Loading...
LPAMin11-06-85SPLea°ewoo~NlR'4o ~dFacv tlove:iber G, 19A5 The Land Pla nnin9 Agency held a special meeting on November 6, 1965 at 7:30 Pti +n the City Lamm ssi on Conference Roan. Present; Herbert Haynie, Chairman S1 one's Furniture Gallery - Mr. Robert Hammond Shelley Stone - nr, hoods R Schroeder Bernard Linton from llootls Enn r. David Wickham flitlden Oak Estates 5ubd. - 6ernie Christian Na91 e, City Planner Nor ti n, ACM Assoc. Geri 2ambri, Dep. Li ty Clerk Absent: Emery Mei neke 1. Mr. Haynie called the meeti nq to order at 7:30 P.ti. 2. ApProvai of liinu [es of October 30, 1905 tieeti ng: Mr. Linton stated that under Item 3, the minutes should have reflected that the Mo [ion to Table died for the l acY, of a second. Mr, flick ham stated that Item 7, fifth line, of the October 30, 1905 Minutes reg ardi n9 lten 5 of Sop tember 11, 1985 minutes, should reflect that the Attorney's re menda tion was based on the fact that the City's rules anA Roberts Rules of Order did not svffi ci entry deal with the subject and, therefore, the attorney made his recommendation based on those reasons. Hotion by fir. idle kham, seconded by Mr. Li nion, that the Minutes of the October 30, 1985 Meeti n9 be approved as corrected. Motion carried by a unans moos roll call vote. 3. Variance Request - Shelley Slone - Variances requested from required land z<a ping buffers, v requested for driveway location, v requested for location of sign, and iva requested for 14 parki n9 spat esr'nnceeu of 70 spaces a required, Loca tionCe Slone Furniture Gallery, 730 Hwy. 17-92, Longwood. Zoni n9 C-3 ttr. Naqie asked that his comments and DR.'1E.P cameo tr, dated PloverM1er 1, 1905, and ail other staff comments be made a part of the record. Mr. Na91e enpha si zed that the warehouse addition must be used only for "dead" storage purposes, with no sales uses pe+mitted. Hr. Na91e stated that all c mnen is had been furnished to the apPl leant prior to this mee ti nq. Mr. Nanle std [ed that the need for the esul ted in the applicant's desire to build a ew buiidi n9. Ne further s to Ledc that the site has many no conformi nq land a es that were built much earlier foam the Present day ordinance and by expand; ng tne5N5 n the s; to me nq rgnfon,; t; es on me site ar required tp be co ected or needed from the Aoard of Adj usbnen t, eMr, Haynie asked ifrDOT objected+toc the landscaping on the rim ht of way. Mr. NaOle stated DOT had no obi ec ti on provided they don't have to maintain it. Nr. Nagle std tetl that he will r end to f.i ty Commission Lhat the a isti ng driveways be changed at the Ci me qtc the r wid eni n9 pf Hwy. 1I-92 (FV 07-0AX as per DOT) and at that tine, request that one of the driveways be closed. Ile stated he will r mend that the Aoard of AdJ us tment ara nt a temporary <e for the existing driveways until the DDT reconstruction, ~Mr, Ilic kham mended that at that time, la nd sea pf ng could be required. There wns discussion gadi ng .l qi nt access to ad,j of ni n9 properties, which ar used for par P.i n9, bei n9 required in lieu of land scope areas. Motion by Hrealli ckham, s cond etl by Nr. li nton, to re onmend that a five (5) foot landscape strip be maintained al pn9 the right pf wa, .~ Motion carried by a una n+mgvs roll call vote. Lane Planet ng nnanov -.- Nqyemner 5, lgas Due to the ,joint use of the driveway area between 51 one's and the Df nette business, and the n cessi ty of the drivevay ranai ning cessible to the Oi nette business for load i nn, Mr, Idic kham maAe a motion that Ilr. Slone and his en ers produce a comprwnise solution on the required landscape buffer o the north property line to be reviewed by stuff before qoi n9 to the Board of Adi us bnent and that a cro anent agrea'nent between the onner of the Dinette business and Hr. Sl ones beedrawn up prior to the site plan bet nq presented to the Li ty C.avni ssion. Motion seconded by f1r. Ilammone. Nr. Nagle stated he would request a 1e9a1 opinion frpn the City Attorney as to whether this aq reanent is sary for the City Lormissi on meeting. 'lotion carried by a unanimous rol lncall vote. Ilo tion by Nr. Hammond, s conde0 by Mr. Ilic kham, that with the addi tionai landsca pi nq provided on the front, that a va ria ce £or the sign be recommended for approval to the Board of Adjustment. Notionncarri e0 by a unanimous roll call vote. Ilr. Nagle stated that there was a need for a ce for the parki n9 required for the existing building a well es 4or the new addition. Mr. Plagle asked Mr. Sio ne iF the i6 spaces shoran would he atl aqua to for his host ness. Nr. Slane stated that the lfi spaces would be more than atl aqua te, as he had four enployees and that there were never more than three Dr four customers at one time due t0 the nature o£ Che business. Motion by Mr. li nton, s conded by M1lr. 4li ckham, that the request for 16 parking spaces tool ieu of the required nunber be recommended for is pprovai to the Roard Df Ad,i us tnent with the under s to ndi ng that the ne addition could not be used for retail sales and that the variance be re ci ntl ed if the use of the entire bu it di nq changes, and that the variance wool dsoniy be valid for the same type of use. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Motion by 11r. Ilammond, s conded by tir. 4lic kham, that the variance for the driveways be re a-nended for approval until such time as DOT na kes fnprovements to Nwy. 1]-92 and should the City or DOT determine that the curb cuts on either S1one's property r the ad,j acen is properties need to be closed, that the variance request be modified at that time to ac mmoda to [he requirements of the City and/or DOT. Mr. Ili ckhan stated that DOT,o in their letter dated October ], 1985, also requested that the ditch be cleaned and the slopes be sodded. Motion amended by Mr. Linton, conded by Mr. Ilic kham, to included the DOT letter dated October ], 1985 as stipulations to the recommendation for the driveway variance, i~fotion as amended carried by a unanimous roil call vote. 3. Site Plan - S1 one's Furniture Oa7lery - Location: ]30 Hwy. 1]-q2, Longwood. Zoning C-3. Nr, tla97e asked that his comments, DRMCP comments dated Novcrlber 1, 19A5 and alt other staff canments be made a part of the record. Mr. Nagle stated he spoke wf th Mr. Nolii4y of DER regarding State's jurf sdic tion on the wetlands - Ifr. Nql itlay said the wetland nn the Slone property is a tune ti onf n9 wetland ar and does a good purpose and ac ommoda tes drainage from the adjacent areas. Ne expressed co rn that if this site plan is approved for the new boil d in9 and other improvnnents, it would ca se flood in9 to the adjacent properties. Ile asked the City to consider his co ments as part of the site plan approval. Mr. Na91e stated he would check the City's Flood Prevention ordinance to see if there are any special dredge and Fill requiranen is that M1lr. Slone may have to canply with. Mr. Nagle also stated that DFR also ex sled w rn Lhat if the eng ineerinq design i not done very well, that fioodi n9 will o o adjacent property ow and a liability would be nn f1r. Slone far putti n9rhls water onto adjacent properties, M1ir. Nagle stated this goes ti On needed tq be resolved. Mr, (lick ham sta tetl the City En9 i near recommended approval subject to DR1f8P torments. Mr. Linton stated, also subject to founty Engineer's approval. Mr. Schroeder of floods Eng i neeei n9 stated they had Submitted plans to Seminole County on storm drainage. Ne further stated that DER had called him on Nov. 5, 19R5 stat they Land Pl anni n9 R9ency -3- Novanber 6, 1985 have reviewed c lcula ti ons a d agree with us and have asked us to drop the under- drain tFree inches. Mr. Nagle asked if he was referri n9 to storm water and Mr, Schroeder replied yes. Nr. Schroeder stated they had suMni tted plans for s tonnwa ter to the County, DER and the City and would submit approval letters from ach of those a9 enci es. Mr, Clan le re awed each Tian on hts November 1, 19b5 letter. Mr. Wickham asked if the opensspace percentage was based using new property line on the east side of the sf te. Mr. Moods replf ed yes. Fir. Na91e stated that DER and DOT permits would be required far the water line extension required. He Further stated that once the line was extended, the Li ty would probably require him to hook up to City water. Mr. Ilanle stated that the slopes on the retention ar very steep and difficult to maintain and eni nded the. developer that al lal and scap inn wa required to be maintained by the Nr. Schroeder stated he enders rood. sNr. Na91e suggested that corbi n9 railroad ties be installed in order to keep the mulch from the par ki nn area from wash inn away. Motion by Mr. Linton, s conded by Mr. Hammond, to re amend approval of the Slone Site Plan to the City Lomnf ssion upon completion of all required items discussed at the meeting toni9 ht and that the plan be rena nded back to staff prior to sulmit[al to the Li ty Commission and that the drawl n9s reflect all cha nn es before bei nn sulmittetl to the City Conmi ss ion. 1lo tion carr ieA by a unanl moos roll call vote. 4. Final Plan and Plat -Hidden Dak Estates Subdivision - Location: South of Longwood Hil s Roa ,east of est a n, n9 to be effected at time of final approval of final plat being recorded 1, Developer: Centex Hanes. Mr. Na91e asked that his comments dated Ilovanber 1, 19b5 and DRM&P comments dated 1 November 4, 1985 and all other stuff comments be made a part of the record. He further stated that the Preliminary Plan had been approved svbj act to all staff onments and City Commission's directives and that all hams were supposed to have been addressed as part of the final plan and plat. He further stated that son had been addressed and some had not been addreesaa. ue stated that the ma,j or item s the deletion of Che Park area. Ne further stated it was the vote of the City Commission that the passive open ar requiranent, to be maintained in the s ubdf vision and that the ar s toabe deeded to and maintained by the Homeowners' Association. He further sta redo that the tract des i9na lions shown on [he plat need to be worked on Ile stated Traci E should state Conservation Area and is to be deeded to the Homeowners' Association. Mr. Na91e stated that deed restrictions not submf tied and we nary and that they should state that no substantial building is to be permitted incthe co rvation ar other than the possibility of sanethi ng like a boardwalk, which could not be constructed within OER's juri sdic [ion Ne further stated that, all ,jurisdictional penni is would be required, i. e., DFRa aSt. Johns, etc. there was discussion rag ardi n9 the take front tots bei n9 pl at tetl out to the middle of LFe lake. Mr. Na91e stated he could consider this acceptable as long as the portion of the lots into West lake were dedi ca red to the public as rvation and rea tion area. This discussion wa not totally resolved as the de~el oper was i ncdi sagreement as Co the dad ica tionsof the portion of the lots into the take. Mr. Nagle stated there w a discrepancy between the lot gradf n9 plan and the site plan a the tlirectionaof the drat na9e from the lots wFicF bordered the c rva t' 1 SHens to tetl both plans must indicate that the drat na9e off Chase lots would notaflow into the weYl and (conservation) area. Mr. Nagle stated that the subdivision regulations of the C.i ty required sidewalks on botF sides of the street. He stated that the develgper had only provided sidewalk on one side of the streets. Fir. Na91e sta tetl his ca!ments o the preliminary Land Planning Agency -9- Ilovenber 6, 19b5 plan wee that sidewalks w e to be provided on both sides of the street and that f.i ty C,dnmf ssf on had approved the Preliminary plan subi ect tp alt staff canments. If~llagle toted that basically the plan was in god shape wim the exception of his cots of Novrnber 1, 1985 not heron fully addressed and the need t0 include aaa; nodal comments :ra tea rompnt. Mr. narnm statea then woma address the groat nn property. ue former sated ne Auld prefer to discuss the need for sidewalks nn both sides of the street with the City Cmmissipn. He stated the stmt note County driveway permit for Longwood Hills Road would be provided, and that all jurisdictional penni is would be provided. IIr. 11a91e asked Mr. tfar tin to have me developer's attorney research and provide a proposal regardi nn me platted lets into the lake. I1r. Itar tin sta tetl he was of the unders Lanai nn that when Centex agreed to donate $200 per lot toward the parks and re tea ti on for the City of Longwood that 1t was in lieu of prov idi ml a park ni thin the subtl iv i si pn. Mr. Nagle stated the donation was in lieu of providing a public park, but that the nein hbprhood park was tD ten TM1ere was continued df scu scion and Oi sag reement as m the intent of the S.OOpd ono Lion between the developer, Itr. Na91e and the Lana Pl annin9 Agency and Mr. Naynie suggested that the Land Planning Agency make a amnenda Lion to fie City Caroni ssi on rag ardi n9 the final plan and D1at as Dresented by Centex. Motion by Mr, Ilic khan, s conded by Hr, Linton, to re ommend that the final plan and plat as sutnitted be disapproved as per City staff re nenda Lions of July 5 and lb, 1 g05 in their preliminary crnvaen is and DRMFP co en ts~, in that all carenen is have not been fully addressed and cwnpl ied wim and that correc tfons should be made and returned to the Land Pl anni n9 Agency prior to su hit ttal to City Commission. Motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. 5. There were no atldi tional discussion itans. 6. Ileeti n9 adjourned at 10:15 PI1. Geri Zambri, Deputy City C1 erk. City of Longwood, Fl on tla ror The mea.ar~ o~ had bee xchi te Land Pl ate Fd<d Icau see PART C(o „mm~ I anr~ai~m aaa me ~ar~re er mr iare«~ ~a me mea.are is a: mnewa. '',.. vid Wickham s the president, n hired by the Co esysPOntiac peoplersh preform landscape/ '. cC rat c sul tan tUw k on The prof ece bePyr n+~~ gwooel'j anning Ag y hat night. ~ /////././/_`/'~c 90 / ~s _~~°`~ ~~~~o r insirunions on when and where ro fle rM1is form. zi~yaponbeny m< arse osc~ a narare I. the and g ~a~ i ao~m oa a ma~~e _~~area~ _~~~rea.o. ;b~Tne measare oa w aye Filetl PRET e VOTING CONFLICT OI6LL09UPE FOP STATE OFFILEP6 [Required by 9enion 112310312). Floritla Statures (SUpp. l9ga).] asure~hkhinures iohisspec elprivaegain,o ~hespecia~gain ofany prine pal by wbom M1~ sreralned i,regruired ''~, o ~smreresia public rewr ~n Pan 0 below within IS tlaya after rM1e .orc oaurs. edM1Off<er ofa na~< agency, bereby disclose lM1at on . I9-. r wmm~ ¢neog oaet r p p ga .or '~~, p g ~aor r om~am «~a~~e hmh l.o~m aad.be eaiareo r rere:~mme mea:arena: mnowe. S gna~ure PRPT C FILING INfiTEULTIONB nerlaa w¢nm rrte~aos~aar: ronowmeme oamre oawrrmwahme p<rro~ e (team Y ~c0~mtt me absenm o(a. g nNa. ~ p ¢ihememoranaum in me me B wa TMS roan aced nm I FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT ,.. ._. 1. .. rice oL rei ~e. ~sawvE.a.p~+l.or. ~o.,,o.aOal,.. oa rowM~„er. ~~. Drop.,. oo.,Ear«,r.~r.<. oa.... r a lzsso M. or ro.~,~r.. apa~r~v~a~o. op sT„T,pa~.ry emne< i3, pi9es WHO MUST FILE FORM < ~e or local, antl pP 9 Y members olaav~zory end nontladvlsory bodice who er~<rawd wi~he voungw«tfitt of Dania a~aror rorra a~mpl« airrzrr marar .orc« M1a roan gs: PART A~isfo oae by porsn~ns serving on local boardslmunlclpel, coon y~special ~axstl~urius.atc). while PART Srd r<e<a ror au ad,er eoama. i.<.. mO,e.a~ m<s~a~e le~m. ARr c or m<mrm <paaama ma~,a<aoa. a: ~„ wn<a aaa wn<re.w Inrm mpa~ be rnm. PART A VOTING CONFLICT OISCLOSUSE FOS LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS ~Requlretl by &uion 11231a3(J), Florae S~a~p~es (Sppp. 19g4}] M1e Code of E~M1ics for Public Or(mars antl Employees PROHIEITE ea<M1 .aval<i-ol,<o ublir ~<n FROM vonrvc m as orecial <apaen apoa aar meaap.a wmrn ipa.e: ~o nice rpa<ml pn.a~e gai~~E orr,<ial <aPaany ppoa aor m<aror. wm~«;aaaa.o mapeaal Baia ora~r orvl` v=1 iomk «~ra e~o..emmr~r g ay asytlaf«tl yin Section l 121122L Florida S~a~uus) by whom M1e is ruain<d. le) TAKEN nyn b y g bcasssmby na~orc Of nos imvanin ~nema~~cr Onxmcb bees ubs~a R efromEVVOTE BEING fb) WITHIrv ISUAYS AFTERTNE VOTE OCCURS by des<riblvginena~arcof nos ~~eresrasapoblicrewrd:n ibis pars below.