LPAMin01-23-85LANG PLANNING AGENCY
da ovary 23, 1985
The Land P7 anni ng Agency held its regularly scheduled meeti n9 on January 23, 1985
at ]:30 P.M. in the Longwood City Commission Chambers.
Present: Herbert Nayni e, Chairman
Robert Hammond
Bernard Linton
Emery Mei neke
Na rry Lindsey
R.A. Bryant, Guil di n9 Official
Geri Zambr i, Record ing Secretary
1. The meeting w s call etl to order by Chairman Haynie.
2. Approval of Minutes: Motion by Nr. Hammond, s conded by Mr. Mei neke to
approve the Minutes of the January 23, 1985 Meeting as written. Motion carried
by a unanrmous roll call vote.
3. Rezoni nq Request - Reques tetl by Stella Zaffis - Lot 1] and VI 1/2 Lot 18,
Farm~~on~5. si3e oT ver-f green. lsresent xont n'-gH--2~RequesTinq
CC-2~+m to Future Land Nse Map.
Mr. Bryant stated that this request was to bring the property into conformance
with the future land use plan.
Mr. Linton stated that at the last Conm issi on Meeting, there was discussion about
this particular ar and requests for re ni ngs by Hattaway were tabled until such
time as a def ini teeli ne can be made in that area between residentf al and co cial.
He stated nothing was official at this tine, however, persons reques ti nq should
know and that a works hoD will be held next Monday night. He sta tetl that the
Zaffis request was riq ht in the midst of the ar where rezoni ngs were tabled.
He stated he felt the LPA should take note of ihas at this time.
Mr. Lindsey stated he was s~iewhat in disagreement with Mr. Linton. I{e stated
the LPA was an advisory committee to the City as to what the LPA thinks is good
pl anni nq. Ile stated he did not feet the LPA was obligated to wait on their
decision as to what they may do and that whatever action the LPA takes v+ould be
n advisory opinion to the Conenission. He stated the LPA might influence their
decision rather than +aait for their decision, lie stated the LPA should be the
leader not the follow up on good pl an ni rp.
Motion by Mr. Linton, s conded by Nr. Hammond that the Zaffis re ni ng application
be tabled until such time es City Commission has determined who tzar Yion will be
taken re9 ardi n9 this area.
Mr. Lindsey stated he felt this wa proper action at this tfine and stated the
application required positive ac tf onaandm that a re mmenda tipn should be made
based on the application. Ne stated we find the law as we find it and +ae do not
try to anticipate it. Mr. Linton stated there was much credence 9iv en tp what
Mr. Lindsey said. M1lr. Linton withdrew his motion and Mr. Hammond wi thtlrew his
second.
Motion by M1lr. Lindsey, s conded by Mr. Mei ne ke that the leffis re nin9 request
be re amend ed to City Commission for approval. Motion carried by a four to on
vote with tlr. Hamn,ontl. Nr. Haynie, Mr, Ilei ne ke and Mr. Li ntl sey vpti nq aye, and e
Mr. Linton voting nay.
Land Planning Agency - 2 - Lanuary 23, 7985
4. Rezoni~Re ~- Reaves tad by Coseph L. Abrams - Lot 1, 3 ,9z 261 and w 1/1.
of Lot 259ngTOwn of Longwood. 5 s'de of Ray Avenue. Present ni ng R-3,
Requested zon inq L-2, to conform to future land use plan.
Mr. 5rya nt sta tetl that this request was to bring the zoning into conformance with
the future land use plan.
Mr. Linton stated he had no objection to this rezon g He stated the area con-
tained mixed uses and also Che City garage.
Motion by Mr. Linton, s conded by Mr. Mei neke, that the Abrams re request
be re menaetl to the City Commission for approval. Motion carri ednbyga unan,mous
roll call vote.
5. Rezon n Requ t - Requested by Thoma H. Hutchens - Lots 7, 2 and 3, 87 ock 4,
Entm ne~'s A9 ao =1, w. s;3e of LR dEi-Fresent zon, n9~1. Ragpestea zon; ng
CC-3~orm to future land use plan.
Mr. 8rya nt sta tea this request was to bri nq the zoning into conformd n<e with the
future land use p1 an.
Motion by Mfr. Lindsey, s contl ed by Mr. Hammond that the Hutchens re nin9 request
be re nmendetl to the City Commission far approval. Motion carri ed zby a unanimous
Yoll call vote.
E. Rezonin Re vest - Re vested b Robart L. Dietz - E 2]5' of Parcel 50. and all
of SC 5-2 -3 S, si e o vers tree t, resent zoni pq R- reques to zoning -2.
Mr. Linton stated he felt this rta n ideal spot for R-2 as [he site was immediately
on the north side from an a already approved for apartment houses and
theosi to is also immediately ea s taoP a commercial zone locaCed on LR42].
Motion by Mr. Linton, s conded by Mr. Lindsey, that the Metz rezont n9 request be
mended for approval to the City Cortmission. Motion curried by a unanimous
roll call vote.
Mr. Lindsey as ketl for the floor. He stated he enders rood that there would be a rorkshgp
to select an engineer to re and make recommendations to the LomDrehensi ve P1 an.
,t would be great to see thi sedone however he stated he thought that su
decision should be made by a professionally recognized Li ty planner, notnj ust an
engi veer. He stated that engi nears ar engineers and planners are planners arM
that planning has been es to bl ishetl a a profession and that professional planners
st have a masters degree and five years in the field. He stated that at this
point in our aevel opment that we should have the best professional guidance we
get. He stated there ar well reco9 ni zed planners in the Orlando area that couidn
be considered for this job on on tract with re Ne stated he would
like the LPA to re mend thi Saco e of ac tton toetheeLi Cy Lomm fission, that a
well qual ifietl professionally re g zed Planner be hired tq dp this jab.
L ormissi ~~er Gol aberg wa n the audience and Mr. Lindsey as kea him if he had any
wmnents on his Bugg esti on~ Commissioner Goldbe r9 stated the f.i ty was not
looking fora planner at this time, they were looking for a nsul to n t. Ne stated
there was no real plan for sewage and drat na9e and that is where the major pro bl ens
P.e stated there wa not enough paperwork on future land use plan.and said
that the City needs to take a 5, 10 and 15 year plan to s where the City is 9o inq,
He stated the City was requesting re es from find iv id ual sewho know setvag e,drai nage and
planning. Mr. Lindsey stated that water, sewage and drainage should be ti etl into
Land Planning Agency -3- January 23, 1985
the overall Lomprehen slue Pi an, must have designated types of se e that
these utilities se and this should be decided before you qo toorfar into
the Plan. He statedehe understood that at present there was an mergency existing
for the se r, howevor, he stated that where se rs qo is not strictly engineering
and shoal dwbe based o needed supply t0 furnishese as described in Che
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Goldberg stated he had so nevdoubt in his mi ntl that the
future land a map and Che Comprehensive Plan are the sa whether they gp
tog ether. He ss to ted overlays should have been made. He stated that the se
problems and passible tlrai nape probi ems need to be adtlres setl and what impactsr
any re re going to have on the City. He stated the Li ty will plan its
way forwardga nd the City is 9pi ng to co ect the map and do it right. Mr. Lindsey
said Co get a real professional canprehensi ve planner to do it. Comm. Gol dberq
sta tetl it will not be done pi ecaneal, it would be done once or don't do it.
Coao~. Goldberg stated the LPA's re ommenda tions are appreciated and they should
feel free to make them. Mr. Lindsey clarified that he was tal ki nq about the
Coniprohensive Plan not a utilities plan.
Motion by Mr. Lindsey, s conded by Mr. Linton, that the LPA re mnend to Li ty
Cpnmission that Lanprehensive Plan for the City be re ewed o~ established if
there was not one by following the guidance of a prof es sf ovally recognized
comnuni ty planner. Motion carried by a una n~mous roll call vote.
Motion to adjourn by Mr. Linton, s cond by Mr. Hammond. Motion carried by a
una n~mous vo tce vote. Meeting adjourned.
Geri Zambri, Recording Secretary
Land Pla nni nq Agency