplacement of the
empo[a[y septic tank eo the adjoining lot. also stated that the City
Engineer ould have to approve the proposed hedges on the east property
boon dry as wthey were located in an easement.
Item 5, paragraph 9., City Planner's letter dated August 9, 1985,
explained fort her by Mr. Nagle. He stated that only 9 t shown and
based on the fact [hat the property line i not straig ht,eebu[ a , that
16 trees should be planted. He also stated that based o the a ntly
adopted Acboc Ordinance, the City could require a two forno replacement
of trees r ved o the site and asked the LPA to consider this option to
the City Commission
Mr. Nagle r ended [hat the site plan be approved subject t eipt and
e coon of outstanding project [ of the City Eng ineero andcD P by
The applicant, solution of all sta£Ewc dated August 9, 1985 and
p[evious ents by DRMSP, v xif icationmebys.project designer that
feasible alternatives e t for preservation of additional t and shouldo
C his be the c e thatxthe LPA should r end [hat additional of
mil ar type andss e be planted to mit ig atemthe planned r vac of ro site
trees, and c submittal of c sed a e plans that rectifyest aff, nRM6P .>~d
LPA project c and that xsuch plans should be approved by staff p. f
to Cicy Commissionncons ider anon.
Mx. neke stated that the finished El ooc elevation of the building
only sl lg htly hiq hex than the parking lot elevations. Rutz stated that
the entice property slopes away from [he building. Mrln reply to the
question as to the u of the building, M[. Rutz replied that the building
ould be sed sales and dish ibution only and that
e cha cg ing not backflu skiing of the wat e[ softeningttanks would be done
the site. In reply to questions regarding the height and file sprinkling
of the boil ding, Me. Rutz stated the building would be 23.51 feet from the
top of the parapet and would be two stories o r the office portion o£ the
building, which would house s tal spacei a further stated that the
applicant had not rnt ended to sprinkle the building.
irk ham questioned what might be the highest employee
anticipated. Mr. Rutz stated that the building divisions a shown would
ost likely continue and that the packing w s based on [he floor plan
show ether sed discussion as ato whether the applicant had
calculated the packing pe en the intent of Che o[d in ante. Nagle stated
that the parking standards a on EUSinq. suggest ed that the
plan be c dosed to the City Commission with a erp~et at ion by the City
Attorney.em Mr. Rutz stated he would p[efec t calculate the pa[k inq to
eet approval of the LPA. ickham statedrthere still other
s to be addressed. ted all c ould be a red
the City's satisfact ionMr t'z Nagle s ted theec ents of theWeln
engineers had still not been [ec eived. Mr. Rutz asked how the question ~£
Land Planning Agency - 4 - August 14, 1985
ice' [he number of trees eegoi[ed would be i erp[et ed. Me. Wickham stated he
believed legal precedence has been set using the arc length of the property
line.
Me. Nagle stated the following i s had not yet been x solved: Numbe[ of
along [th border, alsons hould LPA [eguest City Commission
[ego i[e for ratio of replacement of t and suggested that
perhaps the oratio need not be regaired, also if 16etrees a [equiced along
cth pcoperty boundry, would that be sufficient t atisfy Arbor Ordinance
requirements. M[. ickham s ted he believed the c e law and precedence
should be r xchedW M[. Wickham s ted he wouldacheck with Altamonte
Sp [Logs, as the aC ity's new Acbor Ordinance was patterned of tei Altamont e's.
Motion by Linton, onded by Mc, neke that the and el anning
Agency [ end app[ov al ofcthe quality Water site plan with Lthe condition
that ents of City Engi ne e[ and D M6P and City Planner's ents
ompliedmmwiih and s iafactory to staff pri o being forwarded to the
City Led by a Eourot to vote with M[. Eaynie,
Mc. Meinekess iM C. Linton andaM[. H and voti ny aye and M ickham v ing
nay. M[. Nagle asked the L A forma endaiion regarding the
along the north boundary. Mr.PWick ham stated he believed the length of rthe
p[ope[ty is determined by the a It w s the c opinion of the LPA
that the numbec o£ trees requited shouldabe basednuponut he actual length of
the p[ope[ty line following the arc.
I 6, pI3CP35I4N~ESdBQIdL1,PA.lf&ETIBG9F~11G4&T_2@._14fli~
Mr. Nagle stated the [e ould be anywhere f[om eight my
plans/requests for the August 28, 1985 meeting. it was suggested thatsone
o[ two special meetings be scheduled.
Motion by Mr. Linton, onded by Mi. ickham, that three Land Planning
Agency m Logs be scheduled - ]:00 p. m. to 10 :3o p.m., Tuesday, August 27,
1985, Wednesday, Aoqost 28, 1985 and Thursday, August 29, 1985. Motion
caccied by a unanimous Coll call vote.
Meeting adjoscned at 9:40 p.m.
ambci, neputy city Clerk
City of Lo ngwood~ Florida
G2/mt
r